it is based on a specific dogma that it is necessary to attack europe head-on. and when the americans, for example, are trying to get certain prices for oil, and there the arabs say, no, there is much closer to russia, we will not do this, when they try to open europe, and the hungarians say, you know, no, we are much closer to the representation of russia. that's it real aggression. and this is the right approach, and to beat the dishes at home, believing that we will spoil something with this - well, well, for example, we will now say at home. here are the poles, yes, they said cartilage. so what's next? firstly, at home i do not propose to beat the dishes; they beat them before me in europe. we are not allowed there. and that's why we act, because we act competently. we do not enter directly through russia. you enter through the arab world. we are entering through china we are entering through latin south america we are entering through india and

therefore, whether it wants europe or not, but having closed it overnight, it suddenly screams, the most popular rt satellite cannot do anything all the time passes. i'm ready to give. much for your right to say what what do you think disagrees with you and let and let the end see everything. yes? yes i saw. uh, like an x-ray. what bad jokes. fourth revenge. i know it. then finally give. let's finish finish we don't lead. we are quite aggressive, as a policy, and they talk about it here many times. and the last thing. well, we must finally proclaim some clear goals that we want to drown with

ukraine, we need to clearly state. what is deno? to finish for a few hours is very simple. it is the liquidation of the current state with all its top, especially since ahead, apparently, judging by the eyes. uh, the german politicians of this, uh, olaha, scholz, first of all, the denocification of germany at least. and we keep talking about how we will save the ukrainian state. we are still repeating this in a brotherly way. uh such a scatter that im saying a lot has happened today about all the ad time limits.

what is fedor dobronravov post small claws are medium, and ears are huge. this is not necessary elena yakovleva belarusian eared shepherd dog, he does not for sale this woman is our entire arboretum. can close like this terrible puppy on your quiet life of the moon

i'll start with an anecdote in one of the toy countries of the marital time in no way can have children. yes , they don’t go, they go to the doctors, they come to the tenth such a story. do you understand? what i'm talking about, but i have this problematic. now, as an anecdote , he gave an example of such a household that we are for

internal use, and so we understand why this is bad? why these values ​​cannot be promoted, and what does it affect, but i would suggest look a little wider from a political point of view. why, in principle, the entire western world is using this entire lgbt theme against us, well, colleagues have already said that there are indeed 34 countries, and same-sex marriages are allowed, and for reference, i noticed that there is not a single country where islam is the leading religion . and orthodoxy and this is probably no coincidence. moreover, i believe that we are now adopting this law. we will get a lot of friends. i have my life in general, principle, always taught look for friends among enemies or among those who have not yet made up their minds. here is an example of america given, that is, or given that the past recruit? well, you know,

attract. well, let's take such a well-known movement in america as a kuen. these are the same guys who just ran to the senate, and to the congress the leader of this uncle, he has such horns on his head, there was some kind of helmet where he ran around the table, there are tens of millions of people like that, here they are right in their conspiracy networks believe that the democratic party in america is a bunch of reptilian homos. i think that's how they write. i think these are the guys. there in america, at least they will be in the same boat with us and understand. i'm not talking about the fact that we really are the islamic world, probably in a different way. well, it will look at us even more amicably. here, looking at the world cup. listen, well, every 4 years i'm here accustomed to the fact that once every 4 years the world cup and all the news programs headlines, everyone talks about football or about football no one

recalls the sensation that argentina lost to saudi arabia yesterday, germany lost to japan , everything, especially in the west, the media are discussing this disgusting thing, which, in fact, is shown by representatives of the western world and their minister well, idiocy of the highest degree. now about blink, some time ago blinkin in september, in my opinion, held a round table where he discussed various issues. including the russia of the future, and so from the russian side who you are, they thought there was someone tolokonnikov. the main thing in a well-known rock band, which, by the way, is recognized and you don’t want to ask your legs who, damn it, is serious, that is, you invite him from this lesbian to your place in the state, where you are seriously discussing the future of russia. that this is the whole lgbt story. in our country, it was such a weak link, when we could not provide appropriate support, like many other

