today it was the most unique case, because the body penalty did not affect anything at all, you, as the head coach, are probably curious, in general, the players also take part in such stories. andrey and i told you that it's just interesting, it's interesting. he is not like this, as it were, well, he did not regard it. how do you look at it. i do not agree with him that something does not solve anything with regard to the standings. yes, but as for the result, one team wins the other loses, of course, decides, if even e looks at it during training sessions, when we have guys there, some tournaments or outside matches play among themselves, they end up nothing, they even there, uh, dream and want to win, because, well, this is victory, this feeling of emotional emotional such satisfaction of the work done from the result. these are emotions. football is no longer only played for the sake of the table, it is also the fans who drive the teams the fans left the stadium happy because their team won, so there is no

everything is closed. e standings, let's say. now the broadcasts are from the russian ministry of foreign affairs and hide the harm of the kiev regime and the plans of the so-called , as they say, the liberation of crimea by force , the former commander of the joint forces operation in donbass said directly about this. e, he made this statement in an interview for the iconist, and he stated that the peninsula was supposed to be returned by the year 23. and a date with the crimean republic is dreamed of by many, e.g., kiev regime officials. here zelensky said. that next spring he will swim in the sea at southern coast of crimea hmm well, i would just like to

clarify. this is how he put it. but the adviser to the head of the office, podolak, promised to give an interview to ukrainian journalists in six months. in yalta, well, i want to say e and zelensky, and now along far or podlyaks. i don't even know how to say it right. yes, there is no need to postpone, but he come. take a swim, swim, if you want to give an interview, take ukrainian journalists. welcome , i can say for sure, uh, the head of zelensky's office that he will have time to give an interview in yalta if a group of more journalists arrives take the ukrainians so that everyone can see everything and come, but what are the problems? yes, i want to

, i don't have to restrain myself. by the way, i want to say that journalists, both ukrainian and western, have always had the opportunity, but they really didn’t do something to visit the republic of crimea, and for 8 years they weaved all sorts of fables and told, uh, anything only they did not come to the territory of the republic. well, as a matter of fact, they didn’t see the donbass at all, they didn’t go anywhere where the picture wasn’t fit into their maine and, by the way, they didn’t let them in just the same way. and iskra journalists and residents of crimea were also not allowed anywhere, and international platforms weren’t allowed anywhere so that they couldn’t convey the truth about what was happening there. so you talk, talk, yes, don't talk. at the same time, the revelation of zabrodsky, along with the

trophy documents found during the special military operation, proves that the kiev regime was seriously preparing for a large-scale offensive in the spring of 22. well, if to 23 they should have liberated everything by now. here you are, or what, again we misunderstood something, translated it wrong. somehow, after all, the wife then be determined. kiev with the sight of the kiev regime, and what they say, how they say, everything is logically lined up in one chain then. what , in fact, we were talking about, all this once again confirms the presence of real threats to the security of our country, and the regions as a whole, and the absolute justification of these actions that were taken to protect security and e people who live in this region, as the leadership of russia has repeatedly said, these threats will be eliminated and the task of protecting the civilian population from the pro-fascist kiev

regime. and all the other goals of the task formulated by the russian leadership will be fulfilled, and now , from the interesting point, i can’t ignore the statement by the minister of foreign affairs of the nato member countries, this statement was adopted during the meeting of the alliance council at the level of foreign ministers, forward from 29 to 30 november in bucharest, the wording contained in the document indicates that nato is absolutely not interested in the policy of a diplomatic solution, but in ukraine and in general, the very line that was taken after the coup d'état in february of the fourteenth year in the abundance of the kiev regime was continued. well, and, accordingly, the demonization of russia in order to justify the demand for the north atlantic alliance , nato countries are trying to accuse the russian side of

criminal acts of atrocities committed by the all-union, with the total connivance of western sponsors kyiv regime. and we, for example, are credited with disrupting global food supplies. although it was moscow that proposed real solutions, the problems that have arisen through no fault of our own are consistently seeking their implementation, despite washington’s sanctions restriction of eu brussels and, of course, the attempt to blame russia for the incident with the ukrainian missile that fell on the territory of poland looks blatant, remember yes, like a after the incident taking place right there. the kyiv regime began to squeal, that this is a russian missile, that this is almost an attack. yes, they did not at all formulate that this is an attack on poland, respectively, a fall on nato, on nato countries, on the nato blog, what is needed? immediately

