i would like to talk about a potential introduction. the so-called price ceiling, but not in terms of technical there how much how where? what sanctions, and in terms of meaning, because there in my opinion. there are two very important points point one as well. i think for the first time in the history of mankind. someone is trying to regulate trade relations that are not their own. yes, as the united states with the soviet union with russia, we do not sell you and do not buy anything from you, your rights, but to regulate the trade relations of the one with whom you are fighting with a third party, that is, the united states, the european union, the west is entirely going to set the price for the resources that we sell our oil to someone, they are not going to buy, they introduced an embargo, the united states great britain the european union on december 5, well, they violate the embargo, but nevertheless they themselves will not. but this is an attempt to regulate the relations of others. it is very important. if you agree with this, so you began

to say, well, there is a comfortable ceiling. well, what are you, just agree with this, this is a noose that is worn around your neck. at first it's like a frog you will be created in parts. first. you agree that for the oceanic uncle determines this system gradually gradually. uh, determines the cost of what you produce. well, it seems that at first the price is so acceptable, but not immediately , they say it will be higher than the cost. you do not worry agreed with this further, but they will determine, to whom you can sell and to whom you do not lead, additional criteria, the third price will drop. and again, you are always a choice. you have already begun to boil in this compromising water, you have already lie down in this cauldron, and there is no way out of it, welded to the end, so the position we will not follow what you want, it is absolutely correct the only possibility. i'm not even a cauldron, then a noose tied around the neck, which then they will simply twist. this is the first meaning of the second meaning.

they want to quarrel us with the main buyers of our resources. after all, these restrictions apply to trade with india, china and other countries. and they tempt china india, they say, listen a. let's you buy from russia according to our rules. yes, it will still be profitable for you. we, so to speak, will install the ceiling, then the ceiling will begin to put pressure on the head. to you, comrades, the chinese are comrades of the indians. it will be beneficial. why do you, dear russian oil. let it be not very expensive russian oil. and you look, then you go to the show of russia, that's what arts is and there is already information that the chinese are now. the purchase of oil was suspended a little bit, and in this situation it is difficult for them, and it is difficult for us, so we are not even talking about the desire to strangle the economy. although it is, but we are in put this cauldron where they pour some water and light a fire

and quarrel us with those who support us in one form or another, the topic kindles, but you see, everything was leaked. hmm, everyone said that you would not sell, and once the new ones said that we would not sell. but now we see somehow a dog- all the time throws in these topics, of course, and also the third front. this one is the second one, or even the most important one. he is probably the first in the country, of course, they will do it. now a few words about strategy. well the west of the united states america, they raise the stakes all the time, they don't lower them. they're not going to focus on just one, the stakes are going up, we're talking about a referendum in four areas. the explosion of the northern streams, well, the european parliament is already clear. this is what we did. uh, based on some incomprehensible goals, but we are bad everything that bad happens. this we this does not require any more evidence. the united states and china are tempting to put pressure on trying to drag it into the conflict over

taiwan, putting pressure on iran how many 3 months have been there the real maidan continues and look how western politicians macron, support at the world cup, put pressure on the iranian national teams to somehow sing or not sing their anthem, that is, they create a picture for the western layman all the time. and in order for the western man in the street with this macron, he was going to call putin. i hope the film crew is already catching everyone to obey, but in order for the western layman to sympathize with this very pogromist, the killers who earlier killed the police on the street. there are several hundred people have already died, they are starting to shake the topic. or maybe it is iran that supplies the drones to russia , they don’t say anything about it, they have complete conviction, but it doesn’t even matter here whose martyrs or geraniums they are, it doesn’t matter at all. the united states is not going anywhere. they are not going to weaken, and they put pressure even on the arab

states. here, the cator concluded an agreement for 27 years of gas supply, well, under these conditions, the world cup can still be a good democratic one, but this is a disgrace of the same quick understanding of 27 years for the chinese concluded, of course, so we have to prepare for them to raise the stakes all the time. well, a few words about the strategy of europe, here everything is even more interesting, but it has begun. i think it's casting. so you said, we need two ukraines, there is a casting for european ukraine, but this tells us that ukraine has not coped with the task and cannot cope, so the czechoslovaks say, let's rearm, we will be a powerful army that will fight with russia the era of stability is over the germans , they say. wait, let's rearm, we will be the strongest army in europe we need the strongest army in europe the question arises nato has why germany has the strongest army in europe if the united states of america has financial requirements in the client? here are the poles,

