the last thing i wanted to say is that all this is needed only for one to manage your society. they have a separate story on how it is done, but this is the most important thing to manage and the second to hack into other sanctions states. it's probably a can opener, a can opener as well as an idea, but inside this idea-tolerance there is domestic violence. i'm sorry that i misunderstood you. yes , but this is precisely the opener, this very idea of ​​​​a special, type of violence, special- this is some kind of special that you cannot stand at all. and that it's you all of a sudden it's all the rest, apparently, violence, as they say volodya you can endure, but this friend. here you now did not begin to endure the answer, because it is necessary to destroy the institution of the family, the institution of family power. then the traditional institution of the state will not be destroyed through a wider one. here is the circle i wrote. and the traditional society, and that's it, it's not

an ideology, it's a toolkit, because the ideology is only one of those who drive them. they have an ideology of knowledge because the ideology knowledge. why it is with them it is that we need a world that we can plunder otherwise. no, there is no point in our existence. and those who do it know. that's all the rest in relation to this knowledge tools. and this is the real ideology. this is the knowledge that they need the world, and they must do everything to be able to plunder it entirely from it. what should be an alternative ideology commensurate on this? this is a good question and a very important question. i have versions, but you can probably talk about them separately and separately dmitry well, i’m not strong in the police department, but i’m still interested in this deffake mm with

thick scholz somehow, as you remember, in that film he says, oh, the gardener looks like a dead man so, i’m thinking all the time, and maybe, really, how not to be afraid and stage, so to speak, william of our shakespeare and see at what point in e. hmm, the german bundesberger in the form of his tv. this will understand that this is not this, but this is something else in general on the current generation, such with the level of fakes hmm, so i'm talking about that, with the current generation of these consumers of sensations through the picture. maybe she is on some, that is, it is some kind of thin layer. i think after a while they will understand that they are dealing with something that is not the same, but most of the in general , consumers have a feeling. yes, information can be consumed correctly without filtering. if you

have a certain basic level of knowledge, at least in your field, then in general, we can twist the barrel organ for quite a long time, moreover? it's not only we can twist this barrel organ. this can be turned by any elite group, which, well, what is called, will seize control over the communication channels, in fact, if we take seriously what we saw, and this is the first approach to the projectile of virtualization of power, but actually. this is about what they wrote, which means significant western sociologists, by the way, very often. many of them were hmm nee, what is called in their first life. they were trotsky. this is trotsky's alternative to management. well, the box office is the same, well, classical. yes, this is what he said about the management of society through the cascading of narratives. well, please. in general, what we saw is interesting, and it's creepy, because the

one who has this technology in his hands and the possibility of broadcasting in a society where social institutions have been destroyed in the zone of real interaction. maybe with these ideal consumers, who have already been proven what to consume, what is the main thing in consumption is the consumption of sensations. and these mean, let them fuckers with their golden rollers, they go further than this, in general, you can do whatever you want with them, the game, because they can be up to the gum from the panties. and now yes to me on tuesdays of a seminar in a magistracy. well, such an international group in english, i asked them a question. did you notice that the fifa world cup started about 3 days earlier than it actually started, because, well, in the information flow they say, well, of course, we discuss the agenda there. yes, there and so on is an agreement. yes? i

say, well, when it started then then and there there truth is the only thing i have to tell my son to put. there are, uh, two representatives of the people 's republic of china, so they say, well, then they are like that, guys, they are very literate, they study well. i say, well, what do you think, what is it connected with, and they have just like that, so ours still thought. well, ours also came to this conclusion. hmm they say, and this is because it was necessary to beat the success of the people's republic of china on and personally c-mp not on g2 20 and nothing but the idea of ​​kicking cats, yes, and to score the agenda. not found at hand and began to score. this is very interesting, but these are things of the same order with the virtual mr. schultz. you ca n't do anything in real life, you can't

do much with the same sisimpin in real politics. why because now is the time of the strong . you must win to be considered, you must achieve practical success. can't you keep retreating? yes and here we sit showed them how he went out without retreating. and how did he manage those meetings? and you have to win at the expense of virtual technologies, but there is one small nuance that, for example, worries me a lot. and i think that this nuance will play a very cruel joke on our western friends. well, good, but they shat the qataris as best they could. they generally shit on the middle east. yes, they spoiled the middle east in the middle east by designating lgbt plus there lgbt q plus there and so on as their flagship ideology is not democracy. yes, not

