at the session, dedicated to ukraine, dedicated to condemning russia, the americans talked about it, the australians talked about it. but by the way, and i was even surprised pleased. i don't know about it, the canadians didn't talk about it, the japanese didn't talk about it, the norwegians here, well, from my point of view. well, at least some presence of common sense was nevertheless indicated. well, although they are actively uh involved. so to speak, the conflict in ukraine and all of the above are supplying weapons, and your countries may be in japan to a lesser extent, as they say, but canada, norway in particular, what is called covered this time, not everyone. here's how to try. e raise this organization for yourself. or maybe they just realized that this is impossible, and i am sincerely grateful to my colleagues in the osian format, and the countries actually have different relations bilateral relations with the russian federation, there is singapore, which criticizes russia quite harshly practically

western positions, there are close to us countries vietnam laos indonesia which are in favor of the position. well, at least neutral, but still not less than once again, the format itself almost completely leveled this already traditional, unfortunately, anti-russian activity west well, why didn’t they succeed? after all, they are consistently building their position, they act as a united front, and they are pushing their e, values ​​are pushing a unipolar model. e of the world, but literally at all international venues, here is to remember even here the mps about which we were talking last time. uh, they still managed to, uh, say muddy the waters, you know, i’ll express ideas on this air for the first time, which have long been in my head. eh, it adds up. here the west, uh, is fond of what makes up all kinds of ratings. freedom of speech rating. freedom of the press. state of human rights. well and further everywhere. it is clear that, uh, the

criteria for these rankings are always uh convenient for the countries that compile them, so i suggested thinking about starting to compile on a regular basis, it will depend on what happens in the world rankings. e sovereignty, the corresponding state of their degree of their sovereignty and i think that in the first places in this ranking. well, whether we like it or not , we will criticize the united states of america as much as we like, but there is no doubt. they behave sovereign. regardless in this ranking, of course, our country will be the russian federation without any doubt in the most major league in this ranking will refuse china i have no doubt in this ranking will be belarus in this ranking will be iran in this ranking. i think north korea i call completely different countries, and they are in different situations, but agree that each of these countries is pursuing its own independent policy. and

in this rating, i am sure, there will be a lot of states in asia, including those included in the asian. many states in africa, many states in latin america, and uh, one can only respect this position, i repeat once again, i'm not talking about the content. i'm talking about the degree of sovereignty can only be respected, understanding? in what purposeful way this sovereignty is being tried destroy precisely the western countries, overturning. those, these are the states that claim to be independent of their positions somewhere in the very last, e, lines of this kind of ratings. and so, back to your question. i think that this is an association of assians, with which we have been cooperating in russia for more than 30 years and for the last 5 years, based on the position of strategic partnership. here is the state of the session, given that they are different will be in such a hypothetical ranking. she's very tall and she's very worthy positions of the constant. that is, features is another question

. this week, the federation website discussed such an important topic as russophobia. well, uh, we know the process has been uh long enough. well, over the past six months, with a little, everything has become more and more widespread. as you remember, it began with attempts, the abolition of dostoevsky e. and tchaikovsky as a result, now the situation is escalating and it is really felt by our compatriots who live abroad, as well as our tourists, who, well, find themselves in these so-called unfriendly countries. and how to deal with it, what to do with it, mankind, e, experienced this problem in its history. uh repeatedly well since uh history of racism. the times of colonialism of course, anti-semitism is the most disgusting climax of which was the holocaust, there were other examples, but in the modern history of mankind, the point

where we are now. uh, perhaps the most disgusting form of manifestation of these phobias is, of course, russophobia. and uh. she flourished so luxuriantly in the west for one simple reason. for the reason that it was formed and e developed e, not from the bottom up. not at the household level, it was artificially cultivated from above. this is a conscious policy of the authorities of western states to outlaw russia as a state, then russia as a nation, as a people, and then the citizens of russia up to people who do not even have citizenship. well, either natives of russia, or those who speak russian, or who love russia, all this happened perfectly. the disgusting phenomena of russophobia and uh , what worries me most is that it is now at this stage does not seem to the citizens of western countries we always understand. what role does public opinion play?

