arms, what would be your ideal response to this conceptual dilemma. er the solution to these two principles, which, uh, is becoming difficult. we in this geography start the conflict represent thelema in this geography is not. by and large, there is no dilemma here for nato either, which answered your question in 2008 , the ninth year of the existence of the indivisibility of security, when in 2008 they adopted a declaration in bucharest, in which it was written that georgia and ukraine would be in the atlantic the authors of this document will not even think of an alliance, and we will do it in

accordance with our obligations within the osce to ensure the principle equal to indivisible security. i have already given an example when we tried to reach out to them and said the guys, but if the political obligations enshrined in istanbul do not work. let's conclude a contract legally, legally, necessarily legally security guarantees can be provided at home worth it perfectly, you know? security

and when american missiles are fired upon, uh, russian cities, it means nothing threatens us. and when they say, but we give ukraine only defensive weapons. we do not allow him to land, we do not advise ukraine to shell. uh, actually russian territory, as we recognize it. well, how to communicate with these people, what a dilemma there is, it’s all the same as they promised a palestinian state in their time, and also how, uh, they pledged to support the government. and they immediately allowed the brothers

to send him to prison and positions there in a cage on court hearing. practically does not pay this attention. for example, the polish minister, who is now heading the osce , at this meeting in the lotsa of the council of ministers of foreign affairs, said that the principle of consensus, on which non-application is based, has not been applied. well , now the truth is, er, it is difficult to apply,

so we have moved on to the times of the worlds. this means that when they used.

these are the requests to put forward, but most importantly, they are now where i think at home with the greminger, when he was the general salty of the obse, he remembers how we russia and a number of countries dkb. we tried to clean up. across a range of procedures. one problem is the bureau of democratic institutions and the right man, as well, which do not have any guidelines with any crypts that would be transparent to an understandable country. and that's why, for example, there was a situation a couple of times when they said, here we want to send russia to their homeland and invite them to the elections. observers we want to send 800 people. we say you know at 800 we can't feed enough. why man and with what's there in

half or one third of the states? here are the inconsistencies. eh, it raised a lot of questions. we said, let's approve once it's forever criteria, like here this observation is not wanted and the western level. no, this is the gold standard, which they themselves have not invented. this should be stopped, and it was about the same with attracting the wrong organizations to participate in activities in the humanitarian basket when we proposed. let's do how the water there receives observer status and government organizations that must pass through the relevant committee is there to present its program. no. here are our events along the line of boris, which were held every year there. whoever wants to can come from the street, terrorists came.

there, tajikistan was offended that frankly e terrorist structures, which are on their lists , passed without hindrance on this earth. at the same time, they were not allowed in, they are government organizations from the crimea. here you are, please, come in. who wants to, but not everyone will be missed. this is an obvious bias. well, and, finally, what we still tried to fix. this system of extrabudgetary projects of any normal organization.

and i will carry out a project to train journalists in the right key at the osce in order to organize this you just need to write a letter to the secretary general or the current chairman and that's it. and this will be called projects in armenia. now the same projects have spawned like mushrooms, and in ukraine there is budget financing, but all projects are called projects. what kind of mine is not even slow -acting anymore, it will explode very quickly under both dreams, which the poles are now laying. and by the way,

to say last year, and our swedish colleague anlinda was actively engaged in this completely, ignoring the fact that all osce chairmen should be honest brokers, as it was decided back in 2002 at a meeting of the portuguese ministry. now, from the first of january, northern makiations are coming in, that congratulations, you will lead such an organization and you will do new things, a very difficult period for its future and your predecessors duties. what will he feel responsible for? i have another

interesting thing answered you wrote. yes, sure, we remember the decision of the prototops of the portuguese ministerial meeting in 2002, but we still have commitments to the european union and our national law. anyway, what area is this? 10 minutes to second west i listened to you carefully. and it looks like the

west, and completely sweat, uh, the united states in your remarks. maybe i read it wrong. but how are you? you see the diversification in the west europe is rich, it does not equal the usa and so on, but there is in europe in europe itself and this is diversity in the usa how do you see the diversity in the usa i would ask how veteran diplomat, and this is an attempt at the united nations. the salacious meeting will push

russia into a special position, that is, these five meetings were held, especially the emergency uh meetings. what is your plan, but to contain this process that is going out, yes, as far as diversity is concerned diversity. uh, in every society, probably, the diversity of pluralism, to one degree or another, is present somewhere absolutely without control. sometimes this leads to excesses.