they say we are already spending 5% of gdp on the army. and the higher the percentage, the closer the war. as a matter of fact, the dependencies are clear here, that is, they line up in such a casting and they speak in front of washington. let's invest in us. invest in us all this was before the second world war. a casting before the strategic missile forces well, who will finally choose the winner of the casting russian strategic missile forces our someone? i offer immediately simple options to suffer to suffer, if there was a 100% guarantee, then yes. here, i, too, about the same can be right away. well, to sum it up. yes, there were plans for sex, there really was such a first to weaken or simultaneously weaken the economy of europe to break off cooperation between germany as the main continental power and russia, but there was the main third, after all, the first point

in this, in this regard, to weaken russia of course. it's a plan. they haven't worked yet. and so he says that they have achieved all their goals. no, no, no, no main goal. they have not yet reached theirs, and therefore they are adding fuel to the fire of the conflict on the territory of ukraine. but here is the final part. i would like to focus the attention of the competent authorities on the fact that the cia is directly ready to buy. well, this means that our competent authorities have a lot of work to do, and it seems to me that our legislators should give all legal opportunities for our competent authorities to carry out their work clearly, efficiently and quickly. parliament nevertheless adopted a resolution that our side was declared a sponsor of terrorism. although no definition within europe of what it is.

no, of course, this is a document that allegedly does not oblige anyone to anything, but only calls on countries to, in fact, finally break off relations with russia , how much such a probability is, than this, can turn out for us. we will find out now, but also today at midnight, as you know, the security council upon urgent request. yes, there is no zelensky in general, this drug addict simply began to dictate his rules to the security council, he has already stopped even trying to play objectivity, because videos of performances in combined were always banned, but for this drug addict they always make some exceptions. we will discuss all this with the director of the press information department from russia, vladimir on zakharova from you to see, the more you understand that this is not easy, because this is the trip of sergey viktorovich lavrov and the whole team. said dreaming extraordinary, that is, this can be written as a spy novel, because the feeling that

serious people worked against our delegation is unknown. what goals and objectives were set. let's go in order. where do you propose to start? you start with the european parliament. i, you know, before commenting on this, and this can only be commented on very, uh, succinctly, as we have already done. and let me remind you that literally on the same days there was an amazing speech by the minister of foreign affairs of the federal republic of germany, anna lena berberg. she said an amazing thing. she gave to climate summit as a whole assessment of the international situation. you know that germany has been supporting the kiev regime in every possible way for many years. uh, for many years, germany sponsored internal coups , constitutional actions, and changed politicians in ukraine, let me remind you, a sovereign state at its discretion. and now e berlin is actively sponsoring the kiev regime in its extremist, sometimes

going beyond even tourism activities. they don't hide it. so the minister of foreign affairs of this state literally stated the next thing to look at is how the future of our planet will develop, and in those countries that are directly next to germany and in those countries that are hundreds of thousands of kilometers away, this is even not enough for us 40,000 km. stop humiliating people with your knowledge, you understand, you still need to take some kind of respite, otherwise the moon is from the earth. at a distance of four hundred thousand kilometers, apparently they do not teach in britain, this is not about english education. i didn't say right now, because she is like her friend. uh, leaf is also a

graduate of the british london school of economics . they prepared according to international law. what kind of states are hundreds of thousands of kilometers from germany, the whole world is now guessing, everyone just shuddered. the fact is that, as you know very well, we know from this school program the circumference of the earth, the circumference of the earth along the meridian and along the equator is approximately 40,000 km 40,000 km. that's all, you still need to know something about the level of the european parliament and the people who are delegated there if the german foreign minister he believes that there are some states that are hundreds of thousands of kilometers from the borders of germany and in the european parliament. forgive me, people get there, including using

populist technologies, but within the existing electoral systems. that is, there are not directly the stars of higher education. west there are different people, what are you talking about, they have no banal ideas. so you said that the term country of terrorism or sponsor of terrorism is not defined within the framework of the european union legislation, so whom is it care? well, if the earth has a circumference 10 times less than the one that the minister of foreign affairs of germany knows about what kind of legislation? you say a person was engaged in jumping on a trampoline and became the minister of foreign affairs, who sits in the european parliament, you understand the level of these people, and those people who had the courage for many years to speak using facts were declared by whom to be spies. uh,

crazy, well, remember that, yes, chatsky woe from the mind of a classic, genre, and in every possible way they were pressured, they were simply squeezed out and somehow they burned everything that is connected with dissent, but in principle europe unfortunately, this has happened more than once. it was in the middle of the 20th century when books were burned. you remember the authors were declared to be beyond good and evil, which did not serve this very political fascist nazi ideology. europe was there and before that the middle ages it was interesting from some points of view. but forgive me the people who tried to get the truth across, they were burned at the stake by jordan bruno well i hope your audience knows who this is how we have children. it is in schools that they burned him at the stake simply because he

