kid, that's a woman in our entire arboretum. can close like this i change your eared puppy for your quiet life of the moon and a copy. maybe he put this step and checkmate. cheburashka is always interested in where it all begins. now you will see everything manufacturers of good things want and most importantly. but it's best to check.

probably, it was to this europe that painted pictures for itself, wrote music, but europe that was ready to treat russia with russians, as it

has never been equal in history in any historical period. only then they suddenly start well treat when we come on tanks. so, then they immediately understood that we were liberators about a possible war, about the fact that they were aiming for moments. it seems to me that with regard to nuclear weapons, of course, no one would like to bring matters to this point, but nevertheless, such countries as poland, germany and all the rest should clearly understand. that in the event of such a war they will become potential targets for nuclear strikes and nothing else, that they will disappear neither figuratively, but in reality they will absolutely disappear even when we say, try uh, say no no, yes, that's impossible. i think that there is nothing right, as it were, in this. we don't want it, we don't want it to come to this, but if they understand this, then they will have more and more, so to speak, all the possible ambition, especially, watching how we regroup there

, level the front line, and that's it. . the rest is business. tomorrow. maybe we even out the border, who knows. well she curve is enough of a border. let's align there are a lot of sections, so to speak, that as if, well, as it were, or there is no one there, or it is difficult to defend these, so to speak, or well, what to know there, that's all. give them the opportunity to think so, and at the same time i assure you that we, of course, will never use anything like that, so to speak, yes, we open the gates for this war. we open the gates for such a war to happen. and we absolutely must . so to say it's impossible. although i personally think, to be honest, in the course of this incident that everyone is discussing here. yes c on the one hand, yes, everyone saw that zelensky was here. i was declared there, almost a saint can lie to lie. so to speak, absolutely consciously without shores and it is dangerous to lie along with the poles. and it really is. can bring nato to war. but uh, it seems to me, to be honest, that uh, even if we hit right on warsaw for real, the americans would not

go to war with us. and it seems to me that all sorts of different lithuanians, estonians, poles, and so on, so to speak, but on other, so to speak, wonderful, you need to understand this. here i can be wrong. rather, i'm sure, maybe even i'm wrong about a lot of things. but here is my personal conviction that the americans would not have entered into a nuclear war with russia even if we had struck directly at the center of warsaw, because the confirmation of the words of sergei alexandrovich was the statement, a minister of the count. well, they were made by the united states, who said that before a nuclear war in europe there was no threat, absolutely absolutely does not fly. the americans, that he is ex officio obliged to the americans of internal internal security, of course, relax, there is no need beyond any doubt, but americans treat europe as a consumable , which and only ukraine poland lithuania is absolutely unequivocal for them. it's just consumable. tomorrow in vilnius. wet rocket will not. they fight with us. it would be nice if these lithuanians, poles and everyone else. yes, something will happen, but most likely there will not be a nuclear war because of the poles or

lithuanians, most likely it will be very expensive. this is clear. i'm not calling, wait, i'm not calling where in this. and this is very expensive. to whom does it cost dearly and us there, so i do not call on anything to ask a question. but now we are against the russians. try to nuke. they will answer right away. hello , my russians have a strategic expression, a tactical one does not. correctly , there are no conventional weapons, but there are strategic static nuclear weapons, but in conventional defeat. i am to this i am to this we are. i do not call for this. i just don't call for it. i'm just asking, just asking them to think. the simplest fact is no the first one who turned the back more of an american here in in this very incident, the first who moved off the topic were the americans, while they called everyone, they said enough is enough that maybe they themselves were

involved in provocations and so on, but, nevertheless, it is darker when we are our layman and without of that neurotic frightening with endless nuclear mushrooms. i would still like to ask. and what have you done, why don't we scare you? we will not be on our territory. it's mushrooms that's where mushrooms will grow . they will not grow. well, just answer my question. in that case, yes, if americans are, so to speak, otvyazny guys who are just looking for an excuse to launch a nuclear strike on russia wonderful most wonderful and question. and why is it so to say, people like maduro and kim jong-un are still alive oh if they are so almighty if they are so decisively obliged, why are kim members of maduro still alive about kim a member i can say about china about madora. tell him why he is still alive, of course.

