from apps or website? a large-scale war with russia is becoming a fixed idea in the west, now the czechs are talking about the need to prepare an army, while they say that we will be the first to participate in a full-scale war against the russians. well, yes. let's just the lion's share of european weapons is already a force in ukraine the hope to destroy our country from the inside is also not weakening the cia directly

announced plans to start recruiting spies in russia. look, putin was in the best position the day before the invasion because he had everything. the leverage of power he would ever have his goals were to survive out of ukraine, threaten you to influence unification of names and show the whole world that russia is strong in military economic diplomacy. he squandered everything to the last grain. directorship it's funny. look at this man's face. no. listen, i'm sorry, but he said open for business is certainly not a collaboration. open to me, please, one more time in the face of this man. just everything you

looked at. here he is the director of operations of the cia refers to the same people, and which at one time, uh, a person who worked in the administration of the byte. pompeo spoke. i, well, the cia what we were taught we were taught to lie to steal to deceive. look at his face. this is the face of a liar when he says that everything was putin and when he is the target. putin now has even more. putin's support in the country is very high. if we talk about what happened to our army, our army is undergoing a most serious restructuring of the once expeditionary army, such as we are moving on to a full-scale army that is capable of solving any task set on a wide european front of hostilities. our economy turned out to be much more efficient than any other economic downfall. as mentioned, do not interfere, it will be less than 3%. much less than expected. the rate of inflation. we have less

price growth than in many western countries, we have significantly less unemployment than in many western countries , we have a very low level. but it's better to be curious , it's a liar when he claims to be about our goals. nothing like that, our goal is completely different. and when he talks about what threatened us, he again lies and , according to evolution, that he lives. he very correctly noted sergey aleksandrovich oh, openfi, business, they are ready to atone for our traitors, but in fact they are ready to legalize their bookmarks, which have been in our society for many decades. that's what it means, therefore, they will simply select those who have already worked with them. all this pseudo-orthistic husk. all this is an abomination, and all sorts of others will be flooded. as it was said there vladimir vladimirovich jackals covers, foreign embassies in their time in berlin at public

expense are going to hold seminars to promote russian decolonization. well, obviously, sanctions are threatening, they can’t agree on them in any way, because europe is already bursting at the seams from the previous europeans, according to boris johnson. i had to actively push for the support of hostilities and economic. suicide listen to this brown gardens and different countries, i mean that without a doubt the french at the last moment is everything denied the germans for all sorts of economic reasons, too, did not want to. they were i will tell you now terribly that if i had to happen to catastrophes, it would be better if everything ended quickly, so that ukraine collapsed, i could not support this, as they thought from

russian hydrocarbons. and johnson is absolutely right, he succeeded, if he does not come up with, to do the main thing that we have as a result, compared to, say, february 26, we have a completely destroyed economy of ukraine, we have hundreds of thousands of dead and earlier ukrainians. we we have almost um, the collapsed economy of europe, we have a government crisis in the same uk when johnson got in the ass not even from his voters from fans in the party, because he brought the interests of the europeans of the british to please the ukrainian nazi. that's all. so

goodbye, johnson churchill just failed. yes, if you really look at the results of the board, churchill is also especially proud of something. the tun empire was lost by sergey alexandrovich well, about johnson interesting. that's what, when we were talking here about the fact that the americans are actually undressing europe for the sake of their own interests, and by and large europe is committing such an act of some kind of suicide. yes. eh, because it really does. uh, destroy very profitable hut markets, that is, profitable economic ties. uh, allows uh, to manipulate himself, including putting himself on the brink of war, we were told. well, it's kremlin propaganda stop saying that, yes, it's about nothing, it doesn't know anything that now boris johnson confessed directly. yes, they, the anglo-saxons, together with the

americans, set themselves the goal of the old, by the way, historically the former more than once , to prevent normal relations between russia and continental europe because it is contrary. the interest of the anglo-saxons, but today america and in general, as if this, by the way, confirms. uh, many of our conclusions, which we made a long time ago , including on your site, about the fact that the americans are actually ukraine. set on fire in order to save europe as an ally, because in my opinion, just when they say the americans succeed, the americans succeed, this is true. they do a lot of things, but in fact the plan hell was not such a plan, the next one in russia is absolutely about american power in china, absolutely pro-american power in india is absolutely american power and everywhere on the globe is absolutely american here is the plan. but it was complete, victory, he failed in my opinion. he could not, as it were, give, but nevertheless he failed, because the world is too different, and among other things you are not going to accept such american dominance, at least in this form. yes , there are other plans. one of them is

