ask youth you we need only young 50.000 hour 3 hour minimum wage. find a true friend i know what the concept of sharing fenechukhayut 10 days of this season gave 11. maybe only he is brothers sisters, i thought of reboot.

the heart of parma perhaps

they began to discuss the article on the half-scholt, although, of course, it does not deserve this in terms of content, but it is necessary to understand in terms of the form, in general, why it was needed. if you look at the content on what he writes there, there, of course, there is, as usual. this is what he has in common with josep barel and with others and prominent representatives of the european political intellectual elite. this, of course, is the number of nonsense that is put up for public discussion there. well the article practically starts by saying that the last 30 years have been years of peace and prosperity and prosperity. well, ask about it, please ask the people of iraq, syria, libya, the former yugoslavia, how are they these 30 years. how they prospered, lived happily, how everything suited them in this world. then he moves on to the generally original, very interesting conclusion. he says that the peaceful overthrow of the

communist regime in the soviet union, instead of being perceived by russia, is an opportunity for greater freedom and democracy. so she perceived it as the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century. and the poet, that he directly quotes our president here. firstly, with regard to the peaceful overthrow on the territory of the soviet union, there are no more points left where conflicts could flare up and transnistria and nagorno-karabakh did not flare up abkhazia south ossetia central asia now this is the last the territory was, which remained now there are conflicts on the territory of the former ukrainian soviet socialist republic and therefore, when the president speaks about the greatest geopolitical catastrophe on the one hand. we're talking about the biggest divided nation in the world. this is a russian who, not of his own free will , ended up in various states in general, but on the other hand, each of the large peoples that were included. or in the soviet union faced inter-ethnic inter-confessional conflicts,

who do not have their solution until today . i suspect i won't have a solution for another decade. then what does scholz offer us in this regard. he talks about what he means . and in general, all the pathos of his speech is dedicated to what, you know, well, apparently it ’s time for germany to close all issues related to security in europe and it’s not for nothing that you showed them in parallel with the macron. that is, is it something today, let's say a macron, says germany will now be the guarantor of france's security? we, in principle, know than for france from the ends of the mountains to the more familiar french. i think they are unlikely to uh, forgot them during this time, and we see, uh, here is an article that is completely meaningless in terms of content, because not a single new thought, not a single new approach, not a single proposal. let's say that europeans and germans were not addressed to russia, the russian population in adler, then

the question arises there. why even write something that you already speak for eight months without getting tired. uh. here it is again published in this form. i think the answer to this question lies in the source in which he published his article, because it was his trout published in the usa. it seems to me that he had to show the americans that your man is here, i pay attention to me. i don’t deviate at all from the fact that you want to hear no personal point of view, no opinion of your own. and you are overlord, i will be your vassal here in this territory. i will carry out military service. i will bear the financial responsibility here to be done. you me the first among these vassals who live here on the territory of the macron, respectively, are here, apparently, from a tactical point of view. uh, two approaches, or asphalt this role with a scholz and talk. no, i can speak better. and what the americans say and broadcast it

to europe macron. went the other way. he took on the role of someone who allegedly talks to vladimir vladimirovich putin that he doesn’t talk to him. he just says the same thing as the americans. and i'm such a powerful child a figure that i can afford to communicate with putin, and i will be the very leader of europe who is ready to take on all this responsibility, but the question arises. well, you can say once 10 times 100 500 the point is that the main thing is the result of these conversations, and conversations cannot translate into a result until the bar that the europeans set for themselves has nothing to do with reality that it is at all you can call it some kind of parallel galaxy or the universe with anything, but with reality there is reality. it has absolutely nothing in common. what are we talking about. right now, macron, he says, to serious people, i communicate as a journalist, of course, it’s good. i'm a position it's better anyway. let's just say what scholz says, but nevertheless both of them are not applicable and absolutely what he says are

journalists. he says that it is necessary now, when we are preparing a proposal on the security architecture, to take into account that there is a guarantee of security for russia. this phrase was very relevant in december , when the president of russia proposed to discuss a new security architecture, which will spell out a guarantee for russia when 8 months have passed. you spent everything you could 20 countries are already bankrupt from a military point of view. here, the countries are already winking, that we are, as it were, already hard, please, if you can, a little bit know how to make your statements. and you after that, when we annexed the four liberated russian territories, which became part of our country. you say, okay, let's discuss what you offered us without a special military operations 8 months ago, no one will discuss this. if you drag on for a few more months, in a few months no one will discuss with you what could be on the negotiating table today. no, that's the whole point. many people in our country often speak today and say that in

