a pleasant question about the murder of russian prisoners.

why are you silent? is anyone talking about this? yes, all international organizations. it is useless to talk about it in a civilized manner with them. there are elementary elements of propaganda. and they were published in this country by someone, these documents from all cases of all photographs, all this, who made it public, they said, it's like an infantile girl in the fifth grade is crying and the teacher is talking. i taught but i don't know.

now they started talking. how many such cases have been revered. when where what? it's been a long time to wait there is no white paper on these crimes anywhere in the world, only in some kind of commission, which decisions are not read. this is how propaganda is done. he is chosen by the people; he represents his voters if he cannot achieve something in parliament, because he does not have enough political parliamentary power. this is not a reason for him to leave , throw the keys and leave and spit on his voters, you sent me to visit your interests, and i was offended. and i can’t, i left , this doesn’t happen, you just can’t kick them out, and they are so easy you can’t forge, even the mechanisms to uproot them. no,

you would be glad if we communists left, that's different. it is necessary to treat the deputies of parliament with sufficient respect, even if they themselves do not respect their office enough, well, it is their duty to be in parliament to speak regardless of whether they succeed or not. come on, i hate him. i'm leaving, this can't be. weapons the fact that there is a bureaucracy is not so bad, the main trouble is that this is the corun of the first, probably, the bureaucracy. your bureaucracy works when it takes bribes. that's when you can make it work, you won't smear it, you won't go until today. that's how

it is, or not even anyway they don't go, but over all this, who look at the backside and everything condescendingly they drag on for years. and they come out with ridiculous sentences. under such conditions, only a saint would not steal. what for? he works 10 times more than him, nothing will happen for this, and the irresponsibility of your officials, the higher he is in rank, the more irresponsible, because nothing will happen to him. he will be transferred from one positions are sitting. ministers no, he is sitting, he is already, in my opinion, but no, in any case. well, he went out, but he was sitting, yes, and the challenge is sitting if they were sitting, if

they were sitting as much as they should sit and as much as they should sit. your country. i would be in a completely different position now. well, look at your chinese comrades, how they fight corruption. or at least more like the western version of china as they struggle will have an effect. maybe not even close to it. and it's more dangerous for you than for them. today because for now corruption and without accountability will be the way it will be. in relations

i say even if it was a targeted strike by russian missiles. all the same, the americans would have found an explanation in the style of the explanation that they have now found in relation to the prince of saudi arabia. why not? why isn't it time for a military strike? no, they have enough strength to fight. but i want to draw your attention. i already spoke about this today, the russian army. well, he fights only on russian territory. no, not a single soldier in ukraine, all territories, on which appeared from the point of view of the russians russian and therefore the most necessary thing that was said here, first of all, to be freed. will there then be a movement in ukraine of competitors, if they

say so in the west, there is still hope that russia is slalom. she can't figure out what they are operating on. and for six months, the russian troops did not plan anywhere, they did not advance anywhere. where they moved back 20 km. yes, but no forward. therefore, only a victory on the battlefield, which can and should be, according to all objective data, can change this situation. well the first thing worth the first task that is needed is a dissenting opinion. russian territories, and the second or five since your

president gave the order? stop shelling get out there are several options. how this is done, but now the situation is this and austin is absolutely right, the future of the whole world depends on the results of military operations in ukraine. from the results of military operations, therefore, military operations should give such results that will provide russia with complete security and the development of events as it wants. the upcoming disassembly by the united states,

and what should be the world order and the last thing i want to say, yes, the americans. to put pressure on russia and north korea they don't understand anything either. they did not understand what was happening in north korea as long as american troops and american bases were in south korea. north korea would build up its nuclear potential. because in north korea they came

to a conclusion a long time ago. that with all friendly relations, they cannot rely not on russia, not on china, but only on themselves, and therefore they they said, but we will protect ourselves and we will neutralize the american military bases in south korea with our nuclear weapons. remove your bases of your troops from south korea then we will start talking to continue. victory on the battlefields is not necessarily to destroy

