well, in general, of course, it’s enticing things to consider the contradictions between russia and the collective west as a special case within the imperialist contradictions in this. perhaps there is something, but i don’t like it, but it’s like the system is similar, but i’m afraid the conclusion will not please me personally , because i would still like to, but it is impossible to win. the fathers of ideology. you have to be more toothy more aggressive more

cruel more bloody. in general, this is enough bloody bloody ideology for the most part. here's more here. he is how many iraqs stabbed and normal and no one there practically do not test. note. there were big protests about vietnam, how many years have passed there about the fact that non-merinos were killed there, in general, there were practically no protests hmm well, that means that if we play on the same ideological field, we will have to be we will have to be more violent more bloody and so on. it's not a fact that i'll like it, but that's okay, two sensations and a statement, but, firstly, uh, the absolute feeling that americans, not the british, not the anglo-saxon, namely the americans are now looking for a new ukraine in order to e-ignite the hmm system of the global economy in the

form in which it exists so guaranteed and safe for themselves to completely cut off. not only russia is not here, i argued a little, if anything, europe, probably, china will crack. yes , some other new ukraine is needed. better two. and then it will be a really very serious serious bid for the victory, seriously. leeches for the next 70 years of the american world, if they have it will turn out, i think they are very intense and high quality looking. the second is, well, this is, if you look carefully at all the decisions on recent sanctions that they are taking and on gas, this limit price and on oil. uh, here , i personally have this feeling of a feeling of a big political scam, inside, which is sewn up with

many, many, many different small geshevts for each particular vampire oil group. yes , it means overloading the natanker machine, which means scare the maximum price. well, very, of course, wonderful limit the limiting center. they thought it turns out that the maximum price will be 2,800 dollars. yes, at the same time, in the conditions that, in the conditions of gas supplies that exist today, who are these two thousand 800 dollars. it will get there really right american firms, such as intermediaries that they will hire to resell russian gas there and so on. therefore, this is the feeling that before our eyes is being formed by political methods more economically, so to speak, such an economic panama, the scam is obvious to me and you know such a statement or, as my friend

, doctor of technical sciences, said, a statement. he knew how right he just pissed off there, that means, his environment, but you understand, but today we are talking about europeans, and what they did here was not idiocy. here you understand, consistently, committed idiocy ceases to be idiocy, it becomes a system. they are not such idiots. to consistently act like idiots means they want us to think they're idiots, and so these are the decisions that we consider idiotic. well, actually, if you look at them in dynamics, including, but not yet cherry on the cake, but this is already one of such important intermediate results - the decision of the european parliament. yes , it is so to say, the meeting does not have. uh, it’s definitely a force, but nevertheless it exists, and

it can be further replicated by national passwords, and what does it lead to, they are consistently creating a legal framework for resolving two issues, the first is the complete confiscation of russian assets. and not only there it's already been decided with them, but here they live in the expectation that we will still collapse. and this prisoner, so to speak, he also lives in the expectation that we will collapse and the question will arise. who will own the assets that will remain here from the russian oligarchs in the russian oligarch, including those who, well, through various schemes they help the apu, there, and so on , writes that they are not russian oligarchs. they think they do . no. a

legal base is already being formed for a simple scheme, it was yours ours under confiscation and the second point. they form a legal system consistently in order to declare the entire russian political, and possibly business or possibly cultural elite that will not bow to this cia as those accomplices in war crimes. and this must be understood, this is not idiocy, this is consistent. lichiko doesn’t think that europe , right now, she, in principle, invested in that one, just the plan, and which existed in the united states , it was the paramount master plan was in the nineties, at least after the end of the cold war, there was not only the absence of russia and china brazil of european countries in general, the idea of ​​a world village, when countries could remain a state. and where to remain such

quasi-political associations, which did not play a big role. everything had to fit into the value chain with the financial center in the united states when such plans fail in the united states enter into ben 's plan, plan b - this is the strongest state most a strong state in the world, which rallies around itself a certain camp, this concept has always been followed by the republicans in a mild form. husband in rough form in such a tough trump who just positioned america should go back to that period of the forties fifties , as a result of which it became the main power of the free world. therefore, they have these two plans, and now europe simply fulfilled it by the european countries. having embarked on the path of integration, they themselves delegated their powers to their security is in the hands of the united states.