the idea of ​​human rights, they chose this ideology, which in reality is not nationalism. there you could choose them, but they chose. this is one of the most vulnerable in terms of global universality in terms of acceptance in traditional societies from the point of view of political processes. so they spoiled the middle east in the middle east, having inside their countries of the middle east and great britain and germany and france and any of the european countries that swagger over the qatari and in general over these middle eastern guys, painting themselves inside themselves has constantly the daily growing middle east both in the social sphere and in the cultural sphere and democracy democratic and politically. where did the prime minister of great britain come from, by the way.

will the next one be possible? firstly, they already had major muslim politicians, but i will tell you that the next prime minister of great britain will never be hindu, never british. most likely, he will be a muslim. and it will be right. so, they are thereby, having won in the contest all her minute of this demonstration pictures why not? everything was painted very simply. but they can’t say, they need to show a picture of the modern world - this is, first of all, a picture of sensation, they begin to lose strategically. they begin to lose in the long run, and here, of course, the question is, where are we on this holiday, life is still nowhere, but we must be somewhere and we must not make those mistakes by choosing it as an ideological one. well, what is called shilo, we really want to in one place, to shove shilo to the west, really. so, maybe

think about it and don't poke it right now. yes, choose a certain shiloh to hold back like this, but think about the medium-term long-term perspective of those ideologies that these ideological diversity options that we could offer, really. uh, no matter how much we joke, but the theme of lgbt plus and taiwan are very closely related. and it seems to me that you are not without interest in ours, but for listeners and viewers, this is all. listen, namely in the context of the adopted law and what, respectively, what are the consequences of this taiwan is a country where lgbt plus the agenda thrives. it is the first country in asia to host a legal progressive party under a democratic, non-ruling party. taiwan means same-sex marriage. the first was allowed in the country, and the largest events dedicated to this agenda are being held there. there, the last match is 130,000 people , and what i tend to believe is the number one country

in terms of the smallest birth rate in the world, that is, the dipopulation on the face of the connection is direct lgbt plus the agenda and the dipolation of taiwan is the second largest fertility from the end. this is south korea's culture. everything else means the feminine of a man and so forth. that is real. we do not pay attention to the end of the world here, we look at europe for the majority of us there. i have confidence in our viewers of this issue. some kind of western ideology and so on, that is, the fight against traditional values, politically often a question. but this is a question that directly concerns demography, that is, the taiwanese are being harassed by this lgbt plus the agenda, and there is this agenda. she goes it the twin brothers of the party with the us democratic party in fact. affairs was established by the democratic progressive party. taiwan is the democratic party of the united states and the first minister of digitalization - in general, he calls himself a postendrum. well, that is, and taiwan - i pay little attention to the east asia society

. their processes are even worse and even more neglected, and i think that it sounded here, a such a position that russia is the only country that protects traditional values, and in such a way we defended ourselves the only such nonsense. we have such a struggle with the protection of traditional values ​​in europe , but i think that this is a very erroneous position. even look at the katyr. yes, the fact that the muslim countries were not afraid, by the way, saying, here i am, you all think, here we think that this is some kind of such. this is a given in itself that the arabs are defending their traditional agenda, but they could succumb to international pressure; they don’t buy gas there, they sell it to europe, and so on. could mean what is called on the youth to go down with this agenda. yes, do not knit anyone there. well, even with them there with these flags, they would have waved and that's it, no steel. and fight it. yes, that is, there are other countries that support this traditional agenda. and what is most interesting is why students are watching this world

cup, because on the same days qatar signed a historic gas deal for 2 years, that is, for 27 years it will supply gas to its wife, china not to europe when we remember the parliamentarian from europe traveled demanded so that they have a gas supply and so further. that is the correct position. maybe this is a state to get rid of the false thesis that we are the only country that, let's say , is promoting the traditional trip, because with xingping, it also began. uh, they began to recall the heroic past of the struggle for the liberation of the country's independence, and purely heroes there, respectively, the corresponding films at the level of the propaganda department of the central committee were prohibited from appearing effeminate men on television. that is, in fact, this is what it is. the same struggle this lgbt agenda, that is, because everyone understands it is coming. eh, full try. arrange the west . here the genocide is slow culturally through depopulation and so on. that is, this is a

