hello on air international review in the studio of fyodor lukyanov today in the program international review events of the week of chronicles facts comments the ceiling of prices for russian oil, what will be the consequences of the plot from germany

this week the leading western buildings, as they wrote on command in nato warehouses, even the united states is excising weapons , which can be delivered to ukraine, and what else is available to send risky exposes the defense of the alliance itself. but you never know , someone saw this as indirect pressure on it's time for kyiv, they say, to look for a non-military way out. but every day there are assurances that to push ukraine to negotiations. no one is going to, but they will support as much as necessary. no matter how much the scale of the provided and promised military assistance is really impressive. no wonder that no one was preparing for a company of such duration and intensity. it is difficult to give an exhaustive assessment of all deliveries to ukraine after the start of the conflict

, the united states of america, canada, australia, turkey, south africa and a number of european countries, only the united states and only according to official data since 2014, have shipped aid to kiev and in the amount of more than $ 21 billion, the last most complete list was published on november 10 on the website of the state department. however, in it. mixed, already delivered equipment from warehouses from stock. and the one that is just about to be sent, for example, 20 hymars complexes are already in ukraine, and another 18 have not yet reached the same air defense system. on sams. of these, two have been shipped, six more are expected after attacks on infrastructure. ukraine, any complexes for steel, especially relevant su. video from social networks the range of weapons of the ukrainian army has undergone major

changes at the beginning of the conflict, imported weapons are rapidly replacing soviet equipment and weapons, which, apparently, were lost by the armed forces. during the battles. more and more ukrainian fighters get into the frame with nato rifles in armored vehicles, including armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles of various types. basically, imported tanks, foreign models were not supplied to ukraine, only old still soviet stocks from eastern europe includes the t-62. as for artillery, the 155 mm nato caliber is becoming more and more popular, it is used by towed american howitzers and various self-propelled guns, which often fall into the lens of ammunition, the last 26 imported military aid on the presidential order from what is available was signed 2. on november 3, in dynamics, you can notice a decrease in the transferred shells, if in april they were

delivered 180.000, then in november in total 21 this is important, because artillery remains the basis firepower. everything else related to the nomenclature. such as communication with helmets , bulletproof vests, uniforms and many other little things, almost all of foreign production and also supplied by the allies. is nato really running out of weapons? or is it just a trade? otherwise, i 'll talk with some kind of trick. maxim shapovalenko, deputy director of the center for analysis of strategy and technology maxim greetings fedor, is it even worth taking literally these complaints, which now sound literally every day, there really is a big expense, and the means of destruction for what we call the familiar word ammunition is e. the rates are already from the available stock of the military departments of the western

countries of technology. well, i think that this is still far from being exhausted and one cannot say that in the near future these indulgences can be completed by the force of depletion of the reserve. no, this is still far from the case, but they have some. well, i do not know or has a formally informal below, which cannot be released. there is definitely no. it's all enshrined in nato regulatory documents, and there is another problem in the nineties and began on the lions of western defense. industrial complexes. has undergone optimization, and it is clear that after the cold war. yeah, the demand for weapons has plummeted and conflict. and those conflicts that, uh, we observed in the nineties zero years, they are conflicts of low and sometimes medium intensity and such a number of weapons were not required by the production capacity of western

companies, but in general they are still in. uh, in a minimized form, of course, uh, the ukrainian conflict, uh, that is, for any there, it requires a large expenditure of ammunition, it is still, nevertheless, the conflict is low, and of medium intensity, but the costs are very serious. but this optimization - this also applies to the united states and the united states and allied birds and e countries that are not members of nato but formally have the status of main allies. from what it 's asking now, kiev is very active, what is the most scarce, that is, uh, what there may be an interruption in the means of destruction, that is, the means of delivering e are not as important as the means of destruction of ammunition. again, a very large consumption of artillery shells and, e.g., unguided rockets. er, that's where the bottleneck in the

west is with the americans in particular, which is why we see occasional attempts to engage. uh, in these country shipments that are trying to abstain. let's say that south korea is trying to sit, so to speak, on two chairs and maintain legal relations. the united states and not spoil them. e. with russia. they really don't want russia, uh, so to speak. i mean these deliveries. it is clear to whom they are not intended. uh, so that russia does not resume relations with north korea that is, this is not at all what they need. putin by the way, in valdai, he very clearly warned south korea so that we can see everything. and if we, uh, that's what we talked about above, that optimization was then now hers, well, now there should be optimization in the other direction. and is it possible to expect and to what extent a sharp increase in the investment of vc and on really? a new arms race, what it will

