teddy bear

and play too. the heart of parma

it seems to me that if the west gave an unbiased assessment of what is happening in particular in our country, then the western man in the street would become completely sad, because against the backdrop of a sharp drop in the standard of living of western burghers, larinovich putin was at a meeting a member of the government. e, speaks of the need to increase prosperity. listen to what the finance minister just said. this year we have no questions. well, there are more uncertainties next year, but there are no in this matter, it's very good that we have with you. no, but people who do not fulfill, uh, relationships that do not fulfill our obligations, of course, such questions certainly

arise and of course we must be guided by the numbers that give statistics, firstly, accounting statistics with technical need perfection, and secondly straight. let's say i beg your pardon for this, after all, people count uh according to statistics, and according to the amount of money in their pocket. and this is what we need to look at in an independent way, and therefore our priority tasks. as said the president. our priority task is to reach a real income growth for a real reduction in fidelity and inequality in the country. in general this year. we have made a number of important decisions in this regard, including from the first of april we extended the monthly payments to seven with children aged 8 to 17 years and thereby increased the number

of recipients of such elections. they additionally covered the corner of five million children, in addition, from the first of june, the subsistence minimum was indexed at a faster pace by 10%. social payments as a result of the results of the third quarter. ah, the poverty rate. e. decreased to 10-50%, well, uh, it's certainly not much. we had 11 there. yes? yes, a year earlier in the third quarter, it was 11%, so the decline is really small, but it is important that in the current yes, not a simple economic situation , there is such a certain positive trend. this is what needs to be well preserved. i think that our

western colleagues hmm everyone 8 months ago expected that there would be completely different discussions at government meetings to be held in russia in november december 2022. and apparently the degree of their disappointment will only grow in the future, but i think mikhail is very detailed about the economy. everything will say. you will affect the point of view like international. some question to walk. here we often hear the voices of various citizens who left here or stayed, but, nevertheless, are dissatisfied with the current situation, which says that we climbed there and began to live in peace. we developed there, global institutions were global peace. you know, i recommend that they pay attention to glinkin's latest statements regarding china - this is generally a unique thing. he repeated 24 times, he says, we do not want to fight. we don't want war with china. with china, we have them. well, if you don't want to, we won't fight, who

asks you to fight with them. well, 20 years we don’t want a war with china. why does the topic of confrontation with china arise at all? does china have some kind of base there near the united states of america or is china threatened by the territorial integrity of the united states there are no states, all documents openly say that the reason for the confrontation is that china becomes a competitor for the united states. that is, as soon as you are a competitor automatically. we go to war, but apparently we have to, but we will do everything not to fight. you just stop being our competitors, and then this issue will generally be removed from the agenda and you know that in this world of such unipolar diktat of the united states that they are used to and, of course, it is very difficult to part with all this very interesting statements were made, including and from the nato secretary general from stoltenberg. this means that the media showed only the first part of these statements, although the second significant interesting part was promoted by us, where stoltenberg said that ukraine should

win as an independent and sovereign state, what did he say? further further he says, because if she does not win, as the independence of sovereign states. we will not accept it into nato. first of all, i want from myself personally and from the colleagues present here, thank dens stoltenberg, which he finally clearly gave understand, to those of our citizens who doubted. what is the ultimate value of a special military operation. of the russian federation in ukraine because for 8 months now those who have not understood this have been saying, and what are the goals after all. and what do we still want to achieve? it was said that ukraine should have a neutral status. it should not be part of nato mr. stoltenberg said that for this it is necessary to make sure that ukraine is not an independent and sovereign state then he will not have nato membership. this means that our task is to ensure just such a result of a special military operation. this can be done in different ways. here's an interesting one. uh info. today we can

say sensational information, generally sounded. here is the head of the foreign intelligence service of the russian federation, naryshkin, who said that poland is speeding up preparations for the annexation of the western ukrainian regions, my personal opinion. maybe colleagues will not agree with this. i think this is good news, because if we we are talking about the fact that the territorial integrity of ukraine is no longer an international legal factor. whatever you are, the more countries. it will be poland or hungary that will agree with this, which will present their territorial claims. we do not make territorial claims, this is the will of the local population. but if the western states themselves will present territorial claims to ukraine to us. what are the questions about what then? i'm not sure that these western regions can get along as part of our state. to me it seems that they will always be a hotbed of such tension. now, if they will be a hotbed of tension problems for poland or for some other western states. that is, thank god let them

