dmitry andrey don't say anything like you started yesterday

, then i'll blame extremism. you already. in general, anything is possible. everyone already thinks that you are, in fact, voicing the kremlin's concept how to deliver a nuclear strike the kremlin knows what i say at the end as the kremlin and the west knows that you are voicing it, so it's funny that you are generally an extremist. and we held you back, again the notorious policy of containment exactly now they determine us, which means the state is against terrorists. here are the differences of the united states, there you can argue, but they still have a country they have sovereignty, so there were relevant laws. the article was introduced that it is forbidden to trade with the state, which we will marry about the export of weapons of the seventy-sixth year and from the control of the expo - the law on export control of 2018,

where the articles are written there, they do not define what is terrorism international what is the state of the sport of terrorism, but according to at least there are articles that allow, what is the european union, this is an economic association c on the one hand, yes, which have the features of statehood, on the other hand, these states. and these states transferred part of their sovereignty over european structures to state structures. therefore, no sovereignty, in fact. they do not, it is clear that military allies in the nato parliamentary assembly are military allies. they define their main enemy. yes, it looks like you want to define it. i wonder why we are a state at all a terrorist or a sponsor of terrorism we should have been immediately to define the enemy as a military enemy is everything and then we had to fight. i can already strive for mine.

you can conduct. where there. come on, come on, so that something oh, exactly a nuclear strike, which is called a gynecologist is sitting there with a companion, who is interested in being there in the zones this decision is taken by the military well. there is a flower market. we can't. we're under the flower market. this i cannot allow. excuse me, you have a flower market there, we can’t understand the whole in this for the united states, in principle, everything is invested in the general concept. i don’t know how

it is about the current iron curtain, but they talked about the perimeter for a long time about the containment perimeter - this is still the development of the institute for strategic studies of the 90s, when they said that they were talking about hostile state states , and it was all of china hostile hostile states. it is necessary to create a perimeter beyond which they do not need to release their influence beyond this perimeter. they need to be contained there, this perimeter comes from norway it goes down here to the persian gulf goes on to india and there must be a struggle for india, because it is the largest democratic state after that. here is china where it will be necessary to create a flow, which means under the tongue to china along the island. but typical yes for americans, coastal islands rise to japan and there is democratic

. american troops are stationed there, which means everything is clear. south korea and now they apparently want to end wrangel island on wrangel island. while ours. well , as they say about what would be good, if this perimeter was closed, there and further i went to norway, cut off alaska whose alaskas they are, of course , wrangel island so we don’t, it’s illogical, it will be logical if i first describe the containment perimeter, and then how can we break through it, that is, the perimeter draw they really talked about it is discussed more than that, so the perimeter. here they begin to pinch and pressure begins from all sides. that is, what they are now implementing then needs to be gnawed out of this period, and most importantly , the point of struggle is really central with their points of view. nyaya, central asia, where we must clash with china, because our influence will decrease, chinese influence will increase. here we must inevitably, like

spiders' hut. in this closed bank, we will have to clash with china, and that's it. they succeed. that 's the plan, in my opinion. they are now trying to implement it, of course, maybe then we will go according to my plan, but this will not happen right away. it's not right away, but 10-15, firstly, we need to get it and why should we. i'm not saying that they are now now everything turns out in the nineties. they are now implementing it in reality. it turns out they are implementing this plan. the war in ukraine, they ignited in belarus, did not work out, but they also expect to remove it. remove lukashenka here, we will still wait for a person, not all of them are not eternal. now, if you remove it, everything will start there, as far as the transcaucasus is concerned. well, as allies, we have here we are as a region, we then shouted shouted about the fact that

yes, the dog insulted, naming a regional power. in fact, it must be said that if one were to say now we were called a regional power a compliment was a compliment. indeed, because the regional powers - this is not kept in what kind of historical optimism, eh? so a cat that creates its own region, but we may end up in the chinese region, because all the shanghai structures, for example, chinese e, well, chinese is generally very inexpensive, by the way, many teach, really, many of ours, because china is now replaces in the educational process and china and by the way, speaking both japan and korea replaces the european union and inclusive education students are not going to the west now, but to the east. therefore, with china, of course, we need to think about what we should do, we need to create now. that's why we need an obse. i wanted to say a rougher word, however, if well, they finished

the novel at the same time in europe, but now it seems like they kicked us out of the ebse from there. tell me, please, what is the meaning of european security without russia. this is the meaning of the european security question from russia, you give such a complicated question. if we and what at all, even if we have to pay, if we leave, if we leave the abse, it remains the same countries that have imposed sanctions against us, it's just another question. our allies are there. this is understandable, immediately therefore we are for him and we ourselves leave, then they don’t even enter. now they just don’t let them in there, so to speak, there u u u at the door. do you know how many years in this studio we have called for european democracy to come out of all these european leskov

european institutions have been telling you, you don’t understand, you have to fight for every platform, to get our message across and spend public money on travel expenses for a certain to a certain time. here is an argument about the need to fight for european states for what, in general, the state of europe of europe in the third hypostasis of europe is a national state. here was true. but unfortunately, we lost, we could not organize what we lost, we form this marine le pen turned out to be the wrong person, whom we also created nothing. yes, and it doesn't work . wait, we could work than ours

