a month for food for the whole family. eh, this should be removed from our society. also not possible. we talked a lot with the military, a lot of different job titles for money. no one ever complained to me or asked me. despite the fact that the problem you are saying is obvious now now now now now now now i will finish the thought, that is, now they are focused on what is needed for the unit to give here, help them to do so, that is, these are people who are used to thinking about themselves in the last turn. primarily fulfillment of a combat mission and the preservation of life, and of his subordinates, therefore, the love of an officer is interestingly manifested. colonel he loves torturing terribly at firing practice at the firing range, because people because they want us to go out, that is, it requires demanding discipline, that is, such

officers are different. like the society is different, but the number of amazing people you meet there is significantly higher than in many other strata of society. and of course, these are the guys. well, the war will really end, they come to citizenship. they will look at everyone, the eyes of all of us where they were. and what were you doing in restaurants , hanging out, having fun, not a penny, didn’t give anything, didn’t donate, didn’t participate in any way, and we shed blood and they will be absolutely right. a russian officer is a proud title. this privilege should be like it was in tsarist russia, tsarist russia, too, and there is a lot of tsarist russia. what could we learn, yes, what is a russian officer, wow folk, an officer in some province is on everyone's ears joyful and happy girls would marry theirs, yes, and now what to marry so that

she suffers all her life on this salary of 60,000? no, i'll tell us everything, uh, toiled with him. well, that's not possible. so it’s impossible to go further, this is a request to the state for no money for this. if there is, decide for yourself, i don’t believe it, to be honest, it’s not at all. but if not, raise taxes, we agree. so i 'm talking now, and you tell me the normal part of society , people who make good money agree. we already share on a larger scale than the state. the rich can make us do it further. people should pull themselves together and remember that since we have lived all these years since the collapse of the soviet union, it is no longer possible to live. it is necessary to restore justice social justice means one chanel handbag costs as much as 50 lives of fifty pensioners per month per

month. take 10 20 30 100 200 pensioners for vices, pay them a second pension. until the end of your life, they will pray for you for you. you need this 135, chanel handbag like this. it is impossible to do without it. i speak like a man not rich, not what is considered not rich rich. we have now, yes, well, not quite a poor, wealthy person. it is impossible to look at people who earn very well and do not share. it is simply already indecently unworthy and shameful in our society to continue to live like this. behold, i call upon all many of them i know, personally share the citizens. remember, i was finishing like this now, just a reducycle, as now the mayor of moscow nikolai who became the head of a thirty-three-year-old check is already very wealthy,

and in moscow appeared in moscow under him sewerage plumbing. he built two pressure towers himself, and he was famous. moreover, he gave everything away, handed it out and collected a lot more money. so he built the alekseevskaya psychiatric hospital. yes , kanatchikov's dacha, famous for how he built it. he went to rich people, did not disdain this and asked them, and this is one of my favorite historians on the question of who are your favorite heroes in russian history. yes, i love such heroes when one merchant told him, and this merchant was his father's clerk. yes, and he's like from such a vanity he was told to kneel before me, you will become 200,000 for your hospital, the ladies and the mayor of the city of moscow , the head, knelt before him, looking for problems. no, just give karen. i have to absolutely support marguerite absolutely the right thing. she says that's what's obvious to me. by the way, if you remember, i offered loans to your studios here, forgive all those who serve,

whether they are volunteers mobilized mobilized or there they say contract soldiers. it seems to me that this is what it is, perhaps, and should be done. i don't i pretend like people. uh, they're coming. tomorrow they can kill or maim him, well, they made it easier there. well, it’s impossible for the state to take over these loans in some way by installments. i do not know how financial. i think this is probably how things will be for us on new year's holidays. i don't understand how you can declare such a big weekend when you have a huge number of your young people sitting in the trenches without any days off. we , i understand, there in soviet times, in general, it was like

