on a visit to belarus, he held talks with his belarusian colleague viktor khenin, following the results of the minister signed protocols on changes in the agreement between the countries, and the joint provision of regional security in the military sphere, sergey perishivaygu noted that belarus remains a reliable partner, which is especially important in the current conditions, he highly appreciated the determination of minsk not to oppose the hostile course of the united states and its allies. willingness to jointly ensure the military security of the allied state. sergey shoigu also said that combat coordination of russian and belarusian formations and military units assigned to the regional

group of troops is now being carried out on the territory of belarus. putin in matters of territorial security. two states, both belarusian and russian, are being prepared so that, if necessary, the first birth our defenders of the allied state were able to repel any aggression from this territory. here are the first-aid kits of medical before i'm not talking about uniforms and other weapons. nobody is sharing here. and we, as a single grouping, are a single army. today we are preparing everyone around knows about it. we did n't hide it. you hide in the modern world. this is an impossible word, since you agreed with the president of russia on the topic that this is not simply being implemented with our ministry of defense. we

have carried out our plans in this regard. russian troops repelled attacks by the apu in several directions in the donbass, the ministry of defense reported this, adding that the ukrainian military suffered losses and were forced to stop trying to attack. in the kupyansk direction, preemptive strikes by army aviation with artillery fire and heavy flamethrower systems prevented an enemy attempt to attack the direction of the kuzemovka settlement of the luhansk people's republic , and destroyed up to 60 ukrainian servicemen, two tanks. infantry fighting vehicle three armored personnel carriers and four pickup trucks. on the red liman direction an attempt by the armed forces of ukraine to attack the direction of settlements was thwarted, the kolymychikha lies deftly in the luhansk people's republic as a result of army aviation strikes and artillery fire, the enemy unit was stopped and russia destroyed more than 30 ukrainian military personnel, two infantry fighting vehicles

and the demands of a cossack car in the donetsk direction armed forces. ukraine made unsuccessful attempts. restore the position of their troops in the areas of settlements . andreevka kurdyumovka, avdiivka and little donetsk republic as a result of the retirement firing. up to 60 ukrainian servicemen were destroyed per day, two tanks and five armored fighting vehicles well , now back to the visit of sergei shoigu in belarus , here is what the russian defense minister said yesterday , we discussed the situation around belarus and russia for a very long time. he said that you will be here and we will continue this discussion and develop a common position on our further actions that are effective in protecting our territorial value. thank you so much. thanks

for hospitality. i mean in the first supernatural life that is, who learn together. eh, they really feel here then, because the hospitable people who surround them and naturally. first of all, the military. of course, they are doing everything to ensure that there is more training . naturally, here is the legislation of the ground forces. it already looks like a place that can perform tasks, so thanks to the main whose naturally came with best wishes from our president, but also ready to discuss these topics that you spoke on the phone, about which you spoke at the last meeting. uh, therefore, we, uh, i think

we are at that stage, when our contacts with my colleagues with the minister of defense, but naturally, if possible with you, uh should be more active and naturally more constructive. the supreme court of the russian federation in 2022 celebrates its centenary after advertising on the air vladimir solovyov

's documentary project the qr code in the application is capable of more scan it before payment and with every purchase. we will transfer one percent of the family fund together for the construction of family houses so that children can be close to their parents during long-term treatment. and you and you and me and you and everyone fix the loan rate of 8.9%. this is a discovery. catch thousands of bonuses. every day in the app is a magnet. baldness does not appear immediately. if the hair is thinning, start using the spray to generate new hair growth of the generals, a recognized remedy in the fight against baldness in two dosages for a man and women new year's discounts sokolov from 70% profitable, whatever one may say, choose gifts from sokolov now at wellberis. of

course, you are not gifts, but a gift is needed. always great deals january 1 russian lotto is guaranteed to play a billion. buy tickets the first buyer of new clothes in stores on avito, and here comes the knife chips naturals 109.99 magnet lucky in the new year.