ukraine and it was not and never was the goal in russia but to achieve the military successes that will be accepted. ukraine or negotiate with russia , or even better option for the complete surrender of the ukrainian army, vladimir of france. i agree with koronkich that one should not abuse any historical parallels. i think 80 years the beginning of the counter-offensive near stalingrad operation. uranium is worth mentioning, and this is the context in which the soviet union, including the western allies, wrote on november 19, 402, as they wrote off by december 5, 41. i will now talk about history, but you will feel the breath of modernity such a story on a parable. there is such a territory

called xinjia in china, where the rules are quite an independent person. he ruled only because the soviet union supported him, troops entered suppressed his opponents suppressed the uprising signed treaties. there were advisers to the airfields and in the forty-second year, when the germans approached the volga and the caucasus, he thought everything about the soviet union was crazy and expelled all the advisers, broke all the agreements and said that he didn’t want to have any relations with the soviet union, because, well he does not believe in the victory of the soviet union, he must somehow get out of this rather corrupt person. and then the soviet union began to win and what happened to this shenshitsai. he offered sent a letter to stalin and offered to become there 17 then it was the 16th republic of the soviet union, and so on and so on in every possible way to curry favor with him stalin did not answer him sent him anything. this

letter was written directly by his chief student, and he saw that there was no support from the soviet union, recalled this official and kept him there in an insignificant position with him. this is to the question of how some now, not only in the post-soviet space, but also in the world as a whole, assess the situation. how do they want to do it faster? certain conclusions and to the question of how our allies behaved then, and now de facto our opponents what kind of allies they were, then by the time of stalingrad yes, the soviet red army suffered a heavy defeat in the crimea near kharkov in the leningrad direction and molotov flew in may at the risk of life on a simple. uh, p8 bombers to london and washington are just a deal. open the second front. they are now quickly collecting aid to ukraine in ramstein, it was necessary to beg to fly. and even there is an agreement some was signed in london and they seemed to verbally

promise that yes, probably in the forty-second year, but they did nothing, because now we see the documents. it was written to take a waiter. they waited for the position even in the forty- third year, but they directly set the goal of wearing out the wehrmacht of the red army to wear out the red army with the wehrmacht. that was their goal of those people whom we call allies in that coalition, and they developed it already in the forty-third year. this is already after stalingrad, after that offensive they developed a plan of attention, and the occupation of the territory in the event of a sudden collapse of germany in order to prevent soviet troops from going there, sweden developed the only military operation and almost carried out, you know, what it was called, the salvation of denmark in may forty-five. do you think they wanted to save her from the nazis, nothing like that, if suddenly a different army wants to occupy denmark. this is how they treated us then. and that something in this

respect has changed during the cold war, they showed meanness, these are not journalists who justify the murder of prisoners of war, and what is the official concept in western historiography in western journalism about the brutal attitude of the nazis towards soviet prisoners of war, which, by the way, was actively broadcast in russia in the nineties zero years. but, you see, stalin did not sign the convention of prisoners of war there, therefore the nazis treated the same manipulation of falsification, because regardless of who else signed germany signed and was obliged to behave appropriately by soviet prisoners of war, and they were destroyed only on the parasitic basis, because they were from the soviet union from russia, and they justify and justify it so far, therefore, of course, we are right. when we say that in their behavior, in their ideology, nothing much has changed. here is a question for us, but we have