exacerbation. why? because, uh, the ties that were potentially being built between russia and europe were sorting out america from europe sooner or later . through what it was easiest to crap this situation through the post-soviet states through the state of eastern europe that integrated into nato and the european union, in fact, that's all. now we see the culmination of all these plans. yes, it's bad that they e largely realized. but what they are and what we were right in assessing it. i seem to have confirmed now more than johnson the question is different. and they are europeans. they understand it, the germans, the french. italians. here boris johnson speaks openly. we threw you. we have deceived you. we have solved our problems. we solve our own big ones. so to speak, the american- english problems are due to you fools. and you don't you don't need a market, you don't need whipped chocolate, you don't need marmalade , you don't need any connections, because your goal in life is to secure american interests. and in order for you to have some kind of symbol that you prayed for. this is the meaning of your

life. this is ukraine, this is ukraine, this is, as it were, a false fetish that you all should pray for, and we see how ukraine was very quickly insolent and begins to dictate terms to the europeans in everything. including even on cultural issues, here a scandal erupted with the director of the la scala theater famous which the opening of the season will be, uh, it means to stage the opera boris godunov and then you know gen kolsuno the consul general of ukraine, as it were, but the petition is not impossible. eh, well, for now, at least, the director caressed and said that i would do what i thought was necessary and i would read dostoevsky so to speak, yes, when you don’t think it’s a problem, but nonetheless. uh, ukraine and europe quickly switched places europe that went about the americans. now ukraine must listen to ukraine now it is in charge. yes, this is american scheme in action johnson johnson is johnson this acknowledges the question of how the european elite has become so senseless so impotent so you don't know what's actually interesting. she is not a national european, there is no national cast left. by the way, in part - this is a direct consequence. uh, this is the concept of the

euro-atlantic civilization, because the euro-atlantic solidarity was supposed to make sure that the national elite, no one in any country of the world did not have any different programs there they educate them, uh, they pulled, there are still 60 and seventies plus. i think there is a huge amount of compromising information on each of these of these figures, plus a special one means the introduction of various new rules and values, which, uh, pulled up a huge number of, in principle, useless personnel. check it out. pardon me, so to speak, my french. look at the huge number of women, yes, which in europe took all these places today about women. you usually fuck europeans like that. and this is also the second. so to speak. this is the second tier. these people are obsessed with self-realization. so, the women are fixated on proving to everyone that they can manage the states, the ministries of defense and everything else, like this, so to speak, the last, so to speak, splash of this very feminism in its last, so to speak

, input, with regard to these fagots, then they also have such a system, they are fixated on this, they are especially caste and they are an avant-garde person. they will show you now how to properly manage some. this is a freudian. that there, you see, i just didn’t speak at ease pavlov, he told zheka, what is freud’s problem, that he is all about ouds? yes, the fact is that you are partly right not in relation to me in a relationship, but they accepted this freudianism, of course, as a guide to action, so let's go the paths, therefore, now their personal professional qualities are assessed by the fact that in pants and whether or not, who cares that they deliberately lowered these problems to a level. what is called the lower chakra in order so that people no longer think about anything at all, because these people can no longer think about anything , except for these problems imposed by self-realization and so on, they are

zero managers as managers. as managers , they are much weaker than those before them. uh, therefore, here is this johnson quote. although i was not going to talk about him, but nevertheless since you gave the floor to the first, but here's what i wanted to say the second passes. today, including a male odkberevane. i think, uh, it's time. to each other, uh, it seems to me that's how to stop hanging noodles on your ears about the integration structures that we have created in the post-soviet space, since this is, in general, my main profession. still, it is important to understand that the time has come for a very large recount. if you want, yes, audits, as they say, of everything that was e, means constructions and schemes and models of the development of our country. that's up to the present stage. this is about the economy. this is about politics. it's about management. and this applies to the post-soviet space, because the current crises. this is also the result of a large the number of miscalculations and incorrect predictions. yes, in the

construction of our policy. yes, in the soviet space. still confirmation of the words. lukashenka said, please tell me the last time that the mass media will develop this. ah, the thesis. uh, with life, the fate of the dkb depends on the mmm operation of the russian federation in ukraine. if russia wins, an accident will live there. if, god forbid, he doesn’t win, then the design bureau will not exist and in our countries, too, many hotheads began to discuss this problem, you feel that we have come to a consensus. what if, god forbid , russia collapses, then under these rubble is our place. therefore, we must not only protect each other, but understand, as always, we used to say russia russia its main role. so there should not even be such conversations, we are not going to

