information was transmitted, uh, from the surveillance cameras of the osce mission, which were installed along the line of contact. all these problems, which were obvious and which many of you, by the way, exposed and made public. although they all allowed it to your editions. uh, special monitoring missions were hushed up. she deliberately turned a blind eye to all these violations, including turning a blind eye to the preparation of a forceful solution to the problem of donbass, as planned by the kiev regime. uh, i refuse publicly with my mouth and poroshenko then rustami zelensky refusing to comply with the minsk agreements. the west is silent. eh, indulged. uh, such an unacceptable action and in the middle of february. the statistics are there you can't

hide, uh, hmm, the number of shelling of the territory of the donetsk and luhansk people's republics that has not stopped for all these long years has increased tenfold, a huge flow of refugees has poured into russia. you know what happened next. we had no other choice to save. e residents of donbass and to eliminate security threats the russian federation has no choice left from the ukrainian territory. how to recognize the independence of the dpr and e, in accordance with article 51, start a special military operation at their request to protect them from the nazis? uh, note what? such is the line of behavior of the osce, the ugly line of behavior of the osce has its own explanation, using the arithmetic superiority in this organization. the west has

been trying to implement for many years. uh. well, if you want, privatization, but it’s probably more correct to say that he is trying to carry out a raider takeover osce to subjugate this last platform for a common regional dialogue was also the council of europe, but the council of europe has already shaken the west. uh, i don't think there's a chance of recovery. now, under the gunpoint of the osce, and its powers of competence are being diluted in every possible way and pulled apart in a narrow, non- inclusive format. here, through the efforts of the european union , parallel structures are being created. e, a parallel meeting of the type of the european political community, and recently, on october 6, a rational meeting was held and is preparing

this meeting, announcing the initiative to create president macron of the european political community, proudly declared that we invited everyone except russia and belarus he immediately began to sing along with such prominent figures of european diplomacy as josé barel and analiana berburg, who said yes, we must build security not with the russian federation as to this was called for by the same merkel, e.g., by one of the other european leaders. it is to complete the construction of security against russia , and other structures are being invented in order to impose on other countries in the spirit of colonial thinking confrontational approaches to pull apart the agenda of the osce in narrow formats. here's to the various uh hmm platforms calling for partnerships. here recently. uh,

well, a few years ago, also as a backstab, germany and france proclaimed the initiative to create an alliance of multilotralists. where only they themselves will invite whom they want, just like the united states invites. uh, only their own people to what they call a summit for democracy. but when we asked the french in germans, why create alliance of multilatalists, when there is an inclusive structure of the osce in europe, and in a global format on a global scale there is an organization of the united nations where more multilateral multilateral ones answered us no, indeed all countries are present, but for effective multiloteralism. it is necessary not to work in the osce , but to create a group of leaders, because both in the osce and uh, there are retrogrades

that will hinder the advancement of effective multivatamism. and we are progressives, we will do the rest. are adjusting this is such a philosophy and, of course, this is also a subversion of all those high principles on which the osce was built. as a result of all this, hmm, the security space in europe is finally fragmented, and the osce itself becomes e. well, to put it mildly, a marginal entity, and the current bc presidency in recent years was not at all eager to somehow break this negative trend, on the contrary, the swedes were chairmen last year. already then they openly began to act in no way honestly and brokers.

and as e active participants in western e politics in the osce on subordinating the osce to the us interest in brussels, in fact, the swedes. it was the swedes who began to prepare the obse's funeral. here well, our polish neighbors the whole uh, this year. they are diligently digging the grave for this organization, destroying the remnants of the culture of consensus. e action. warsaw we all know about this grossly violating the rules of procedure for the decisions of the decision-making bodies, still in 2002, at a ministerial meeting in the port, a special document was adopted on how the current chairman. well, he doesn't have to allow it. they match their actions. rather, it is obliged not to allow its actions to be inconsistent with the positions that

are agreed upon by all state participants, that is, to consensus, and it is obliged to ensure that in its actions in its statements the entire spectrum of opinions of states is taken into account. participants, uh we, uh, within the framework of organizing a collective security treaty at the level of foreign ministers of six countries, made special statements on november 23, in which we expressed fundamental assessments of these indecent actions of the polish chairmanship, we know that others in a number of other osce countries share these assessments, and in general i can now, approaching the end of my opening speech, which, probably, has dragged on. but i hope you change i can say. it is responsible that the anti-presidency of poland, e, in the osce will take the most