i don't want to talk about etcb. yes, because i immediately have some feelings, but in principle, they are justified. and when russia once knew how to build good alliances. such as line up, the united states yes, the americans, the europeans are military allies, and who has the nuclear key, who has the nuclear weapon, who has the full line of strategic forces, who has intelligence information, who has the early detection of nika missile launches the americans don’t even give this to the europeans in the hands of the csto. vtkb, you see, when the united states is in their interests. now it took the europeans to oppose their trading partner and main supplier of resources, the europeans also have only one side and nuclear weapons, the ability to detect long-range

reconnaissance and so on, only those are correct. then another, then the president of this country, as we remember the option charles de gaulem where are they sent? he resigns, and then another french president comes in, who again enters for the last time. i'm arguing with the postulate of who holds the nuclear key. no, that is, the nuclear key is not enough. i say he needs a lot more, which is not there. well, there france britain does not have enough they do not have a nuclear force to talk about them and charges. i apologize to them less than china, one chinese has a demonstrative nuclear one, they are nominal. in general, by and large, nuclear powers, but now, if you remember history, we always build alliances like this, we didn’t know how. we have always tried to expose some equal americans not to buy their allies. listen , they never confuse them. something about history. we have always been able to build alliances with whom

the soviet union built alliances to build alliances badly, he built. well hello, with all the country said. yes, it was such a subordinate feeling, of course, very tough right, but it was not different, that in america the union was just that the union, as allowed, fell apart, and therefore the union fell apart. and if they had not fallen apart, no one would have twitched anywhere without forgiveness, volodya, let's observe observe. so to speak, historical by historical, first fell apart to the end. we started to rot inside no, rotted. still, we know it fell apart. here it collapsed. yes, it collapsed because gorbachev ruined it, because gorbachev lived in hell. come on, we ruined it ourselves, as a result of the weakening of the united states of that married. that's even though when it was overvoltage, the so-called imperial tension of the united states, their internal structures were driving. and

now wait, wait, guarded this history is a cruel science, because it remembers something, that the tsarist empire or something, the union did not know how. and what kind of unions in the kingdom of the empire, which were petty in our interests in the caucasus, our unions were in asia, our unions worked perfectly, then they became part of us when the time came, which of our unions worked there, right? all of us once began to collect, of course we in general, as far as we could, we were in such a difficult position that if we did not know how to maneuver and make alliances, then the flatness of russia would be its colossal minus, because it is difficult to defend alliances there. we usually did when our troops entered there. that's when they became europe is not occupied, or what, the americans in a different way? wait for the american armed stand, trace followed by policy. that's even increases properly reduced to

37.000 after the post-cold war american now brought today's us you know what 's the matter for the american allies. the american allies are now fully complying with this line. here. even now, when the european parliament agrees with you about the winter, in principle, a legal framework is being created, because there are two countries that have legislation, and the state sponsoring terrorism is the united states and canada have never had such laws, the europeans have never had such laws . but now, indeed, at first some lithuania has already accepted it there. yes, because recognize them as nazi and states. we do n't give a damn about the laws they pass. sorry of course, but the assets of foreign countries are foreign citizens. there is a history of russia if we confiscate it rather harshly compensates for our possible lost. maybe if we are tough, well, 320 billion, approximately 20 billion. let

's fuck these pictures for now. at least no one is going to. we even have such and who said he was not going to no, legal connection. well, it's funny there is a base there is no base. base you will go, tomorrow i will have three letters for you and that's it, reading by the end of the day they think, all the time what kind of fuel, for example, a ukrainian tank is driving. not well , this fig brilliantly very interesting, right? you know this is what is called classic, so baldi, we are talking about the fact that there are laws that will confiscate everything, and what kind of fuel is good. and than , like the bird on the tree of the city, kiev, therefore, it is necessary to reconsider some. here, look, now the other day the federal district. uh, federal district court. colombia passed the law on demand. well there was a lawsuit from one ukrainian citizen who demanded from the russian state. more precisely, from the russian embassy to pay 7.2 million for

some village there, which was occupied by russian troops, he was denied this on this basis, because it violates such a principle, well, there is the law of sovereign immunity of the state. he acts to him he was refused on that, so that, well, basically, basically, if u change this legislation just a little bit, the united states will begin to confiscate here. everything literally looks like do we have them? how will we have them? now they are developing. it was removed in the same way, not confiscated to us, we also offered to conduct the same legislation. yes, a stiffer one always works symmetrically. if you don’t try, something to hunch ours, we will hunch them volodya, we are already pellets. well, wait, well, it's not comparable. i think that we need to