look like no, in fact, investments have already begun. well, here i'm not ready to give exact figures, so to speak. well, the real increase in orders has gone, including, uh, considering. expenses incurred replenishment of stocks, and i think that we still will not see a sharp rise in the production of weapons, because the market situation for manufacturers and developers is unclear. that is, it is not clear to them when the ukrainian conflict and the orders placed will end. maybe, maybe not required by the end user. but this is interesting. we, uh, well, that those who pretend that we are studying international relations and understand what will happen next all unanimously proceed from the fact that the period of conflict is now for a long time and the ukrainian conflict is far from the last, obviously why? that is, the markets do not believe it turns out. well, because precisely confidence is not in terms. not so to say

the geography of conflicts, nor in intensity, so it is generally like that. the territory, so to speak, is mined there to walk through the minefield. here these accidents, where no one knows where they will shoot, well then, the question may be stupid, since my soviet childhood, when we nevertheless grew up on the fact that the american military-industrial complex is fanning wars in order to increase its profits. can you tell now? well, if more elegant, can we say that so far really plays a role? uh, well, hawks i wouldn't say, really. well, here's what i'm seeing. sometimes it seems to me that diplomats. uh, from the other side, they inflate much more than the military and those behind him funnel at the defense. it still focuses on the military budget. the military budget is still

more confidence in forecasting. yes here e. this is a ukrainian conflict, and on the one hand, it cannot be said that it arose from scratch . that is, everything went to this, well, to foresee the scale, and the scope of e fighting. so to speak, the intensity of use. e weapons nobody. i think i couldn't, and uh, exactly, so here it is. uncertainty about what, let's say, next year. uh, action will end in a truce there, so to speak, the intensity will decrease. it is impossible to say, i think that they will not be able to predict it. our non-western specialists, that is, the situations there of the cold war, especially the soviet side, when migration capacity was prepared with a wild margin in case of any conflict at all, and they accumulated there, this is probably small. i think this will not happen. well, if they are good, well, if they are bad, we will assume that they are good,

thank you very much. after a period of uncertainty, when all interested parties remained silent, extended actions of the so-called grain deal for the export of ukrainian food to world markets. what shady compromises, who made it is unknown rumors, as always different, including around russian fertilizers, exports, which, despite promises. so they resumed guessing will not. it will soon become clear whether there was a secret agenda or not, and the situation in the field of food security, and at the same time other global problems. we talked with a wonderful interlocutor yoma to you and sundar, one of the most famous economists. not from the west professor sandaram, in addition, an impressive scientific public career. in his native malaysia, he worked for many years in the un system, including in the world food organization, and as a professor,

the grain deal is again valid, but doubts remain in russia, for example, hers. consider it hypocritical, because it actually serves not the poorest countries, but you agree with the rich, in general, the deal is relatively successful, a lot of effort has been made. well, yes, the trouble is that food does not reach the poorest countries. and it creates huge risks, for example, in the states of the horn of africa, where very serious droughts are recorded. they also occur in other areas, and in a number of places, on the contrary, the island has problems with flooding. another claim from russia is due to the fact that western countries are not interested in resuming the export of russian fertilizers. namely , this is extremely important. to ensure food security, the topic of fertilizer is extremely important, meanwhile, sanctions have affected two key countries. in this industry, russia and

belarus are not so acute problems directly now, but the medium term without a doubt. not expensive. fertilizers will hit food producers who will not be able to maintain the required level of production. we should not forget that the jump in wheat prices, for example, is caused not only by the conflict between russia and ukraine, financial speculation, which has taken on a special scale over the past 15 years or so, has made a significant contribution. remember the food crisis of 2007-2008, the reason was, of course, the failure of the rice harvest in china due to the invasion is described by the rink, but it was greatly aggravated speculation related to the excessive use of financial derivatives. it was in the markets of all ordinary goods, manipulations and investment funds with financial instruments that were transferred from one product to another , the situation worsened on the eve of hostilities in ukraine from the end of last year, the american

intelligence services whipped up war sentiment, apparently there was a sharp surge. sbf list of the richest people in the world of all those under thirty, his fortune was estimated at $ 17 billion . sam was involved in charity work and actively sponsored the democratic campaign. his contribution to biden's presidential campaign was the second largest in 2017 , the former wall street trader founded the trading firm alameda research and then the fts exchange itself. after 2 years, her tokens were bought by binance, the largest in the world. crypto exchange and ftx has become a leader in the industry last year, the company's revenue