unattractive place in the history of this organization. no one has ever done such damage, the osce, standing at its helm. well, or as a summary, i will say that the efforts of countries. yes, for many years they were aimed at preventing building a system that is equal and indivisible to european security. despite all the incantations that uh were taken within the framework of political declarations, and we are now waiting, we are reaping the fruits of this absolutely not far-sighted uh, erroneous policy, the spirit and letters of the basic documents of the osce. trampled and the osce was created at one time for a common european dialogue. now i have quoted to you the goals put forward by both the west and the osce chairmen this year and last year. eh,

everything. it raises tough questions about, uh, what our future relationship will be like, but even, perhaps more important is the question of what will be clear to the osce itself, what, what, if and when at some point in time, our western neighbors will not get away from the neighborhood, our western neighbors and former partners. if they suddenly become interested in somehow restoring joint work on european security, then restoration will not work, because restoration means returning to something that was before. but, as usual, there will be no business, and when and if the west realizes that it is still better to coexist on the basis of some mutually related, but we will listen to what the west

will offer and it is clear that these should be fundamentally new principles of interaction, but will it be possible for such interaction to be seen in the future? i don't know how to decide for the west, which has been systematically destroying everything that was laid down as the principles for the functioning of a unique common european organization called thank you for all these long decades. sorry for a little abuse, probably right. opening remarks ready for an interactive conversation dear colleagues it's time for your questions, we understand, there are quite a lot of them on a variety of topics. but we would like to remind you that today's press conference is devoted to the problems of european security,

so please stick to the topic. well, at least at the beginning of our discussion, a-and russia today, igor zhdanov, i ask you. hello , you essentially dedicated your opening remarks to the osce to the history of this group and the unification of this union and its current situation. you mentioned and smith in the boat, which is now passing and polish presidency. where it is in these sensational warsaw that your god did not let you into your group, and russia will not take part in the munich conference either. and it all looks like moscow remains cut off from european diplomacy, and my question is related to how moscow can now adapt to these conditions and, for example, how relevant is, for example, a grain deal for russia in this context of such an attitude. thank you so much. well, you know, to

answer the question. will moscow be cut off from european diplomacy, by the way, we can add to the examples you cited the fact that during this year our parliamentarians were not allowed in twice this year by not issuing visas to a meeting of the osce parliamentary assembly, one was in britain, the second was recently in poland e. this is also a characteristic of how honest brokers are. the so -called are leading a pan-european organization, but returning to the question of whether we are being cut off from european diplomacy. uh, i guess we need to deal with that first, uh, there is whether preserved or european diplomacy? and if so, what is it so far from the main european diplomats, and we hear. eh, here are statements in the spirit

of the same jazz. barrel, which he, like a mantra , repeats first a special military operation . this conflict must end with the victory of ukraine on the battlefield. this is the european diplomat. i have already quoted in the opening remarks of another statement by barrel, er, who stated. uh, when the macron announced, uh, a meeting within the framework of the european political community proposed by him that declared my russia will not be invited, as well as belarus and then barrel and after him, and mrs. berberg, uh, declared, uh, another new new task of building european security, not with russia, but against russia, if this is understood by european diplomacy, i don’t

think that we need to go there, we need to understand when european diplomacy will appear, well, people are also sane. you know, uh, i'm here, it's not even difficult to remember all this, because such specific quotes are always the same. the same michelle demanding again, to ensure the victory of ukraine declares that this must be done, because ukraine strives for european values, and stoltenberg said that it is already defending them promotes the values ​​of europe the values ​​of freedom and democracy ursula von der lein made similar statements, if this is the quintessence of european diplomacy that we need to help ukraine now because it stands for european values, it means this is