deal with bandera and their old friends there. uh, in the morning, they lay wreaths in memory of the victims of the volyn massacre, and in the evening, uh, it means that the combiners bow before the memory. here in this world it is political that this is supposedly a photomontage. well, the essence does not change. well, well, well, welcomes them with the bandera vine. when they come to kyiv but in fact? well, i think, yes, absolutely the same thing. and therefore, here this factor can hardly be considered as bad news for us now. it seems to me that there would be a positive scenario for us, in this regard, you need to understand that for our country in this confrontation there is no scenario of retreat or loss. that here is a scenario in which we retreat, but persist as a state. i think he doesn't drive. such a scenario for the americans. i thought that's it

prevents the americans from losing this confrontation. nothing will happen to them on their own. in this case they lost in afghanistan something happened. they've lost before. in iraq they lost in syria their political system and their current political leader is perfect. for this provided. to put it mildly , bayda is not the most promising political figure in the united states and it is unlikely that his career is just beginning - quite a fine figure for losing to take on. all the blame for all these mistakes and give a chance there i don’t know the republicans, who, apparently, in any case, win the next elections, accuse the democrats of the canoes on his particular administration , close this page and move on, so the only scenario is if they tell us that the only scenario for peace in ukraine is to provide further weapons to ukraine, we we can say that the only scenario for global peace. it is your defeat to take responsibility and leave, and then peace e all over the world will be at this

scenarios are quite possibly the global context of our special military operation. he is quite understandable, and there in the ninety-fourth year, a woman said one famous phrase. he told us that russia without ukraine will never be an empire, but with ukraine it becomes an empire automatically. but what is very important and that we rarely, when we quote, he waited for us a hint, what needs to be done for this? he says that the stability of ukraine, the stability of ukraine will be in question if the united states of america to divert attention to other problems, to the internal problems of europe, to relations with iran , to relations with turkey, to other regions of the world. and this is what i want to draw attention to, we will not be able to win this confrontation. if we are surrounded on all sides and set on fire, then the south caucasus, then central asia, then eastern europe , internal political protests are trying to

ignite us in the most diverse ways. and we're trying to win on the same battlefield. it won't work. we will have to work exactly according to the same methodology and go with the same goals, very good evidence that we have discussed the italian elections many times in the studio. we talked about the fact that all this positive reaction to the victory of the right in italy is, on the one hand, understandable, because they at least publicly performed better than the left in our respect, but it will not lead to anything at all. here, the melting is already occurring in nato, this is the minister of foreign affairs of italy and he says it is necessary to make sure that the russians leave the western balkans. it is necessary to weaken their influence on the western in the balkans of eastern europe, there should be fewer of them. and why are we surprised? it cannot be that we are not working with political forces within countries with opposition within these countries with leaders of public opinion, but they have won elections. for some reason start to work for us it won't. and until we start actively. sorry for the

expression. let it not from a legal point of view violate there. eh, someone’s feelings and so on, but until we start to actively interfere in internal affairs, formulate an agenda or result there and as a result of political processes expects that they will be aimed at our interests. i don't think you should know. you give me a word to interfere with the influence of a good interest. mikhalych well, what, exactly? and yet, in general, more or less, it is clear. if they fall, and we grow, then we will still win. so we would have to grow, while they had hopes that they would fall a little bit, we would fall hard. as a result, we will lose, and they will rise at the expense of our resources exactly what happened in the late eighties, that is, they the seventies fell, then riganomics began, which was not such an afterburner on

limited resources, and suddenly, unexpectedly, we lost and the golden age of clinton began, which actually meant the plunder of the former ussr, as soon as these resources ran out, problems began in the late nineties. and so. uh, it means that we need the growth of the issue. can we have growth, of course, for a banal reason, because we are the most not well, as it were, under- invested piece of the world economy. so we can accept investments. well, including how through import substitution procedures. we throw out hundreds of billions of dollars every year. to support the world economy, because we buy consumer goods there, which we can produce ourselves. why do we do this mean? and, because we do exist. here are the three basic sources of

