hello on the air international review in the studio of fyodor lukyanov today in the program of the international review of the event of the week of chronicles facts comments. russian oil price ceiling, what will be the consequences story from germany western weapons nato arsenal is running out of supply schemes to ukraine the phenomenon of the kator miracle a source of influence in the world materials of our program this week, the leading western publications, as they

wrote in nato warehouses, even the united states is cutting weapons , which can be put ukraine, and what else is there to send risky exposes the defense of the alliance itself. and you never know, someone looked at this indirect pressure on kiev to look for a non-military way out. but every day there are assurances that to push ukraine to negotiations. no one is going to, but they will support as much as necessary. no matter how much the scale of the provided and promised military assistance is really impressive, no wonder that the reserves are not enough for a company of such duration of intensity, no one prepared. give a comprehensive assessment to everyone deliveries to ukraine are difficult after the start of the conflict , the united states declared its readiness to supply kiev with weapons about the united kingdom canada australia turkey south africa and

a number of european countries only the united states and only according to official data since 2014 have shipped aid to kiev and in the amount of more than $ 21 billion the latest most complete list was posted november 10 on the state department website. however, in it. mixed, already delivered equipment from warehouses from stock. and the one that is just about to be sent, for example, 20 hymars complexes are already are in ukraine, and 18 more have not yet reached the same air defense system. on sams. of these, two more six are expected to be shipped after strikes on the infrastructure of ukraine, any complexes for steel, especially relevant su. video from social networks the range of weapons of the ukrainian army has undergone major changes at the beginning of the conflict, imported weapons are rapidly replacing soviet equipment and weapons, which, apparently, were lost by the armed forces. during

the battles. more and more ukrainian fighters get into the frame with nato rifles in armored vehicles, including armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles of various types. basically, the import exclusion of foreign-model tanks was not delivered to ukraine, only the old still soviet stocks from eastern europe include the t-62. as for artillery, the 155 mm nato caliber is becoming more and more popular, it is used by towed american howitzers and various self-propelled guns, which often fall into the lens of the ammunition load, the last 26 imported military aid package on the presidential order from what is available was signed on 2. 3 november in the dynamics of delivering, you can notice a reduction in the transferred shells, if in april they were delivered 180,000, then in november a total of 21 is important, because artillery remains the basis

of firepower. everything else related to the nomenclature. such as communication with helmets , bulletproof vests, uniforms and many other little things, almost all of foreign production and also supplied by the allies. is nato really running out of weapons? or is it just a bargain? otherwise, i 'll talk with maxim shapovalenko, deputy director of the center for analysis of strategy and technologies maxim hello. greetings fedor e. is it even worth taking literally these complaints, which now sound literally every day, there really is a big expense, and there are means of destruction for what we call the familiar word ammunition and supplies are already from the available stock e military departments of western countries of technology, but i i think that this is still far from being exhausted, and it cannot be said that in the

near future these indulgences can be completed by the exhaustion of the reserves. no, it's still far away. not so, but they have some. well, i do not know or has a formally informal below, which cannot be released. there is definitely no. all this is enshrined in nato regulations, and there is another problem in the nineties. well, in the international review program. we will continue a little later, and now the cadres of the press service of the president of russia good evening, please, i ask you, dear friends. 15 years ago, the rostec state corporation was established. i am pleased to congratulate all of you and all your colleagues on this significant date and first of all, workers and foremen, scientists-engineers , designers, testers, all labor collectives of rostec enterprises, and these are hundreds of thousands of people

, sometimes highly qualified, unique piece specialists, who contribute to the industrial development of our country with their work, energy and talent. directly involved in solving the most important state tasks in a number of priority areas in the field of high technologies, including aircraft manufacturing and the automotive industry, radio electronics, mechanical engineering, chemistry, medicine new materials, and, of course, this is the strengthening of the defense capability of russia, these significant shares of the state defense order fall precisely on the rostec enterprise of our largest corporation in the field of the military-industrial complex, emphasizing that this is an area of ​​​​achievement, significant results here must continue to remain unconditionally a priority for the corporation it was for this that it was created, and in general