any case, the solution must ultimately be diplomatic, negotiations are necessary. i would like everyone to understand that if we sit down to negotiate today, then we will have to cede something from all four territories that we have annexed to our country, if we can liberate three more territories, some of these families, if we liberate the entire territory of the former ukrainian soviet socialist republic it is likely that nothing will have to be ceded. it’s really nothing to concede, which is enshrined in our constitution, of course, and therefore, when they say we need to sit down at the negotiating table today, they don’t care that we have notes in the constitution to puke, that you yourself, it ’s written to them to spit, what international law says. they came up with their own rules live by them whoever they want is bombed, whoever they want is overthrown, so they are told about what they will say about our constitution, they say, go back to where you were in the nineties. you don't care. we will leave for your reunification with crimea. here you can

generally go back to 1912, so we can’t be in the twelfth 19 you wanted to say sakhalin is half that of the japanese, or what? because of this, we will take poland, there is rather much much more. therefore, i want to say here, we see two such competing approaches, but who will the face of the european union in the near future macron or scholz macron, he says, i will talk with the russians, what he says here, i will not talk to them . i will speak on your behalf from the american side, but we see that one leader , in order to express his position, writes a foreface article, and the second one flies to the usa in order to designate none of these two forces

is subjective, none of them is not independent and therefore, if we have to talk to someone to resolve issues related to this conflict, the only country with which this conversation should be a dialogue is the united states of america, no one else has subjectivity . and we have no one to discuss anything with, if these countries are able to ruin their own economy with their military potential. it's all just on one order from the usa, which means they are not capable of making political decisions without being subjective. we need to talk with those who are behind the adoption of these things. absolutely many are now worried about limiting the price of oil. answered for them approximately. in our practice, we are not going to use tools related to the price cap. to do this, we are currently working on the mechanisms of the ban. e on the use of the price tool, no matter what level is set, because we believe that such an intervention can only

lead to even more destabilization of the market, to a shortage of energy resources in the market, and a decrease in investment. this may affect not only oil, but also other products that are currently traded on the market and affect not only russia but and other countries, so we will sell oil. uh, oil products to those countries that will work with us on market terms. even if we have to cut production somewhat, if i understand correctly that both china and india have confirmed that, well, alexander understands this by 33 orders of magnitude, that is, 33 is three orders of magnitude more than me, but let's listen. a foreign expert who generally supports our point of view. this is a good idea on paper, but it is very unlikely that we have works in practice in the long run.

why see red is different in limiting the amount of cash russia can get from oil exports oil exports, one of the main sources of money that putin uses to finance what the west and many others consider to be an illegal war in ukraine , thus acting in that to limit these gains and prevent a show in the global oil markets maintained stable stands to prevent a sharp rise. it was great without problems nothing like oil before that plans to ignore. it won't sell to anyone, it will try to impose restrictions and guess what right now the market is actually on the side of russia still show small charts that show who is watching the cheese. you are the centers of the medium energy and clean era non-profit think tank countries such as

china's india are the two largest consumers, which filled the resulting nonsense when they were granted, if some other countries, such as japan was declining at the beginning of this war, growth is observed in india, china, also in the akarovo emirates, with which egypt and turkey follow, it is important how much india china pays for russian oil, right now they buy it at a big discount from $ 60 per barrel, then the marginal price for the oil agreed right now by the g7 on australia is $60. it's not that big of a big difference practically in the market between russia enjoy no prices. such that she received income throughout this war for the first 6 months brought 158 ​​billion euros from all types of

fossil fuels, most of which is crude oil, so russia has not suffered putin laughs on his way to the bank. and the kremlin was not at all afraid. this is them. of course they don't like it. they believe that shooting themselves in the leg and at the end of the mosque create a catastrophic scenario for world markets. especially for low- and middle-income saransk, who have problems with the availability of oil in the first place, the economic police columnist for the fts 24 channel. douglas herbert the french did not even have their own expert, but we have our own experts, please, alexander yes, thank you. i here, by the way, the amount of income. he also took from the same site that he shows at first, a special military operation began to calculate how much money we earn there. periodically, they refer to them from being amazed . my look, that's all the money they go to russia what are you doing? stop buying everything stop buying a big thank you to them and one more phrase that this citizen said

would like for her. i would like to pay attention. this phrase is about the fact that especially small are not small, these are the economies that are breathing their last. well, here's what he said, at the end i exaggerate a little, but nevertheless , all european leaders, all american leaders, are talking about it. they say, we're introducing a price cap system to help the small economies here that are suffering from the current crisis, what's the problem with us? no? well, look at us, we are strong , we can print money print us all ok. we only help them, but this is a lie, this is an outright lie, because the system of marginal prices is based on a mistake. more precisely, even two mistakes that our western partners made when they imposed an imbargo, more precisely, when they made a decision to bombard, and the states and great britain decided to impose an embargo. in march, the european union at the end of may well, it passed, uh, passed it into law in june. but there was a mistake, the next one they watched that production in