spoke about his scientific discoveries. tried to draw attention to them. something has changed, of course not, what to our terminology to our legislation or globally to international law. these crazy wordings have nothing to do with it. now i’m not even talking about factology, but simply about law, as no one is interested at all now about the security council of the united nations , which are on demand, but the kiev regime. here should get together, right? and what, i want to say , they remembered where the security council is located in kiev, yes, that is, they began to tell zelensky that there is a certain institution where he, among other things, speaks online, which deals with international law. but all these 8 years. where they were, they did not know where the security council was located, they never had a desire. when

there was still such an opportunity to just fly there and tell or answer questions about how they do not comply, the very international law that they now refer to where they ran for help, and they ran for help to the structure that they ridiculed, saying both poroshenko and zelensky that they were not even going to implement the security council resolution, which was in support and included this very agreement, the minsk agreements, the minsk agreement, which was expressed they ran there. they, you, you, you mocked these international laws, you thought that you could do it. all of you simply tore up these agreements and threw them in the face of the international community, and now the right-wingers have remembered. no, that doesn't happen. that's not so happens now, and in the argument, apparently, they will

talk about the fact that there is no light, but there is tension with water. and who will tell this will tell the regime, which has been giving criminal orders now and throughout all these years to block and destroy civilian infrastructure. the one that struck, and let me remind you about this, was spoken by the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine kuleba directly on the crimean bridge. you remember he said it was their doing. remind me about power transmission lines, which they mined mined people who fully associate themselves with the kiev regime. and they never stopped them. only they were encouraged to tell water about water. now they don't have enough. and they asked themselves a question to the inhabitants of the crimea all these

years, as they have with water. and we asked that same un security council, by the way, saying, not only there and at the osce platform, and at all conferences and forms, we asked how it could be that in the 21st century, putting some next declaration of rights under the table person or something in support of it the international community is not even going to discuss these issues related to attacks on civilian infrastructure, mining in civilian infrastructure, and so on and so forth. well, what began already in january 22, it would probably also be nice to remember those who are now concerned about the problematic civil infrastructure, electricity, water, and so on. well, and more please tell me january, how the offensive is the most active, and the strikes on the territory of donbass from

the kiev regime. after all, they start. account since february, and february comes after january. and in january, we remember what happened and also to all those who will now start from the west, and he will shout either at the security council table or around the security council meeting room and talk about the topic. how bad, it turns out, how unusual that civilian infrastructure suffers even from military operations. i will remind you of two things. the first one, in general , would be nice to know what the kiev regime is talking about now. this entire infrastructure is connected with their armed forces and with replenishment everything that is used in the asset in hostilities, including in carrying out those operations that they proudly attribute to themselves

and which, of course, are extremist or terrorist acts and the second point to all those who are in the west, we will now discuss this. please tell me, did you figure out who donated the civilian infrastructure in the form of the nord stream one and two gas pipelines, did you figure out what it was, what it was undermining? you have dealt with this. so you need to go further or that you vladimir dol'fovich. tell me please, maybe they missed it, but then i missed it and i after all, no one was going to convene the security council, he from western countries had no desire to discuss what happened at the bottom of the baltic sea. how did it happen that including their project with their side on their territory in their area

of ​​​​responsibility for stuffed with all nato from satellites to ships and underwater equipment. suddenly it was blown up, that's all to the question of civilian infrastructure, but other questions arise, because you mentioned such an abbreviation osce, for the sake of now it has at least some meaning after the meanness that the polish authorities showed. i would still try to separate these things here, although they are already critical and dramatic. well, they're probably inextricably linked. there is, after all, the russophobic policy of warsaw for this part of the wing, which does not spend many years bilaterally everywhere, simply destroying their relations in relation to russia as a state in relation to russia as a people of our history, and so on does this on many, but the venues does. this is largely with the filing or with direct instructions from

washington. is there another osce, as such, that has arisen? as you remember, this is a very important point. it is very interesting. it did not arise as a union of like-minded people. this is a platform. how did she come about? well, i call it the watering area. you understand what is at stake when, understanding everything, the need for some kind of respite or truce give each other an opportunity. yes, to touch this life-giving water in the form of a negotiation process. it arose just like that, when two systems during the cold war during the cold war were aimed at destroying each other, such a dialogue format appeared, not as an organization, in any way . eh, such an already formed structure. no, not to go to the united nations at all . but what exactly is a negotiating platform in order to

confront. and since the cold war, so they and the warring parties could have had the opportunity to discuss a number of issues, the so-called negotiation tracks, which concerned and disarmament and humanitarian security. we will not now assess the need for the correctness of those events, but it was created precisely in order not to sound in unison, not to work out some kind of common note on the tuning fork, but in order to be able to people immediately by our points of view with a diametrically opposite to hear each other and more or less find connecting points, which we are told today since there is a country that has a different point of view. she has no right to use the site in se that you you are destroying yourself.

