so that in this six, well, sixty-year-old ideology, by the way, true, they said thank you that about afghanistan yes, the party's policy was conscious, what is happening there in afghanistan nobody should know. well, there was no funeral. well, there was a lot of things there, no one should know, because the society of late socialism or communism was completely unprepared to accept afghanistan in its entirety. well, the reality of what happened there, including a fundamental mistake. it turns out that it wasn’t russian damn it, they defended it, but some kind of international duty was performed, but no one understood what kind of international duty we have in relation to this, well, a corresponding social context arose, so to speak. i agree that, of course, our army coped with afghanistan and is much better than the americans in 10 years than the americans in 20. if you

add anything else to this americans, none of the superpowers fought, but fought against the soviet union in afghanistan the whole western world is america and everything is needed. plus, china and india are slightly remember by itself. in general, it was dmitry don who now remembers us with nostalgia in afghanistan. yes , we, well, therefore, you understand our limited contingent in afghanistan, but fought with a large part of the world. what do we have to face now, uh, in this svo. here, then, there is another very interesting point about what went according to plan. i looked at their statement of the last days. well, starting from the bidens and ending with the schulz macron, but it all showed me very curiously. that's because again, i do not want to embellish to reassure. someone we talked about ourselves a little to say, especially since this week gives. wait, yes, we were barbecuing advertising among ourselves. so

the real colonel, it turns out 60.000. this is just treasure for him. no, pluses go plus-minus. no, no, no, first of all, it's not a colonel now. lieutenant, but this is a treasure, this is the salary according to the position, and then there is a length of service cheat. they certainly get combat. i don't doubt it. we just said in the advertisement it sounded that we they understood that if he was there at the war at the front, he had military or other things. and, if he listens to the diet in the far east, then yes, 60 no no, i understood it correctly, i blink. no no. i'm not saying you're wrong. i just want people to hear and understand that, in addition to salaries, there are, well, additional systems of material behavior. the first is connected, the first is connected with combat, but the second, if in the far east he gets a debt, the title came out cool

there it goes, plus in the far east it really gets 60. i think not now. no, it's been a long time since we're not arguing, we're just trying. look there, uh, again, i’m not the greatest specialist either, but i think that i agree with those, as evgeny petrovich describes it. because there is a salary, there is a rank, there are other surcharges, not even combat ones, but the fundamental question is different receives that, probably, more on hands. that's because there are several components of all this more, but the fundamental question is different. but they wrote the concept of obyzov to neither nights to be remembered or gaidar is the same, but i have a different question. and we have a concept already or we are working on them. yes? so, what kind of army do we need? that's because there will be colleagues do you understand what's going on? no, it works. it is on the

next transmission that i will ask the ministry of defense for the exact alignment. how much is obtained what does it consist of? well, for the audience to know, huh? ask for specific lieutenants so that the generals report. here are the people who really understand this yourself, yes, a specific lieutenant, because then fate will be an alarming army. it 's still the right structure, so let's get it, as a member of the public council of the ministry of defense. uh, the people responsible for the financial component in the ministry well, for example, you see several times with us, even before ours, but there were such reports, what they consist of, it means that everything is competent there in this part and in this sense it is impossible there, well, take the number out of the computer, because it is wired there. so uh, everything, the whole system knows for sure. therefore, if if here is volodya

ask you to submit figures, then they will be exactly, respectively. i emphasize once again that these are not questions for the ministry of defense. for us, the ministry of defense is not a private shop that itself appoints payments, like some firm. so i want to pay the chef in the restaurant. i want a million, i pay 10,000. i don't want to cry at all. this is you and me, who listen with such a breast, in which it is possible in society. in general, this part is not disputed simply because specific numbers and titles and others were heard for the audience. i am i want the viewer to have a complete picture in order to further understand how to adjust both financial policy and society. just look and i, here i am, so i understand you correctly, i'm talking about this, that the ideology of society, on which we used to swear. this is not the fruit of the nineties in the nineties there was legalization. before that, 40 years before, they created it in a targeted way, and it

has not been done anywhere yet, by the way, only the situation allows us to start, well, modify and modernize this absence. zero mindsets to decisions, so to speak, in the economic field or military production there, and so on. sorry, until march 24, there was no gap at all on february 24, there was no gap at all in which one could discuss that society could be arranged in some other way not according to consumer patterns. so the whole world has been living for 60 years according to consumer patterns. what do you want again? what do you want again and many people like it. at the same time , you understand, we must again objectively look here at the standard of living that developed by the end of the 2000s. early tenths. if we wrap it in ours in our past, then we can say, yes, what in the tenth