grew by more than a thousand percent. however, in early november, employees of the condensate found between sam benkman's company fries. yes, a suspicious transaction, as it turned out, most of the assets. research makes utility tokens ftt, that is, it relies not on an independent asset, but on coins issued by a subsidiary, which means they are at high risk of bankruptcy due to a crisis of confidence of the cuban ceo. i decided to sell ft tokens, after which ftx clients began to massively withdraw funds from the exchange, the volume of daily transactions exceeded $ 6 billion, and the company faced lack of liquidity ftx. suspended the withdrawal of funds and requested help from binance. however, the company refused to sponsor it and buy it, as a result, the ftt rate fell to less than two dollars per token and on november 11, the ftx exchange. declared

bankruptcy within a day. sam bentman frit lost his entire fortune. now , he needs to be investigated. along with this, the republicans established that the bankrupt exchange was associated with the kiev regime on the basis of ftx bentman. freed created the website eight for you crane to raise funds in support of ukraine on twitter , he wrote that he was flattered to work with the ministry of finance-ukraine, then the fact of cooperation, confirmed the ukrainian ministry of digital transformation itself, fox news hosts suggested that the following scheme was in effect democrats send money to ukraine ukraine sends money to ftx . and she finances the company of democrats. however , the democratic party denied everything and blamed everything on russian propaganda since we are talking about

finances. now everyone is talking about a recession, or even the depression of the global economy. do you think there is reason to be afraid even before the pandemic, the global economy began to slow down over the past 10 years - this has been fixed, in general, since the eighties with the volker intervention in 1981, the world economy has begun to develop more slowly, its financialization has begun, investors began to proceed only from considerations of a speedy return of profits and not be guided by where to invest in order to strengthen the productive forces. this is the root cause of the slowdown, which became apparent after the global the financial crisis of 2008-2009 and received an additional impetus at the end of the tenth years , the growing international contradictions played to a lesser extent with russia, for example, since the childhood of trump, the united states increased the torture to isolate

china, but it began earlier at the end of president bush jr. in 2007-2008, when the so -called wolfowet doctrine was adopted with the aim of turning to asia, president obama was striving to contain china, the most dangerous thing in the current situation, economic sanctions, which have become especially much after the outbreak of hostilities. in ukraine, they led to a rise in the cost of delivery of almost all goods, which was already observed due to the disruption of chains during the pandemic, attempts to isolate china and russia all aggravated sanctions illegally from the point of view. mouth but they are supported by a number of countries in europe there are signs that, for example, chancellor scholz is trying to take steps that are not shared by some of germany's neighbors, that is, some shifts are possible, but in general we need a different world agenda, much more positive an agenda for the protection of peace creating the conditions for peace. it is very important. you are developing countries, in

some of them there are calls for pacifist non- alignment. this is not just not joining, which is important in itself, but it is precisely not joining. in the name of preventing war, another global theme in egypt, the climate conference has ended ; complain that e plans to slow down global warming. almost sent to the trash? what do you think? the climate summit in sharm el sheikh, kop 27 , lasted 2 weeks, representatives of more than 120 states discussed compensation for losses, the poorest countries from irreversible climate change, natural disasters, hurricanes, extreme heat , droughts and forest fires, the result of lengthy negotiations was the creation of a fund, the money

will be contribute developed countries voluntarily. but how much and at what expense it is not yet clear that the promise to pay was given far, not many austria belgium denmark canada new zealand france france scotland they were already ready to compensate the losses to developing countries, the conference participants also decided that the decision of the paris agreement in 2015 to prevent a 2 degree increase in global temperature was not reliably decided to focus on a new mark of one and a half degrees. that we need to reduce global carbon emissions by at least 50% by 2030, but while emissions are on the contrary growing, the final wording repeated last year's speech about phasing out coal and abolition of efficient subsidies for fossil fuels more ambitious initiatives, such as the indian proposal mentioned in this context.

not only coal gas or reaching the global peak of emissions, but gas by 2025, were not accepted by the representatives of russia, who spoke out sharply against the reduction in the use of all types of fossil fuels. arguing that this could exacerbate the energy crisis among the informal outcomes of the resumption of the climate dialogue between the us and china, which was abandoned after the recent nancy pilotti's visit to taiwan, and the promise of the newly elected president of brazil, lulu de silva, to preserve the amazon rainforest . the only concession made by rich countries was the creation of a so-called loss and damage fund, but, in principle, this was made 30 years ago in 1992 in rio de janeiro. however, in practice, the level of support for poor countries has never

reached what was promised, for example, in 2009 . on the eve of the conference in copenhagen , the president of france and russia, the prime minister of great britain brown, the european commission claimed 100 billion a year for climate finance, in practice, less than half was allocated from 2020 it was supposed to increase payments sharply, taking into account the severity of the climate problem, but this did not happen, in addition, the bulk of the funds go to mitigate climate effects, reduce emissions, and no need to adapt developing countries to global warming. the issue of compensation for damage has been discussed for a very long time the same 30 years, but very little progress has been made a special background has been created, but so far no one has not stated clear intentions to fill it with funds, and i fear that sharma sheikh will join the series of unsuccessful conferences. there have already been many, an impressive failure was last year's

