but the fact that there are interests in europe that do not coincide with the interests of the united states, it is obvious that europe cannot protect these interests, in my opinion, while this is also a medical fact, at least the results or lack thereof of president macron's visit to washington a reinforce me, a in this opinion. thank you, please.

i will speak because it is, uh, your union is , uh, the oldest friend. e russia, we have mr. minister. you know very well that there are a lot of graduates of the soviet union and russia, and thanks two institutes - this is the institute, ibimo and the institute of oriental studies and experts and come to syria to see what the real situation is in fact, the whole real situation, not that, but big politics the real situation. what potential is everything and what potential is positive

potential. here, uh, i know what their choices are. really very big business potential. and this, can be very good very good support. on the one hand, on the other hand, it's potential. unfortunately, it is also used for russia because we hope for this little push, because your experts, in my opinion, that's the opinion. thank you so much. well, well, it's not a question. this is hope, as i understand it, so, well, i

completely agree with you that syria, unfortunately, remains the victim of geopolitical games. and how did it all start in 2011, and from the so-called arab spring, and so did the americans and leading european countries, unlike the two before 2003 , when france and germany opposed russia

, mr. hosti mubara was betrayed by his allies with whom he has been solving problems of stability in this region for decades. it was very, very revealing, but since then the surprise has already passed, just as the afghan leadership was abandoned in half an hour and left to the mercy of fate. well, and many others of those who tied up their political careers, yes, and tied up the future of their state, and the united states of america is extracting, but so far not everyone has a new wave of such animals and attempts to convince that, here, let's compensate you with everything . you do not

suffer, only now join and including those who invited, the syrian leadership and those whom no one invited, given the special relationship. history of relations between turkey and syria. we are still here a few years ago and given the iranian influence in syria in an environment where the league of arab states. uh has expelled her ranks from syria and refuses to admit her mistake until now. and we were convinced that those who really influence the situation on earth should unite and talk to president mass to array. how the

ostankino troika was formed in russia, turkey and, for all the specifics of the relationship between damascus and the turkish presence, this presence and the creation of the astana troika was perceived as a reflection of reality, as a reflection of the need to conduct a substantive dialogue and such agreements. in this trio, the consent of the syrian government was achieved, but in different configurations, including turkey's russia. in particular, i mean the agreements on escalation disk zones that were implemented quite quickly now remains already. true, time flew by. the zone is the idli zone for escalation, according to which we have specific agreements between the presidents of russia and turkey regarding, and the survey of those terrorists

who are present there. from this structure, and the agreement is to separate them from the normal oppositionists who are ready for dialogue to cope with terrorists , there can be no dialogue. there is also an agreement to unblock the route. m4 there is also an agreement on joint patrols, a and a number of other specific military things. uh, not done yet. this agreement is entirely about it. recently, we spoke publicly and our turkish colleagues admit it, but the truth is they assure that the difficulties will be overcome, and in turn , agreements, again at the level of our president, regarding the north east kurdish

structures, the syrian democratic forces are there in ipj and no matter how they called we understand what this structure is about, which are considered by the turks as hostile, even some of them are designated as terrorists in the turkish republic, but these structures are united by the fact that they enjoy the patronage of the united states a through the illegal presence of american troops on, first of all, on the east bank of the river, where, uh, such a lot of security is stored in non-legitimate zones 50 km radius inside that no one knows what's going on.

recently, there have been again attacks of a terrorist nature, turkey - this is also worrisome that the americans are literally cultivating there. uh, the separatism of the kurds. it's worrisome and other countries. on whose territory there are kurdish minorities, because the kurdish problem exploded very much. that is why we make one of the main topics of our dialogue with the house the idea of ​​dialogue between the kurds and the syrian arab republic so that the kurds realize the need to abandon provocative inroads and agree on how they can live in one