understand the present conditions. no, why do the sarmatians of poseidon need to use more harshly what we have not yet used against them along with a military operation imposing sanctions you understand usually sanctions against usually sanctions. yes, we talked about this for a very long time, but for some reason they are not found. now we have to impose sanctions against. well, to close the entire border with the baltic republics from the czech republic, which called us state states of terrorism. this means a break in all practical relations, one might say inclusion, of course this does not make the question. here's my big question. why is it great? just here eight years of honesty in ukraine no the fact is that i saw these very seriously that it concerns now it will concern our oil supplies. we supply this day, indeed this oil there with bulgaria then in the form of fuel and lubricants. it goes to the same ukraine and everyone knows

the enterprises that the burgas and petrochemical plant and i will not name who owns it 9% of the bulgarian gdp it supplies. and by the way, bulgaria was allowed to receive this oil. now there are restrictions, and by the end of next year, japan was allowed to do it. well, japan japan is sakhalin now they have their own sansami, the japanese, we fuck here, i suggested such a bastard. give us an hour to hammer the case against us with sanctions of status, which you don’t like the word status, that is, it turns out you like sanctions, now we can also against japan against the japanese. and we are also discussing money like we have here. let's switch to rubles

well. they took the state duma proves that we can do it. let's not sell anything to anyone now. we'll close everything now. we have we have three main ones of ours. they will take all the volume that we need so and so will have to be painted. they will select the entire volume that is needed, most likely. we'll have to anyway. that's not the answer. that is, it works. if we cut back, we offer to cut it ourselves, because they want to keep or here, pragmatism should work just right. here is the pragmatism of the work, it means by progression. let's deal with pragmatism. if you are now led to a ceiling that suits us, we would sell, i will say something else. we, unfortunately, have a different problem there, based on pragmatism. well there another problem is that here this ceiling will affect the bidding process with those who buy from us in this problem. i'll say so a couple of years

ago, the price of oil was 670 for happiness , let me remind you, what i'm talking about is that they introduce such a ceiling that we will explain, because he said, we will not sell, but he said, we will not sell . and i think we need a very simple approach. now i have a simple approach, but you were blunted against. we immediately approached him again, the germans, they will write everything, but i caught him offers yes, be afraid. ask colleagues have already mentioned today's resolution of the european parliament several times . uh, definitely legal. but i would like to touch on its content, because there are, of course, such unique passages, firstly. what does the resolution itself say? she

says we don't know what a state sponsor of terrorism is in the legal sense. we don't have such a concept, but this state is russia we feel on an emotional level means, how did they do it, how did they determine it? what factors are given in addition to all this water of suffering for ukraine and so on are key factors. first, russia, uh, missiles hit two poles. this is the fault of russia claims. this is a resolution. poland says it's not russia the us says it's not russia's european parliament. he says - this is russia second russia blew up the northern streams of the pipe. this is guilt. russia investigation results no, nothing established, and the european parliament says it's russia next. what it says is that russia is violating the world order, based on the rules there are no rules, no one has seen them. they are not accepted by anyone, they are not established anywhere, but their violation is an act of terrorism following russia criticizes liberal values.

this is an act of terrorism from the point of view of the european parliament, that is, christianity is terrorism. well, that's it, today's zero european politicians. be careful because this equates to either terrorism directly or further sponsorship of terrorism. i think it did not go without the direct participation of the jozel, because the following points indicate that the wagner group took the most direct part in the second chechen. the war and the russian georgian war of 2008, i have no idea, but this is one of the key points, why they need to be sanctioned, so i'm sure that here and wagner is possible and the profession of ursula fanerlian would have played a role uh in writing , that is, not participated to clarify it is necessary to see, but here they have already installed. exactly. i counted three times there

prigogine he macleod yes to think, which means what is proposed in the e, given in connection with doing. what measures should be proposed the first one says that it is necessary to isolate russia in all international organizations. how are they going to do this? here is a good example of obse what they did there, they drove or obse sanctions against, like someone from a member of the russian delegation. no, why weren't they allowed to do everything by yourself, because polish customs officials decided not to let members into the delegation, that is, the osce, as an international structure, as an international organization. sorry border guards. yes, it does not exist anymore, everything is no more, because now, it turns out, the polish border guard. he is higher than the osce, he decides which of the delegations to take part, who does not, and in precisely such small-town local small ways. they will try to isolate our country, the second thing that colleagues have already specified is the

confiscation of our assets. i think to this you just have to be ready, it will 100% happen. i already have a doubt. no. i think yes. why wait? means the following, so his assets are also the constitution as it seems next. uh, the next measure, which means it is proposed to ban and close the organizations of the russian diaspora in european countries. what is a diaspora is the citizens of these countries by their ethnic origin representing the peoples of our country. that is, it is in the rights of people only on the basis of ethnic origin and religious denomination more pure form of nazism absolutely and xenophobic fascism. it is proposed to do anything at the official level, uh, what else is said that in relation to the soviet union , it is necessary to deploy an active company to