31 short days. first one day off nothing and worked. well, it's still christmas day, and it's fine. i think this is obvious. it seems to me simply shameless, that at this time in krasnaya polyana we will ski mountain skis. well, like how can it be? i, of course, do not mean that it is not a children's holiday. i you understand, well, an adult can, as they say a little. and well, that is, the military-industrial complex will definitely not be a weekend, then it's there that the guys will show people who it is. well, here it is, it seems to me, even the very step itself is obvious. it's the most it the decision will be correctly perceived, or in all cases, topics. wrong wrongly perceived. well, nothing, we will remember them, let it be so , but it seems to me that this is obvious, but the thing is that you understand margarita but this is the question

that needs to be corrected somehow in general hmm e system model. i'm talking about this. well, of course, what we m-m. well, i've said it many times. well, you understand, this, as they say, comprodor capitalism. oh, he doesn’t, especially he ca n’t lead them like that. it's just not in his nature so it needs to be somehow. as they say, to change somehow to modify it is necessary to modify some economic model and the social one must be changed, because, uh, there is still a certain feeling that, in general, as it were, for this class, which, in general, is actually the ruling class in he has, as it were, an understanding in russia that somehow this is not necessary. this one will somehow manage it all, gas is traded in oil. now it's 60 dollars. yes they announced this one. well, they say

it won't. but in all this i see that there will be sell. here's my feeling. here i am, here is everything i read. here is the information. here are the sketches that it is possible, that it is so, that i already feel that everything will return, somehow they will justify it, so to speak, they will put pressure on it and it’s understandable. here it is, although officially our power. he says no, that at the state level. it is not the authorities who say that we will not sell to those who will be at the state level. well, in this sense, we understand that the president is under enormous pressure. but that doesn't happen. everything, this, whatever no centralized power, but it is still under pressure from those, and those, as they say, groups from which can exercise this pressure. this can be persuaded , the masses can be persuaded. reasons may convince that it will still be beneficial. and you know. there you go,

this will be better. i think we still don't know how much. we only supply what they need, because they need us so far, i 'm sure, i don't know, we still don't have a precise understanding. how much is this trade conducted on rubles and all. those who lead for rubles, who lead yes, not for rubles, and where this money still remains, you understand, this is all this is all obvious. all this disturbs society. and society, agitated, all sorts of thoughts arise in him, all sorts of doubts arise in this society. i think ours understands perfectly well what this war is all about. uh, it's a collision. i would say, that is, it's not even about the war, but it's for a long time, guys, it's forever. i tell you this forever, because from the first day of my existence i have been fighting the west. that's from the moment before i was born on july 52-8, 1952. i

am at war with the west that has never stopped. well, that's right, i was born during the cold war, then so to speak, she was the bloody stalinist era. yes, i still caught one year one year of the stalinist gods. i was all the time until the ninety-first year. in the ninety-first year, we decided that we did not have a war , but they were at war with us. by the way, i always said this, and you rai in the ninetieth year and said so to say, nobody listened to it, then. i always said this about the fact that the war with us was going on, they didn’t stop it. this is the state of this war. personally, i, like any citizen, any russian, any soviet citizen, is here. here i am in it for 70 years, but why should i have at least some reason to believe that this will change? this cannot change, this is the

essence of the general policy of the west in relation to russia . this is so this is a great civilization. i was brought up on it myself. i love her attention mass achievements, but she is so aggressive and the most important thing is that she has. she is completely ruthless. she has no sentiment. i don’t save an iota for a penny, you absolutely understand, and that’s exactly what they always took all the other civilizations that they crushed the chinese indian one , all these civilizations never had this internal iron rule to bring everything to the end and in this respect, of course , will not bring. even. if somehow, well i mean favorable to us. well. somehow it will end the company itself is in ukraine, and the confrontation will not end, the confrontation will

