our comrades are definitely far away. excuse me for being outspoken. yes, we just do not advertise this case. yes, who will be aleppo tomorrow and how are these russian comrades to us, that is, she says she is directly afraid of a collision. uh, turkish forces with the iranians and de facto with us, because ours would be there, but he will go for it and we will do it. it is clear that we have a significant part of our forces; all this definitely does not in any way say that we use nuclear weapons, human will not tolerate this. no, you're coming back. to the events in in europe, the poles create the largest army of 300.000. they plan to create. so they are buying new weapons attention, where do they buy it. they buy artillery in south korea, and you knit everything that you can. the koreans signed a big big contract with them for the supply of good tank systems . there are no questions. i myself ask the question, but these north korea north korea goes mirror against south korea if south korea supplies poland, we, yes, they don’t sell to us. it means that those who are responsible for this do not work well. i don't believe that people who, in the korean direction, can

not agree with them, and perhaps they are synonymous. can i be such a phenomenon? we have such people. well, i think, of course, there is where to keep. i 'll tell you what, we delivered at one time. uh, until recently, there their military equipment mige twenty-ninth. where to get su-25? this is a new technique. unfortunately, in my opinion, they have not even come out of the general sanctions yet. well, somehow these uh, we turned out that we are still holding the sanctions regime against them. well, could to be alive, of course, this means the phenomenon of china that affects the north. which is without a doubt, but if the chinese do not help us in this regard? well kind of takes a go, there's a friendly moment. that is, you can say that with them all. i told in this studio that if the north koreans, when i hear another, idiot in all seriousness, say that it turns out that we should buy a good 60 from them, you have everything, then this or an enemy and a fool, or most likely everything in one means, yes, it means they have what we need

i talked, i called specifically, listen, they have 17 factories for the production of small artillery weapons. they have 35 factories for the production of ammunition for the artistic shooter , including what is used in the conflict zone, i say 152 mm, 121 and so on. all this they produce huge new stocks and so on. they produce over 200,000 small arms a year. how do you like it? yes, over 3,000. this means a system of artillery systems and rocket systems. took, two fires of 200 tanks of tanks, by the way, there are good last ones, these are ours. here are the sansa sanctions for some reason, the t-72 with deep modernization, close to the t-90s tank, but it’s true that we also have 200 pieces. i said, here's the girl. yes, here they are ready, well, let's work with them. listen, we say we will supply grain fertilizer for free strange africa so why supply grain? put the koreans with

them, put it there for free and with templates. drive. grain fertilizer is not needed in africa, we have common borders. in general, we have two africa, we will deal with africa and so on. we've had enough deliver and get in return a lot of what we need, you tell us, we will apply everything, listen. well, if you don't have enough, well listen, this is a long-term war within a war, there was nothing superfluous. i understand why they will turn to the iranians and koreans to look. you don't know american. let's say in ukraine i mean more, the dprk to everyone in korea, iran, by the way, voted, in fact, for us, unlike the country. the same. we say that prior to the decision of their iranians. we got shaheen 136. i'm sorry. this is what i say, but who knows, maybe grab to put. so, they are now two geraniums perfectly, but i suspect that before the start of the operation

and if we believe in our press and western that nothing of us earned the plant together with the russian, they supplied other drones. 171 steps, 191 you are talking about the fight against uh, hahaims. yes, these are excellent heavy, as information shock drones were made according to the stealth scheme at one time. they landed a unique american heavy drone, which, with a face from victoria of afghanistan towards iran, was rapped and captured in this drone. i don’t remember the name reverse engineered, uh, it’s even more interesting to make this drone cost the american $ 400 million , there are only 20 of them, they heard. what is an expensive thing? they don't have to do it. they removed and modeled individual components, made several drones for the base. it was made according to the scheme. and yes, that is, it passes and westerners mark all air defense systems and it’s hard to destroy, yes, and it carries a serious bomb load. and in the sense of some 191, it has a range of 4.000 km. here in this