well, the united states braids, yes, we are also observing these processes, sometimes these processes not only in the usa, but in other countries also acquire such a violent character. we remember how the events in washington followed the results of the last presidential election, the events in the capitol, the arrests of hundreds of people, which caused a huge number of questions from another part of american society, supported the republicans. uh, the processes have not yet been fully completed, but the deadlines that are discussed there are surprising to many. and, of course, the polarization of society is strongly measured. i already have it

understood that the doors are political processes. that was the mid-term elections. there will also be presidential elections, the arguments that the parties resort to . extermination to become personal and standing on the other side, and the desire to push politics and economics somewhere into the background. and when questions arise, say it's all putin, right there, in this sense, they have no polarization. although, of course, republicans say mushrooms, well, yes, it’s putin but first of all, it’s her fault, so she says, if it weren’t for putin, in general, all of you would have been frozen there everything in the head. ah, you read this polarization, that tomorrow, after all, monoliths at this stage. i think they are now trying to

suspect us of this, that we want to split. west, when we say that europe has lost its independence, we are inciting the europeans. it's not like that at all. we sincerely have always said for many years that we want to accuse us of trying to create some kind of trojan horses in the european union. we have always answered this, and to be sincerely interested in the fact that the trade union is an independent player, this is a sincere position and does not because we wanted to send this player to fight the united states, not at all. it was just that it was independent and obviously mutually beneficial, energy projects of the industrial operation, which were born back in soviet times, so that they would work for europe and for us. and

as a result, these projects of the russian federation . therefore, we want diversity and there is diversity in our society. i don’t see any risks here, but diversity, of course, should be within the framework of culture within the framework of tradition, which in a particular society exist if it is a variety of genders, which now there are more than 80 pieces in europe and somewhere else in england. if that's what

i saw in sweden last year when i attended the meeting when excuse me for the details. no, i asked where the toilet room was, they showed me the door. well, not in a human way, just not in russian. i don’t know, i answered or answered your question, but i’m not convinced that the idea, of course, is china india russia

iran needs political attention. why where are the principles that are still? in my opinion, at the beginning of the 2000s, at a special summit, they were approved that they were one people, one religion. and what is needed, how to live together, too, this diversity is now being used for quite non-constructive, non-peaceful purposes. here, well, about the general assembly, where it is also embodied. it is also the embodiment of diversity trying to suppress, and those who advocate democracy are trying to suppress it, but the west comes for democracy only when it comes to how other countries

must live democratically. what it is? i absolutely do not understand how this country lives and do not draw any conclusions from the huge amount of facts available to any more or less interested researcher. i think these were fantastic characteristics of, ah, how stupidly this policy is being implemented and what it leads to, of course, it ended ingloriously, by the asian partners, whom they are now trying

to include in their new european union with the central asian five structure, whether they are talking from armenia azerbaijan from belarus rule? we will explain everything to you from here, a huge number of organizations that train the population tell the best practices of western democracies and of course, but i mentioned lgbt, of course, in the modern interpretation of democracy, lgbt is one of the uh pillars. uh, what they are trying to teach and something they are trying to instill, but as soon as you start with the americans or with the europeans about democracy at home. yes , we have obligations under the universal human rights instruments. we are on the council

human rights periodically. each country tells how it fulfills its obligations. everything is clear here. let's talk about democracy at the international there is a rulekovich. how would he leave kiev, but he went to a neighboring city where his party congress was held, well, it doesn’t matter there, but in the same 2014 there was a coup in yemen. if you remember, the yemeni president, mr. hadi

, did not leave for another city, but fled to saudi arabia. and since then, until recently, for many years, we all considered it legal president and demanded that a peace process be launched to resolve the egyptian crisis with the participation of the legitimate presidents and with the participation and only less than a year ago.