here are the citizens of western countries well, in most cases. it, alas, does not seem unacceptable, it does not seem disgusting, and uh, this should, of course, be handled much more systematically and from my point of view. uh, we need to fix the situation on the fact that we are not dealing with the problem of attitude to a certain country and to a certain ethnic group, we are dealing with a much more systemic and therefore more dangerous problem, when the state interstate disagreements, problems of contradiction are transferred to the level of attitudes towards people. and this is completely unacceptable now, uh, that is, if you like, this is a moral category. here you can't do it. it seems to be indecently bad, but i think that this category must necessarily be fixed in international law and i am glad that here in russia lawyers have already begun to work on this both lawyers and diplomats. and if we're going to talk about what needs to be done. this is the norm and international law is clear that it was already then not only

not so much russophobia. although for us. this is the main critical thing, a critical topic needs to be discussed in a broader sense. eh, understanding, but about this as an announcement, and i believe that this phenomenon is most clearly most adequately described by the term ethnocide, that is, the negative attitude of ethnic persecution with all the ensuing consequences. i will repeat once again. we have already started working on it. this idea at the legal level at the international legal level konstantin vasilyevich you used terminators. yes, that is to our interview. i looked up academic words. and so he gives the following definition that this is a nazi - this is a policy of destroying national identity, the self-consciousness of the people, and there is such a postscript. that the peoples who have become victims of ethnocide usually lose their historical memory or a significant part of the loss of historical memory - this, in your opinion, is the goal of the western world to deprive. i would now replace the

word loss deprivation with artificial deprivation. e some e croups of the population of some people of their historical memory. of course. yes, of course, yes. we see how the history of our country is falsified in all its in all its refractions. not only the great patriotic war. the german bundestag has just declared a ukrainian famine. e genocide, although it was a national tragedy of all our then soviet people, and we know that not only and not so much ukraine was this tragedy. when we are affected , we see how all the previous stages of our russian history are being falsified. this distortion of history ultimately leads to try to arouse some people's rejection of this story and desire. to distance it, but in the end to forget this very real story, starting to use some, uh, surrogates and, uh, simulators. this is absolutely clear. thank you

for this definition, which is part of a strategic, part of politics, not the only part, but the most important, because in any case, the national identity of any people is determined by its history, its traditions, its language, which ultimately goes to those moral values ​​and national interests that make any people a people, or do not. what do you think, and when in the west they still see the light and, well, they will decide to make a 180 ° turn, after all. uh, what is imposed from above is uh, after all, it is artificial and understandable that sooner or later people will realize that this is an artificial pleasure, an artificial fear, an artificial attempt. the abolition of russian culture from my point of view, the turning point in people's minds will happen when they realize that, on the other hand, which they are trying to evaluate the same people as

they are, it seems to me that we, in terms of our informational, in a good sense, propaganda work, are underperforming, because very often we are limited to work. but if you want, official structures. this is what is called the voice of the kremlin, the voice of moscow, but, uh, when the so -called crimean platform gathers somewhere there again. from my point of view, the crimean residents of crimea owe millions. go out with all two million take to the streets and ask from this street a question to those who somewhere out there in some sort of hamburg or warsaw are going to the so-called crimean platform. are you there what are you going to discuss whom you are discussing? you are discussing us. you are going to transfer us there again from one jurisdiction to another jurisdiction, we live here. we are people, we determine our destinies, and no one but us can determine these destinies and has no right, and the same thing should happen when someone undertakes to assess the situation in the southeast. uh, in our new four

subjects of the federation in those regions and still ukraine which. well, what is called borderline . it doesn't seem that everything is being done in terms of our official positions, promotion of positions. eh, everything is done correctly to the maximum, but it is necessary to accompany all this with civic activity of the population, primarily of those regions of those subjects of the federation territories that are now in the zone of attention and when people are in warsaw in hamburg vilnius in london in paris where in washington anywhere more will be understand that the matter is not only and not so much in the official position of moscow, but in the will of people who want to determine their own fate, so, if this becomes obvious, while it is artificially obscured. it's only obvious to us here in russia for now. that's when it will become obvious in the west. i am sure that a lot will turn over in the

minds of ordinary people who are now forming this public opinion, the west, and already through this in the future it will possibly change the official policy of these countries. how far is the bot willing to go information confrontation with russia, how deep can the global information split turn out to be and how should it respond to new challenges? our country, we will discuss these topics today with senator alexei pushkov, chairman of the federation council commission on information policy and interaction with the media. alexey konstantinovich hello and the topic of the round table that you held this information split in the global world with the task of russian information policy, if we talk about this split, how much it is now obvious deep quite obvious. e in the information sphere, between us and the west is a preacher. we generally exist in completely different dimensions. and what we perceive here, how important and fundamental for ourselves in the west. this is not