constantly continue, because you know how in rome, like ancient rome, rome always brought everything to the point, it did not leave anything at half, so to speak, two-thirds at seven-eighths, it brought everything to end to triumph, when, as they say, the one whom he captured, as the king of the gauls, was kept for 8 years and still held in triumph. caesar triumphed through the streets of rome and then removed? here in this is the whole of rome, in this tradition has not disappeared anywhere, and with this and with this nothing to do about. this is nature. it 's over. this is bad, but the time ended badly. how to say? who is caesar himself? well, how to say dream on the one hand, yes, you can say yes, they

all end up like that, but on the other hand, he became the basis of all western civilization. she came out of it what is modern western civilization. this is the heir of rome, therefore, when we say that there were thousands there, it was not this, this is ancient civilization. this is if you look at history, rome is there and this 2.000-3.000 year old is more powerful, i say, i must understand that it is very refined, very intellectually powerful, with a huge number of achievements of civilization. so it is not necessary to treat even, because they behave. here we are laughing. and he says, in general, things should be listened to. he is not stupid, and he is not in a state of dementia even from the fact that he is not there from time to time. we have one, as they say. this is so to say. this clown, this zelensky clown, he is not a clown. he is very dangerous. he is very dangerous. and everything he does in a relationship. here orthodox church. now there will be some kind of reaction,

in theory, there should be. and the church has leverage in order to answer this is generally blatant to say this, as they say. i think that he, of course, is already clear with this. you know, never touch the church, never touch the temples. yes, they are bolsheviks. with all due respect to that, they did a lot, on this they, as they say. i think a lot of what they got. it was precisely for the destruction of temples. and so to speak for the fact that they are a church, whatever it is the church is different, maybe, but nevertheless, don't touch it, never touch it. well, the bolsheviks had at least some. well, you can’t even name an apology, but since all property is church in the russian empire. after all, he belonged not to the church, but to the emperor as the head of the church, but he was also the head of the church. well, the emperor is a little different, but

this is by no means an excuse. i mean, it's not even here. so this, as they say, well, treat him, while we have it there is a clown. this is this this is such a second. yes no, it's very dangerous. he is very dangerous. and that's how you should treat him. in the place of our leadership, i would have treated him exactly as a very dangerous person and not at all and not at all as simple, so to speak, a fool as he was all the time , well, what am i saying to the fact that this is a confrontation. it is inevitable it is for a long time and we must understand what is in this confrontation. eh, you need to set yourself the goal of defeating. we do not set such a goal for ourselves, you know, you know, like these. i love these martial arts too. the octagon is out. he did not set themselves the goal of knockout. one puts, and

the other does not put the other, as it were. so to speak, sit there for three rounds, you see, there, it seems, it will end, and the second puts knockout to destroy. here is the difference in what it is necessary to set the most important task, they will not say, but this is impossible. listen, when there is a super task, it turns out that everything is possible in the best of your years. the soviet union inflicted. the mortal defeat of the west is precisely because it set its tasks like this. although, the soviet union was much weaker and the soviet union was generally uh, so to say alone, nevertheless suffered enormous, general damage. uh, so to speak , put his opponent almost on the brink of defeat after the defeat in the vietnam war, the americans. everyone believed that america would collapse. it was this was '73 in the states there was an economic disaster, a complete

moral collapse. it was all thanks. uh, i must say to a large extent to the soviet union as soon as the soviet one stopped setting such tasks, but it stopped. that's when it began, as they say, a completely different story, therefore, in in this sense, you need to understand this for yourself. and, of course, what margarita said, and that, well, we must take this very seriously and, of course , we must. you need to understand that something must be sacrificed and something must be done. for those, and this is the color of the nation, who is fighting today, this is the color of the nation, in fact , you understand, this is the color of the nation, which is dying and fighting, everything must be done in order to provide for them and so that they understand that they that they, that the whole country is on their side, otherwise, then they can know that and

think. let's start putting things in order . here, god forbid yes, yes, yes it will not come to pass, because the whole country is on their side. well , alexander mikhailovich well, i am in full solidarity and with words of gratitude not only to those whom vladimir vladimirovich visited. well, i want to tell you personally, that everything that is discussed on your program and everything that is discussed outside it gave rise to such thoughts, about which we probably had a couple of months ago, but maybe even 6 months even. didn't dream, namely i take the economic a sphere where almost everyone today recognizes the need to change the economic model and various proposals have arisen, there is the state planning commission 2 and there is a freak two and two, but everyone puts their own meaning, no one fully understands that he went through different stages from the soviet union , the thirties and the twenties and thirties of the fifties are khrushchev and more careless, that is, we do not understand what it is appealing to

