and the freedom of the media, as it seemed to them, perhaps, or maybe they did, true, they thought it was in the rank of some such idol. and when it turned out that you gave it exists only in their imagination, then a problem arose with latvia, which simply asked them to leave. that's all. this is just a collapse of a false system of values, but the journalist vladimir solovyov my colleague, in my opinion, wrote something about it in his telegram channel that traitors are not loved anywhere. i will not be so categorical and i want to formulate the question in a different way using the example of rain. uh, we can say that independent journalism. perhaps you are exiled when you are already a priori in a dependent position, that is , the doors are closed to you to work on the territory of the russian federation, this is moving to another country. and there you are trying to be independent. this is possible in the current geopolitical environment. and you know, this is only possible by the imagination of people who, for some reason, accepted this one. the idea of ​​false

values, i am convinced that in the conditions of aggravation of relations no state can will allow hmm to exist some forces, uh, that will claim neutrality in relation to another state with which this state hmm has a bad almost unacceptably sharp relationship. well, i’m talking about latvia now, that is, it’s naive to think that latvia will allow some kind of journalistic political public opinion to exist on its territory, which will claim something other than e. hmm negative attitudes towards our country. this is a naive, belief, which in practice has shown their fallacies. well, just the other day in riga , they also canceled a concert-organists or for halts, in general, to journalism to politics, who have nothing to do with 10 years already living in the territory. latvia she said more in this

country. so she won't show up. and we are seeing such a picture when the radical part of the latvian society wins the radical part, which in fact requires the complete di -russification of the media cultural space. we know that chulpan khamatova is learning the language in order to she is not given the opportunity to speak in latvian in russian. i have a question. why? do you think the country, after 30 years of gaining independence, still cannot find a balance of peaceful coexistence of people of different nationalities. you know, it seems to me that the latvian society is very diverse and, probably, not without the participation of some external forces it turned out. so that the decision is made there, just those people for whom russophobia hatred of russian culture and the russian language has become a professional role. the fact is that this part of their own political, it seems to me, the agenda they are on this

hatred on this denial. they are building their careers. and this is quite obvious and i think that this is quite in line with expectations. e those forces that in relation to latvia are external and for them. actually. this is not a country, not a people. this is just a certain function of the function, which is directed against russian culture against the russian language. this is a sad situation, but it is typical not only for latvia, we know that in other countries of the larger european countries, but very often. even so, that people who adhere to traditional values, for example in the field of family life in the field of gender relations. they actually stand for a traditional family, just like you and me. they don't have any voice. they are not heard, they are not invited anywhere, they are not allowed to take any interviews, leadership positions, unless they give up their views. this, unfortunately. here's

the sad reality found the time. i think that we just need to know these people, either they did not live and keep in touch with them, because uh, i think that the future, if it awaits us on this planet, yes, and i mean, until the second coming in which we believe in christians, it will be built around those people who have retained some idea of ​​​​biblical christian values, including including and primarily relating to the relationship to the family to children to the tradition to the faith worldview. this is some kind of unity that we must seek and acquire. well , now to ukraine, where there is a feeling that the second religious front is opening on december 1, the day ukraine gained independence volodymyr zelensky published a video message to the nation, where she spoke about the importance of the spiritual independence, that is, the spiritual independence of his country, and last

thursday there was a meeting of the security council of ukraine where they discussed the ties between certain religious organizations and the aggressor state. i mean the russian federation just a couple of hours after his statement, but about the impending closure of the ukrainian orthodox church. the representative of the dog and such a waste, zore , said on social networks that the charter has already been registered laurels, like a monastery under tsu, then, however, this statement was removed. ah, well, it seems that something in general is planned. there, what is the situation? by this moment, and most importantly, if the goal, well, let's say, is to take the laurel, but you can not resort to such complicated e procedures. yes, it can just take to expel the monks of the priests from them to put others. why hasn’t it been possible so far, it’s slava. what is the difficulty there, and you know, i don’t think