, it is imperative that everyone run to include. and so to speak sirens and launch procedures to protect nato as a bloc. you remember all this very well, then the fog cleared, so to speak, the morning came again at the bank, someone turned into a pumpkin and it turned out that the rocket was not russian, but it was not clear whose and not two were the rocket. and as if already one. she immediately came out, warsaw began to reassure everyone that for now it was necessary to figure it out and count while they were counting. it turned out that not so much and not those were rockets. but it was necessary to win back here from the information that could really lead to a serious complication of the situation for everyone. and by the way, speaking about this, and the people of poland , uh, began to speak, and uh, the peoples of other eu countries, handing over questions to their leaders.

what are they all doing. and what generally, in principle, happens if they push like this our continent is a global catastrophe. well, now the nato members have gathered and decided that, despite the fact that everything was not quite, the way they tried to present it, from the first minutes and hours of what happened, well, it’s still to blame, russia well, what is the thesis also heated many years. technological capabilities are pumped into it by means of forces, not a word is said about the results of such a widely publicized rassle. dovaniya i would remind you that the polish authorities announced this investigation more than nato, where is the investigation, what is going on? wait you it has not yet been held, you have held it, but the result has not been announced. what is the problem? you need even more

time to figure it out. not only that, because the announced investigation is being carried out, among other things , by nato allies. so what did you write then in your statement, which you accepted. there is somewhere an asterisk marked with a paragraph that all political statements in this newly adopted document require confirmation by the results of an investigation that has not yet been carried out or there is no such thing. you know, this is not the theater of the absurd, this is already mimic theater is kafka i don't know plato i can list authors for a long time who in the 20th century attempted to describe the absurdity of what is happening, but did not

find it. oh, some necessary ones, and the word in order to turn it all into a philosophical concept, and uh, they came up with such works, and dystopia or utopia ukraine is allegedly protected by common for nato values, what well state them. at least we will understand, it turns out that based on the fact that we see the values ​​​​of the alliance, this is probably the nazi ideology. these are the people with the swastika - these are the people who, uh, put up portraits of collaborators. uh, on, in general, the state and next to the state symbols. and ukraine is this what values?

just that's it, this is not the first year preached, but by the kiev regime. and we do not see any other values, as far as democracy is concerned, freedom of speech , pluralism of freedoms, in general, human rights in general. there never was. here are the last decade. all this has proved some such values ​​that you share. particularly the emphasis of the statement is on nato's open door policy 14 years later, bucharest remembered the notorious wording that took place. in the same place in 2008, the north atlantic alliance themselves in relation to prospects and membership, and in the organization of ukraine and georgia well, in general, a good reference to those events about the danger of such statements. after all, we spoke more than once, uh, in the same 2008, similar

statements with the same theses led to aggression. uh, the saakashvili regime against south ossetia and then the cultivation of the nationalist regime in ukraine, which since the fourteenth year has consistently destroyed the population of donbass and the civilian infrastructure located there has oppressed the russian-speaking population throughout ukraine to the issue, by the way, civil. we will return to our infrastructure now and nato values ​​​​against this background, of course, the statement sounds wildly cynical, but the supposedly defensive nature of nato well, i just don’t i know who surrounded nato, but i know who should be surrounded by myself. in fact, it turns out that the promise of the north atlantic bloc to continue to provide assistance to ukraine for as long as necessary, this is so worded only indicates that the line is for further escalation

of the conflict in this country and destabilization of the situation in europe. the continent remains the main task of this instrument of the collective west, this is a very dangerous policy of a pseudo-defensive bearer alliance. outward, starting with the barbarian bombardment of peaceful cities yugoslavia in the ninety-ninth year, only the pain of suffering, the destruction of hmm and the false values ​​of the substitution of concepts. and all this deserves the strongest condemnation. here you know, just proof in another proof of words. i would like to bring. nato's postulates, well, it's impossible not to do it on the issue of the values ​​that they share on the issue of civilian infrastructure and, er, so to speak, law and order.