accepted. so e russia is to blame for everything in russia is the first cause of everything up to growth. food prices up to rise. valuable energy carriers. that is, they are destroying ties, refusing to buy our oil and gas, and for some reason we are to blame for this, that is, uh, the west, uh, creates an absolutely different parallel reality, in which at all. but there are no problems that caused the actual ukrainian crisis. for example, no, topic topic, why didn't the west give security guarantees to russia when we asked for it last september? the only thing the west should have done was start negotiations with us about such security guarantees, and instead they said no. no, we will continue to uh post. uh, armaments on the territory of ukraine to prepare them to work with them along the line, reconnaissance and so on and so on. in general, drag them to nato well, what did they expect. this topic does n't exist at all. that is. uh, like i said, this is

parallel reality. this is a different world, so we don’t touch, but this was also the subject of the round table, it was dedicated to the possibility of expanding russia’s informational influence outside the western world, and this is a very important topic, because for some reason, with the light suggestion of the westerners, the reformers of the nineties years used to believe that everything is the whole world. this is the west. you see here there is light in the window. and everything else is some kind of blurry incomprehensible country to say this. which we don’t care about, and now these countries are turning into the main thing for us, our main partners. eh, economic trade in the main ways of delivering goods and products to russia, moreover , both official there, like all sorts of parallel and other other imports. here, and these are countries, by the way, that abstain or vote against anti-russian resolutions in the united nations. that is, this is also our political argument. and this one is not western

the world, which is approximately 120 states, that is, 2/3 of the planet. and here for them. it seems to me that it’s worth fighting and they are ready to perceive information from russia, and for a number of reasons, firstly, they didn’t suffer the same from the west, because they know that they deceived the west many times, but because they saw what the west was doing in libya in iraq in afghanistan and it did not cause. there 's no excitement there. that's because they see constant double standards. these are uh, this is now i would say the most natural states for perception of our information. this is the creation of the information paradigm of russia, which will be built into other states. here is the task. it is how complex it is on a large scale, understandable on a large scale, how feasible this task is in the current conditions. and i would suggest e to look at the need to create just an alternative western approach, because the west claims to be

total. they are trying to impose political positions now. well, i'm already african countries. yes they say you have to vote. won. so-and-so. yes, well, some part of african countries go for it in different ways . here, and what is 40-45 percent? yes? no, we won't. and just recently there was a vote on a resolution, uh, about the annexation of russia and four new territories. i think it's october 23rd. uh this year and 40% of african states voted, either abstained or against. why do they just not want to fit into some rigid paradigms. they want to settle into the western paradigm, but this does not mean that we we must impose our own, we must show them a different picture, not the one that is being created in the west. here is to explain our position, to explain why we did this, to explain that nato had every opportunity to avoid this crisis, but went so to speak to aggravate with russia that in general

this crisis is of western origin. it stems from the expansion of nato, i must say that i understand this. it is understood in india it is well understood in china it is understood in pakistan it is understood in morocco it is understood lies it is understood in egypt but saudi arabia, that is, they understand that this is not easy. here russia has taken, so to speak. there is no beginning, that this has a backstory. he is trying to destroy this background and start everything from february 24th, as steinmeier, the president of germany, said. yes, everything was fine until 24. you are sure not until 24 there was a coup in ukraine, there were these executions on the maidan. and there was an attempt. it means to suppress the donbass with the help of terror. and the train, uh, with the ukrainian radicals tried to get to the crimea in order to establish terror there. hear the shelling was 12.000 a person died. stan mayer says before the 24th we were moving into a beautiful future. no why does he

say that? and, because the west is responsible for everything that happened before the 24th , because they stood behind this ukraine , they turned a blind eye to neo-nazi movements. there they turned a blind eye to the torchlight procession. they turned a blind eye to the shelling. they turned a blind eye to the fact that zelensky constantly disrupted the minsk agreements, and poroshenko before him. so we have to show this reality. and so in those countries of the non-western world. the west knows this well, because they themselves suffered from it. there it will be perceived by us. we should not impose a paradigm on them. we must offer an alternative information picture. they will see for themselves. how much will it lead us if we return to the topic of the information war against the body by standing in the information war, as the west calls it, it is clear that on our territory the west lost this information war, but do we have a chance to get through with this one? animation paradigm with with this new vision to the west