false thesis that we are the only country that we need behind you, not only through international organizations or through the line. mida to build the alliance union and it's time to conduct full-fledged certain actions at the level of connection with the same actors and players who traditionally lead this agenda there in china in chinese culture there is some traditional attitude of race, but let's just say absolutely. no, time like christianity or islam or judaism is changing this. yes? it is absolutely true that no one particularly stigmatizes this agenda. no one actively fights with her in this, of course, a minus, but firstly, the relationship of psychiatry is about chinese. she did not remove homosexuality from the a list of mental illnesses. this is soviet psychiatry. still. it exists no one will fight. with this actively open, but everyone understands that the family is the union of a man and a woman who are created for the birth of children. and this is an indispensable

value for any traditional society and chinese, including the problem of demography. there , too, have already been identified. that is, many demographers. they say that last year was already the first year when the depopulation of the chinese population began. this is strange. sounds like this. uh, it means in this place, but nevertheless, the chinese really began to gradually decline and also do not want to give birth, and so on and so forth, but what are we talking about goes, that it is necessary to develop a unified position in relation to the west. which leads like this ideological offensive on all fronts. absolutely right reveals through this and what is taiwan taiwan is anti china this is a showcase through which the west shows the majority of the chinese. how can you live wonderfully, how will you have chips? how are you? high technologies, we will all go to the west, that is, the chinese are also looking at taiwan, at such the baltic states or ukraine, and now they are trying to read some code from it, how to live, that is, this is an attempt to open. china is also present through taiwan in a certain way, or through south korea or hong kong yes , of recent times, that is, such communication is at

the level, but there are no subjects of this traditional ideology. although in china there are indeed. if separate, then tours in the central committee. so, uh, the department is a special committee for the direction of building a spiritual civilization, no one is to build any with it either. and let's say so certain specific circuits of communication. there is no communication along this line. that is, it goes. basically something. here is the statehood between the state or there inter-parliamentary, it also exists, but it is not enough. work, that is, this movement, it would be very useful. yes, so that this continues and that we form a united front against, respectively, the same, but ideological structures in the west, because this is what we are talking about. we are not alone in this fight. these are slaves. these are the chinese. these are indians in many ways, but there is no talk about it. agree. it's necessary here. well, by the way, it should be noted that it sounded. putin, when he spoke. he talked about the unification, of course, but the traditional directions are good. uh, the russian world is

like shilov in the bushes. how can you title entire essays on this topic. uh, indeed, russia is by no means alone in upholding, uh, traditional values ​​in upholding traditional culture and, uh, the ideals of the value of traditional society, remember when the law on the legalization of sadomitic marriages was passed in paris. let's always call by their proper names. uh, hundreds of thousands of french came out with posters protesting against this bill, many putin help, and there were whole pickets in front of the russian embassy with requests from russia to somehow intensify its policy precisely in defense of traditional values . it was, in my opinion, 2007, then the whole city was decorated with graffiti with obscene expressions against sodomites, including, uh, a portrait of the profile of the russian president and such a story is a parable of the expulsion of sodomites in fact. yes, how to say the symbol wow as a katant uh, and there is such

the parable was once the first first, this given sabbat in belgrade was held there by a small group of consolidatedites, mainly from europe, who arrived, they were guarded by a police cordon 2-3 times greater than the number of participants in the demonstration themselves. here is an elderly belgorod turns to the policeman says. well, why are you ashamed that you are standing here, he tells him, understand somewhere if i leave here. i am only from work and i will not have anything to buy bread. listen, let's go, i'll buy you bread in the store, but just don't get out of here. disgrace, but this leitmotif is. here, indeed, it unites the traditional society in russia and in other countries, and we must pay attention. with what simply satanic, uh, hatred and stubbornness, and stubbornness in sin is satanism, no person can be completely without sin, but if he begins to consciously persist in this sin, then this is e pure satanism with what stubbornness, but representatives of