direction. we need to work now on dkb. i am the most non-existent organization. but on paper. this is its harm and danger. it's not just empty that they don't help us what they are are you going to be hostages of this organization now? for example, from uh, in three countries. i have our military base in dk, yes, in armenia and in kyrgyzstan and in. tajikistan yes, we're here take we now so lazy, he says, not today. tomorrow will start on tajit. we consider the hostage if some events begin, we will be forced to to take part in these hostilities on the afghans, the tajik border is completely unknown signs in a completely different direction, based on the false information of our soviet road accident, do you believe that she, who is more inclined towards the americans , meets with the high military command, then , uh, to make strange statements, in fact playing along won will give us correct information. we are not ready to transfer our fighters as a keepsake. they'll be there fucking listening to the

americans to blame. no, it's time to work this direction is very hard and clearly aware. sle-in its degree of responsibility in this regard. they sit and wait for us to get involved somewhere else . unfortunately it is so. these states were no longer ours. i'm not saying that they are at war with each other. you can imagine the two countries of tajikistan and kyrgyzstan are at war. they are in a negative sense the beneficiaries, perhaps the negative consequences of this invasion, because this direction is the same we, as we will say, the guys do not want to fight together, and hate each other. sorry look at the saying heads. look like a snot agent. it means that the minister did on the one hand scolded the other side of the minister, he himself is scolded in another country. yes, well listen, and we say no. we have an organization. and now let's talk about the next exercises. if i give you too much and so on. i do not speak to them for frankness. here she is in ukraine now said a remark, so i will finish it. bye. so, you are talking with our material. there is no oil from where in romania time in the second world war has already dried up protection of all where does it come from? through what ports

to enter? who recycles them? and why are you right when you say sergey with impunity under the danube, which means that thousands of tons they go they go quietly. i'm still talking again. here, let's do it. and why hammer machines and others, they are heavy equipment 100 times said in this, ed, they cross the border calmly, well, rockets. well, take these creators of drones. let them work over great depth after the melts. that's until we exhausted until that we were done talking. oh, uncle in arms, but excuse me, as i have a club in one pocket, and in the other. eh, how they didn’t shoot at the weapon, she is now using a truncheon, and then she attacked you on the go. well, that's another question. club with a club, although, as colt said when he was told that the problem was with a revolver. well, why did these new guys appear now, they say, if you need more than six rounds of ammunition, you contacted the wrong guys, so we need to understand that you can’t brush aside with a baton, well

for the sake of objectivity, to objectively apply all means that had not previously used it, well, there was such a term, the last argument of the king was written on guns. here is a nuclear weapon - this is the last dollar, and the guns fired fired. although it was the king. yes , it was the last day of artillery, it was used constantly. well, yes, but still he came running when they went, yes, yes, therefore the last duty. for some reason, it was let in and descended first of all during the battle. so the dollar, maybe the last manner, diplomatic maneuvers have already gone nowhere i will hold sergei alexandrovich with regard to really drawing a picture of the future. what are we fighting for? well, i already spoke about this on the program when i said, he says, here we are, here we are, we won, and then how we will live. that's what's real here, as it were, a picture, that is, we, as it were, what just slipped through, or something, or something, as it were

, returned to what was all they say that it seems not. there will be no return. well, you really need to really draw it, and, uh, you really need to understand why, in fact speaking, we fight and, as i always say too. we fight not only on the fields of special military operations. it's a big conflict in that sense that they've managed to get out right under our noses. in general, many other states under their noses to create, but in general, quite one thing, probably one of the most powerful in europe and the nato army . better secured than any other. there are nato countries in europe, at least now they are ukrainian. yes, ukrainian, the army, of course, there are no minuses, formally. she is not nato formally, they are national, but, but in reality, this is what they managed to do, how to create everything here. yes, we have encountered this, but in particular, so to speak. we have a struggle going on with a significant part of the so-called western world and in other areas. and very many problems. here it is precisely connected with this that this is not the only direction. the only not