i have been working in the judiciary for many years. it 's not true that in the profession it always seems come to court, even as a witness. this act is a big workload professional

big workload, psychological incredible. dear participants of the meeting hello, please sit down the court is coming to the supreme court. why does it depend on him, probably, our judicial system. i say this not because i am the chairman of the supreme court of russia, she is the most accessible, probably, any person. in accordance with the procedure established by law, 39 million different categories of cases can go to the supreme court only on the first instance in the year of russia recognized the former traffic police inspector from irkutsk reached the supreme court. all

left unchanged, the supreme court considered the cassation complaint, which suffered an overwhelming majority. this is a civil case, when a citizen himself comes to court for protection. if you don't find the truth in the district court, you go to the regional court. if you didn’t achieve something in the regional court, it’s true, you go to the cassation court and so on up to the supreme court of russia for a few words that have slavic origin. and the word to favor and initially it is first a person's stay in sorrow in grief. and in this context. in general, it appeared in ours. the legal sphere, therefore, when a person complains to us, then we should proceed from this, how we can ideally help him. probably this is an achievement of some kind of general justice. i have powers of

attorney, so we ask you to consider confirming the settlement agreement. will you apply here statements i support the declared the arrangements for approving a settlement agreement on the spot determined listen did not postpone what russian statehood was. centuries, and the supreme court is only 100 years old. many lawyers ask me this question. and why report the work of the supreme court of its establishment activity? well, it’s fashionable to keep everything from peter. yes, of course, on the one hand, but indeed on february 22, 1711, the senate was established, ruling by peter the first. well

, of course, he resolved issues, and the consideration of certain court cases, but independent there was no body of the highest judicial body in russia until 1922. nikolai vasilyevich krylenko, who was the chairman of the supreme tribunal, he proposed the creation of the highest judicial body independently of the supreme court. countries in the world to ensure the unity of judicial practice

did not believe in it. no one still believed that such a body instantly choke in the number of complaints, however, krylenko managed to defend his position. this provision came into force on january 1, 23 from that moment in our legal system in the russian legal system there appeared such a concept as the supreme court mikhailovich well, krylenko, this did not help. no , i shot him personally. myself. this, however, is a trial for him 20 minutes. he was convicted in one of the mass cases that took place in the thirties. vasily ulrich was the chairman of the military collegium of the supreme court. he took this position back in the period when they, together with krylenko, worked on the creation of the supreme court and created the regulatory framework. this happened in the twenty-second year. it is obvious that in the thirties the situation had already changed. it must

be taken into account here that what we call the repressions of the thirties is mainly associated with the activities of non-judicial bodies. in particular, those very special troikas that are widely known to everyone did not consist of judges, the judge was not even included in these troikas, therefore the massive repressive measures that were used by the troikas had nothing to do with the judiciary does not have a separate most. high-profile trials really took place in the supreme court according to his earthly stone and potukhachevsky. and these cases were considered by the military collegium of the supreme court. our people alone crush the damned reptile. well, there are nuances here related to the fact that this colleague still occupied a special place in this organization, such a term was a punitive practitioner of the court. that's how easily appealed to this phrase and completely without

hesitation. and what is behind it? why punitive why not objectively not without registration is unfair so since when did the court become a court? the meeting of the judicial colleague for criminal cases of the supreme court of the russian federation continues its work, the criminal case is considered on the cassation appeal of the convict stronger. on my own. court is a territory of conflict. so it has always been so it will be. e. this applies not only to russia, it applies to any other country. deprivation of liberty with serving a sentence, for a correctional colony of a special regime, the convict claims the

illegality of the unjustified injustice the verdict firmly asserts his innocence even aristotle separated justice into general private. each person has his own idea of ​​justice his own idea of ​​good and bad appellate decision to terminate the case is stronger. what did you want to tell the judicial board when you read the criminal case in your subconscious, the movie is going on? that is, you reproduce all the events, you are, as it were, at the scene of the crime at the moment when it was committed, this, of course, is not emotionally simple and national not everyone can fix it with her there were crimes and also the spouse will be the sincerity of the law enforcement agency, it didn’t matter. you brought to the attention of

the jurors voiced that's good. well , you see, the peculiarity of the consideration of cases by the supreme court lies in the fact that the verdicts have already taken place, the decisions have already entered into force, the person is found guilty, how reliable are the arguments that he sets out to us. the alibi suggests that we consider everything else, right? some parts of there crime. that's all words given to the defender more easily. he was deprived of the opportunity to prove his innocence and innocence of any crime did not commit this person, so that he does not represent himself as a person, convincing motives for the decision to leave the sentence unchanged from the fact that he turned to us with a complaint believes that

there is a violation. and we must check this, we must proceed from the presumption of the reliability of his arguments, the main punishment in the form of imprisonment is proportionate, committed and fair, the victim of his concept of justice, he is sued for his concept of justice, the court comes to some conclusion of his own, which may not suit either of these parties. you've never had to hear a case where sentences involving the death penalty were handed down, thank god i didn't pass a single death sentence. please stand up, the court is coming. listen to the criminal case. and now, quite young, very young, it was really difficult to work.