areas of our activity inside the country from an informational point of view, and promoting these values, they also had the tasks of a certain political pressure, that is, from these people who presented. as lgbt core values. they. naturally, they were perceived by our society as extremely negative, and they began to make politicians out of them and financed them. i'm something on the street friends. we didn't see a single uh, gay, or lesbian standing and begging. all of them feel great, and we see how a colleague of us also said they are circulating huge circulations. uh, it means that there are books of journals corresponding there, and at the same time we show some kind of terminological tolerance from a different point of view. i will say the same applies to another important issue. i believe that we have adopted this law. this is such a first swallow. there is one big problem here. i

believe on which we do not pay attention to domestic violence. does it exist in our country? yes , we do. why don't we talk about this a lot, because even 10 years ago this whole topic was also saddled by so-called foreign agents, that is, people under foreign influence. that is, through this topic, where they promoted this fight against domestic violence, they received certain authority in social networks in society in society, then they participated in election campaigns and were elected by municipal assemblies to legislative assemblies. some almost went to the state duma and now this topic is so tactful that they are simply afraid to approach it, because if you suddenly start talking about domestic violence. it’s not immediately clear to you what will turn you need to do it, seriously, or about what we said to do it right, than seriously. well, the topics where we are informational, the ones we rent violence from him, in what for example, i have always been against it for one simple

reason, there is violence, or are we going to share domestic violence, office violence, school violence, street violence, neighborhood violence is not the point of what was proposed in the state duma. absolutely. i know what was offered was terribly offered. that is, just a principle , an option was proposed according to which any father could be sent to prison. no. quite right. you are talking, but you are saying, only the bill that you have read is actually a problematic. in my opinion, quite serious to her. she is so serious, but a problem, because in the place where this happens, a person should be protected, depending on where he is at the moment. here you are just today, just what you say subject or object. this is the very propaganda that domestic violence does not exist in our country, but i think it's easier, here there is officer crime. the officer's here to say and yours must say that you are mocking. that is, now you just take the whole class terminology, vladimir, because here you are, for example, talking about duma violence, there are

deputies of the state duma undressing over their assistants. listen, you're generalizing now. but i'm not saying, that is, but that is, it means that i'm generally there, i'm not at all, well, well, if they punched me in the face in the apartment, this is domestic violence. and if you get punched in the face on the street, it's not violence on the stairs. we are not talking in general. i'm talking about the beginning. i say, but some parts of the information in our society that are not customary to speak, no against violence, as such, i don't care where it happens. yes, i am also against russia. you know what's the matter. i'm sorry to interfere. i was going to talk about it, maybe then they will cut me for this, what's the matter. but this is the whole story, well, with lgbt and many other stories. i'll prove it logically, than you need only one for hacking tradi. of course, i will show this in history, and now here it is being approved by a tool for hacking a traditional family from the institute. we are talking about completely different things, wait, i'm not talking about

traditional values. that's what i'm telling you about, that well, you don't hear, yes, you let me finish. i did not propose to discuss now. i just offer this terminus separately. here it is used. i agree with you, what you say is use political. and what you are talking about, that somewhere they will share, where not. this also agrees with you. now let's come to the distortion of our historical values ​​as an example, which is generally especially closer to me about, and what we are also not doing yet is a movie, which we now have at the box office or went before such a film, known for half a year, was at the box office called winning a peony. in general, both the americans and the british play as a super-artist. i read the description of this film, it tells about the fate of penkovsky, pinkovsky, as we know, is the most famous traitor, shot in the

sixties, the only one who worked at the same time on the mi-6 for the cia who, when meeting with his people. e in london, great britain, to satisfy his ambitions, he first wore a uniform an english colonel, then an american one was photographed and successfully worked for glinsky, one of the most successful champions. and here is the film being shown. raised a huge amount of money on all our screens. i have looked at this movie. we already fought, because i myself had a project of traitors, where penkovsky i tell i read it. interrogations. i got acquainted with archival materials, how he was detained, how he participated. in all these activities. there appears a man who, it turns out, decided and e to give russia in order to allegedly inform the mines of our missiles located in cuba and thereby save the world from a nuclear catastrophe, and moreover, the film is really very colorful, it perfectly