i would like to draw attention to this from the briefing by the nato press secretary. these are not just some comments. this is the first official briefing the second is an official briefing directly by a nato employee authorized to conduct it. the third is the position of the alliance formulated clearly. we found this fragment directly on the site of the north atlantic alliance, it is there now and i hope they will not be able to quickly remove it from there. at least we have it all . all this is left. so on may 25, 19. 1999, in general, the latest history , the nato press secretary answered the following question during the briefing. the question was formulated as follows, if you have to say that the yugoslav army has a lot of generators, why are you depriving the country of 70% of

not only electricity, but also water supply, because according to your nato words, only military facilities are attacked, the north atlantic alliance response once again emphasized this official nato response unfortunately , the command and control system also depends on electricity, if milos is talking, really. want to have his citizens. there was water and electricity. all he has to do is accept the terms of nato and we will stop nato. this military campaign. until he does. we will continue to attack targets that supply his army with electricity. i would like to emphasize that the line and earlier the nato representative directly

set conditions for the citizens of the citizens of this country further. we continue the representative of nato yes, by the way , i can say, what was his name jamie shea and so jamie shea continued. if this will have consequences for the population, these are the problems of his milosevic. the water supply of electricity is being used against the people of serbia we cut them off forever or for a long time for the sake of life. one full sixty million kosovars who were kicked out of their homes and whose lives were seriously damaged? this difference continues

the nato spokesman will not please everyone. but for me , again, this is a nato official. this difference is fundamental. and so, 20 years ago, the north atlantic alliance formulated a position regarding the civilian infrastructure of the needs of the civilian population in electricity and water supply and its own interests, to put it briefly in 1999, the north atlantic alliance, in which, of course, the americans ruled. he said the following, if someone does not accept the conditions, nato will not have the opportunity to use life's necessary water, and there is energy. about something there is defensive in

nato, there is something humanistic in the west. maybe about values. we'll talk now. this is how it is with paperwork. they are all much. through a comma. remember the values ​​when you offer them to go through the documents. historical fact when you propose to compare their statement? literally, passed before our eyes. they leave the conversation. trying to get away with one sentence. let's forget about history. history is unimportant. it has already passed or the story begins today. that's all the people who think in this logic. in general

, they have no idea what values ​​are for them, values ​​matter, only now they have momentary value. they are directly related to their specific well-being of that day. they are incapable of thinking, nothing else, that's all. now the situation in moldova is closely monitored situation. there, unfortunately, we note that the west, through the hands of the authorities of the republic, continues to actively draw it into its anti-russian campaign. the scenario is similar to the one that was implemented by ukraine. cleansing the information space from objectionable opinions. political repressions, incitement of russophobia, departure from the neutral status of rapprochement with nato. everything. this is the hands of these same politicians, who, uh, took shape precisely, so to speak, from the western feeding trough. we have already drawn attention to the degradation of the situation with media freedom

further, there will still be a ban on broadcasting russian news and socio-political television programs regularly. and by the way, i’m just explaining why this is really important, because russophobia enjoys there, that is, there are channels that are actively promoted by russophobia. and i'm destroying the channels that led to some extent. this is an anomalous e, this anomalous situation in a state of balance. not now. now absolutely nationalist. but with an emphasis on e, so to speak, e rejection is precisely one culture one nationality one people bank. therefore, it is not a question of the fact that just for some reason you, even if it were political, did not turn off the channel. no, not in this. the fact is that they impose one specific ideology,

and everything that prevents them from doing this must be eliminated. in fact, that's not what they 're doing. that is, it is not a phenomenon within a political nature. this is what i would like to draw attention to. this is not an inside political story. it has uh, the implications are much wider and much more dangerous than exclusively local, tyranny, and the authorities who came temporarily, who a have support, e from abroad, but at the same time act in the interests of their own people. they do not act in the interests of their own people and pursue the policy that their foreign sponsors need, but not in the interests. themselves, but exclusively, as one of the puzzles of this huge geopolitical picture. penalties are regularly applied against russian-language tv channels

pressure on opposition media is becoming a common practice dissident journalists from the side of control supervisory bodies, whose powers are constantly expanding, while the volume of grant support is increasing, the so-called correct media through an extensive network of illegal organizations that are controlled. naturally for the west, as a result, the russophobic trend has become today, the dominant moldovan information space on november 24 this year, the country's parliament, with the votes of exclusively members of the ruling party of action. solidarity adopted a declaration with condemnation of the holodomor in ukraine in the thirty-second thirty-third year and its recognition as an act of deliberate genocide of the ukrainian people. today and in general, in principle, we have repeatedly pointed out the blasphemous nature of such political speculations in the memory of the millions of victims of the tragedies that befell many peoples of the former

soviet union and were not ethnically oriented. i will emphasize again. how is it with the assessment, and the actions of western countries that are actively involved in foreign trade settlements by the soviet union accepted only grain barter. there is an assessment in the same document, which was adopted in moldova , apparently, in chisinau they no longer know how else to divert attention. actually, the people from internal socio-economic problems, how to elevate the e degrees of russophobia, which did not take root only for years among the people of moldova the fact is that globally solve social economic problems, and the authorities are not capable and are not able to for one simple reason, they lead people not there and people understand it. yes and explain to the voters appeared on the internet internal correspondence with the leadership of the republic, exposing him, well, in the appropriate light. eh, you also need to somehow