years? well, in principle, at the end of the 2000s many people say so, and i will repeat it. it is in this case, well, never so good in so many people. they didn't live in russia clearly, there is poverty, but it has been declining. well and so on everything is difficult. but if we take it integrally, in general, then this state was indeed the state of society. in fact, well, of course, i don’t understand what i want, but the question is different. well and such big upheavals of such big social, masses can be solved in a non-revolutionary way, because i will tell you for sure. i am categorically against the revolutionary path. that's categorically. i am against the revolutionary. i think like and the vast majority of people here are sitting. well, that means we need to look for these moves, we need to look for them, here, ah, about the army. yes, definitely it is. well, like me, that's why i said about the concept, but in what concept, well, an army

officer will receive above average there in the region, or what did they say? or are there higher officials? well i'm not a specialist, i don't have a direct answer. a good civil official would be better. yes, of course, this is something that i have discussed many times , you understand, because what military duty consists of military duty is that one must give one's life if necessary. that is the essence of military duty. yes, there is nothing else. now such duties are asked. what rights should these people have, whose duty is written to give their lives, if necessary? well, here's a simple entry. what is your duty in the institute to give your life, if the motherland demands, well, if he has such duties, then what rights should they have against this. this is a very serious issue, not

reducible to monetary and social pleasure. well, i think so, although monetary social contentment must correspond to this already unconditionally. yes, of course, not reducible to this issue. here now. if there is an opportunity a little bit about our enemy, the most important western one, of course, here, but the enemy definitely has difficulties with the definition. the regime in which they are ready to continue to wage war with us is that the war will continue. i have no doubts, but they are looking for the best modes and the best maneuver, of course, this whole song, starting from biden, who did not know what to say, the words that he wrote, he nevertheless said, but at the same time making a few curtsies. indeed, so that you can always turn away.

if you understand the double triplet. and better, uh, eight ways are curious, of course macron. it is generally possible. well, it's easy to laugh, but france will say to guarantee the security of russia, that is machronous france is going to guarantee the security of russia and we say we will make sure that the security of russia is guaranteed. this is, of course, very funny against the backdrop of the trip. he went there to demand that biden take care that european industry does not die. well, how did you demand it? by the way, i didn’t find a single word in the joint entry in this statement, but european industry in the joint declaration of biden and macron. no, not a single word, and before that, for a week, the entire french press was shouting, trumpeted, as soon as she arrives in a huge one, she will now order pressure on the canoe. here, well, the same thing that he, it turns out, is studying how the newspapers write secret knowledge about putin well, calling expresses

concern. but it’s interesting after what happened to them in these 8 months. and, of course, diplomacy and the president have their own assessments of the situation. they must act in their own way. i ask myself abstract scientific questions. but after all, it happened that in political science analysis, how these countries should be perceived european, so what, well, is there a difference between germany and ukraine and what exactly it is expressed, but in the sense that the transformation of germany into a military instrument against russia is at an earlier stage, yet, well, probably because it is very difficult talk about the fact that there are such sovereign countries in europe that are pursuing some kind of policy, that can guarantee something, that can offer something.

it's interesting, we forget all this very quickly, and then we start as if it was not macron, in the middle of early february. putin came and conducted long negotiations. long came out of there and said fine. we have brought our positions very close, the solution has almost been found, and now i will go to zelensky, and then after that i will call putin and report back and everything will be fine. but i’ll remind you that the macron came out from zelensky and didn’t say he shouldn’t say a word in public call just left for paris well, well, no, but it would be better if you’d be an aunt, saratov, yes, that is, it turns out zelensky was so powerful that he could send macron to paris why zelensky was such a powerful friend, because the americans decided everything at that time, yes, and the macron, he packed up and left for paris, so i don’t expect any negotiation, well, there

are absolutely no grounds for them. here, uh, apparently, the confrontation is historical, which lasts as the prince said all his life, our e life. and if you look at history, then the entire time of the existence of our country and our state is a whole thousand years. this confrontation lasts with more or less hmm and bursts, so to speak, but it will go on and on and on it will go on and on so, as far as the current situation is concerned, but they wanted to find out something on the battlefield. well, that means it will be clarified there, and then we'll see, just touched on this topic, the head of belarus , president alexander, says that lukashenka, meeting with the minister of defense of the russian federation , this is what the president of belarus said. there, the minister of defense told the belarusian e about the situation,

belarus . units of belarus and russia that are present in belarus must say that we are in your officers took this seriously to ours, and the guys are preparing both the belarusian and the russian woman. uh, so that, if necessary, the first kind of our defenders of the allied state could , uh, any aggression from this territory. here are the first-aid kits of medical before i'm not talking about, there are awakenings and other weapons. nobody is sharing here. and we, as a single grouping, are a single army. today we are cooking, everyone around knows about it. we did not hide it in the modern world, it is impossible to hide it. he is since comrade president of russia you are in the subject, not just in the subject, this is being implemented with