shows the motivation of this person. and coming out of this film. well, i don't know this story. you will sincerely believe in it when i sent there, the appropriate requests to the appropriate wenamstvo. listen, well, how are such films, in general, as a matter of fact, here you pass not from the point of view, but from the judge, but from the point of view of the concept the answer was very simple. we don't check movies when we finish our rental licenses. this is also part of our loss in the information war, which our opponents immediately use this vacuum, so i believe that today’s bill, which was adopted, is significant not only because we have already approved our values ​​​​by the law that we have shown to the whole world that we are against the political imposition that we observe from the west and where is the line between forbidden films of censorship. perfectly correct question. i wanted to just continue to really

get charges. in censorship. this is a really difficult line, but i think we need to work on it. it's just that he's very good with experts, we're just talking about the prohibition of propaganda. no no. i now well, as for the film, which is, by the way, well, there is nothing surprising in this. the fact is that the image of a spy who saved the world. it 's a geological cliché, which is behind the participation in penkovsky, which has been west for many years. uh, tried to promote it was called, by the way, speaking a bestseller, written in memory of the perpetrator deryabin and an american professor, and the history of piyakovsky. very unambiguously certain. i agree that, probably, a film glorifying traitors and historically inconsistent with realities, probably, should not be released on our screens, but the struggle should not be waged through a ban. no. no, because i have something else to say. at tarantino, hitler was killed in paris in the forty-

fourth year of quarantine, and at tarantino. if you are talking about him, this is a kind of phantasmogoria film, there this is not a historical context. who will determine this, you know, we are now it seems to me, we are now talking a little different things. so, when we are talking to you about lgbt and other gb rules , it is important here that we did not just show them. no, not in what they were shown is important in what we have clearly defined for ourselves. i didn't say a probably very important thing. it sounded like something to us. i want to focus on this again. the fact is that today russia has objectively become a citadel for the protection of traditional values, and not only in terms of sexual relations in many others. social networks in matters of religion, in matters of conscience, in matters of human relations, in the long run, in matters of good and evil, and this attracts people from various countries to us, and we continue to

move this story with lgbt people and about dmitry with consent. this is what through this is an attempt to blow up our code and not by chance let's say books that outrage a huge number of people, their sharp surge has occurred precisely in the last few years. as for the propaganda and glorification of spies to the very best. on my look through. uh, dealing with that is a different quality of films. and, by the way, in the west there is a considerable spy bridge, a wonderful film for prohibitions. this is what the prohibition of minecraft can print vitalovich. yes, yes, they came home tragically, in short, i can believe that the state believes these economies will come to you. yes, question question. set this too terminal habit of the word censorship, like something like that. here, what is right here is terrible and the end of everything is heard, the question is not in the word, but simply the practices that are behind it

carried out, how complex it is selective, how qualified, how legally elaborated, and so on. here is the word censorship to be afraid of, there is no need to be afraid of the implementation that stands behind it and think about it, of course, but this is me in the margins, since it is already accepted here. vitaly comrade started, then i immediately, uh, i’ll say correcting, so to speak, with my personal view. viktorovich first. well, that's probably right. yes, i support the adoption of the law. here it is, great. and well done. here, i will say this. i'm here all vladimirovich lenin remembered who loved to talk. that's what i mind is nothing he liked to say. so yesterday was early. tomorrow will be late winter. let's take the text close today. yes, why am i? well, now you have accepted, do you understand what's the matter? it’s not in vain that i defend very hard and often argue. sometimes we swear very strongly, well, the concept of democracy as a key for our country. and here you can see it very well. all because

if 5 years ago, here are two deputies or even 400 deputies. here is a draft law 5-7 years ago. well, people can imagine what would happen in our series. yes, you said it yourself in the bath. and i say, yes, people, as if heard. eh, look here. yes, i can tell you that these five seven years are critical. that's done for most of our society. well, in this sense, the people are widely understood, obviously, the danger that is opposed to e. the adoption of this law is obvious, a lot of words are not needed to prove it now. this is understood and accepted. yes, and it is very important that we, in principle, in many ways, they acted so yes, formalizing the

general social understanding that has matured by law. yes, by that time. this is a very important principle, and the more and better and more often we manage to observe, the better it is , again, remarque now. here vladimir all the time she puts on the fact that you should discuss the word ideology and correctly. that's because it must be discussed all the time, because there is still a great danger. well, make the ideology itself an idol. here it is or something else. well, today it was said that western ideology through lgbt is in in general, it’s correct, but everything is much more complicated, it’s not by chance that we came to this discussion now about censorship and how to regulate, look. you see, i believe that totally i am the ideology of the world exist. in general, it is the same for almost all societies and, by the way, you know. to my great regret, i don’t know, i