this e western european already, and fading civilization are clinging precisely to this agenda my 2017. e arrives at the sochi residence of our president. uh, frau chancellor angela merkel, what was the main issue for her on the agenda, not economic cooperation, not some kind of cultural ties, she asked god for the persecution of the chechen people. well, it's easy to imagine, firstly, it's both funny and scary at the same time, but it's not customary to do this in north caucasian societies. well, how did she count 12 concentration camps for representatives of these non-traditional relationships, and after all, grandma svyato believed that she was doing the right thing pursues the western european agenda. this is not counting the dead. yes, yes, and for sure, these tortures were also there in roles, mein-ham were forced to read and drink blood and the germans fought. here, respectively , then in these narratives. they create so much and

that they themselves begin to believe in these, as in these fairy tales. and that one, that provocation in the frame. and this is true. you can't call it anything other than a provocation. it's actually about the same as caricatures of the prophets, which are in france in denmark in other countries. uh, tried, thereby uh to excite, including the islamic community in europe, the only thing it doesn’t seem to me is that it’s completely unclear what purpose? should. eh, these provocateurs, indeed. they want to unleash an inter-religious civilizational war in europe itself in order to finally sink it. e europe how e civilizational as economic single space? ah, because there is no logic to explain it. that's uh hmm that one, freedom's narrative is forbidden to be banned. uh, under what slogan were the demonstrators in paris at sixty the eighth sixty-ninth year, but this is already here, in my opinion, does not carry a logical explanation. eh, there is already something behind this, probably

transcendental. something is already in some spiritual forms, where we really see this, you know the final stage of the struggle between world good and world evil, uh , respectively a good form of a man, but already completely mired. e in insanity, because this is what it is now giving out european civilization, this is the global carrot suspended in front of humanity in the form of maslow's pyramid, where frolicking representatives of various non-traditional orientations present themselves as having reached the highest levels of initiation. this pyramid is no longer needed for implementation, because they already have everything else. and that's actually, uh, scary enough, because if you read between the lines of the club of rome papers or the sustainability strategy papers, then you see a clear, uh, message for depopulation by reducing

the population through the introduction of the ideology of tea and the introduction of various real and sexual deviations, which are also correctly spoken in china according to the traditions of soviet psychiatry. it is still considered a mental illness. and by the way, this is a proposal or maybe even an appeal to our state duma. why not return? uh, for example, these deviations are a list of mental illnesses, then maybe it will be easier already completes here with it is allowed. and why are we still waxing. and why? why is it still there and now there? yes, yes, it turns out, and that's why we are there now. for example, a good question for me, it means mental illness. yes? certainly not, further compulsory treatment, well, proof. i hope it doesn't come. well, why are we constantly going on article for the homosexuality of the

sausage, because there was a lot of such a correct question during the soviet era. you understand what's the matter, and what's the problem, that's why it's a problem it is very easy to get inside it. ah, well, satan and these people out there that use it as a tool. it is very well understood the problem is the following must be mixed. yes, not distinguishable publicly and often what, what you make public, but publicly make private. well , for example, it was convenient to steal. you see. and if we don’t rigidly distinguish it, for example, it’s absolutely indifferent to me, and i’ll honestly say that, yes i brought myself up, who has what private life is absolutely, because it is private this very word means that it concerns only those who

conduct it, and you understand that a group of people is participating in it, trying to spread their particularity to the whole society, by the way, that is why e is a parliamentarian. the law was adopted that private, let it be an hour only to treat, you know, like advertising. arrival yes, the latin word is public, private life is not necessary, our deputies said and did the right thing, in general the law is good. i have read all the comments on it. and i think don't bring your underwear into public life. no need speak. yes, i have been with casta for a long time and until now, and just passed the law, only two remarks. although we had such a political broadcast at the beginning, relatively during the time of the tsars, to which , regarding the uprising, he said that it was early yesterday. tomorrow is fasting, and now he is wearing a lane just right, he