investigate its crimes in every possible way, it means to promote the media, so we must be prepared that now there will be a new wave in this direction, and finally, what i would like to draw your attention to is that it is necessary to increase funding for those russians who are now in russia in order to to take them to protests against state power here. i think that the time has come , first of all, from what to give the status of an inogen, then they have fun with it. they give people there. actually agents. they put some music in their commercials. more precisely, it is better to categorically ban money over this something else. well, now , in my opinion, a bill is being considered. that it is impossible for an agent to engage in educational activities among minors. and why is he with us ? why is it possible? why among the university in universities? it is possible there in schools it is impossible, what kind of logic? oh, well, in general, people cannot be engaged in paragraphs to teach university now. right now, just consider everything that is not allowed in schools. here i am now reading the bill. he's just

talking she has no right. he will go to court. you say this, let him go to court, and the court will finally change the incomprehensible status of a foreign agent, but it’s clear that with treason to the motherland and, uh, in this regard, that they still put us in length, by the way, it’s interesting on a par with , that pmc wagner participated, which means that in the second part of the war it is said that the manifestations of aksom. this means that russia's sponsorship of terrorism is support. the assad regime, that is, russia supporting the only legitimately elected current legitimate president of the syrian republic, who fought against the armed opposition, as it is called in the west, that is, to call the terrorists the armed opposition. this is the same as calling robbers to armed customers of the store, for example, that is, absolutely obviously, this is terrorism, this is a crime on the part of russia, what i think here in this regard, you know, if we start

listing what they have done during this time, but we will have a tenth resolution of various organizations there. we certainly know that we are accused of violating territorial integrity. ukraine, they violated the territorial integrity of serbia absolutely illegally. rejected. why can't we move beyond the resolution? and he is that these countries are violators of the territorial integrity of serbia, they are us accused of supporting terrorist organizations in the middle east, they are their creators, they came up with terrorist organizations in the middle east more. why can’t we and we will get huge support from many middle eastern states if we promote a resolution that western countries are sponsors of terrorism because they support fundamentalists and radicals who seek to overthrow the constitutional government in these countries. well , finally, we know that everything that is happening in ukraine now is a consequence of 2014, and

we know that 2014 would not have happened without the overthrow of the constitutional order, which was organized by western countries, which do not hide this. we cannot declare this to us at the international level, not just within the framework of our communication disk at the level, at least a resolution by the general assembly let there be competing resolutions. i saw that the latest resolution regarding russia was transported there, it was not very big in fact. if you work, if you work with delegations, if you work absolutely, you can achieve in order for one of these resolutions to pass, i think andrey, he is actually sure that everything is lost, that everything does not make sense, and inside, of course, he is inclined to choose, sarmat or squatting. but not yet. it is to publicly admit literally a couple of words about foreign agents. uh, a lot of them especially organization. what are they doing now they are creating. uh, as if fictitious, well, in organizations that they themselves do not directly manage, in fact, this money that they do not receive. through a chain, they lead to the same place and these

organizations, not being foreign agents, lead exactly. the same girl, you think that this law on one agent should be rewritten. stop writing from american legislation, nothing is written off from american legislation on the thirtieth anniversary. with development, you know, very good legislation was in soviet times, probably, the period worked very effectively. collapse memory dissociative amnesia does not remember what happened to him and who he is the most vivid events of his life.

we received a lot of requests that we go out

more often, well, we try. in the west, they are trying to declare us a pariah country. let's take a look at this the story is a bit different. this is an attempt to hear recreate. through painting, the entire panorama of the great country is artistic fantasy. and nikolay i would like to talk about the potential

introduction of the so-called price ceiling, but not from a technical point of view, how much how where? what sanctions, and in terms of meaning, because there in my opinion. there are two very important points , the first point. uh, i think for the first time in the history of mankind. someone is trying to regulate trade relations that are not their own. oh well, like the usa with the soviet we are not selling you an alliance with russia and we are not buying anything from you, your rights, but to regulate the trade relations of the one with whom you are drilling with a third party, that is, the usa, the european union, the west is entirely going to set the price for the resources that we sell our oil to someone . they buy are not going to enter the barrga, the united states of great britain the european union on the fifth of december. well, they violate the embargo, but nevertheless they themselves will not. but this is an attempt to regulate the relations of others. it's very important if you agree with it.