it’s so simple, because the kiev-pechersk lavra is , of course, a great shrine, and she, uh, hmm is a spiritual treasure not only of the ukrainian people, but also of many other peoples, including the russian people. uh, with whom we uh, are children of the same church. and, of course, such is the czech lavra. hmm, in the eyes of most ukrainians, she did nothing of the sort. and what would explain the attempts of the sbu to arrange searches there? the show masks actually mock the monks and disrupt the building of church life. that is, in order to justify such actions, and the ukrainian authorities, of course, must come up with something, for this they they publish with enviable constant regularity some regular news that they found something there, some message from the networks, so that the patriarch in the archives of the lavra or some monastery or hierarchy, but this is all ridiculous evidence

that does not testify to anything anything other than the fact that the church in ukraine is not to blame for anything, that it is an organization that does not fit into their political conjuncture from the point of view of being for someone they are not for whom they are for christ, and that’s how i i think most people think those people who go to church in ukraine. here but this haunts the ukrainian authorities. this applies not only to name and spices, as we know. very active actions were taken in order, let's say, to inflict some damage on the ukrainian orthodox church, headed by vladikanufri. we know that thomas was illegally obtained from the phanar was an attempt to take away the parishes. they managed to take away part of the parishes from the canonical church. now they are trying to know how, like , in soviet times, probably in times war communism, but any objectionable

priest. it was possible to accuse him of anti-soviet agitation and to close the parish by sending me somewhere to the camp, yes, even now i think that the ukrainian authorities. perventos are trying to act according to the same scenario and they, er, are trying to prove that the enemies allegedly settled there behind the monastery walls, who are on the wrong political side there. this in itself is nonsense. but, apparently, they are trying to justify their lawless, violating all possible ideas about freedom. and conscience, uh legality the rule of law all possible norms the principles of rule that probably exist on the european continent, i don’t know since the 16th century there since the hundred years war, the peace of westphalia. i don't know when that was the first time conscience spoke on the european continent on december 6th. well, literally a week after zelensky's statement

, the cabinet of ministers, the head of the state ethnopolitics of ukraine and lena bogdan, were fired, and now ukraine is planning the so-called eternal examination of religion. few of course, who knows who elena bogdan is, but perhaps her dismissal. this is some kind of sign, given that she was the head of the department that dealt with the state ethnic policy of ukraine, and if this signal is for anything. do you know elena bogdana, she became publicly known for her statement that the ukrainian orthodox church, headed by vladyka onufry , still, er, owns the vast majority of parishes. whether not the majority of ukrainians belong to the racist dog, but it is obvious that, uh, the same bureau for

ethno-religious policy has completely different numbers, which show that most of the parishes in ukraine belong to the canonical ukrainian orthodox church headed by vladyka anufri. and of course it's true. she apparently cut the eyes of someone from the political establishment. and so they decided to take this god. although her there is some kind of traitor to ukrainian interests. it is difficult to name it, of course, it acted in that digma, in which the entire ukrainian government operates, that is, as an official, it performed its functions. it's just that she made a statement that, hmm, actually stems from real facts about the religious picture in ukraine but, apparently, the truth, let's say, has lost all meaning even with these statistical estimates that the tubers are engaged in, therefore, of course, now they will try to prove , i mean, the ukrainian authorities, that there is supposedly some kind of dependence of the

ukrainian orthodox church on moscow. this of course, the self-governing church in ukraine has nothing to do with the matter. she defines her own life. uh, but i think that uh. hmm, the task that the most radical parts of the ukrainian political and social are pursuing is to generally destroy everything that in any way resembles. and uh, those natural, uh, intimate relationships that bind our two peoples. i don’t know if you are subscribed, uh, in social networks banned in russia to the ukrainian producer alexander nevsky, but here i am as if the question that he formulated here may be rhetorical or maybe not rhetorical to the russian orthodox church i will quote that perhaps you somehow parry him, it means that the post he writes this post is not about

religion not about faith not about deep a person's personal relationship with god he is from the church about the organization. ukraine is preparing to ban the activities of the russian orthodox church on its territory, the relevant laws have been introduced to the supreme rainbow. in its current state. the roc can hardly be called a church. is it the ministry of religious affairs or the department of the fsb or, if necessary, the ministry of foreign affairs of the russian orthodox church of its hierarchy, have long become mechanical conductors of the will, putin and his jim, and most importantly in another, the moscow patriarchate gave its parishioners , first of all, their ukrainian part. and this is a third of the entire flock of the russian orthodox church for you to answer this alexander rodnyansky. you know, i'm always touched by the attempt of those people who obviously have nothing to do with our church. uh, uh, make your own conclusions. am i convinced that rodnyansky does not know what a church is. what is the sacrament e, what is the task of church service