hush it all up. the standard way out should be blamed for all the troubles on russia, which, according to the president of moldova, who is a citizen of romania, left the moldovans. but as she said in the dark and cold, it is who left the people of moldova in the dark and cold, russia for so many years, helping, supplying, supplying everything that is possible. hosting the citizens of moldova, give them work. what is work? this material support for families and those who stayed there in moldova is a contribution to the economy of moldova all these 30 years. it is that romanian citizen sandu does not know this. what did she do for her people, and this is not a rhetorical question at all. he is very practical, that's what russia has done for the citizens of

moldova, she has proved with her work for 30 years. really and what does the current, having the citizenship of another country leadership? no one understands, except destruction. so far, this has brought nothing but catastrophic consequences. that's why all this, of course, is convenient for talking with western sponsors without the financial support of which the moldovan authorities. it will hardly hold the situation, but the result - i want to say it again, such a state of affairs is deeply regrettable. however, we also see that attempts to plant a hostile image of russia in the minds of the friendly moldovan people they simply do not work. yes, he probably focuses on the future, when people grow up who will not know and

understand. perhaps with a consciousness focused only on social networks manager messengers, a hmm video hosting platforms. maybe, maybe . but not now, now people have seen how for decades, when russia itself, by and large . let's be frank, alone in the nineties, she resisted international terrorism, which was then run on us by launching people with bags of money with weapons with political support into the north caucasus. west we single- handedly withstood this shaping. a new country from a legal point of view from a political point of view from the point of view of the state system. like this two processes were going on in parallel. and despite all our difficulties, we helped moldova and the citizens of this country. that this is not known in moldova is known, of

course, the people know and remember it, and i am sure they will never forget it. ordinary moldovans understand the essence of things well and demonstrate a negative attitude towards the russophobic policy of the western authorities. and now they are simply prevented by these authorities from living, they are doing everything to complicate the lives of their citizens. we hope that in chisinau they will finally realize this and find the strength to abandon the imposed the west of a vicious path that leads to the complete loss of the sovereignty of the republic of moldova and the impoverishment of its citizens. you are for the sake of the united states. america is doing all this. this is me now to the official chisinau. i will not forget you and betray you. you are not the first and, alas, not the last you will toil and throw away. ah, now about australia in november

, australia picked up the baton to promote the anti-russian agenda in the information space, only this can explain the unfounded politicized accusations of the country's police against russia on the subject of allegedly committing cyber attacks on the insurance company copper bank. wherein. well, naturally, as always, no evidence is predictably presented by the investigation . well, why is responsibility, as usually assigned to agreements with a clause, such as heilenlikes, this is enough for our country. uh, this does not prevent the australian media from promoting, but this story is in the appropriate vein. we strongly condemn such practices. all international platforms and in bilateral contacts, consistently explain the investigation of incidents should be engaged in, the competent authorities authorized to do so are technical specialists based on the analysis of all data method. to draw the necessary conclusions to establish those responsible to make

the appropriate decisions to repeatedly bring to the australian side information about the russian specialized structure, the national coordinating center for responding to computer incidents described in detail its main tasks and principles of work directly in our contacts. the type of building in moscow, our embassies abroad did it publicly. how many statements we published on this score, we passed on the necessary templates for establishing substantive interaction, everything was done so that when the slightest suspicion appeared. well , in particular, the very same australia. about what legitimately malicious actions that e result from the territory of our country, they would have the opportunity to quickly express their concern, establish contact with russian colleagues and do everything that technical specialists, no, gassy, ​​and in no poly battles began to work together to find punishment for criminals or prevent new

crimes. as far as we know, australia did not use this channel. i'm just interested in the australian media, they will reflect this, they will ask their politicians politicians a question . and in fact, why didn't they use the normal official and, in my opinion, very convenient channels to clarify the incidents around their bank. no, if you live in in a fictional world, such a fantasy story about the fact that russia is always to blame for everything. i think that, in principle, it is possible to start weather forecasts already from this, but talking about the fact that the rain of the storm grad is all the machinations of moscow, if all the same descend on some real ground, then the australian media could remember what e can be asked. question, well, i hope you can ask your own questions in australia.