, i am reluctant to turn the west now into the primary object of our information efforts. that is, i am not saying that this should not be done, but in the west there is a certain group of people, well, as a rule, experts and bloggers, by the way, who are ready to perceive information coming from russia, and i want to say, that these people have already formed before, as opponents of the western approach, so now, despite the fact that yes, of course, you need to work with these people, but uh, change the position of the approach. uh, leaders. uh, the ruling elite, more precisely, yes. uh, western western state. eh, the united states of america, of course, we will not succeed, because there, you know, there is such a wall of fire. here is informational, and here is the same world sudden yes , it is receptive. and this is where we must stop our efforts, especially since

our supplies of gas and oil will be relocated here. uh, everything we sell there is said to be a nuclear power plant. there everything that we sell in foreign markets and from here. we will receive the largest volume of goods too understand. these are the new new centers of economic power. a-a political influence is such countries as brazil argentina mexico and india pakistan iran china egypt e, algeria a. well , even the united arab emirates, where it seems to me that the center of our efforts should be, is now not the western world, which is turning into our main trade, economic and political partner. alexei konstantinovich thank you for taking the time to answer our question. thank you. north-eastern olympiad for schoolchildren in the profile native languages ​​​​from this academic year were included in the list approved by a joint order of the ministry of education and the ministry of science of higher education of russia in november, the

qualifying stages started, it will last until january 10 about this project, let's talk about this project, senator rimma, galushina rima fedorovna in russia there are about 200 nationalities and very it is important to pay special attention to the preservation of national languages ​​and culture. tell us more about the north-east school olympiad. what gives her new status today in russian schools is studied 105 native languages, and 24 of them are taught 81 are studied optionally or subjectively? well, in recent years there has been such, and not a very good trend. this decrease in interest in the study of native languages, a key event in resolving this issue, was behind the visiting meeting of our committee in yamal last april, where it was decided to work out issue a on holding the federal olympiad in native languages ​​with the provision of preferences for the winners and prize- winners of this olympiad upon admission to higher educational establishments. we have determined that the

northeastern federal university is the most suitable for holding this olympiad. since they have already held the north-eastern olympiad and schoolchildren in their native language. as a result, we gave federal status to this olympiad and we had the first trial stage of this kind, well, it was also quite large-scale, because 3.5 thousand took part, and uh, 167 children became diploma winners and winners of this olympiad and uh, in including 42 were the child of a graduate, but this year, who just received these preferences upon admission, and in six universities sar organizers. we have significantly expanded the scale, and holding this olympiad is not easy. the geography of this olympiad was held because we have, and this year, not 18 regions, but 30 regions of universities, the number of organizers has increased from 6:00 to 18, and

this year we are holding an olympiad in 29 native languages. e, in principle, e is simple, but it is enough to register on the website of the olympiad to get, e, the corresponding olympiad tasks, and online and solve them. naturally, with the preservation of all the security conditions for the olympics, it will continue, but wait for an answer. uh, do you pass or do not pass to the final stage of the olympiad, which will be held in february next year. rima fedorovna, you have already mentioned that the prize-winner and winner of this olympiad are given preferences for admission to higher educational institutions. they could have elaborated a little. on this, for sure, to many future applicants. it will be interesting this year we seriously, a worked out the issues olympiad tasks. and so this year, and we held a conference platform. e, kazan state university spoke and a well

summed up, e, all the olympiad tasks from one denominator in order to e without entrance examinations, and enter e, higher educational institutions on the basis of victory in the olympiad e. hmm, you need to score 75 points in the russian language, and each university , e, dictates its own conditions, and hmm, preferences for diplomats of the olympiad. diplomats are winners and the winner of all these conditions, and they are posted on the site higher educational institution and the guys, but they can initially get acquainted with them. and, of course, to understand whether they correspond or do not correspond, but to the fulfillment of these conditions. next week, at the council of legislators, parliamentarians will discuss the socio-economic development of russia and its regions in the context of adapting to new challenges , senators will touch upon issues, accelerated registrations of medicines and medical

devices under sanctions pressure will hold parliamentary hearings on the state of aviation industry of russia there will be a meeting of the council for the development of the transport complex in the constituent entities of the country, we continue to follow the most important events in the federation council see you in a week in the senate program.

i'm not a man, but who is? christian soul walk behind a stone. no, there won't be

all of them.

a two people were injured this evening during the shelling of the center of donetsk under fire turned out to be the central voroshilovsky district of the city, one of the shells hit the car. because of what a fire started in the city vsu, they killed the very morning, friday in a day according to the latest data, four people died , one of the shellings actually took place right during a video conference with the participation of vladimir putin , vadim serik, a former soldier of the somali battalion who is now working as a volunteer, spoke with the president. he did not even have time to listen to the president's answer because of the shelling, he had to leave the meeting, and the situation.