, in order to provide. consolidate save and ensure, thereby developing at a new level of our technological production innovation potential, i remember well when the corporation was created and how it was, and today i want to emphasize the decision to form such a powerful industrial flagship of the domestic economy, the concentration of financial management resources has fully justified itself. defense and security global technological competition. sure. you well understand that the key task today is the number one task to do everything to fully meet the needs of our armed forces and, above all, the

units and subunits involved in conducting a special military operation. it is necessary to increase production and deliveries of the entire range of products in demand with a clear and high quality, strictly within the established deadlines, to fulfill state targets i will repeat all the decisions to support our enterprises to the russian government. we will accept it as quickly as possible, and there is no doubt about the people who work here, so i am absolutely sure that the plant in moscow, st. petersburg, the urals, siberia , the far east, in dozens of regions of our country are working with a maximum load of several shifts. and this, by the way, speaking also e. well, i don't know how to say. well, today's conditions will certainly

give and give a unique impetus to the development of high -tech industries, and not only directly in the defense industry, but their civilian industries, people really work hard, equaling our ancestors to the great traditions of many generations of our gunsmiths, who have proven that russian weapons are the weapons of victory. i want to sincerely thank the labor collectives for such work, for such dedication, for the patriotic desire to do everything for the defense of russia to strengthen its sovereignty, so that our heroes who are now fighting on the front line are trained at training grounds and in training centers receive everything they need. i ask the leaders of the enterprise to implement additional measures of social

support for members, labor collectives of their families, including special incentives for rewarding the best specialists and workers with the experience that we received and continue to receive during the event. uh, special operations and counteraction to modern western models of military equipment. this is a very good experience that should be used to improve the quality and reliability of the combat characteristics of some of our weapons of domestic military products. in this regard, close interaction between rostec and all profiles of the enterprise of specialized enterprises of design bureaus and research centers of the corporation with specialists from the ministry of defense. and, of course, it is necessary, uh, to implement our internal russian competition to encourage internal competition. eh, between enterprises to give way and put into series the

best examples of military equipment. on the basis of those that are already operating, fighting and confirming their characteristics, dear friends, since its inception, rostec has been responsible for the development of production and export of high-tech products not only military, but also the civilian purpose is not easy to continue. and to work even more actively in all the main promising areas that ensure the psychological sovereignty of russia . of course, i expect noticeable breakthrough results from poetry in such areas as microelectronics and electronic component base, the construction of equipment for fifth generation communication networks, in general, a more effective search for the implementation and promotion of domestic high-tech decisions in all areas important for the development of our economy, which determine the modern quality of life of people. eliminating dependence on imports

, for this we have everything everything is in our hands excellent unique world-class scientific schools innovative ambitious teams, scientists and inventors powerful industrial base, experienced skilled workers, talented strong well- motivated youth and a significant share of this huge intellectual and significant the share of this huge intellectual production potential of the country is concentrated with a concentrated in the control loop of the state corporation rostec. i am sure that your results and new achievements will correspond to the colossal scale of the strategic tasks of the country's development and certainly. i wish you success and once again congratulations on your anniversary and thank you very much. on his 15th birthday

, he stressed that it is necessary to start production and supply of all products in demand for the russian armed forces, and then see the continuation of the international review program. and at the beginning of the 2000s, the western military-industrial complex underwent optimization, it is clear that after during the cold war, the demand for weapons fell sharply and the potential for conflict decreased. and those conflicts that, uh, we observed in the nineties zero years, they are conflicts of low, yes, medium intensity and such a number of weapons , the production capacity of western companies was not required, and they, in general, are still in that. uh, in a minimized form, of course, uh, the ukrainian conflict, uh, that is, for any there, it

requires a large expenditure of ammunition, it’s still, nevertheless, the conflict is low, medium intensity, but the costs are very serious. but this is an optimization - this also applies to the united states, the united states and allies, and e countries that are not members of nato but formally have the status of main allies. from what kiev is now requesting, it is very active, what is the most scarce, that is, uh, what can be an interruption in the means of destruction, that is, the means of delivery e are not as important as the means of destruction of ammunition. again, a very large consumption of artillery shells and e, unguided missiles. er, that's where the bottleneck in the west is with the americans in particular, which is why we see occasional attempts to engage. uh, in these country shipments that are trying to abstain.

let's say that south korea is trying to sit on two chairs, so to speak, and preserve legal relations between the united states and not spoil them. e. with russia they really don't want erna's russia to say so. i mean these deliveries. it is clear to whom they are not intended. uh, so that russia does not renew relations with the north korea that is, this is not at all what putin needs. by the way, in valdai, south korea very clearly and specifically warned that yes, we see everything. you're popularizing the other way. is it possible to expect and to what extent would there be a sharp increase in investments in vc and in fact? uh, the arms race is new, what it will look like no, in fact, investments have already begun here, i’m not ready to give exact figures , so to speak, well, in reality, orders have gone up, including