, in principle, made conclusions from these historical examples, which we list and to which we speak. here, uh, now we have why these anniversary dates, the battle of stalingrad are important. here we talked about cities, including the hardest time the hardest. uh, when, well, really, not everyone was probably convinced of victory. let's be direct. yes, the soviet chiefs were convinced. so stalin didn’t believe, you know, some didn’t have faith in the red army when zhukov voronov and vasilevsky came up with a plan of operation. uranus stalin says, and you will definitely be able to carry it out, because there were several attempts before this encirclement of the germans and far from everything, to put it mildly , it turned out they pulled out there, then launched a counterattack. well, it's near kharkov a classic example, but they got together and really it was a mobilization, really. the same, stalingrad was supplied, having no bridges across the volga , only through having the necessary crossings, the crossings

were under constant fire, and there are many of these examples when we talk about examples. by the time of the patriotic war, the question arises here, we simply retell them, as examples from a plutarch, and great heroes, or is it still a role model when we constantly refer to. eh, there, as soon as we mention stalin. that was the mechanism. this is how it was recipe. we say this simply for some beautiful quote or in order to put it into practice now. but after all, this is our country, our ancestors used those mechanisms, those methods, those methods of warfare, which led to victory in victory in conditions incomparably more difficult than now in conditions. yes, we had allies. but as you can see from these examples, we had such allies that with such allies we often don't need enemies. actually. we were constantly under the threat of betrayal. and under

a threat of mistrust to each other, until there, well, maybe the first meeting of the big three took place, for example, in tehran. so maybe if we draw historical parallels, if we have made the great patriotic war part of our ideology, if we are talking about imitating these great examples, not everything will work out now. well, something to apply. and i don’t say anything, only about an order, not a step back, there are some nuances there. but here, as already mentioned, first of all, it is the will that uh consolidated naruto consolidated naruto and when there is will and conviction, then sometimes new year's holidays could be held, because then it was also discussed not to hold and the decision was applied situationally. it's the seventh of november. here the parade was held in the most difficult conditions, because from that time there was a solemn meeting. yes, in the metro yes, at mayakovsky station but why was this done in order to show that we celebrate the holiday on

november 7 and in such difficult conditions it inspires people looking at that story, we see once again i emphasize, but not just some shadows of our great ancestors, like this, uh, let's say the east asian tradition. well, we see specific people who are only two or three generations away from us. lenya, and now we are faced with the same challenge that we faced, they then and, accordingly, in some of their actions should behave accordingly. alexandrovich , i once again celebrated the country's last birthday. thank you very much, german also three belaruss too germany, like no other country, has in its history in its life some kind of certain mysticism, which very often consists in

some numbers and has a certain numerical expression. i have already said that, for example, november 9 is a date repeated many times in the history of germany. there, more than eight times on november 9, some events took place in germany, including the path of hitler, including their rustal night, including the fall of the berlin wall, the unification of germany, and so on and so forth. well, not only is the commitment to these numbers very interesting. i tried a little. here's how the dear professor says to play around with the theory of long waves. i want to remind you that kondratiev's history of long waves, which says that each state or each society can go through some certain cycles, uh, which are formed approximately in the range from 40 to 60 years. there are so-called long waves. there are also short waves. here, with regard to germany, the theory of long waves, which, if shifted to germany, it shows very interesting

laws that i would like to talk a little about them today. and this is very important. now , if we take the minimum length of this so -called cycle to cycle - this is the kondratiev cycle of 40 years and let's start from versailles in 1919, that is, in fact, the destruction of germany and spend this this long long one. this cycle is 40 years 19+40. we get 59. we get the year of formation of the actual federal republic of germany when there, well, there already by this time. germany was created, but in fact we we get during this period the destruction and formation of a certain e state of the german state, which, in the form in which, and we recognized it by the beginning by the end of e by the beginning of the nineties, it was formed of this period. if we still

stretch 40 years, then we get such an interesting date of 2029, which is the fifty- ninth and 40 years of the fifty-ninth marmot. excuse me . yes, we get the date actually, which will be linked to the unification of germany by the creation of new ones. e creation of a new germany, it is not absolutely coincides specifically for each figure, because in germany there are still so-called short cycles, these short cycles in germany they fit into 12 years. here is the most famous short cycle - this is national socialism, this is the forty-fifth year, and there were also cycles that fit into the same. well, it occurred to me that, but if we try, if we are talking about germany as a country that has survived this cycle of national socialism and now we are talking about ukraine, which we very often use nationalist nazi state and we will assume that in ukraine in 2014 a