state, where they always lived with others. americans dissuade them with lies. it 's the americans who are interested. as well as. well, you see, they say, we are not interested in the collapse of russia. really interested. they sometimes blurt out officials that it is necessary to weaken russia, and they are also interested in separating the kurds up to the creation of an independent state. it is their long-standing lines that shared the power of the anglo-saxon such logic and, uh, they dissuade the kurds in every possible way. eh, the leaders of the syrian forces of democratic syria, and from the fact that they are serious, we are, unfortunately, kurdish structures. they still expect the americans to be reliable partners. let them remember the fate of the baroque about the fate of the afghan

government. and for a long time we will be tough to ensure that there are no encroachments on the territory. and this, by the way, is recent. and following the results of the next astana meeting, it was confirmed in the context. it is these understandings of these agreements that we are interested in on the basis of the still valid adam's agreement between turkey and syria. these two countries, through the resumption of dialogue, it seems that the prerequisites for this are now ripening, resolved specific issues of ensuring security at the border, taking into account legitimate concerned institutions, which the syrian leadership and the physical recognized and now recognize. please

well another half an hour from sergey viktorovich good afternoon surkov nikolai mmo senior researcher at the center for metatarsal-eastern research a question after dr. mali ah. what will be the fate of the constitutional committee? is there any hope that the pause will end and he will resume his work, and what needs to be done now for this and the second question regarding the middle east as a whole, there is no risk that this confrontation between russia by the west, including spreading to the middle east. the first is the constitutional committee. the second is the middle east as an arena for confrontation between russia and the west, because so

far everything is concentrated on eastern europe, but there is a risk. actually, we stood together with the turks, the iranians, and of course. we are the syrian opposition at the origins of this body, we held the syrian national dialogue congress in sochi in january 1919. your obedient servant and his colleagues personally, as if preparing the final declaration, and participated in a special message from the un secretary general, then it was mr. mustafon in place, then the initiative to create a constitutional committee was born, so we are unconditionally committed, and this format, which the west is trying to discredit, you declare that

the government or about government delegations, as it is called? uh, they block everything, they don't want an agreement there, but in fact, it is necessary, of course, that both sides are syrian. the committee represented, uh, sought compromises, and we contribute to this, uh, and in that in particular, we note the relevant proposals that were made by the damascus delegation, but we also note the additional steps that were taken by the syrian leadership to create more favorable conditions for confidence-building, i mean the significant amnesties that the tass president announced this year , while the west is trying the concept of one committee, but

substantive processing and instead of direct negotiations and reaching an agreement on relevant constitutional issues. he is now promoting the initiative highlighted message herpeserson is the approach that they call, that is , let damascus do something. and we are already there, as it were, to ensure that the opposition also does something to meet them. and the west itself will be ready to ease sanctions somewhere, and so on. well, president assad did. uh, very beings announced the truth to you. people went free. uh, there are resolved issues in the future uh in the life of activities. and here we are asking colleagues. here he is, he took a step. uh, without any close conditions, where the answers are not, so that we will

inevitably faced with the fact that the achievement of a fair agreement will be in every possible way. in the same vein, the so-called small group on syria, created in defiance of the astana format, is now trying to create some additional mechanisms, and i think that this is simply to divert attention from the constitutional committee. uh, to disperse efforts, well, some kind of application, but in addition to this essence, to achieve. still, there is a unified approach to these to the consideration of constitutional issues. there are also logistical problems, which are related to the fact that switzerland has joined, where the building of the collection committee has always been held. she joined the anti-russian sanctions, thereby

completely undermined her irrevocable neutrality. undermining. uh, like a neutral party, in territory where everyone was comfortable gathering. this is to discuss russian-american strategic issues of the implementation of the start treaty, including it was comfortable to meet and discuss within the framework of the geneva discussion in the caucasus with the participation of georgia and south ossetia, abkhazia and strange organizations that help in this process. it was also comfortable to meet, interested in the committee. yes, we cannot, but send our delegation to a meeting of the peasant committee on conditions that will be discriminatory. now there is no direct air connection. the swiss initially demanded that our diplomats