said, a real livonian. never lags behind the masses. he always leads them forward, and we are making a global revolution. and therefore must go ahead of the popular masses consent, no. well, you may be glued to disagree. i just i am quoting him. you have already referred to it. this applies to our deputies to listen to you, how the masses of the people or to lead you forward must be revolutionized. you know, i'll even hold you, look. ilyich meant, for example, to the collective organizer of the newspaper iskra, look here. here, yes, and here is what you said about this 15 years ago in a newspaper or in solovyov's program. it was me at first that you are a real revolutionary and led the masses behind them, they matured and formalized it in the form of a law. and then where are you

mass becomes a material force, which receives into the laws of a completely state. deputy fortress, i’m generally for a parliamentarian, however, otherwise created regarding the bankaf of adolf gita well, from those, this is a delicate topic politically, i must say that yes, it should and can be published, because almost 100 years have passed since the creation of this book of publication, and from the moment when the ideology was invested in it , the efforts of the world, however, our army failed. uh, it's been, uh, almost 80 years. that is how u historical already need. and now i tell you no no. no, i'm sorry, i 'll explain exactly, that is, you propose that you propose to publish nazi literature. you say that 100 years have passed. we now have all of this in ukraine. so explain to me. well , now a second of a second, when you tell the truth with the russian celestial patches, no, damn it, the nazis

were not condemned to me by the nyurvezh tribunes, if you want to cancel the yursky decision and justify nazism and enable nazi literature to be widely published and sold - this is your position, which is contrary to the current russian legislation. if you want to study this, there is a narrow scientific literature for this purpose, published in a small edition in the mountains especially for a scientific user. well, security is something, uh, viscous other, you are special furniture, which yes, but this cannot be kept. uh, plus 16, where we publish bandera literature, where it is allowed, like, come on. that's what they're arrested for. go show me the place where you rent longer, i'll open a search engine for you. and what a wreath? hitler translation into russian read from the german name what going further you open enemy books. i

told you, this no, you use forbidden literature and poke everyone in the face, now call on millions of people to violate the current russian law, you climbed there along with the nazi bastard that climbs there and now the program is trying to promote nazi literature happily telling how you can find it with russian laws and with e, dismissed is not necessarily seriously the execution of parents. let's see how you get tomorrow . i don't know who's coming now, what's in tretyakov's program solovyov called for reading forbidden nazi literature. well, why did you say? i said that in russian it is officially existing as soon as possible. you say the site should be censored censored. this is called obscene following the law. at the same time, we remind you, adopted by the nuremberg

tribunal, which sued the nazi. well in a week i will see that you are striving for the publication of this literature will disappear. i justify it that's what upsets me much more. and he said that it can be asked, because. this is a monument of political history for a minute. that is, you offer now or not. and now you are proposing to abolish the current russian legislation. i express my deputy. according to our legislation, you can publish it in minecraft to use it, because this is extremist literature, then why is it all clean in half, because you show that go to the site. it must be closed. yes? yes, go to the site. go to one site. maybe maybe the location of the federation will bring you

drugs. legalize these, based on the fact that if you score on the internet, anything will appear. this is not a distortion. and the exact quotations of what you say, survived by the dean of the faculty, justifies the publication of nazi literature. i do not justify what you are doing, but, i say that historical documents, like all historical documents with you, are of origin. uh, typography manuscripts can and should be published, because i need it and its history study. if you don't like russian law. it is your right. you will publicly call again that it was you who said, in short, you won’t know the laws then. study the laws before shouting violations publicly. i didn't call for it, i called for it, you said that you think that this law is wrong, you said that you think that nazi literature is necessary. it’s not enough to print it , you also said where and how you said that the nazis

heard it. everyone, everyone, look at what is being transmitted. we invite the best russian foreign experts. everyone has their own position, their own point of view on the current event, often these points of view collide with each other. this is what is called pluralism, the opinion of freedom of speech now or on. difficult sometimes all emotions go wild, because we all really worry about our country and its future, but once again i repeat the times difficult tectonic changes are taking place in the world, political economic ones are rearranged, in the end. social processes. we respect and treat all of our neighbors and a strategic partner, and we hope for reciprocity, these ties must be maintained and strengthened. in the summer, one of the main guests at the st.