in this world, but at the same time, he probably heard somewhere such a phrase that the church can be called some kind of ministry or department of the fsb of imed. in general, this is such an opinion that it seems to make it possible to convincingly criticize the church, but hmm, i think that such statements are some kind of another attempt. like it as part of your audience. here is his new one. let's just say that the target audience is , accordingly, hmm, that part of ukrainian society that adheres to the most radical and intolerant views. here is this one parts of ukrainian society. he tries to please. this, unfortunately, looks all funny, because the church, of course, holds its own views in its life in its activities. but at the same time it always remains with the society with the people. eh, and let's say she lives

by what the people live in the conditions of a special military operation. the church provides spiritual assistance, the russian army to the russian soldiers who are on the front line supports those who suffered from the war, we have huge social activities, which, as you understand, no fsb or other state structures of the power bloc is not supported, because this is precisely the church activity. this is a calling and many people volunteer priests perceive it this way, so you know, it's just uh, let's say primitive propaganda, primitive accusations made by people who have nothing to do with either the church or christianity, most likely, or their own people. and how do you respond to the accusation that the third parishioner of the russian orthodox church who was on the body of the territory of ukraine turned out to be in the moscow patriarchate devotees? you know, but this is some kind of nonsense, because no one betrayed ukrainian parishioners.

uh, with many of them, we, uh, say we form a single whole in the canonical space, except for those who themselves come out of this space or try to get out, we pray, to the same saints we receive the same sacraments, so, uh, despite everything political structures, despite the wars that unfortunately would have been and will be in the history of mankind. and also think it will be healed early. and er, so to speak, we can with one mouth. as they say praise one god and the rakeans will praise the power he is now trying to prove his loyalty this week. yes, the last point was put in our country after four letters. the lgbt president signed the decree. from the total ban on lgbt propaganda in all

spaces on the internet in fiction on the screen, on screens and so on. in this connection, can we say that this question has been finally put to rest or not? and you know, it seems to me that in terms of legislation, of course, this is a very big achievement. this, i would say, is a breakthrough, because finally, something that could not be done before, uh, the church, uh, which has always testified to the perniciousness, uh, sin about the perniciousness of the propaganda of sin, has finally been done, received some feedback, some response from the state. yes indeed it is a sin it destroys the personality it destroys the society and therefore we will not allow this ideology of speech to be freely propagated. it is the ideology of the ideology that undermines the integrity of the human personality, which decides the person. e

opportunity to create your own happiness. we think so, it's our spiritual religious beliefs. and we are very glad that these beliefs are values, because only a traditional family has values. the end is fixed and protected by this prohibition to say that we now have an end to the family crisis. i can’t, because there is still a lot to be done in order to create an alternative system for protecting promotion in the public space on the legal basis that has now been created, and hmm ideas about family happiness, and the union of a man and a woman, and having many children about the value of mutual service loyalty of love support all these patterns of behavior all these theses. they should return to the public space again and so on. i think that the russian family will get a chance for their

revival, and our people will. really. let's say we are protected, maybe the president of our country has already stated that one of the goals is the existence of our country. this is the savings of the people. so that with the people you need to re-build a strong a healthy family that will be a place of comfortable life for spouses for children for grandparents for all family members in the broadest sense of the word. well, and the end, and sensational, which means that in the series the monastery, which the ministry of culture banned after the russian orthodox church was recalled to it, as an artistic product that offends or potentially. e, capable of offending the feeling of believers in our country. here i got a document in my hands, and sent to the minkul . and signed here you are. am i right i understand that for this series, how would you

form a conclusion or was it some kind of expert board and you already wrote it in a letter, well, let me read out a couple of phrases about the decision to refuse. filming was accepted due to the fact that the script contained a distorted caricature description of monastic life by the filmmaker. nevertheless, they managed to agree on filming, and in the period of the ozersk monastery. you are such official positions of the roc a, anticipating a deliberately negative reaction from a significant part of believers the church's public media relations department considers any official support for the film to be contrary to the goal of preserving the strengthening of traditional values ​​in russian society. plus or minus what you just talked about, and everything that we see, watch, read should contribute to the formation of a positive image of the family and traditional values. but you yourself understand that any negative review of the russian orthodox church is our