. uh, at least me and mine colleagues to the fact that we need to talk about a new economic ideology. why because, if these are not empty words, we had this economic ideology in previous years, and it was based on the fact that after the destruction of the soviet union we practically abandoned our own economic political system. we were built into the world system as suppliers of cheap raw materials in order to purchase everything else that we did not need, supposedly it was allowed, and we have been like this for many years, so we must refuse this, in order to refuse this we must formulate. not just a new economic ideology. and the goal is no matter how trite it sounds. here it is. well, at least it is close to me, i can formulate it as one of the proposals. well , firstly, this goal could be the multiplication and preservation of the people, as the bearer of the russian cultural code. that is, we must talk about the multiplication and multiplication, including the resources of all, both within the country and beyond its borders. that is, if in simple words, then we should be more of us and each of us should live better if you want

scientific terms. solving the problem of demography and rising and solving the problem of poverty. well, or at least inequality in our country. and when we understand that if this new economic ideology will make its way, then this goal will require new tools for the implementation of which and let's pay attention. recently, the budget was adopted and again we hear the same position of the central bank. it is corrected, but not cardinally. see actually today's central bank policy the financial bloc is aimed at the fact that we are limiting investments and limiting development, and this does not correspond in any way, for example, with this goal, if we take it as working tools. second, if we as an example. look, there was a mortgage, a preferential mortgage, to which it led to the fact that the price only grew everywhere, but this also means that we do not fully understand that this process has a preferential mortgage, as a financial simulation. acquisition of square meters. there must be an addition to be created those square meters. well, how will they be

created with the funding that is, when you said that if the state takes for itself at least this segment, not all of it and solves the problem, by the way, including avoiding these, well, many cities actually building. we have a huge territory. we can not develop housing, even in regions where low-rise capitals should welcome, where we should settle our populations throughout the country. so, in order to create a square meter. this should be a government task. so take it upon yourself to solve it through cheap money. financing infrastructure and creating prerequisites, when any investor is interested in this, moreover, you will oblige the construction of a hospital from the school, because the state will assume most of the costs, and then the investor will develop cheap or preferential mortgages and financing. we will give that square meters and add these two indicators and then the price will not increase. if we are talking about what kind tools are needed, but government funding through the central through

state banks is needed. we once talked about this, but if the state needs an enterprise for the production of chips, what does this mean, let's say we build for 3 years, 2 years, we reach the design capacity, we build profits, the state receives taxes and lives well. so you will do the opposite, if the state has calculated the economic model, if the state pays today about advancing this money, which you will start receiving in five years, nothing will happen. this just swap it with another. this is actually the state that expects to receive in five. no advances today in production. and that's okay. today there is already a fund for the support or development of industry of the ministry of industry and trade, there are already great examples of e-crediting 0.5%, 1%, 2%, that is, differentiation depending on the direction, but there are 300 billion, but what 300 billion for those projects that yes, if we have to increase it 100 times and then we will not recognize the country in 2-3 years. why? because there will be a huge potential for the government,

going back to the central bank and liaising with the government, of course. changes are already visible today. lord, so many good things have been done, but we need to push a little more and we will get with you that the integration of the central bank and the fulfillment of its obligations by the financial bloc, as part of the program that lies in what program to increase the social and economic level of our country, when the financial scheme is a financial instrument becomes part of one not privileged, but one of the tools maintenance. but, when we are talking with you , the export component was touched upon. yes , raw materials. so this is the trade balance. today we have a fixed forecast, at the end of the year there will be a 300 billion dollar not 300 billion ruble trade surplus. but this means that again our material resources are exchanged for money that we do not need in the form in which they are, but if we do not need them, maybe we will reduce, maybe we will take on the fundamental responsibility for something to