investment is the budget, and we see how our government is in the face. mishustin is doing everything to direct every penny into investments, the trouble is that the effectiveness of these investments is often low, because money that gets somewhere to officials, and officials have had a habit since the nineties that everything that fell into their paws is theirs, and not at all the people. well, well, that is, if it's not there, then it's not nah. no, they are automatic here, therefore, well, they somehow need to be punished. we see that the process of punishment is accelerating, but, apparently, there is still a drawback. and foreign investments, well, everything is clear here, and they were closed to us almost completely, and then the most interesting moment begins domestic ruble investments liberal economic

politicians. and you can criticize a lot those people who implement this policy, but let's look at it not from the point of view of, as it were, the criminal code or something else, but from the point of view of politics in our country. and by the way, not only here, the united states of america, the same picture, there are two groups. one says, we must build a national economy in a crisis, as we grew in the thirties, when everyone was falling, and the other says, no, we must go to world economy, the united states of america the same picture byte command. she says we should keep the world dollar system, a from the publication. i'm sorry, it's getting harder. it generally says. no no no. let's make america great again and to hell with it. so here is the current situation,

as it was already said at the beginning today, but it is already clear that in the global economy we are like, uh, not equal, and even junior partners are not expected. for this reason, a political decision must be made to abandon liberal economic policies. so far no such decision has been made. and this as? i think it's a very dangerous situation. at the same time , we have an example of the ninety-eighth year, because in august-september it seemed that everything is well, everything, the catastrophe, economic growth began already in january-february, december ninety-ninth. well, in december, as it were, only separate everything, and then it began to grow furiously in 2001-2002, it was 12-15%, why? because they changed the refusal? liberal economic policy, if we talk

about uh, like numbers, then the share, uh, like money supply, that is, the monetization of the economy, which was before the default, 4% of gdp by 2002 was 40, that is, and it was increased 10 times relatively, but in absolute terms, 15 times inflation. at the same time , it fell as soon as the liberal ignatius came in 2002 , at the end already in 2004. industrial inflation. it doubled from 14% to 28%. by the way, after that, the inflation statistics became heavily falsified. well, because it was just clear that the liberal policy leads to an increase in inflation, but because the liberals do not understand what inflation is to contain, they know, only were monetary. that is, in other words, what to do? it's clear how to make it clear, but at the same time one must be aware that ninety percent of the population supports the national policy,

but in the elite 90% want peace. someone has a problem that the world does not want, but they have a big problem, the world says, no thanks, they don’t have houses there anymore. i know by myself where my house is not my house. that's it, remember my word, the house will return to you, they didn’t start here. yes, i want there will be not only one question, what will be there at this place in another. why is there will not return, let's see how it goes. maybe in 10 years the chinese will all become russia that is, this is a woman. maybe this, by the way, can also be, but the problem is not in this, but the problem is that we, we, we got into a problem. how is it not theirs. and we must make our own political

decision. well, that's all and the last i can't talk about winter. you're talking about domestic investment. and here's what i don't understand, we are collecting a wild amount of money as comrades in order to buy everything that is needed for the front. that's where i'm interested in the fund with modest name svr fund not because the foreign intelligence service, because that's my last name. and why can’t you issue bonds so that people, like during the great patriotic war, just support the ruble, dmitry offered money about this, it’s impossible to invest it. why is it impossible to invest the process is limited to this, and like this. well, that's how, well, look, assemble and buy a car that you can already have. but if you try to raise money to build a car factory. that's pretty fast find that this money somewhere disappear car factory? no, well, wait. we now from time to time know exactly what the state wants directly

and clearly. clearly brings the money to the final address in itself, the responsibility will be the car factory. of course i don't see any problem. yes, there will be money for state activity only through investments, and still there is no political solution, then. i say why they answer the political decision will be the state investment, of course, here's the budget maneuver, because this money will should. but it is precisely to ensure that private investment is gone. here it's honest, it's just more difficult, because the state must guarantee, because people trust the state do not give the military-industrial room. it's easy to develop. that is, i don't see any problem here, there is no problem to raise this money, targeted painted, which go only to the military-industrial complex, no problem. no. and to her, well, there are many other industries, even you can color the ruble . no, i still mean, here in the military-industrial complex - this is just to assemble. can i think to control? yes i think it would be right, but like other industries. why infrastructure can not be