our ministry of defense. we have carried out our plans in this regard. uh. i'm not going to scare anything, especially since everyone is already so scared , scared, but if they want us to live peacefully in our region, without looking, they are somehow looking at it from across the ocean. both russia and belarus are ready for this. if they want to fight to the last , either by ukrainians, or by poles or mercenaries. well, that's their business. it's their right, for now. for example, i and our special services do not see that they were ready to full-fledged negotiations on human agreements were not seen. they see in our opinion. how to continue the war. well, then don't stop the operation on purpose. it's probably the best. he knows that we will exchange opinions in one

franc. yes, of course, i will comment on this important visit, but we have one of such popular topics here, today i don’t understand, i don’t understand everything either, i was driving around moscow by car. i chose the radio station the driver for almost an hour and listened to the radio, as i understand it, one of the most popular there prepares for this musical. award presentation, like, uh, in russia, i listened to an hour in an hour. i didn't hear a word about the fact that at this very time at this very hour at this, when the award is being prepared there, the guys are defending their homeland that they are giving their lives, getting injured there, they were talking about some kind of truffles. uh, some hits, some outfits there, and here's an hour without visiting the site. i didn’t see anything at the radio station either, there’s no music award at all that, well, there some money will be transferred to help the army or something else, there is no special operation at all. no , there is at all. a part of russia that lives a completely different life and enjoys it

over the new year's weekend. there, uh, skiing in sochi or somewhere else and so on. here, i would drive around moscow and listen to people live there is absolutely no spice. well it's so simple notes and they understand it. as for the visit of sergei kozhugetovich, yes, except for this important statement by the president. it was also said there that we have a single grouping from the first-aid kit and so on. what we have uh, cooperation is very serious military-industrial, i will even say such cooperation that we already have, uh, and you and some factories do not have enough workers for production. we look at human resources. and the next moment. uh, a comment was made that the special operation was inevitable, poroshenko recalled his statements, but in ukraine there is such an internal championship, who will say more how they wanted to deceive russia so they set themselves up, that is, they declare that all these years they were preparing for

war, then zelensky, then poroshenko, then their military, then their diplomats. eh, and thus justify the very beginning of this special military operation. that is, it just needs to be fixed. and another important point. a protocol was signed there. here is sergey kozhegetovich as soon as he arrived. i don’t know, maybe they are right there on the airfield or somewhere else with our minister. uh, defense victor signed protocols to amend the security agreement. regional security attention in 1997 that is, a new one is coming. there what will be like? and what else is worth it? what was condemned there? i to you i'll be honest, i don't know. and what's more, i'm glad that i don't know this, and even more glad, based on the comments that go, that, apparently, the enemy does not know this, i was most pleased with the way the institute for the study of war commented on this, who simply issued a grandiose

analytical formula that, as a result of shoigu's visit, military cooperation between russia and belarus is even more strengthened - super analytics is right. and we uh bypass them. remember when we deployed a regional grouping, how they fussed. all the blow will be delivered from belarus, where our fugitives have stepped up to create some kind of illegal formations. and the kiev regime began to transfer the territory by a brigade, which means that minefields are torn off every day on tv. and what turned out in the end? as a result, he simply launched training at the training grounds for your mobilized with the participation of ours, and they thought that they would really strike. the special operations will continue, at least we will, and above all the russian federation, if at least someone by chance. find out what the commander-in-chief surovikin is thinking about. i

will be very surprised. and this is the very talent of the commander, that let the enemy side make plans, think about the plan, it will become clear after its successful implementation. that's the most important thing, but now another part uh, because the war is won, as we all said here, not only on the battlefield and not only in the economy. eh, and maybe you will argue about what i will talk about, here is our enemy, we often say he is not funny, but he is one consolidated funny. western europe usa - one and also none too none yes they are decided by sovereignty. yes, they are under the heel of the americans, but uh, look, macron is going to washington schole calling putin on the way, they coordinated this. maybe, maybe not. their interests diverge. we see that when we say, yes, throw this smell into the one

for all 2,000 years. they opposed us and there is no chance here. no, we need to finish them off, and so on, we need to look for a contradiction. here, not so long ago, we had a wood-cutting championship and it doesn’t always work out cut wood. uh, even when you have a cleaver, you bang a good one, and this, well, it doesn’t fly apart, but we had one there, uh, master, uh, for chopping wood. and he showed, he said, look for a crack, you look for hits, so, uh, it doesn’t work. why a knot at the bottom? hit from the other side with three so it split, then bach it fell apart. that's about the same way we should treat our adversary, the interests of france and germany do not always coincide with their business, whatever one may say, deprived of sovereignty under the heel, but he is not interested in a war in russia for him. it is deadly dangerous europe, in principle , does not want war. yes, she is forced to follow the pattern of american politics, but russian e. foreign