only one thing, or these european diplomats are not informed of numerous facts from the fact that really happening in ukraine as it was destroyed for many years. long before the start of the special military operation of the russian orthodox church, despite all the norms of civilized life, how the opportunity for national minorities was destroyed. however, then the european national minorities. removed from this ban. there was only one russian national minority to use their own language. in all spheres, without exception, how russian-speaking esmi were destroyed, not only owned, but by russians and russian organizations, but also by those media broadcasting in russian language that belonged to ukrainians, how political positions were destroyed, how parties were banned, how leaders of, uh, political

political structures were arrested, and much more. not to mention how nazi practices are openly propagated. what is enshrined, as i said in the legislation in the legislation of this state, and if european diplomacy, calling pathetically, calling to defend ukraine, which upholds european values, understands european values ​​by this, by what is now ukraine, uh, really uh, promotes, but we don’t need to have anything to do with such diplomacy, we will fight to stop this diplomacy, and stop it as soon as possible, and so that people who pursue such a hateful policy in violation of the un charter in violation of numerous conventions, but violations of international humanitarian law, and

so that these people, uh, after all, uh, retire. yes let me put it this way. and if on the topic of what values ​​it stands for, and the current kiev regime started talking, then uh, uh, recently, zelensky did a lot of interviews there, but in one of them, uh, he uh, he is everywhere, he says you can’t let russia win and everyone applauds. and as spellbound, but in one of these interviews. he said that if russia is allowed to win, this is already an idea, by the way, and stoltenberg repeated. if russia is allowed to win, then other big countries will decide that they can. attack small strange and several such large countries on different continents, zelensky said they are remaking the entire geography of the world, the big countries of the world will divide and

strangle the little one and then the most important thing for the sake of it. what am i quoting. i want to bring. i speak zelensky for a different scenario, when everyone on the planet will know that no matter where he lives, he has the same rights and is also protected, like any person in the world. end of the quote by vladimir zelensky and no one who chose the interview asked this person. has he forgotten that he advised ukrainians who feel a sense of involvement in russian culture, and he advised them to get out of russia, this was literally a year ago in september 2021. here is a man who wants to defend the rights of every person in the world. he just wants to kick the russians out of his country just

because they kept their language, their culture, and he probably forgot when he declared about the right of every person, regardless of where he lives , to be protected, he forgot that zelensky's ambassador in kazakhstan is not so i forgot his last name a long time ago, which means that the first three letters are lying, in my opinion, some kind of vrubel. here he publicly in an interview, while in kazakhstan, said that our main the task is to kill the russians. and the more we kill them, the less our children will have to kill them. no one has commented on this. not a single european diplomat paid attention to this. although we uh drew their attention to the unacceptability of this kind of behavior, of course. this was a direct

insult on the part of the zelensky regime to our kazakh neighbors, as well, who said that it was unacceptable for the ambassador to do such things. yes , this man has been hanging out there for about a month and a half. only then did he manage to get it out. here, therefore, european diplomacy, which swallows all these manifestations of the ukrainian approach to european values. i feel sorry for this diplomat. but then, about the grain deal, you also asked, uh, well, very briefly. hmm, mona did a lot of information about this account, and since march in march of this year. uh, we began our military to announce daily, twelve-hour periods of operation of humanitarian corridors for the export

of ukrainian grain from ukrainian ports, the only obstacle, for this, was that these ports were mined and our military announced these humanitarian corridors. please, ukrainian colleagues said to take the appropriate vessels through the minefields, and we guarantee their safe delivery to the entrance to the straits. zelensky stated that he had raised this, that it was an ambush that the russians could not be trusted when we offered to guarantee freedom of passage through neutral waters, and together with their turkish colleagues, they agreed, and again zelensky was capricious. well, here is the intervention of the general to sign two documents on july 22 in istanbul one the document is very detailed. it explains what steps and what guarantees will be applied

to exports from ukrainian three ukrainian ports, and ukrainian food, and the second document says that general steel will try to remove artificial obstacles to the export of russian fertilizers of russian grain. it's been july 22 so far. at least until a week ago. i heard another statement, either barrel or someone else from this e euro e structure that there are no restrictions on the export of russian russian grain fertilizers are not contained in the sanctions, but this is frankly a lie, because although the headings of fertilizer and food from russia are on the sanctions lists. no, what is in these headings and what is prohibited this is a ban on banking transactions, primarily for our leading bank