separately possible, what the central bank says, the central bank will say, you are taking away liquidity from commercial banks, and it will become so. it’s bad now that this money is on bank deposits, of course, it will be good to say that they can, but it will be fine. but it's still a political decision. well, in the end, since we started in the winter to defuse the situation a little. let me remind you, the old school joke is still soviet about how a history lesson in soviet school. mashenka who is alexander nevsky, this is the great russian commander who lured the teutons to our earth, waited for winter and defeated them. and who is kolenka, you are such kutuzov, the great russian commander, who lured the french to our earth, waited for winter , defeated them, tanya who is stalin, the great soviet commander, who lured the germans to our earth, waited for them in winter, defeated vovochka a.

who is yesir arafan, and also raphael is the great palestinian commander who lured the jews to his land and is now waiting for the winter to demarcate them, that zelensky is the great khokhlyatsky commander who replaced. he lured the chechens and the buryats, there is no winter, and now he is waiting for the winter. yes, but, let’s say, you can’t directly wait for winter, but i don’t understand what the problem with colored money is about, really. yes, well, but there are simply spheres. this is for now, insider. well, at least two. yes, how contrary to liberal principles, i say again, i talked about this topic. well let's do it. well, now the times have changed quite a lot, and why did ours behave? the government of the times there of the covid crisis

show that it is by no means a liberal model of rule. well, because, if, of course, effective reasonable, what is happening now with our vc shows that there are no liberal principles there. but there is a need for a clearly defined task, traditional developments are used, plus new technologies are taking place there, colossal changes, colossal changes. that is, if it is necessary to support money and why not give the people the opportunity to support their native army industrial complex. we already did it in a different way, right? let's give people's money through yes, you can give people's money, through i still have no problems today , i can absolutely trust him, but i just know well what rostec is doing. tomorrow i will show one of the divisions of rostec, which generally produces science fiction, that is, in reality, they have increased the volume of production of what is needed for the army in a colossal way, but i will be honest, yes, i will give through i know to whom i give. i'm just with this no problems better lady than the unknown hand of the market, yes

the market will become visible, of course, the hand of the sleeve money. uh, marat sent money to mishustin. i don't see any problems with this, because it is contrary to the liberal. i'm saying now, i'm just as nabiullina in the nineties, when we worked with her in the economy in the same department to talk about these topics. she was then in charge of small business reform. here is something personal. yes, yes, we are in the ninety-seventh year, when she requested millions of budget money for this reform dollars, and, accordingly, everything is correct on its fate on the phone. well, i said that she was very offended by the thirty-year cycle, semey shutila, she pouted, so you can,

but this is a political decision, not an economic one. we have now generally entered the era of political decisions back the political decision to take profits. uh, profit from european oil and gas companies. well, this is a political decision, when americans make, by and large, solid political decisions, when our money is being stolen, freezing our funds. this is a political decision, for which there is not even any legal basis, when i studied economics back in the late eighties. i was always there, everywhere it was written any attempt to influence prices leads to their increase, that is, any attempt to limit the prices of a russian person. no, it leads to an increase in the load, price people. theirs. yes , but he is a different problem, which is not accidental, but he said. apply it 6 times, yes, it will spread to different groups. the goods are absolutely innocence. once kohl lost.

so everything, but the fact is that it immediately collapses immediately. the entire world economy. it just needs to be understood, but what you are talking about, it turns out that we are the last stronghold of liberal economic thought. we will appear as the last stronghold of economic thought. this is just a good part, so it is, but if the liberal economic is bad, if it is because it is not, but these are the philosophical reflections of advertising.

economy, then today sergei kozhu gettovich, obviously addressed a very specific, type economy. listen to what the minister of defense of the russian federation, general of the army heroes of russia sergei shoigu, said. as a result of a special military operation and partial mobilization, the requirements of the state order have increased at all levels of control and execution. implementation has been optimized this year