russia was falling and the international energy agency thought that it would drop by 30% in our country, well, for simplicity, somewhere around 3 million barrels per day. ah, at the same time, our 3 million barrels will quickly replace the countries of the middle east and increase production in the united states. so it turns out that we are introducing an embargo and stop buying russian oil. it just leaves the world market. and in its place comes some other oil simultaneously introduced with a ban on sea transportation. all russia is locked. it can only lead along the oil pipelines of oil pipelines. few of them will not be enough and remarkably incomes will fall. and here it is in june it turned out. more precisely, somewhere in the middle of it, it turned out that our production began to recover, and the countries of the middle east said, wait a minute. how how what kind of substitution russia we cannot know, here we would like technically not how it turned out that at the moment when the embargo is introduced and the ban on maritime transportation is not russian. really. it can leave the market, but then there will be a shortage, because the whole

situation looks surprised with interest. oh, everyone is watching with interest, they say, guys, flounder. it was then that the decision was made to this. e price ceiling and in vain here the citizen is surprised that 60 dollars offer the essence of this proposal. here is this price limit, but it lies in the fact that its parameters are at the first stage beneficial to the russian federation, that is, so that you can say to your own, yes, mouser, of course, we are punishing russia. here are 60 dollars, they are, not 60-65. by the way, he made a mistake there in november. we had minimum prices for urls. this is not all our oil. uh, well, that's what urals is most important to us in terms of taxes and stuff and urals. we have cost $65.5. per barrel, on average, and ah, but here it's 60. well, it seems the difference is small, but nevertheless, we can say that it was 65, we assigned them 60, but now we don't choose quotas. we produce 9.9 million barrels of crude oil. and if we submit

to this price limit, it means that the entire infrastructure of maritime transportation is open to us again, and almost 90% of it is tied to europe and the usa. well, there’s nothing they can do about global dominance. and so we can increase production, increase supplies, which means the number of barrels that we throw into the market increases income grows, that is, per bar or lose the number of barrels increased. we have earned more here, of course, i am talking only about crude oil, excluding gas condensate, when i talk about statistics. in our country, statistics are usually considered together with oil and gas condensate, so this reservation must be made. so in the end we are lured by the fact that the guys. well, you understand everything. well, where are you going? you will need and then open. they say representatives of the us treasury should there will be money to spend on creating an alternative alternative infrastructure for maritime transport. it's not just ships, it's insurers. these are brokers. these are financiers. it 's all-all-all-all-all. who one way or another, this, by the way, is maintenance everyone who is involved

in loading oil to insure oil if something happens to it, and it’s really expensive to really develop your infrastructure it’s expensive to invest in shipbuilding it’s expensive it’s expensive to create and develop your own microelectronics and everything else that is necessary for a great a beautiful ship, where you can load one million two million barrels there and send it to its destination. it is definitely expensive. but this needs to be done, and they wink at us, they say, guys. it is expensive. so give up. well, just give up. and if we obey now, then we get the following picture, that is, once again europe and the united states do not buy our oil. they brought in varg and they don't refuse him. this price list only gives exemption from the restriction on sea transportation and everything in a third country and then we must agree to this and the third country must agree to this. now because of these third countries of the buyers of our oil, only australia is interesting? japan, by the way. uh, here again in this video, he mentioned japan. and

why were deliveries there reduced, but deliveries to sakhalin were found and our production on sakhalin was declining due to the fact that exxon mobil was getting ready to leave, and the sheil was getting ready to leave, and there are several several requested both production and supply to japan, too, in japan received an exception from the action. here is this and from under actions of this price ceiling, that is, they will receive oil from sakhalin regardless, that is, they do not need, despite the fact that they are in the big seven, despite the fact that they signed up under this entire system, they will not receive in our oil at marginal prices. interesting. why can't they believe that we uh, can they believe that we wo n't deliver, although the us treasury speaks out guys. believe china india here you are in particular. come here, and russia will definitely supply tibet? calm down everyone ok. we looked at everything. everyone revered russia - this is beneficial. it’s good if we obey, if we start to participate in this, we can really earn, well, in january-february there is more money than if we don’t

fix it, because they don’t need to clap anymore, that is, until february 30, they are reviewing this price in order to can i help you. yes, and they found in america the male incarnation of jamesack, although kirko's level of stupidity , of course, surpassed her long ago, because it was kirby who said that getting out of afghanistan was a brilliant operation, to which the americans say, that sick. he says. no, you don't understand anything. so, not understanding anything in one kernel understands nothing of anything else. but he was a rear admiral, and who he was there. and that's what the rear admiral says, who doesn't do it in a word. here you are in the word oil and three mistakes . we write the usual word on the fence like this. here, the maintenance of the price ceiling does not aim to oust the russian one. no, the policy of limiting prices for russian oil from the world markets will help limit moscow's revenues and we don't think it will. what impact do you have on world