policy was then successful when she knew how to use these contradictions when they collided. filmed this game with the collective west, as dictated by our opponent lost. and when they played on these contradictions, whether it was the chancellor of the gorchaks, whether it was andrei andreevich gromyko, whether it was soviet diplomacy in the twenties and thirties. eh, they got an advantage. here are those a terrible defeat for the west that we inflicted on it at that time. after all, they could have been occupied by adenaurov in this germany completely under the control of the united states, now jelly brant appears, it is removed, but it appears, although it seemed. well, no one like that, in principle, appeared there on this scorched field, because they could establish relations. what was france like after world war ii? what is the fourth republic? it 's just weakness. politicians there were still more ridiculous than the current french ones, but among they appear deguli, they can establish

relations with him. and here patience is needed, of course, the temptation is great there to get carried away by the burgundy of scotland, i don’t know, by the false serbs. there, the corsican separatists hurt the enemy, probably, and this is also necessary, but to play on his contradictions , use it to your advantage, be more cunning than the enemy. this is where it lies, as by the way, on the battlefield to bypass the enemy, and to trick the enemy to be one step ahead of him lies in this. may we win, we have already finished the conversation, and there blinks strongly leaves and asks. listen , are we giving away zaporozhye or not? this is a question that i heard all the time including hearing at the front. you are the same as at the front they ask me. and kherson it was an agreement or not? and time after time, i do not have the level of knowledge of political leadership. i can only speak with my

eyes. here is the zaporizhzhya power plant everything that concerns rusatom in the full program works 2,500 people signed a contract, this must be done in order to give back a new leadership has entered, the city everything necessary is provided, the national guard stands confidently handsome men. the so-called sorbate is no military problem. for them, it's not there. and they see everything. how they get out. the coronazis regularly drown them. although, probably, now after what zelensky said, they should be called satanists, because what i was talking about, that is, now this is a fight against orthodoxy. that is, he is an outright demon. well, these satanists, when they try to deal with them clearly, clearly understand. i was on the roof of the sixth unit and looked. here with that

side across the river position. there is manganese, where the shelling comes from, there is a counter-artillery struggle. we are sure for sure. yes, these boats run regularly. this is the same place. here, if look here on the other side. that's just standing looking at the ukrainian positions there are different devices, which allows us to see everything. we all know we're not going anywhere. this is again. i speak as journalists. i am not a politician. just like, uh, kherson, i clearly explained that it was a decision. tragic war, connected with the mistakes of the summer when we we stopped in a semi-position instead of crossing the water barriers to start storming nikolaev and we take into account these mistakes that we made and understand what and how we put on, now the mood on the fronts, but we can’t compare the hard -motivated men and they understand that demons and nazis are opposed and everything about him. that's the

feeling that here they are, well, well, well, that's all it's all gone. we see what they really are. let's say we've finally heard what you've been saying here for eight years. no illusions no, coherence has gone to a completely different level. this is what i think, let's say the military expert, and i have a feeling that both sides are getting ready. seriously, the ukrainian side has a very poor idea of ​​our plans. because of this, their american masters are wildly twitching from here and the political foundation has gone. let's hear what 130 says, if you look back all the way to odessa and then another lion where the yellow dotted lines are up, this is along transnistria the russian enclave has made moldavia the ukrainians are starting to make noise that they can attack transnistria in order to take revenge on russia southern ukraine to odessa in order to secure

the transnistrian region dnepropetrovsk, that is, whether they are sumy i don’t know from the sea. yes, this means the end of the ukrainian economy, no industry worth mentioning, no longer will the economy be represented only by agriculture in eternal doomed poverty, as i said before. we have seen the collapse of the state. could offer the minister of foreign affairs

of president putin if they sit down at the table, negotiations with state secrets, blinkin to his wife on next week, they are going to talk, they will listen to russian everything that we have occupied is left behind us back nothing will be able to choose from these territories of the regions entirely. that is, you have some troops to remove quietly do not spoil, otherwise we will kill you with this announcement of our conditions. russia will not say you want to stay with you, odessa disarmament to join. listen to pray that the russians don't change their minds, because russia extends beyond these four

areas that they have already occupied. what god they all did not occupy the back border of the earth no longer i'll be back. this has been going on all spring. you don't see the lightning-fast russian victory, you don't see the victory means that joe bytes he will call zelensky and say the owner, more precisely, show me the peace negotiations to his wife. that's fast. victories are different things. a military political victory will be achieved by the end of the next one will not fly. no negotiators of foreigners

who use the unfortunate ukrainian peasants . this is not necessary. elena yakovleva belarusian shepherd dog, he is not for sale.