no ideology. and if you don’t have an ideology, you ca n’t create what dmitry spoke about very accurately very many times an attractive image of the future, something that the other dmitry really dislikes when this terminology is used, but by and large. and what we wanted to say, we want it to be what we didn’t have for us, of course, it was possible to create a society for the protection of our whales. and then nothing is impossible, because it should still fit into the general doctrine. although and if there is no this core, then everything will fall apart, like america it is understandable, of course, if you have heard a wide part of the ideology that forms a brilliant image, dima had a brilliant brother, red square. project project red project, well, you just know, i tried to avoid it so often called red projects magnificent where i just

analyzed the very era of the formation of the soviet project. but we don't offer that right now. why was there such an attractive force, why various forces worked with us back, because a phenomenal attractive idea, i understand, but now we can work with them for money, or what? yes, it’s not disgusting for ourselves, only for money there are different ideologically. yes, no, never no, uh, a big project that well, was not born, because it is difficult to invent it, it was born, it is born. oh, what a historical, what kind of insomnia people had in the twenties and thirties. what historical circumstances. it was an absolutely conscious movement of power, even if there was infar. they said what are we doing here? there was the idea of ​​the idea of ​​the world revolution of prosperity, which, by the way, speaking, then the west appropriated it, but at

least some small steps are small steps, even now we can make us, in principle, a problem, if the osce is safe in europe, but there is also security in the eurasian space. let's make a project of europe, we'll lose it in the caucasus, then we'll lose the middle centers. it is this project that will allow us to unite and for the caucasus and central asia, i will even say more. so keeping safe. it's fine away from us safety. they think that for them security is the us authorities nothing bad center. if if there will not be we will not be and i do not mean the state. let them watch their elites think differently. but, when we offer security this is extremely small, they tell you how to secure it. they say, you know

, they offer so much money that they tell him security yesterday. you and ukraine will sort out the dangers. that, of course, is your other question. yes , all major issues can be resolved after we won in ukraine, and we are ready. yes, yes, we will be ready by that time, but in order for the time to come it will take if we really we say we will always be misleading people, because the legal definitions of war impose colossal restrictions. have spoken many times to the country of the people, therefore. but america did not declare war on anyone unconditionally, because when america declared war on whom for the last time in 1812, the last time it declared on june 4

1942, bulgaria-hungary-romania is correct, therefore, hazel, vietnam and further down the list, there are definitely no announcements that international countries, but countries and at the same time trade with it. well, it's impossible. well, first of all, of course, and this is possible if it is necessary to use the question goes to another question goes in common sense, but it is impossible. to this they understood this , a coordinating council appeared, well, until now the question. and where the rate of informational correction is fine, they would be bad for gku. would be a good solution take much faster. here we have belarus our brilliant ally. they are badly fast, so the system of integration of mutual understanding, so that everything goes quickly clearly and clearly, but to understand his dkb. who is with us, who is with us, but to understand our relations with iran, and to build relations between north korea, venezuela, cuba, nicaragua, african

countries, china, we are trying to build this. i don't know they're hard lining up a president. well , hello, if that's all, in short. guys explain, at least something states you do you want to deal with this president personally? no, i don't want the president to take care of everything. well, i say it’s no closer, we don’t have a ministry that would separately deal with strange neighbors there, it doesn’t exist, it worked for us and efficiently, but it should be noted that it was good to work. yes? i didn't stand, didn't say to santa, i headed straight and worked very efficiently. he worked. everything, the influence of russia was then

greater, of course, do not compare anymore. look, i won't say anything funny anyway. i am i won’t say anything funny for anyone first about ideology. i hear this many times. i have heard this for many years , and since i also know some of our ideologists or people who call themselves such. well, listen, the slaz has died, because the ideology has got the idiologists up to the neck. these are not real ones that were, and you are deaf and blind, dumb rotten crap that the soviet union had at the end of the soviet union remained in this place, at least they

pretended that they follow some kind of ideology. badge a small, worthless brain swap, mind you. i didn't say zasraf polite of these people you will make ideologues. why do they have to be idiots? and of whom the ideologist stands must believe in what he says and does; the ideologist must lead people who are ready to die for his ideas; the ideologist is ready to die for his idea himself, and

only in this situation. designated this topic another. it's kind of like the story of one wonderful dean of a wonderful university about how ivan the terrible pushed apart the meanings of ivan the terrible