the only place of contact. and, of course, here we need some certainty, our internal is really so. from point of view informing people and not only in general, by the way, speaking of ours, you understand, as if ours, at least those people who want to listen, because in fact, as the experience of the chinese comrades has shown. well, it would seem that anyone who would listen to communist china turned out to be a phenomenal success and the english-language media are phenomenal all read. at first, everyone was scolded for this business. yes, why are you reading this, what is it? well propaganda communist beijing but they managed to shove this thing through. here they refer to them all these very newspapers. why are they so cleverly made? they created a whole spectrum, according to the opinion, it is considered more liberal, so to speak, it is clear there according to the extermination of such. here's how they could do it. and in this sense, talking about nuclear weapons is also a small fan. how to put it this way now to do this business there, but why, for example, and not serious ones, how not to create a

newsbreak, not to create a serious source that would constantly speak with getting into the english-speaking segment of the media and, in general, the internet is serious some expert to talk about the fact that, according to his information, military circles, for example, are growing annoyed by the fact that so far, so to speak, a tactical separate weapon for transport is certainly growing. i don't know, i'm not a military man. you understand this question, but it will also end up on the table, and the corresponding military intelligence. here da and they will analyze it there in di- ay know perfectly well that all these conversations there are like putin da vladimirovna who whispers in putin's ear well , they usually call it the mouthpiece of russian propaganda. well, this, by the way, was also said, yes, that is, in fact, they understand that this, of course, is not so, and therefore it is necessary to create a source, a seriously serious cover, thanks to this case, the chinese,

thanks to this kind of operation of the system. yes it is a system that is not really difficult. adjustment is not difficult to build, because the expertise is based on what it needs to be built. you just need to know how it works there. is it possible for the elites to create panic there? in this regard, do not make them err movement, it is possible understand, this is the first moment the second moment here, as it were, what else does it mean, why why? as a matter of fact, this is the most tactical nuclear weapon. i think this is the wrong answer. well, because it can be done in other ways that will help us in other areas. well , for example, the problem is that only now they are starting to destroy the energy infrastructure and how transport is still. everything is not bad with them, of course, and what comes from kazakhstan , relatively speaking, there is oil in ukraine, these territories, so to speak, support the entire nato army of facts. well, this is real, as if the

question is precisely that we did not work with these battalions or who is there turana yes, which turkey allegedly sponsors? yes, and there excuse me who is, i even more than that, i will say that here we are speaking effectively in this, at least. i remember that i came across criticism here, so to speak, when i said that the infrastructure is not fighting to destroy the entire transport infrastructure, no one who is many, who is there? yes? everybody's been talking for months now in the month of april, 32,000 transport workers moved across the ukrainian border. so someone needs it. well, by the way, the question is very simple, if they go there. so, how can you not delay, or what? not well the question is now, kazakhstan why does he act like that? why say so? for example, the same erdogan erdogan works for turkey and for his own, so to speak. clearly the election campaign. but if we now demonstrated determination without any

tactical nuclear weapons, determination, there is the transport hub should be demolished to zero. by the way, if erdogan makes it superfluous, problems will arise and no one will say a word to him; moreover, they will talk to him more respectfully. the more efficient. he will wipe away the dust, one city or another. well, when you beat little little ones, you have to beat them convincingly. well, this is a normal thing. that's exactly the same as the slovaks were the first echelon with weapons, how they made a self-sufficient nato army, how did they do it? after all, they are very quiet at first, because this is the concept of indirect warfare. no they checked, and we, of course, of course, this is a question of how we got to a situation in which we are now starting to discuss, so to speak, nuclear weapons, when in fact they were talking about the fact that it was necessary to simply cut off the gas in slovakia absolutely. and by the way, it's so hard on me here. other. sorry to worry, slovakia is the only nato country where the gala conducted a survey in all countries in the summer. this is the only country where the population of the