leave the political military political arena. at least it will exist and no one will collapse anywhere. well, that's all we need. the president of kazakhstan said that the situation around ukraine has come time for a joint collective search for a formula for peace, but i know this formula for peace to liberate our territories by denification. yes , the militarization of the neutral status of ukraine, we voiced our demands well. lukashenka is right in this case. i continued including repelled by his words. we are at a point in history when it is not only russia's challenge to keep all these structures in imitation uh and many other structures that have been created in the soviet

space. they need development prospects, but in general they, unfortunately, were based on background. they need something very simple, when we have to give them something from russia, when they need something, as it were, yes, they immediately recall the many vectors about the fact that they have the independence that we gave them, by the way they didn't win it, we gave it to them, and we owe them something all the time. to be honest, you know recently, when we were all this rigmarole in america , we would discuss blm. well, what nonsense, they remember some kind of colonization, which means some kind of cotton implantation, and now he demands privileges for himself, but for about 30 years in this sense we had such a strange white in the post-soviet space, indirectly. we actually supported the new soviet mythology of these states, in which russia was a colonizer, and since russia was a colonizer. she gives them something all the time. she must, so to speak, deliver them to yield. we must always take into account their interests, in general, we must feed them in our own way,

because there are millions of labor migrants here. we must be at home. we owe everything when we needed some things we, too, as it were, but lined, as it were, such an image. tnuyu track lightning, no, i'm sorry, we are not dependent. we, unfortunately, kept these structural terms, because we believed that it would be better to have such than none, but the time has come such that more - this should not be allowed. thank you i watch your program all the time. no, not always, but here i am. not quite, sergey alexandrovich agrees and i will explain. you know how a person has already lived in this youth. here are all these ideas, they vitali in the minds. forgive me but agree greybeards youth and throat sounds, of course, quite a boy. in short, god forbid, i have great respect for sergei

to our well-known. he knows it. well, okay, that's not the point. uh, so i'm talking about these ideas , you know, they were in the minds of the russian public at the end of the eighties in the sense that why do we need a republic. so i remember these conversations well, and we need the republic why we needed it, moreover, patriots like putin just went on stage and said. and why do we need it at all? it's generally us that we feed them all the time the idea was. she was it is in the russian environment, it is in the russian in that part, as they say, it is precisely in the russian intelligentsia in the russian public that we feed the republic, we are this and we are not at all in general. it is that they are the same to us, that they live better than us. it is visible here, many of them here

lived better on the most fed. why do we need it? well, this is a better question. it has become better, well, we do not feed them. well here we have them as they say, and what we got. now i have a question, maybe it made sense to feed even maybe at the expense of myself and keep them to yourself than here to do. here's what they did, as they say in the ninety-first year, yeltsin, uh, first of all yeltsin, of course, first of all. well, it cannot be said that the russian and russian public did not support yeltsin's idea. let's remember that his, by the way, first of all, his main platform was this uh hmm advice, as the supreme soviet of the rsfsr was absolutely absolutely. rosa was not there, there was no one there, no caucasians, no asians, no one , it was in general, so to speak, precisely russian

wednesday. she supported him, because these ideas were in the air. well, you see, i think they did a very simple thing, well, it’s clear that all small peoples. they are. otherwise, they are looking for a patron for themselves, and they want something, if you don’t want it, don’t feed it, they will go to another, but nothing can be done about it. now the crisis is the state security in this sense, lukashenka, of course, is a wise person, no matter how you say it, even though you and i worked a little there, you can’t refuse him at all in the state, he said very correctly. well, does he know what's wrong? is he really, of course, a big politician. he he understands that cabbages have an ending. with what the swing is connected with everything is connected with the fact that russia did not show military power. there is no result, but immediately starts there different reasons. i don't

take it now, but the fact remains. we all know what to say there was a feeling that the russian armed forces were there, would solve this problem in a week. yes , there was this feeling, everything was about it and we are about it, by the way, we thought so. we did not know much about our army, about the situation about those problems that there are not only us from i remember well, we ourselves in your programs constantly quoted western analysts who gave a week there, so to speak, in case there was such a conflict, so we did not show it. well guys. a what a what, a what do you want they start to stagger? yes, they are starting to look for options they have some kind of and it is clear that this is it. yes. it's unpleasant enough for us, but it's necessary. well, this must be understood. and if you want to have them satay. do you think if the united states relaxes tomorrow one of the these will be behind, damn it, yes, there will be no one