. if he knew that he was not pushing the boundaries, but these guys didn’t make sense thought, and so they built the country, doing a specific thing. yes, moscow was the terrible, so generally deep and geologized. yes, ivan the terrible ruled and built the state. and we got over. well, what yes, i don't care, why i saw how the border was kindred, so the new jerusalem why built a reason from here it was written off that he was a practitioner of 40% of the troops of ivan the terrible broth, which seemed to be taken. deeply and dilogized direligious is up to religious fanaticism. now it is thought that he was degraded then, but if it is also so guys, well, what kind of person did he write, but not psalms

there, and it’s always like that, but you call it ideology. and what do you call it? he is so moving away from a theoretical dispute into practice , i don’t see a thunderstorm, petrov, too, and lenin and stalin , something is also very big shortage, yes, and marx is sandlers, oh, which i won’t call it better. now the second topic. we have a mother-in-law, we have a well, competently implemented project for the gradual crushing of the former soviet union the former russian empire with his own hands on his own territory. this is exactly what it is. and when you look at it from an american point of view, and it’s absolutely all the same, berets, the director of the cia or the e department of state is doing it, it’s not the same. yes, well, damn it, he answers. not this, well, an

incomprehensible creature is for us victoria well, he answers. but this is a dangerous sneaky enemy, and it’s not for nothing that she was on the maidan. she worked so well and professionally. these guys, before our eyes, nights, of course, for a long time, but in 7-8 years they reprogrammed a huge part of the former the soviet union of ukraine in the same way reprogrammed the baltic states and now there is a reprogramming of central asia, transcaucasia of everyone in the world, including armenia, kazakhstan and gradually setting fire from everywhere. here is the same bars and one conflict, the second conflict, the third conflict, the twenty-fifth. on our former territory yesterday, turkey is working out its wonderful turkey, because the ttg itself has just passed , i saw with great interest how in the article of the seventh declaration of the

samarkand male with an objection, therefore about kazakhstan and uzbekistan, nevertheless, as members. oge was accepted, northern cyprus because they objected europeans americans. now tashkent and astana will not be told anything, but article seven says that northern cyprus is a member of the utc a , according to the status of everything that is written in the documents of the utc - this is state status. it is not an interstate association. he is not a forum, so he is the same statehood, please tell me who is in the cis or the csto or fuck knows what he recognized. in any state status north ossetia south if i must ask, south ossetia, abkhazia, who recognized

the dnr lc? no one so here it is to the question of what is and what can be promoted by the turkish bureaucrats. and there, what is there and what russian bureaucrats can promote. as they told me, when we last discussed the quality of our personnel, people who know our personnel are a team of professional middle peasants who beat a team of stars, in which there are few stars and they work based on the turks from the states. here, with an armored rink, they promote their ideas and promote, and the otg will still become a military one correctly. you said that we don't need an idea, we don't need it, but an idea is needed. and how is it possible, that is, there are ideas . i'm an ideology no. that's what tell me, i'm running you for a pipe now. tell me because they haven't told me yet, because

if you don't have any ideas, except cutting the budget and establishing a fruitful dialogue with the enemy, to sit in his warm office in a civilized capital and the children went to school in strasbourg near london or washington and enjoy every smile in your address, you don’t notice that you you give up birthright not even because of lentil stew, but for the smell of lentil stew, but makes a huge number of all those people whom we seem to call to form so that the president will not be personally involved in politics, because there has been nothing like this for six years already. there is, in fact, nationalization. the elite went through a very tough one, and the states helped the west in this. government

officials who else so there's no chance at all excellent. they are engaged, they are establishing a dialogue, telling us about the need for peace, who we talks about the need for peace. now tell me who the government is talking about the need for peace. well, again, you make me ask the question well, i know people well in the administration and in the government and in the house in general, such conversations and in the administration and in the house people go to war, but now how many deputies of the state duma are leading i expressed my attitude to the system, my friend of the transformation was terribly happy that you have such a point of view. i know this means that when you and i die under the fence, it will be positive. no i never

i will die. under the fence under the fence. let vladimir vladimirovich die, you are not one of them, therefore you will never die on yourself under any fence. it is better to die in battle. father anatoly , they will tell you how, where the monster return the memory of dissociative amnesia, i don’t remember what happened to him. and who is he the brightest events of life. youth we need you, only young 50.000 hour 3 hours minimum wage to find a true friend. i know that i

share the concept and do not sniff. we received a lot of requests that we go out more often, well, we will try. in the west they try us

declare a pariah country. let's look at this story a little differently. this is an attempt to hear recreate. through painting, the entire panorama of the great country is artistic fantasy. tell me, please, here we know how

the dutch, the british and all the rest tormented the spanish empire. true, with pinpoint strikes, they gnawed off from a country over which the sun never set, and whose influence was greater than that of the united states today, much everything that we could know, how the same thing was done, and at different times with different situations. well, i don’t see our privateers anywhere. i had an idea that our oligarchies were robbed. perhaps they will start behaving like the jews, the moors in the spanish empire, and they will bring something out into the world space, an idea. it was stillborn. it doesn’t happen here if you don’t know why the oligarchs don’t do it, but the

big russian businessmen evgeny prigozhin do zhen prigozhin is a separate, well, separate, but he already has this business. he is. and what he did in africa is just a unique experience, because of this he many thanks to new developments. in st. petersburg , those people are wonderful. yes, they are french in africa, uh, i know this very well, watching the sohel, and kadyrov does a lot, and sobyanin is absolutely right in his field, and a lot of people who have proven themselves are doing a lot. a. well, where better? what could be imagined in a critical situation. but when you talk about contra.