rosselkhozbank, which is excommunicated from swift, namely, it serves more than 90% of all our food supplies. also included in the sanctions is, uh, a ban on access by our ships to european ports, and foreign ships to russian ports, and also the sanctions concern e, chartering of ships and insurance of ships. it's all open in public text, a emphasized the sandwich at a recent themselves these groups of twenty in indonesia a. he is engaged, to his credit, in removing these barriers, but almost soon it will be already the fifth month since the signing of this deal. the reaction of the united states and the european union is uh, very uh slow. of these , our monov colleagues literally

have to knock out some exceptions every time. uh, here, but, in principle, we certainly support that made by the general secretary. uh, another thing is that in relation to his efforts, from the west , uh, there is not much respect. this is also the manner of the west to show who is in the owner's house, whom should we run after, whom should we beg? and the next question is the tv channel of the union state bels julia stolbova, please. julia can't hear you, please turn on the microphone. please tell me what your forecast will be of european security without the participation of a union state throughout belarus. to me difficult to make predictions. i can tell you with all

responsibility what the security of the allied state will be, regardless of what the next mockery will be subjected to . pretends to, uh, chairmanship of the osce. e, promising the functions of an honest broker. we learned the value of those figures who are now head of the osce secretary and who also simply do not have the right to do anything, which would go beyond the end of the world. well , back then, the conference on security and cooperation in europe in 1975 was not created so that, uh, everyone danced according to someone else's tune, not so that everyone obeyed the vision of the world and the task

of ensuring security and cooperation that our western partners offered as a result, all this was created in order for everyone to be heard and so that not a single country would feel itself, but excluded from the general process. but now all this has been turned upside down. the west does exactly what it would be created against digs dividing lines, but where they dig there, and someone can be buried, fearing that this is done specifically for the osce and all these initiatives of the european political community. well. that is, everything except uh russia and belarus is a frank invitation to the word of the osce to create a western intercompany, from where they will promote their initiatives, including unilateral

illegal sanctions, including the creation of some kind of tribunals for the confiscation of funds, and this is well, nowhere, not disappeared colonial thinking desire and desire to live at the expense of others, just as the united states now lives at the expense of europe and will profit from the economic crisis , the energy of the cruisers that europe has hit will sell to europe and gas is four times more expensive than europe uh bought russian gas, and they will promote their own laws, and the fight against inflation. uh, allocates hundreds of billions of dollars there. or for their industry, in order to lure investors from the same europe and, as a result, europe will come, where industrialization is, therefore, security without russia and belarus, they are already

trying to build security without russia in belarus. but now they need to agree among themselves. here the macron urgently flew to washington to complain to demand. i don't know how this will end, uh, but uh, we don't need that kind of security. the whole security of europe now comes down to the fact that it has completely submitted to the united states. a few years ago there were disputes in germany as well. uh, do we still need to build in france, of course, when she advocated for the strategic autonomy of the european union . it proposed the creation of the armed forces, and there were corresponding discussions in the european union a and b in germany, but most actively promoted the idea of ​​the armed forces of the strategic autonomy of the eu. la, did you promote it? france, but recently one of the

staff members of the national security council is the president of the united states. i forgot his last name. he said that europe should categorically forget about any dreams of creating some kind of its own army. you can't get away from nato. at germany a couple of years ago. these discussions also ended with the same conclusion that we must rely on nato for germany's secure security. well, about poland and the baltic countries. there is nothing to say. as well as under the pro-pro a number of central european countries that seem to have always demonstrated some kind of reasonable approach. but now they got the government. ah, ultra radical. uh, russophobic and uh, v. in general, anti-russian by and large. what about that? by the way, here, well, about the independence of europe, uh, discussions began

about the need to increase the number of american troops to conduct exercises on the european continent near belarus near the russian federation, here defender yura was the largest exercise in many, many years, and when they asked mr. austin, who now heads the pentagon and the united states is transferring his troops on a temporary basis or otherwise, he replied, without thinking directly according to freud we have not yet we have not decided in washington yet. what will our military presence in europe be like in his mind? was not to say and of course, we must consult with our european allies. no, we haven't decided yet. here's your answer. to the question what will be the security now?