country, on the question of who you will be, you will be on the sidelines in the event of a conflict between nato and russia answered with russia, so now listen to everyone, because the american president is an american american. so it is necessary to easily bring out their very feelings in practice, because no one blows it out. unfortunately, do. so no nuclear weapons. listen, it's not about that at all. listen, what kind of argument is this, that they have some kind of survey there now and therefore there is no need to impose sanctions against them. no, i say what nuclear weapons are, once again there is a question. here, in what, what does it mean there according to the survey? this happened, nothing does not mean the money of our enemy. that's what is important, and not that they are there on some survey with us, and not with someone. how many times will we stumble on these little brothers by

blocking the gas, in general, now 155 caliber would be three times less in ukraine to start bombing infrastructure in may, but the question is not that here we advise even military entrances, all absolutely known. that is, there are two tunnels, how many there are five countries, we already know the problems are different, so that constantly until now, by the way, and what than actually more there is a lull at the front. by the way, as well as on other fronts. well, for example, somehow i didn’t hear what was moving forward, ruble pricing. here is the very decree of the president how the northern streams exploded and is not moving anywhere. this is an equally important fact, nord stream, it is clear who blew up who, and we will somehow respond to this. well, putin said, who will react to this, right? or new said we do not plan to sell no, still reliable partners. eh? listen, please, russian the federation has not changed the ceiling for the kid , the side that observes the principle will not change. no, it's

all clear. in fact, what kind of sport is really present in our country, and therefore in our environment and, therefore, among our situational partners. the main dispute is one and the same, it is very easy to say. we will no longer return to the point before the special operation, a significant part of the elite and some active part of the population, some of which hit the road, so to speak, to all sorts of georgia some of which have returned and continue to work here. they believe that they will return there. you can of course, this is a cultural conflict and sit with such a cultural conflict. within a country within a nation, it is impossible in the middle of the 19th century, the united states led to the civil war, yes, russia , so to speak, for the most part similar, so to speak, in fact, cultural internal conflict led to the civil war. after the october revolution, which is now called to us with the lyrical revolution, well, they went sharper civil war. just started again this is an

internal cultural one. now, if this cultural conflict, i hope the civil war, finally, the state will begin to do its job. they count the votes in slovakia, so when this starts, no nuclear weapons will be needed in order to finally subdue the winners even this nato army in an indirect war, and then, by the way, i will also ask that well, listen , let's still pay attention to the fact that the next problem is kazakhstan, because they can also start the same. excuse the nazi processes now on the ukrainian border. we also have russians there. there are a lot of people, by the way, nuclear fuel. that's why we recognized it. that's the problem. that you are somehow pessimistic, everything turns out to be positive. it is no coincidence that we are called

a terrorist state. this is from the fact that the collective west now feels its own useless . fuck then ukraine and poland were brought up, these are two twins, a brother of 30 years. they walked hand in hand everything went to this conflict that we see everything this has been worked out for a long time. and how in ukraine 30 years ago appeared on the money. who mazepa thought, we will agree with tymoshenko there with someone on gas. their entire population has been brought up on this, and in poland, when they began to demolish monuments in recent years, the first one was demolished in the ninetieth year in krakow, was there any other soviet union in memory ? the entire polish elite all consolidated

around an attempt at reconciliation with ukraine . i reckon, of course, that a significant part of the people of poles they are not going to forgive, nothing. they participate in rallies. their extremely annoying state policy aimed at distributing social benefits, the government is forced, of course, forced to maneuver and no one is going to forgive the volyn massacre. is not going to forgive, and unfortunately, literally today i found out that

, uh, the parliamentary spittle has joined the authorities, that is, they are together with skoczynski in this situation. i think that we need to act with poland. naturally, do not deliver. the question of severing diplomatic relations has long been raised. what's the point of keeping heat exchange relationships? we are holding.

eh, what will be the rigidity? well, let's break off diplomatic relations, but we left by words. they are still fighting in ukraine. that is, they are not warm from this, not hot. yes, the fact is no diplomatic relations. no, in ukraine on a massive scale. there are no poles, 1,600 people, officially 1,600 people is a lot. if it is 600 thousand people. well, at least the poles don’t want to rush to fight there, what they say, that we buy there , they hate less than the ukrainians. no, but she hates russians more. what are we talking about fighting no one. doesn't want to.