instantly, they will all scatter. all now, the united states is giving the main finance money into power, military military, as they say, military power is fine if they stagger, if they are like it was, by the way, after vietnam after vietnam , this was all this vacillation in the western camp, it is no coincidence then the united states and many spoke in primo. they stood on the verge of a complete collapse at that time, because the defeat in vietnam is me, i hope with us this is not will happen. i’m not talking about this in order to look for analogues, but this is how this world works, you can’t do anything about it, it’s pointless without emotions. i agree with sergei alexandrovich that yes they are grateful. yes , say it. we gave me addiction, well, emotions are meaningless, you have the power to have money then

you will have friends if you don't have them then don't be offended. this is how this world works. there, the chinese are on their way, so to speak, they have money, then they begin to swing there, they begin to swing, and nothing can be done about it. this is one of the worst sides. that is the situation in which we are now , so i would understand, i wholeheartedly support the victory. and this is to say that there is no other alternative, then we don’t have it now, but i would, after all, we went through an element of this, a little bit of such an element of capping, but i would now have it this western elite, no matter if they are gay or such seki well, while she achieves her results, she generally achieves. and we , though not a genius, do not achieve. very even to say very slowly and not at all like ours public to our people. i would like to. therefore,

i think that in this sense we need to somehow look more realistically at things. i understand, me, this johnson is terribly annoying this one. well, yes, well, i understand his inner feeling. they seem to have achieved what they wanted. we are embroiled in a long war in a long one. we have huge material losses, it is clear that for us, and anyway, as they say, this is a feeling. well, all these sanctions still work. and further on, probably, they will work even harder. that is, there is a lot. here staggered. all dkb. it staggered. the results of these also staggered, and so that they seem to be like many. yes, they did not achieve what they wanted, that is, no matter how we collapsed, our armed forces still exist and still we are there on that territory, so to speak, therefore, in this sense, not everything has been achieved. but i think that there is no need to flatter yourself. it is necessary to make decisions last

you want, i can say about your topic yesterday. that's what i'm talking about dialogue. here you were arguing a lot of interesting things yesterday with sergey. this you know, here's what i'm going to say, here, first of all, look at what's going on. this is also our betrayal. at one time, that's who ours are, those whom we betrayed cuba north korea, which we still haven't lifted sanctions for some reason. here they are with us, you know, but we betrayed them at one time, betrayed cuba. i remember flying to cuba quite quickly, well, the cubans said directly, yes, you betrayed us. you will even if you did the same , but not immediately. you have no idea what we went through in 1991 when cut off everything cut off everything. he says yes, we were ready to pay. it's okay for you, you wanted to, well, at least not right away, they remember it. now here

it is coming back. well, what am i talking about, that's about ideology, what are we talking about all the time, that we have an ideology? no. well, we actually have an ideology, in essence, an ideology. this is a liberal bourgeois with a strong right bias. yes , conservative in some ways, it is close, i would say to the american republicans, that's why we love trump so much, it's not accidental they applauded when he came, so you understand, in general, and the product is. that's what i also heard and thought. look at our allies, all leftists, still now, who are our allies, our allies, all leftists communist china in north korea, it means that the communists are there, vietnam is sympathetic, it’s also clear, either this is india in general, the left side as a whole. she is in general this whole part, but she is leftist in her own these

indian nationalists on well, the party in power, which is the nationalists, is right, but everything, everything, the whole structure of india is, in principle, of course, this is not capitalism. it is very close to socialism, very close there, so to speak. i've been there quite often too. it's she's on the left, but that's interesting. here we are, as they say, with this right-wing ideology, now, so to speak, we are trying to create some kind of this one with absolutely left-wing countries. and this is generally possible, this is generally possible. in this situation, and in principle, it is clear that we are now ideologically much closer to our enemies, since they have the same. they have the same login. the difference is that it can be, there to say, american democrats, they are the same liberal bourgeoisie, only more left-wing there with a pull. there, so to speak, something like a couple

of quotes from marx, well, after all, what is the problem, therefore, this deep question that needs to be addressed, therefore, er, so to speak, ideology. do we have an ideology that is suitable for such a truly fundamentally titanic struggle in which we find ourselves hello, this is my kindergarten. i have many friends here and girlfriends. i am not 4 years old. i know she has autism. i heard that she used to not know how to make friends. she didn't speak at all. it could not be put alone even for a minute, and now everything is different, obviously it turns out to be a special program. she is learning to play with us. i'm on the cool diana my friend foundation, bare heart creates a free system of services for special children and their families. you can support

the work of the foundation. help us help more. huge this is not necessary elena yakovleva belarusian shepherd dog, he is not for sale.

see the contradictions between russia and the collective west as a special case within the imperialist contradictions in this. maybe there is something, but i don't like it. well, as if the system is similar, but i'm afraid the conclusion will not please me personally, because i still would like to, but it's impossible to win. the fathers of ideology should be, that means more.