oil prices in the long term, he means probably 300-400 years. we will not speculate on what might happen if russia decides to cut off oil supplies, what i can say is that we will do everything in coordination with our european partners to ensure stability in the carrier energy market. they already do a couple of times, so each time find the worms so that he says something like this called, and the show of the rest was a pity. i mean, she's the only one they have there as a transvestite. sorry, he already broke through already ripped off. a woman's handbag, so he can't be around. and if he grabbed him, it would be him, so he is legendary fluid. he stole women's clothes, as it were, he has been building his defense for two years. he's talking about something he couldn't avoid. oh, not my bag. and the things are right mine. excuse me. yes. please,

these jokes are always wonderful wonderful people's business. not if we don't. this is for the americans, not jokes for us fortunately, as long as this joke. yes, we look at them and have fun. ah. and by the way, he told the truth, indeed, they maintain stability, they are not going to force out. that is, if we submit to our oil, it remains, it becomes more, the prices begin to slightly decrease, our trustee partners. plus, she starts to look strangely bored. wait a minute, what's going on. why are you doing this? why are you setting us up? here, we supported you, yes, ours were selfishly interested in this, but we supported. let's answer. we will bend, and i am so lucky, that is, the statement of the statement of our deputy prime minister was well, well, i took it with great enthusiasm, because this is the statement that should have been made now, what is required. well, in my opinion, what is required, for example, is a presidential decree that prohibits russian companies from selling oil at e, to buyers who participate in the marginal price system, because, well, let's say we

have state-owned companies. this is more accurate state-owned companies. and there are purely private companies, what specifically in russian legislation prevents them from saying now, excellent. gorgeous. we are ready, we agree, guys. we ship. you carry, we increase production, everything suits us. yes, nothing interferes, in fact, that is, nothing interferes and something must interfere. let me remind you how in march many believed that russia was bluffing when it announced ruble prices on march 31, 172 the presidential decree was signed regarding the transition to e, the ruble system of payment for gas and some countries. they thought that this was some kind of joke , well, it’s not really a bulgarian, for example, i thought so, but it turned out that everything was really the most interesting, that even the stockholm arbitration later litigated, when the sellers ran , they said that russia does not supply us. it must come so pretty. arbitration shrugged it off and said, no, we know, here is the decree of the president - this is russia, this is for russian companies. this is indeed a force majeure. that is, they cannot violate, otherwise, well, people will sit down, they don't want to

the same decree is needed and now that it is impossible. well, that's a plus. we need development support, first our insurers further, who provide sea transportation unexpectedly. suddenly there was a boom in the tank market. it is said that a large number of tanks were bought by unknown people, it is now unknown, but this is not in our area. yes. yes, there are some here what moment? they are all our western partners trying to say that russia buys everything. well, apparently it was bought. i'm so there are, let's say, competitors from european carriers, and they, too it is very interesting that the russian share be theirs, that is, for understanding, we translate by sea, well, 3.5-4 million barrels, but these 3.5-4 million barrels. this is from the share of this share of world production. this is 4% somewhere, and the share of sea transportation is already much more. this is such a delicious pie pie that everyone

will want, just one of those countries. well, yes, many greeks have a large, uh, share. here in this world trade as well. i turned to a friend, but who is close to this trade in tankers, and he, well, somehow indirectly confirmed that a lot of people are now er in the world are interested. they are to create such a, well, parallel front. here are tanks, yes, which is just now provided by russia, and how on what conditions, eh? well, i just tried to understand, is it possible yes? and he assures me that what is happening in this trade. yes, it's easy to change these ships. uh, the flag is changing the name , uh, changing the content. eh, and just the guys who are already working in this area. they have evolved over many years. that's it in the processes.

uh, overcoming all kinds of embargoes and all sorts of uh such restrictions.

it seems to me that world trade in this area is now just getting ready to continue on new terms as profitable as possible for them and for all the players. how

can you stop? first, the companies are not recognized. that is, this news was very much dispersed. but this is a childhood disease. that is, when we build a parallel one, when we create something new , childhood diseases will come out, that is, we create a new insurer. immediately there are people who say, wait, we considered the aryans, and who is this such, and what capital and let's see the bank of russia and what capital the bank of russia has well, the insurer belongs to just the bank of russia here, mm, it begins. this is the paper work, this paper work needs to be done. yes, it is normal. well, plus everything.