apply for visas. in violation of the existing procedures for visa-free travel for holders of diplomatic passports, but also much more. here is a purely logistical we e in response to a request from the un they said that we are ready to gather in any place where you can arrive, without being subjected to any additional distortions, or, if he asks us to stay in our lives, the swiss authorities must give on paper that there will be no plane with our delegation. no problem, they told us that we can guarantee the freedom of movement of your aircraft in swiss

airspace, but to get to switzerland you need to cross the airspace of certain european countries, we answered them that it's your problems. negotiate with these countries. if you want to keep geneva as the seat of the constitutional committee over the middle east and there is no such kind of prominent action here regarding russia with the west. well, we have never had a crazy east, and as far as the politics of the russian federation are concerned, we have seen warnings about how explosive the potential is. on my own

. well, yes, there must have been things that didn't fit, uh, understanding. e human rights, but these were isolated cases, neither there nor there hundreds and hundreds of thousands of civilians, citizens who were killed during the aggressive atlantis, even in afghanistan, by the way, iraq, too. and there were prosperous countries. yes, there, probably, there were not so many freedoms. especially in the way that freedom is now interpreted in europe and in the united states, they also tried to interpret it at

the world cup, but there have never been problems of a socio-economic nature. there, people housing in libya in general, the population was impossible to be best provided in africa with free education petrol. it costs 2 kopecks education could be obtained abroad. it just didn't like it. with this test tube with white powder, they started something for which later someone who was not a blender even apologized. well, apologies, where you can’t sew, and the country is still not so badly destroyed there as in libya with state structures, but the situation with the iraqi kurdistan is far from being resolved there, and in the arab lands, the judges also have not yet overcome their contradictions. remember how, uh, when americans george w. bush announced that

democracy was established in iraq. all the structures of the baaz party, which was based on judges and the army and the police, whatever you want, and then these sunni sunnis, former military personnel , were out of work and away simply because the americans threw them homeless from any position.

and do you understand a lot of interesting things about russia if the soviet union has never done anything like this? yes, we developed relations, sought to

create military ties, supplied weapons somewhere , created what can be called military naval bases, trained officers. but we we never pushed our partners in the middle east to attack anyone, but they did all this in order to get a loan from sberbank and return one and a half percent of the rate with bonuses. thank you monthly.

pay through st. petersburg will get a chance to win a million rubles by the new year. and even here, in general, and in general, wherever sbp is accepted. pay for purchases through sbp and check the winnings on the site. sokolov's new year's discounts from 70% are profitable whatever one may say, choose gifts from sokolov now on wildberries this is an advertisement for a loan without surprises bandits mail it is interesting that in the box there is a guaranteed guarantee rate without surprises

mail bank. my ex is calling, partner listen, let's go faster at work, by the way, what is it with him, we're just an envious person.

the vtb team will offer a credit card solution to the possibility of a reliable vtb bank that is 200 days of purchases without interest. apply for a credit card opportunity right now at vtb.ru. go to vtb and everything will work out. and also grandma frost mom frost back grandfather, baby you are not the only new year's sale on yandex.market for you all the advantages of the highest rate of up to

nine and a half percent per annum online and, of course, the reliability of sberbank is obviously beneficial. summit in istanbul in 1999 and yes and this document for european security consists of the inseparability of security, but a very reasonable paragraph that implies freedom. the choice of security organization that each state freedom itself choose uh, the way to ensure security. this inseparability

of security means that no state must ensure his own safety at the expense of others. if we apply these principles to all these states that are geographically located between the russian federation and nato ukraine georgia armenia azerbaijan, belarus moldova e, a telema dilemma arises, which needs to be solved somehow by diplomacy in different ways. uh, maybe arms control. and what would be your ideal response to this conceptual dilemma. er the solution to these two principles, which, uh, is becoming difficult. we are in this geography begin the conflict represents in this geography. for me , there is no dilemma here, and by and large, there is no dilemma for nato, which answered your question in 2008, the

ninth year of the existence of the istanbul charter with the formula of the indivisibility of security, when nato in 2008 adopted a declaration in bucharest, in which it was written, that georgia and ukraine will be in nato the ditch of this document did not even have a thought to say.