most effective advertisement to remember at least the film matilda and i see it by e, it means the feedback of people who write on instagram that the ban on the russian orthodox church was their main motive for watching the series. why are you doing it? look, well first, i want to start on the positive side of this whole story. uh, our church is very active in this relationship with cinematographers, directors, producers. we have a positive experience here - this is the film naughty, which was shown at the box office, so to speak, and on television too. e, probably, will be shown or has already been shown, the second part is being prepared, that is, we are ready to interact with cinematography. we give the opportunity to make films, including those films that are feature films, which are not, you know, some kind of deep reflection of orthodox life. they contain some kind of criticism

, maybe not complimentary approaches, and so on. that is, we are ready to cooperate. we believe that christianity is the church life. it should inspire creative people, and we are ready to assist this creativity in every possible way, but, unfortunately, the film is a monastery. not the same story at all. it seems to me that its creators were originally intended to create a false image of the monastic life. i think that there will be nothing wrong if those people who did not want to watch it, let them watch this film and understand. that such monasticism, which is drawn there in nature, does not exist, it is worth looking at to be convinced of this. this is an absolutely fantastic false, distorted picture of monastic life and monastic quest. too. that's what i think people will say. here we are we have seen, we understand that this is not and can never be, and also some kind of effect. well, i heard

that the film actually from the official church, after all, had it. eh, counselor, what did he advise wrong there and all this happened. i don't know how to correctly say that he advised there, because the film contains a huge number of blunders, and not the accuracy of distortion, even where i think. the seminarian would have seen the inaccuracies and corrected it . yes and so continuing what. i said again, um , we welcome any creative people who really want to make movies about the life of the church and do. it's beautiful, interesting and captivating. eh, sometimes even a provocatively reasonable degree of provocation, in my opinion , it is quite acceptable for creativity, including creativity from the church. eh, and there is already an example in the film the novice, uh, which i have already mentioned, i think that this is some kind of sample that

indicates that our church is able to interact with some kind of graphic community know that it is supported by your tv channels. it is very good. eh, it's coming out. the second part of this movie is coming soon. we saw the script , of course, we will not do any spoilers, but in my opinion. it's interesting. the film and i think that it will inspire many people, and then to make it even more interesting and alive but about the life of the church , the monasteries and the naughty two. yes, we will be looking forward to it. thank you very much vladimirovich for coming to our studio. thank you if

a loan, then compare an open interesting social network. being an entrepreneur means keeping everything under control and use a retail solution . now i know my customers better and can earn more. we have improved the internet banking and now you have a solution for your type of business, become a savings business client and take advantage of new opportunities for 0 rubles. savings business with us every second entrepreneur from 7 days 3d cream massager for deep correction of facial contours, hyaluron collagen, vitamins

effectively, without injections, collect complex care sends. post office bank

dreams come true i now serve in the legion of liberty russia changes the political system in russia, he is a few dozen activists and are engaged in informational propaganda work. similar structures had information that it was possible to carry out arson with the help of dry fuel. most of all, they were interested in the room where the personal files of the servicemen were located.

are you a real alligator, a terrible feisty, which gennady petrovich devours everyone, or is gena just a gardener? if you come back to

this apartment,

we'll take care of this business. it will be the honest detective. we continue to follow the developments in the

zaporizhzhia region, they are shelling the coastline of the city’s energodar, where the nuclear power plant is located, our special correspondent olga kurva reports that according to her, more than ten strikes have already been carried out over the nuclear power plant, a drone has been spotted, we are following the incoming information. well , in the center of dresden, the police stormed a pharmacy, where before that an armed criminal had taken a woman of a child hostage. he himself was reportedly wounded, the hostages were not hurt from before this attacker. at first, he tried to enter the building of the local radio station and opened fire, but the employees managed to barricade themselves and called a patrol. after that, the attacker got into the car and, as they say. the media escaped from under the nose of the police, drove to the shopping center, where he burst into the pharmacy from the barricade there, well, who died in this story. everything is just like that. this is an elderly woman who was shot by a criminal in another area of ​​the city. and so, apparently. and as the police say, it was his mother for a long time. prer