can’t study, for example, the society of north korea , probably, it’s not like that there. and i’m very bad. maybe, and maybe there is. by the way, i'm happy to go there. yes, never just wondering what at once i say that when i said the world is clear with exceptions or there, i'm not ready to be responsible for a large number of countries in africa. for example, i don't know either, but this is a society, but this is an ideology of consumption. it has become total universal, by the way, without illusions. nicholas was refuted. they won't refute me. we can bet she is the leading one in china, of course, no one is stylistic. she is the leader in china, well , just like in the soviet union with khrushchev, she was the leader as well as back, alternatively about at the same time, khrushchev dragged her from the west here, she became the leader and she still remains like this all over the globe. real genuine and so on,

she has a well a hyper-device like a secular faith but we had a secular faith in communism they have a secular faith in democracy. here, and there are grounding conductors that should raise the top, and there are grounding conductors, well, the standard of living and the volume of consumption, which is measured economic, exclusively economic more. he doesn't measure anything. well, by the way, except for our failure nomenclature of the party, which in general, this was the main reason, of course, the collapse of the soviet union but hacking. he passed from society and society through such a simple thing as consumption, his level of development is very simple, he went through it right , by the way, the party there is somewhat, in the end it was even admitted. well, that's why he said about it. well, i'm sorry, we can't provide you with the required consumption level. we are going. it 's just a growing need, but it's very,

very important. by the way, freedom. yes it is too such under democracy and the second booster freedom and why the wife is expressed, as in what in volume of consumption? and for the soviet union, it was compared directly. well, how much are you free. how free am i? yes, we are not free, that they freely consume sausages or the amount of something else? what am i missing? and all my life i have been missing something, as i swore in the soviet song. all this is very important. the problem is that the level of consumption. oh well, just consumption then fit the availability of information. availability travel for sure. i am for the audience that, of course we are, of course, only about sausage. of course, of course not. well, the whole thing, as it were, is a whole way of life in which well, here we can say that entertainment is the consumption of entertainment. it's the same

consumption. yes many even argued that entertainment is more important than sausage, for example, well , let's see now, now it will be very interesting now and now. well, look what happened. sorry for going so far. well, then it will be clear where all these emerged far now it's fast. look how interesting it is, but the level of consumption in the main competing civilizations has leveled off, it has leveled off very much , and moreover, there is another such situation that it is impossible to increase it competitively in the west. it is understood that now they will generally have a subsidence. how about demonstrating? this is all a new degree of freedom. this is a new consumption. you will require a new degree. freedom, mind you in qatar, that's what i explained philosophical material dashed off and that's it. this is very understandably. but they are not free these there.

united emirates nearby all this world they are not free. and we are free, you see, we can afford everything . we want a relocation. we want everything at home with anyone. everything is possible with us and we are on the side of progress, this is progress, it also allows a person to be more free. try to argue with this thesis. he is also a powerful ideological one. well, progress allows, well, science can't help but worry. that's how it was 30 years ago, and now it's easy. thanks science. by the way, well, maybe now there are difficulties, well, in general , science, it will provide us with a rock of abundance, believe in science, everything, because for the next steps are just about. tomorrow, in principle, will be what we saw in communism to each according to his needs. there, too, how interesting the communist slogan. the main thing in it to everyone and every person understood.

that such a time will come, that's all i want i will have. well, they promised to satisfy all my needs , in principle, all this management goes through this is this movement to the maximum full satisfaction of the total need, what you just do not read.

i understand. maybe he's shaking to find a real friend. i know the notion i share is celebrating 10 days of this season there. at 11:00 maybe, only he is great-grandfather. i thought of everything reboot a few words, novice 2 recall everything i start countdown three two one.

a little bit

the last thing i wanted to say is that everything is needed only for one to manage your society. they have a different story on how it's done, but it's the most important thing to manage and the second thing to hack. other sanctioning states. it's a can opener, it's just like an idea, but inside it is the idea of ​​tolerance for domestic violence. i'm sorry that i misunderstood you, but this is precisely the opener , this very idea of ​​a special type of violence, some kind that we cannot stand at all, we cannot stand the traditional state through the wider circle that i wrote.