imagine a trial judge district court. we didn’t have official transport, as today, and now you go to an offsite session with a criminal case, public transport had a small salary, there were very strict requirements. uh, rules of conduct for judges. legislation very truncated to the extent possible by the courts questions of the independence of judges yes, they were enshrined in the constitution of the ussr and in the constitution of 1936 of 1977. well, the laws that provided these guarantees of independence of theirs freedom when a person can do whatever he wants to do. how will he like justice in our country is carried out only by the court, both the prosecutor and the defense are obliged to help the court understand the merits of the

case. only after that he can ask that all the judges were in the park. including judges of the supreme court and party directives, of course, from the point of view of the legal consciousness of the communists was mandatory. these were not some behind-the- scenes conversations or calls. it was quite officially dependent position of the judiciary on the executive authorities and party bodies. could justice be achieved? that is? whether the superiority of the law remained, when the law determined, and not the call of the party leader. here, the party leaders never called me on specific matters. i worked in various judicial instances and in the district court and in the court of the level of the regional supreme court. well, you

can tell me, well, it's very fortunate for you. perhaps i do not deny these cases, which were also gross interference. the session of the judicial colleague for criminal cases of the supreme court of the ussr is declared open. there is, of course, a lot here. depends on the personal qualities of a particular judge, because the relationship between party discipline and law. this is such a gray zone of soviet law, where a lot depends on a particular person on how he will answer, how he will react to such an indication. the people have given us responsibility . we must think about taking care of the future of the country. we do not begin our work with a deep understanding of our responsibility to the party and the

soviet people. here are my predecessors all my history. you know how it happened. across the refusal turned out, then less big words more businesslike responsibility for the assigned cases sergeyevich offered to go to the post of prosecutor general of the ussr

and then comrade lebedev's candidacy was called chairman of the moscow city court. i was perfectly aware for myself, just as a person, that it was too early for me to work in the supreme court of the ussr union, especially since i refused to take the post of chairman of the supreme court of the ussr. they say that they have passed their pension, like too young. that's when takova is from the dialectic, so i think comrade lebedev will accept this with understanding. let him work and there is no question of distrust of underestimation as a candidate, but yevgeny alekseevich smolentsev should become the chairman of the supreme court of the ussr. he was appointed to this position, probably, after all. uh, the general opinion

is that the supreme court should be headed by a person who is more solid in all respects and prepared and with great experience was to lay out another proposal from mikhail sergeyevich again came. well the attorney general and i was dumbfounded because i in general, such a position, but it is offered, i would already be the chairman of the supreme court of the ussr and said sergeyevich thank you, but i cannot accept this offer, because i do not know this job. i haven't worked in the prosecutor's office for a single day. this is the most complicated state body and without experience without knowledge of specific knowledge, and i can bring something, there is only harm. these are the highest judicial instances, where cases are considered on the held court decisions. note.

how many members of the president i will say 12 13 chairman. here is the number 13, it has for me a certain value. i was elected to the position judged by the leningrad district court on december 13, 1970. in general, almost 52 years ago. i was approved as chairman of the moscow city court. in 1986, i am the thirteenth chairman of the supreme court of the russian federation vyacheslav mikhailovich lebedev became chairman of the supreme court of the rsfsr in july 1989, life turned out so well that soon there was neither the soviet union nor the supreme court of the ussr and the

supreme court became the highest judicial instance in the country russia powerful strike to you now to the order run. i will not shoot. i shoot not yet. i have cartridges on the nineteenth of august. we learned about this information from tv and saw that

such a committee had been created. that's his position came to work, and i was followed by a lot of phone calls from chairmen of crooked republican regional courts. what are they doing, and together with the minister of justice of the ussr, we signed an appeal to all courts of the russian federation that all decisions are like an emergency, they are illegal in that situation. it was a dangerous decision, since the outcome of those events, as we understand it, was not obvious. this was the position. why because there are situations when well a few tips should be advised and decide to decide what will happen next. well, that would be.

payment by phone returns to your world card in the sberbank application online and pay for purchases with one touch. enjoy, bewitching design, pay and win up to 5 million sberban bonuses, pay by phone.