poland was immediately preparing to be such a deterrent buffer for russia, i remind you still combined the soviet union yes, in the spring you already know that the nato parliamentary assembly adopted, that the sponsor state was recommended to its own to consider that they accepted, and what is a terrorist? maybe this explains the sponsor's idea of ​​terrorism. who do we sponsor? well, this is logic. this can be built according to american law. it's just now , yes. this is the idea that we are a sponsor of terrorism. actually, it's not defined yes, even in that law, supposedly, supposedly, we allegedly support certain organizations that act with terrorist purposes against against the free world. so the us is a sponsor of terrorism. that

is, we are pursuing a terrorist policy, in fact, you are acting against ukraine. well , yes, like this, that is, in relation to yugoslavia , nato in relation to afghanistan went from the rules , corrected them, which they adopted, volodya well, what can i say to fuck a person, these are people who come in general invent, then they try to show from the label figure let's die last, what kind of logic is this? why do we have there is a weapon that ensures the absolute victory of the country do not use it, because the question is why it was produced, if we still believe that the value of our life does not mean anything. do you not need nuclear weapons, because the most important thing is that bill is a wonderful western world, but russia can be destroyed? well, let's cut down the interrogations with the development of modern types of weapons, but if they do not fulfill their function of deterrence, they are performed in relation to other

nuclear weapons. it's completely wrong from the start. deterrence approach is relevant to military action. as such, if you were drawn into conditions that are unacceptable to you, nato is fighting with you in full, superiority in the number of certain types of weapons is used and you understood what you were saying then . yes guys, of course, you are at war with us like that, and i'm talking outside, which we have. no, we will not remember our doctrine, if it comes to the existence of the russian state. as such now it is the existence of, of course, the earth at the moment. no, the fate of the military operation began in a minute. yes, we are talking about the country. no, excuse our territories. occupied but how yes, where else did the constitution declare our territories to turkey a little bit in the constitution, what is written? according to the constitution, is this our territory or not? we

announced everything, as we included, of course, our territory, but this was in a situation of hostilities. what does it matter what the constitution of course , someone has an inscription such that this is not quite our territory, because we don’t have it included in these we should have an understanding that what is happening is good, crimea, if they enter, is also not a threat. again, we turned it on in the fourteenth year, again. this is another terrible story. well, in belgorod, especially kursk , all the more so don’t touch nuclear weapons, all the more no, well, i really hope that with any attempt to do this, we have the opportunity to resist without the last one died before that, vladimir then nadezhda konstantin krupskaya then, then you can already use strategic weapons or tactical right again? they also hope that we won’t do it every time, so they will throw polish mercenaries there, as now the american mercenaries are the entire nazi dumping of the whole world. there is a warning that is sent

to the power plants of ukraine, in particular, it is increasing stop these warnings. fighting never stops. the nato parliamentary assembly called for the creation of a special international tribunal for russian aggression, recognized as a terrorist state. well idiots no sponsor at the same time there is no official statement, but they allegedly have it on their website. appropriate resolutions were adopted, but what you are saying about the use of nuclear weapons , nuclear weapons, when they appeared, created the conditions for the development of international relations. that is why major wars did not arise, because indeed between the soviet union. we were on the verge of having a cuban missile crisis for the early nineties . oh, in the eighties, they also stood on the same brink, they practically approached her nuclear conflict. e nuclear weapons create only the condition for the absence of a big war of a small war. these are the small

conflicts that we are now waging with direct aggression. there is no nato against us, which means that there is no direct aggression. nato troops are fighting there. there are instructors. there, of course, people of all local conflicts were in all local conflicts of the cold war , on the other hand, the military fought on the other side. he, too, did not fight me on the territory of those countries that participated in the proxy war; there was no war on the territory of the united states; there was no war on the territory of the ussr there was a war on the territory of vietnam, it's true, but here, i'm sorry. the war is going on on our territory, all the fighting. if you look at what the constitution now defines as our borders go to the territory of the russian federation, even if they go to the territory of the russian federation , which, by the way, this territory has recently become and that the russian federation is another one? excuse me

directly. today, a circle of people sorting out an institution that wants to bring us under the monastery, therefore, they decided. in reality, say just reality. what they say is that in the course of hostilities we gained control over at least two areas that had not been discussed until that time. in any case, if only in our column constructions of the constitution it is written, as in a chat, the territory of our constitution they have become since september of this year. and yes, but before that we started february. this means there is a war going on in our territory. they believe it and it's controversial. with whom is she controversial, she is a controversial topic, and with whom we are terrorists, we argue no minute, we we are not arguing with our constitution, we are arguing with the enemy on the battlefield, the highest form that is written in our constitution is all a controversial issue in our constitution the constitution

itself never fights. troops are fighting. the country is at war. here is a country fighting to make life the supreme law of our country. well, of course they are. let's at least have a military point of view to use nuclear weapons. you can abolish the constitution well. now they will enter the territory of the oryol kursk province. yes listen too it is not clear when how to disable. it's the same question. it 's a matter of time, therefore or not. you voted. how what question is in the constitution who doubts the constitution i voted to support the adoption of these ions now this is your position of some kind that this is a disputed territory. no , my position is that they need to be fought for in order for this to become a reality. here is my position in zazerkalevich. through the looking glass it is considered that if it is the best weapon in the world. use because suddenly it will perceived as not civilization to protect our