path took place, as a result of which this state was created, which we call nazi and we will try to impose some time periods and compare these twelve-year cycles. that is, if we take, say, 2014 and today it is 8 years of this cycle, if we return to germany, take 1933, plus eight years, then we will get that we are today in the forty-first year in 1941, unless of course , legally compare these cycles. i think it's unlawful this is dragged, of course, but theoretically, at about the same time, we are in the forty- first year. and so, if i can interpret it correctly, it's not us, but the maturation of the ukrainian nazi, probably, is located in the same place where it was the world community. i mean the world community and, in particular, ukraine,

including germany. well then, if we extrapolate this further, then in general it turns out that we still have to wait 4 long years. while this cycle will finished. it will be completed, and in favor of destroying the old, a new one will be created. but this is how i, as it were, have gone far enough. here i am returning to germany for me here is this theory of long and short waves in germany comparing these time periods here. it means a lot, because in addition to those figures, about which one can speak, it does not correspond. i, unfortunately, see hmm in germany, that's all the signs. this is the 12 year cycle. i know the creatures here, they probably listen very carefully in germany to this fear, zimmermanic so listens. stractions norman stractions norman i, who wants to fight with russia, who said that we have the right, we have redeemed our nazi past, we can again be on the tail, and to fight is one of those signals

that i wanted to say, but she does not the only one, after all, it is not the only one that gives such signals, and not even that they want to fight politicians of this level, but that there is a whole mass of signs of signals that are in the same time period. or he wrote that the bundeswehr has earned a plan of action persistent with russia well, you already know that, here they mentioned the white paper. i am so white. in short, i'm against it. i believe that there is no problem with weapons in germany if they are declared, there is no war for us. to me, targets for nuclear weapons have a very simple target. germany this target is a target, germany had two whites who were not aware of in 2006. uh, the last white paper was i don’t remember when, in my opinion, ursula von was then the defense administrator , 7 or eight years ago. der lein at the launch of this white paper. i was also

present when she introduced her. and here for the first time the words of a hybrid war were heard, when no one had spoken about it yet. she already there cited five signs of a hybrid war, which were then displayed in this white paper. well, i don't want to go into this. i just want to say there are several important factors factor one, although the war factor, the second almost complete absence of freedom of speech and freedom of expression, the third factor is the disappearance of the political field in which some parties capable of expressing opinions can exist. there are a few additional factors from the state in connection with this and taking into account these time cycles. i think that before 2029 the following changes may occur in germany, firstly, germany will cease to be a christian country, a christian country, not in the sense that other religious movements will occupy, this political field, germany, but in the sense

that i i think, on the approach of creation, some new party minority party party, lgbt plus. something else will be added to this and this minority party, which does not yet exist, for which it will inevitably be created in the coming years. it will determine the political vector of germany's development, in connection with this, germany will have to change its constitution, which was built on the principles that the americans proposed at one time, which are called the constitution as the basic law and where christian principles are enshrined, but if this party is created, then it will have to change the constitution the constitution will automatically mean that germany will enter a completely different period of development, in which it will be necessary to abolish the well-known social system ; changing the direction of germany's development from uh, a country that is

pacifist, that does not preach war to a country that can wage some kind of aggressive war. well, i think that in all likelihood germany will seek to separate itself from the separation of itself from the north atlantic alliance, but if we look at this cycle in full, then in 2029. it will be a different country. it is likely to be divided along some federal lines. well , i do not rule out, let's say, an accident, but she wants to, she already wants to now. well, it may well secede , there are other federal lands that can go in the same direction. therefore, this is the theory of long waves, he says, let's wait until 2029 . it will be another germany, i'm not sure i will be very happy in this other germany. now advertising. after it, we will continue with the new line-up.

we'll take care of this. it will be the honest detective.