yes, and all the interceptions are in polish, when they say that the poles want to take the lions more, they do not want to take the lions. there are no such speeches or appeals. they have a more cynical position and much more cunning, but they don’t want to take all their goal of destroying russia as such and then picking up all the remnants of belarus, ukraine and whom they don’t want to fight wherever they can, well,

the poles have always fought well, but this is good , yes? oh well, they fought the ship. here, i 'll say it. well, you can and so on win. no, i do not wanted to understand, it will be good, the biggest. army. they will have a wonderful technique of life. blah blah blah. they already have the european union or take it, if they didn’t want to fight, really, some of them would already be in ukraine. there are already there. yes, there are no real parts of them there. how many parts do you need how many parts do you need for this special operation. there are people, firstly, that will be of interest to any nation that will go to fight in 200 people, especially

if they were helped by ours were in spain during the civil war. our been in china time civil war our regions were, well, 1,600 people on their vehicles. this is serious. where do these official authorities come from? not all, they give. it is absolutely certain not to conduct separate negotiations. this is specific data. and the poles don't really hide you. i'm ready to go interpreter from polish to all natives. no one knows, please, how i can translate and do interceptions. there are also guys who know the polish language well, there is no problem, belarusians generally understand the polish language perfectly, but who knows the belarusian language, so that there is no problem here, you can go and hear with your own ears, here on the dividing line. right now, where is an extremely dangerous area, where svatov is

practically there. so you are a given, i have no reason not to trust the authorities of the lc. dnr you know, uh. i think that if some kind of compromise is reached, and we all want to win, and preferably without allowing a nuclear war. this is such a maximum task that we face, it’s not easy to do, and here i would return to this very demonstrative situation of provocation with the s-300 missile and what alyaksandr lukashenka said that the key word “agreement” was used there, but not in the way that behind-the-scenes negotiations are often understood here. there is someone from russia with someone from the west, and whose agreement is back. that is, it is more and ukraine agreed on something. why was britain behind this? why the americans gave a stop order the situation is very british kept silent all the time is very interesting. this coincided in one week with two major events in the

malaysian fight verdict. and read to the parliamentary assembly nato does not recognize russia as a sponsor of terrorism, just a terrorist. yes, just terrorists. and these are our americanists to me. here the sponsor was simply confused. eh, but nevertheless, the third moment is a terrible video with the execution of prisoners three in a row. why in the west they hoped that kherson would become a turning point and lead to an increase in protest actions, and not liberal pro-western ones, but patriotic ones, seriously divided. they are fighting ukraine for internal destabilization in russia by any means and are closely monitoring but exactly the same as they miscalculated in february march, thinking that the sanctions, this close sanction blow would blow up russia and did not blow up, thinking that the mobilization would blow up and did not blow up. they also believed that khersons did it kherson did not

do this, and there is a choice. a further strategy, that is, to provoke an internal situation and then lead to further escalation, because let's be realistic here, i agree with the emotional sergei alexandrovich in europe 's assessments. that's what our a colleague said, we just don’t eat, the west and consolidation. west, it is weakening, they vote, they declare, but the gap is very serious. there are clearly formed two parties. they did not fully form the party of war, and eastern europeans treat it unconditionally. against the will, by the way, many of their peoples and parties. yes, mirra is there or the party compromises with russia, some believe that yes, the thirty-eighth parallel. yes, it is possible that the dnieper and such people are among their politicians and just say that this is to the west of our borders. that's it, it's one and the same, it's not like that, they don't want war, they are afraid of war and many.

the europeans are also slovak, the government is the same germans. see how germany decides on the supply of weapons and ammunition. they pay off the pressure they say, come on they pay off in order to take part in a real war. mishka zhenya on it, so that the honest prince of perm was i'm not a man, but who?

christian and you play dashing. i need someone to protect her. heart of parma