number, uh, considering. produced expenditure on completely stocks, and i think that we still will not see a sharp rise in the production of weapons, because the situation is market for manufacturers and developers. it is clear that is, it is not clear for them, when the ukrainian conflict and the orders placed will end. may be unclaimed by the end user. but this is interesting. we, uh, well, that those who pretend that we are studying international relations and understand what will happen next all unanimously proceed from the fact that the period conflicts now for a long time and the ukrainian conflict, far from the last, obviously why? that is, the markets do not believe this, it turns out hmm, because it is the powers of attorney that are not in time. not so to say the geography of conflicts, not you intensity, so it's generally like that. the territory, so to speak, is mined there to walk through the minefield. here are

these accidents, where will it shoot? i don’t know, well, then the question, maybe stupid, since my soviet childhood, when we still grew up on the fact that the american military-industrial complex inflates warriors in order to increase his own more. can you tell now? well, if more elegant, can we say that so far really plays a role? uh, well, hawks i wouldn't say, really. here is what i observe. sometimes it seems to me that diplomats. uh, from the other side they are inflating much more than the military and the defense crater standing behind him. it still focuses on the military budget. the military budget is still more confidence in forecasting. yes here e. this is the conflict ukrainian and on the one hand it cannot be said that it arose from scratch. that is, everything

went to this, well, to foresee the scale, and the scope of e fighting . so to speak, the intensity of use. e weapons nobody. i think i couldn't, and uh exactly, so here it is uncertainty about what is coming, so to speak, next year. eh, the actions will end with a truce there, so to speak with the technique of intensity, it cannot be said that it will decrease, i think that western experts will not be able to predict our days, then there are situations there during the cold war, especially on the soviet side, when mobilization capacity was prepared with a wild reserve in case of any conflict at all, and they accumulated there. this is probably small. i think this will not happen. well, if it's good, well, it's bad, we will consider it good, thank you very much maxim shapov was with us. after a period of uncertainty, when all

interested parties remained silent , the so-called grain deal on the export of ukrainian food to world markets was extended. what shady compromises, who went unknown rumors, as always different, including those around russian fertilizers, exports of which, despite promises. so they resumed guessing will not. it will soon become clear whether there was a secret agenda or not, and the situation in the field of food security, and at the same time other global problems. we talked with a wonderful interlocutor yoma to you and sundar, one of the most famous economists. the sandaram professor is not from the west, in addition to an impressive scientific public career. in my native malaysia for many years worked in the un system, including in the world food organization, and as a professor, the grain deal is again valid, but doubts remain in russia, for example, her. consider it hypocritical, because it actually serves not the poorest

countries, but you agree with the rich in general, the deal is relatively successful, a lot of effort has been made. well, yes, the trouble is that food does not reach the poorest countries. and this creates huge risks, for example, in the states of the horn of africa, where very serious drought. they also occur in other areas, and in a number of places, on the contrary, the island has problems with flooding. another claim from russia is due to the fact that western countries are not interested in resuming the export of russian fertilizers. namely , this is extremely important. to ensure food security, the topic of fertilizer is extremely important. meanwhile, sanctions have affected two key countries in this industry in russia and belarus; these are not so acute problems right now, but in the medium term without a doubt. not expensive. with fertilizer will hit on food producers who will not be able to

maintain the required level of production. it should not be forgotten that the jump in wheat prices, for example, is caused not only by the conflict between russia and ukraine, financial speculation, which has taken on a special scale over the past 15 years or so, has made a significant contribution. recall the food crisis of 2007-2008. the cause was of course not the rice crop in china due to the invasion fit into the rink, but it was greatly exacerbated by speculation related to the overuse of financial assets. it was on the markets of all ordinary goods of manipulation and investment funds with financial instruments that were transferred from one product to another , the situation worsened on the eve of the hostilities in ukraine from the end of last year, the american intelligence services whipped up pre-war moods, apparently there was a sharp surge. activities already then. until recently, the

founder of ftx, sam bangment freed, known online as sbf, was on the list of the richest people in the world from those who are under thirty, his fortune was estimated at $ 17 billion. sam was engaged charity and actively sponsored the election campaign of the democrats. his contribution to biden's presidential campaign was the second largest in 2017, the former wall street trader founded the trading firm alameda research and then the fts exchange itself. in 2 years, her tokens. i bought binance, the largest in the world. crypto exchange and ftx has become a leader in the industry last year, the company's revenue grew by more than a thousand percent. however, in early november, cohens discovered a bentmonaurid between sam's company. suspicious