i remember the very essence of this structure, after all, for many years, but i don’t know the last 8 9 10 years. the ministry of foreign affairs of russia and all our representatives among the minister deputy minister, all those who supervise this area were talking about the same thing. let's finally turn the organization for security cooperation in europe, the osce, into a real organization. let's move it around. this negotiation format is not without some kind of institutional links, a real structure. let's adopt a charter. let's agree on real rules that everyone will equally respect and so on. they did everything to prevent this from happening. ok then. now they are finishing the last one. they say polish border guards. well , the leadership of the fighters could say, then we’re going to another country, the essence is that the leadership of the osce is not the polish chairmanship of the guys, if you can’t

make it not a place for the osce not to let russia in, and you don’t have a place, because you violate the basic principle. how much more can you call out your voice? uraza let's just announce them, the real topic is the nazis. let's still remember how we started well, if the minister of foreign affairs, the leader of the european, eu and nato structure of the country's germany, believes that states are located hundreds of thousands of kilometers, thousands of kilometers from her country, what will you tell them? tell me, you understand that they have, uh, the story begins this morning, everything that happened yesterday is of no importance. unless it's related to process. i'm afraid i won't be able to ask i am very worried about the question that we have not seen in indonesia. that's because, as i understand it, well, this

has never happened before. i mean the unofficial part of the point of view of the formation of the russian delegation for us. in general, we followed the scheme that we already had, that is, there was nothing unusual , but we understood that the informational political space of the world is charged and is being charged. you know how it starts stuffed with such subversive actions. this western propaganda, what will explode? this it was obvious. that is, you remember first you need to exclude russia from the top twenty did not work. well, it can’t work out, then you need to isolate russia , that is, it can’t be excluded. let's isolate her, then all kinds of speculation will go russia who will go? how will be presented and so on and so forth, again failed to take tra. a scheme that was already tested at the moment

when russia was represented not by the president, but by the foreign minister, but by the financial bloc of ministers. uh, finance, and so on. and uh, whole a number of experts. in this direction, again, it does not work. what to do? how can one find an opportunity to create a feeling of creating a feeling that we, as a country, are not participating there, to throw in a fake about the alleged fact that the head of the russian delegation, russian foreign minister sergeyevich lavrov, was hospitalized. what did they expect? well, you perfectly understand that in the course of, well, how many 7 minutes passed until eight, we veiled this not with words, but with a concrete video, on which sergei viktorovich lavrova listen. well, this is already beyond reason. speak principles of conversion. where did they even get this from? they don't think about it, because when will a representative of the russian delegation take

a mandatory patient test in a particular country? it will all be recorded and will be presented like i don't know hospitalization and so on and so forth. no need to think about what they are guided by in terms of analysis. they are guided by only one thing, but if you are only media, but also other types of provocation, but it 's always these people who pretend to be journalists, but at the same time they are real provocateurs. they should also be accredited verified to understand what happened. you know that when we, in cambodia, tried to find out at the venue of events who are these same kind of journalists who are running around screaming, uh, rushing in, trying to somehow know. e. well, that's just impossible, they don't ask questions. they are just being provocative. you understand that they began to hide their own, not to open them, but to hide,

that is, to hide them. that is, to this extent to such an extent, that is, it was an attempt at provocation trying to touch me so complex, history is a question. and there they are, well, of course, both the host country and our delegation were accepted by itself, therefore, in fact, nothing was implemented. the question is that you see all these attempts. you see that at any cost, they are ready for anything. it was eliminated from this or local people. now it is impossible even to understand who this business is, that when we tried to understand who these people are? who exactly those, as if the journalists who were trying to get to sergei, do you understand what a badge is? it is very interesting. this is what automatically identifies you, that is. and

by the way, on many badges or on many , in many instructions, er, that conference participants receive, it is written that your badge must always be turned upside down and your photo is reflected. and your status is in delegate member. uh to reporters and so on, and the barcode is the name and directly the country belonging and belonging to one or another structure, it is written that, like a car number, something like this, if people start hiding these badges and are afraid to show them, if they run away only because the organizer’s security contacts them with a demand to present a badge, which we are talking about, what we are talking about, that's all. this is not the first time this is the systematic work of those who are trying to disrupt our

part of the modern. technology, anything could happen, if they got sergey viktorovich , they could sprinkle something on the hand, eat, apply anything about that to the question that these are the same people who talk about some kind of high morality, which appeal to certain, but the norms of freedom of democracy, and so on and so forth. here is their world order based on their rules. here he is, he is based on the disgrace of permissiveness , disrespect, to any traditions, norms or laws. everything is possible everything is allowed. that's all. thank you maria vladimirovna now we will continue advertising after it in the new composition.