earth in accordance with our doctrine the question is not how we will, how they will consider the question, what will follow? and what will happen from the point of view always something for some reason always follows. if you follow your logic again. why hit the headquarters in poland to decide the nuclear umbrella is not in poland, i don’t say it’s necessary to immediately hit the strategic reserves of the strategic forces of the united states in such a block of cases to sink their submarines, we know where they are deployed, then there is news immediately. and you just now got up on duty. we have these sarmatians, so let 's at least arm ourselves. here in the thirty-fifth year, when everyone, when everyone will have weapons programs, and then we will start, yes, russia will be 35 years old. and i think that russia will even think,

i think in a better condition, tender, it is better than this officially, simply as a national one, more like nato is now planning to make us lazy nato declared us a terrorist country with all the following. part of the armament it’s just that in the russian federation we stopped saying so, we had nato as a practical partner. we have ceased to designate it in documents as an aggressive imperialist god. he remains so. sergei, you are talking about poland. yes, he went from gubeshevsky when the union existed, he went to headquarter in this brussels to agree that poland would join it . yeltsin had to be on the ninety-seventh; i don't know, i don't know how much he agreed to

94 began this story already in december of the ninety-seventh year, a decision was made. sorry, this is the case of the poles, but there the question was directly discussed that the poles would be the poles , of course, they would be nato infantry. that's right, cannon fodder, yes, the americans at the top are an air cover. it's a nuclear umbrella. this naval forces poles are fighting on the ground. they took on this role 40% at one time, moreover, the poles believe that if they now play under the americans, they are playing under the americans, the zloty to the euro will not tied in general and many other things. they are absolutely aimed at us now. the parliamentary assembly is not only there, there are terraria there and everything else, it's clear that a we were still talking. yes, stop everything pump yes, no need for the main one, let's call anyone all sponsoritarianism in

the fact that this will be a long time ago, for example, we are now next to us. here are the countries, how you got up , became here, and here the chinese are standing with us, you can see how the rock is, where volodya want to say. now another thing. now taking place in warsaw council of foreign ministers. del lav lavrov was not allowed to go there, the council of the minister of foreign affairs, they were not allowed to let our delegation not be allowed to go there, no, the belarusians were also not allowed, in my opinion, they were also not allowed to go there, so, uh, 55 minus two 57 is strange. if we are seized with the belarusians, we should remain in this organization. and there are our all our dkbeshniks. it also covers europe, north america and our central asia. well, how are our allies formally? do you have contractual agreements that you can see the alliance formally

food is a legal agreement, a normal rhetorical one, we need these agreements, i’ll even say more, you understand, and when you need the osce, but the social security scheme is now these countries are the eastern country. with the transfer of money through one island state , our ally in the dkb sold ammunition and military technology to ukraine, despite the fact that they refused to supply us with anything. nothing like that. what is not happening now? this is the very ally that we saved, and now from where it goes to romania from there, before you hit the nuclear missiles on united states, we can have our inner circle there. i don’t need to understand that you are not embarrassed not for ukraine from ukraine, we from ukraine even slipped through such a thing as sanctions. we have not imposed sanctions against them. what time is it now to tell anyone? we are in this studio of the fourteenth

year of the workshop as i say, but you know if the taxi country. as they say, now they said that the problem is that we had an illusion, at the very top, that it is ukraine that can be bought? who had the illusion i didn't have you didn't have. well you but not at the very top, no lord of the rich. here is my deep conviction, all this nuclear rhetoric is all around us. this is preparation for the deployment of conventional forces near our borders with strike missiles. remember how the seventies, when we were forced to go to the exchange. yes, and we are still talking, we are saying that in order to negate the nuclear effect of

hypersound, it is necessary to place closer to the border until they are placed. but when they place the exchanges will begin, but the main thing is what we say. not not we just no way we not god forbid nuclear weapons by placing nicaragua in cuba to place a war there, and we tried to try the caribbean crisis, when we forgot we will do something now that they agree you checked. well, that is, we say we agree and agree. it's diplomatic work when he speaks and they agree. well, no, well, then we see this here, tossing a coin not to think, accordingly, we do not agree. it will be like the chances of a blonde meeting dinosaurs 50% or meeting or not meeting. but if we reason something reasonably, then this is a question diplomatic work, this is how people work, that