operation, as it turned out more part of the assets. research makes utility tokens ftt, that is, it relies not on an independent asset, but on coins issued by a subsidiary, which means that they are at high risk of bankruptcy due to a crisis of confidence, the ceo of cubinance decided to sell ftp tokens after him, ftx clients began to massively withdraw funds from the exchange, the volume of daily transactions exceeded $ 6 billion and the company faced a lack of ftx liquidity. suspended the withdrawal of funds and requested help from binance. however the company refused to sponsor it and buy it, as a result, the ftt rate fell to less than two dollars, and on november 11, the ftx exchange was sharpened. declared bankruptcy within a day. sam bentman frit lost his entire fortune. now , he will have to be investigated before the

republicans established that the bankrupt exchange was connected to the kiev regime on the basis of ftx bankman. freed created the website eight for you crane to raise funds in support of ukraine on twitter , he wrote that he was honored to work with the ministry financial-ukraine, then the fact of cooperation, was confirmed by the ukrainian ministry of digital transformation itself, fox news hosts suggested that the following scheme was in effect democrats send money to ukraine ukraine sends money to ftx. and on finances the company of democrats. however , the democratic party denied everything and blamed everything on russian propaganda since we are talking about finances. now everyone is talking about a recession, or even depression of the world economy. do you think there is reason to fear even before the pandemic,

the global economy began to slow down over the past 10 years - this was fixed, in general, since the eighties with the intervention of walker in 1981, the world economy began to develop more slowly, its financialization took place, investors began to proceed only from considerations of a speedy return of profits, and not be guided by where to invest in order to strengthen productive strength. this is the root cause of the slowdown, which became apparent after the global financial crisis of 2008-2009 and received additional impetus at the end of the 10s. an important role was played by the growing international contradictions to a lesser extent with russia, for example , since the childhood of trump, the united states stepped up its attempts to isolate china, but it began earlier at the end

of president bush jr. obama was striving to restrain china from the most dangerous of the current situation, economic sanctions, which became especially numerous after the outbreak of hostilities. in ukraine, they led to an increase in the cost of delivery of almost all goods, which has already been observed due to the disruption of chains during the pandemic, attempts to isolate china from russia have been shelled by sanctions illegal from the point of view. charter, but they are supported by a number of countries in europe there are signs that, for example, chancellor scholz is trying to take steps that are not shared by some of germany's neighbors, that is, some shifts are possible, but in general we need a different world agenda, a much more positive defense agenda peace creating the conditions for peace. it is very important. you are a developing country some of them call for pacifistic non-alignment . this is not just not joining, which is important in itself, but it is precisely not

joining. in the name of preventing war, another global theme in egypt, the climate conference has ended ; complain that e plans to slow down global warming. almost sent to the trash? what do you think? climate summit in sharm el sheikh cop 27 lasted 2 weeks, representatives of more than 120 states discussed compensation and losses to the poorest countries from irreversible climate change . speech about natural disasters, hurricanes, extreme heat, droughts and forest fires, the result of lengthy negotiations was the creation. developed countries will voluntarily contribute money to the fund. but how much and at what expense it is not yet clear that the promise to pay was given far, not

many austria belgium denmark canada new zealand france germany scotland they were already ready to compensate for losses, developing countries, the conference participants also decided that the decision of the 2015 paris agreement is to prevent the increase in global temperatures. at 2°. precariously , it was decided to concentrate on a new mark of one and a half degrees. that we need to reduce global carbon emissions by at least 50% by 2030, but for now emissions are on the contrary growing. . not only coal gas or reach the global emission peak. gas already by 2025. the representatives of russia were not accepted and spoke out sharply against the

reduction of the use of all types of fossil fuels. arguing that this could exacerbate the energy crisis is among the informal outcomes of the resumption of the us- china climate dialogue, which was abandoned following nancy pilotty's recent visit to taiwan. also a pledge by brazil's newly elected president lulu de force to conserve the amazon rainforest the only concession made by rich countries was the creation of a so-called loss and damage fund, but, in principle, this was adopted 30 years ago in 1992 in rio de janeiro. however, in practice, the level of support for poor countries has never reached what was promised, for example, in 2009 . on the eve of the conference in copenhagen , the president of france and russia, prime minister of great britain brown, the european commission announced 100 billion a

year for climate financing, in practice, less than half has been allocated since 2020 it was supposed to dramatically increase payments, taking into account the severity of the climate problem, but this did not happen. in addition, the bulk of the money goes to mitigate climate effects, reduce emissions, and do not need to adapt developing countries to global warming. the issue of compensation for damage has been discussed for a very long time. the same 30 years, but there is very little progress. a special fund has been created, but so far no one has stated clear dreams, to fill it with funds, and i am afraid that sheikh's charm will join the series of unsuccessful conferences. what has already been a lot, an impressive failure was last year's conference in the eyes, where the determination to abandon coal, but some six months later, europe abandoned the obligation.