analyze no need here, here is the cap to throw that analyze and structure the export of raw materials in order not to finance those countries that are really at war with us today, and we must ensure that the budget is not saturated with what remains there, that we will just save costs and reduce export costs. we will increase here the possibility of financing the war being carried out by the complex and all this production, which support our economy. and this is possible only when we understand what is happening with it. well actually these dollars. they give us not needed. we don’t even need the yuan in the form in which we have it, because if we can’t use it effectively for the economy, then we don’t need it, we need to reduce all this and invest inside the country, and we shouldn’t tie it today. everything we do is manipulation. we tie everything to the budget. there is no budget, if there is a new economic ideology, there is a different approach, other opportunities and, accordingly, other scales for the realization of our goal, and we should not be afraid. here's one that today's state's kind of government understands how to do it? you

just need to help him. no, i didn't understand. so if we have so much money, then we can not raise taxes, as suggested by margo. moreover, i supported and said, firstly. well, it's technology like social. yes, there is, in fact, the social responsibility of business. here i would support moreover, it is necessary to look at changing and perhaps coordinating also the tax reform to tie it more to nature on rent. we need to put things in order here. second. we must shift the focus in the tax reform. why from production? where to consume capital 100%. accordingly, you and i have a good goal about well, such, well, needed in our country. and when we talk about this approach, we immediately answer the question. but how can we make social responsibility, and today, not by our efforts, he is again placed in such conditions when he needs to think about it why because even if there was an idea to somehow use the west the west is closed, the west itself is closed merit

there the central bank is that we have today the exchange rate is assigned. we know with you what will be tomorrow. this west did he limited the credit and she increased the withdrawal. capital ended everything that was previously connected with the fact that we fought. that is, he expressed although today, again, the figure is fantastic this year, a capital of 250 billion is projected. well, well, it’s already so that you can’t close the edge, you don’t really understand, but i want to say that there are tools and today it’s not possible. today. we're moving right direction and today there are tools, but it is necessary. finally realize that without a new approach and a new ideology, without a new goal and awareness of a set of tools that can realize this goal, we will not solve the problem to achieve this goal. there are three things that i do not understand, look, if anything, then you can not control capital flight abroad, it is elementary correct, if you can control this peru why capital flight abroad, that it is easily solved, the second task is to drastically reduce corruption hmm because

all corrupt schemes were based on the fact that the money goes abroad, and then the citizen tries to meet with them abroad. and here it will not be a strong blow to horse corruption, but the third one was talking and talking about one of the structural divisions of rostec, which produces a lot of things, something flies there, the parachute explodes everything, that is, the fantastic company. i said that i like that a person comes to work, who accelerates by 6:30 in the morning. well he comes from his break room where spent the night, that is, there are no, there are no weekends , that is, people live at work. we are all the first random operations. unfortunately, this only happened in june. it became possible for people to pay money, because before that, employees working at military-industrial complex factories received less than the

average salary in the region. only now their salaries have become 10% higher than the corresponding industry in the corresponding region. and since there is processing, then by 40%, and somewhere twice they should have 100%. the question arises, the state all these years here are the people who are related to finances all these years. here , going over there, they said that the army is not needed there. i'm talking to big members of the department of defense. they say, seriously, aga do you want the order that azov signed the open government to reform the army, which was proposed once the army was supposed to remain only 500,000 people. in time, we saw this case, many more unfolded. gaidar told 300 thousand people, we are solving the problem. hardest big european war, yeah they are fighting against us, well, to be clear, a trillion is against money. they have a billion de facto

mobilization resources. so after all, the entire population, if you read the country, and those that are against us, we have 150 million. well, it’s good with belarus 160, so we can win thanks to which the mind has new models of technology, there are brilliant commanders.