there are a number of states with which the deployment of foreign military bases is allowed, and there are a number of port states that are ready to receive foreign ships, there is no doubt about this. pronuclear weapons. yes, they won't agree. ok, someone had this conversation with them. i think that she needs to be there now , she said that we do not have such a need for our military, they say enough. i've never heard enough of our films to not say that for months, we have been believing more and more in the military, the military, and the military, the whole country decides, which means, well, i'll start with poland, which means that poland is not necessary. nothing tell me about turkey because the operation has begun and the turks of russia are unreliable. we russia is not enough. they are now introducing a restriction on our insurance papers. this is against us, which means that there was an

amendment that if the deal is in turkey, they are here, well, it’s clear here, turkey well, they have grain farther than that. they have oil, they have grain on ukrainian 20 three times cheaper sold in turkey than it is on the market, people make good money, what they bought there for 100 dollars 150 are sold 400 450 more, of course, it will be the same with oil. what is there to say, like from gases. so now what's going on there? i have repeatedly said in this studio that if the danger is a serious large-scale operation, because turkey's ground operation in syria will affect us all the events that occur only in the provinces. so just in case. yes , it means blows are applied to the mare, it means lipstick ju, and afrino there, they didn’t occupy, but not far from africa, but there is a certain territory that is located there because of and and esoteric. yes, it means, uh, listen, dear erdogan is clearly preparing for a ball of large-scale operation, of

course, now 40 aircraft were striking. yes , not only died, fighters of the self-defense detachment of the kursk party union well, the syrian soldier died. every case there. including directly president apa what does he want it? we don’t know that tomorrow you will occupy the kuban and calm down, that we strongly doubted closer to the elections. you see, he says, listen, damn it, my rating is not enough. me. tomorrow they will sort out, like my batch of passports. wait , let me olepo, i'll take it. i am in this studio as long as i speak, and then they will vote for me definitely and really accurately, by the way, there are areas with populated roots, along which it is supported from the boys' party. argumentation, well, just one hundred percent, then there is also. and here he is , who prevents him from making this fish. our press is more obsessed not with the fact that he strikes at syrian territory. well, according to iraq shangalu is a separate issue, not so for a general one. as the drawing says, so to speak, shangal, they will never take it. it's mountains and so on, right? and

it says that, it turns out, the kurd was fired upon. uh, so one city or kazantip, what are you? what are you, of course, four missiles. uh, she means shot so to speak. listen, it is not clear where the kurds got their missiles from. first, they still shoot at their own. so, just in case, it will. basically curdera. arabs once lived there 100% armenians then slaughtered them all in the fifteenth year exiled for 22 years old. now the kurds live there and so on. that is, he is clearly preparing for this, and he does not hide it. these are not allies. he's not even a situational ally. this is just a cynical person who uses us to the fullest. gas. it's good for him, somehow. come on no. that's so zer. so, and we continue to cooperate in this. let's simulate the situation. so tomorrow it means chords that are about american or not about american pro-russian there are just kurds, whoever helps them from that, they don’t take. well, we helped in a chord lately, whoever you want, i'll tell you kurds often, maybe i won't reveal some little

secret, they come to moscow and sleep. i understand you said that. it’s just that now these kurds themselves, who are being hit, they have recently worked with whom. here they are working now. here you can with us, who help everyone to work? well, now we are helping them, or are americans more of a degree americans, why is it very simple that we don’t want to offend? i'm not saying not good good. i just don't understand, that is it turns out that the turks are still insulting the americans, so i went to the bank. well , of course, this is so in istanbul a and they already got confused by their very testimony, which means it was at first. the kurdistan workers' party then speaks. no, it’s probably the islamic state that doesn’t fit any headlights. the liberation of armenia for half an hour to carry the western army itself after 992 . she is no longer there. it has long been azerbaijanis. yes, listen to someone's keychain. it's different, it's not a serious

conversation. reclaim memory dissociative anesthesia does not remember what happened to him and who he is the brightest event in the life of a minimalist. 11 can, only he is brothers and sisters. i came up with everything reboot not foul language, not a

novice 2 remember everything i start countdown three two one. to let us go out more often. country. let's look at this story a little differently. this is an attempt to listen to recreate the entire

panorama of the great country through painting. therefore, this union means it will use us to raise its rating. we raised a grain-related flight that is few. well, two or three percent does not solve anything. this option is very likely. if zara had been swallowed, what about the operation on mant bij, and, and there, too, our comrades

are definitely not far away. excuse me for being frank for simply we do not advertise this case. yes, tomorrow there will be clashes comrades. you knit everything that you can, the koreans have concluded, the south has a big contract with them for the supply of good tanks of good russian systems. there are no questions, i immediately ask a question. and here is north korea north korea is doing everything in a mirror against south korea if south korea supplies poland to us, when she says, yes, they don't sell to us. so those who are responsible. that's probably why it doesn't work well. i do not believe that people who