conference in vowels, where they resolutely announced their intention to abandon coal, but some six months later, europe abandoned its obligations and made a new bet on mining and burning, for several years now there has been a regression, not progress . in the field of counteracting climate change, in addition, an attempt to cancel the ceiling increase, temperature, atmosphere and a half degrees. it did not quite succeed, but the developed countries want to get rid of this restriction. this is clearly stated in the influential british railway station with icons. we are moving towards a coming catastrophe, and no one, including the richest countries, is taking action. the most terrible consequences of climate change will be in the tropical and subtropical zone, and there are most of the developing countries. thank you, we were talking with the professor of economics, yo-my sir. climate conference

progressive environmental community considered a disappointment. so the struggle continues with the now popular form of european activism. our regular author eduard shilin got acquainted. autumn in the morning in berlin, the beginning of the working week, environmental activist lina johnsen meets us at the largest exhibition center. now her colleagues are preparing nearby and will block the movement. on one of the city highways. all preparations for the actions are kept in deep secret until the last moment you see, and now we are sitting on the pavement must come police officers with special oil, because only with its help you can tear off the glued palm. the main thing is that we sit here as long as possible, the larger the traffic jam, the more likely it is to put pressure on the government. we do not support violence, we have chosen glue, for only in this way can we demand change. exactly eight in the morning, one of the exits of the city is blocked

by people in orange vests, that if the government does not keep it under its control, there will be a traffic jam for several minutes. help not endure and engage in a skirmish, one of them is so annoying that he helps a lone policeman make a breach and drag one of them to the side of the road, but only those who will not be glued to the pavement. i have to go and i have every right to do so. get out the activists do not express any emotions and the police are forced to let the cars take a detour . this time battlefield is a street, not an art gallery. yes, we glue ourselves to paintings or pour paint over them. these are emotions. it is important that, symbolically, the effects of destruction create in people a longing for loss.

this is exactly what we need now, because the loss of a work of art is comparable to the multiple loss of what people can lose for the first time ecologists. the movement of the last generation loudly announced itself, when the activists wore t-shirts with slogans. stop oil doused with orange paint showcase, famous in london the next department store was van gogh's painting sunflowers in london's national gallery. main element. stock. everything is done in front of the camera and posted on the internet. media success is the most important thing our movement includes representatives of all walks of life. this and the parents of the students are simple working carpenters. people come from everywhere and what is special is that they are willing to work with children. but how can we look them in the eye when they have no future ? damage to the environment. now standing

guard over green trends, he took and glued himself to the asphalt or to a work of art. and you are already one step closer to a clean planet with new methods of fighting the movement. brandenburg gate mean autumn sun few tourists on underden lindon, yak berliner introduces his friend to the local sights. he admires the activists of the last generation, it is amazingly wonderful that there are so many young people among them this generation that will live after us, to unfortunately, some politicians want to put them in jail for a long time. i think they're saving our planet the time has come uh i must admit i'm on their side, so far not a single piece of art that has been attacked as an activist has been seriously harmed. is that the plane of their opponents. sometimes it even seems that they themselves are watching this more closely than anyone else, because it is worth suffering. at least one material object

, the attitude towards them will change. i support the environmental movement. but this is unacceptable when they begin to interfere with other people's lives. it's not very extreme what they do, of course, attracts attention. but when they go beyond all acceptable norms and principles, a question arises. a is it really necessary wolfs gallins gallery of modern art of the berlin armor-punks on the walls is a picture of contemporary german eastern european artists monday, therefore, there are no visits yet. one of the owners of the gallery archgallands alarm follows the development of new trends in environmental movements. student years. i worked as a restorer a lot, so i look at these tricks through the eyes of a restorer. for the most part the painting is behind glass, but no matter what the soup or paint leaks onto the canvas. and even if you are glued

to the frame. this is also unacceptable because the frames themselves. sometimes comparable to paintings in terms of artistic value. the time of change smells, of glue and acetone, its persistent smell hovers. in the berlin air, the movement of the last generation was read from a few people, and now there are more than 500 of them, the number of shares is growing attention. they attracted to themselves that further edward, berlin, the federal republic of germany, especially for international viewing. after advertising about football or again about politics? and there is a difference, don't leave at all. petrovich is one belarusian

shepherd dog, he is not for sale . producers of good things want and most importantly.