they tried to dismiss the employee, as if to make amends for the situation, but the license was still the latvian authorities, the general director in tears natalia sindeiva of the employee revoked. so he asks to return for the fate of the rain, so everyone is watching. do you follow this story and how does it make you feel at all. you know, of course, i heard about this story. and, probably, at first glance. it may seem that she has nothing to do with the church. maybe a direct relationship. she really has. but it seems to me that she hmm this story this plot. it raises a number of questions these questions are about value. that's what value is. e freedom of speech freedom of the media is this a value that is absolutely and generally applicable and can this value be higher than other values ​​that exist in a particular society. here i would like to remind you of all this already. they know that we are currently

undergoing a very serious revision of values ​​in russia. recently, the president of the russian federation approved a decree that involves the protection of traditional values ​​of a series of culture and other areas of public life and among these values. in my opinion. uh, those values ​​that go beyond that list, uh, usually uh, that are considered sacred by our liberals, have priority. this is what freedom of the media is. is it possible, for example, to humiliate your fatherland, to humiliate your compatriots, on the air, for example, which broadcasts in russia, means to criticize the army, which consists for a second not brought down by a robot, but from people who give their lives. i think that this cannot be done. what pretext can be used to refer to the freedom of the media to some other democratic freedoms or considered

as such, but in my opinion there is always and should be a certain priority of values ​​and the most important value is the value of love for one's neighbor and love. e to your fatherland. i 'm talking about precisely such secular values, which, in principle, although they have a religious basis, are applicable to any society that wants to exist and survive, as the story of rain shows us. they first erected freedom. media as it seemed to them, probably, or maybe they did, true, they thought in the rank of some such idol. and when it turned out that you gave it exists only in their imagination, then there was, er, a problem with latvia, which simply asked them to leave. that's all. this is just the collapse of a false system of values, but the journalist vladimir solovyov my colleague, in my opinion, wrote something like this in his telegram channel that traitors are not loved anywhere. i will not be so categorical in another way i want to formulate the question. here on

rain example. eh, you can say that independent journalism is possibly in exile. when you are already a priori in a dependent position, that is, the doors to work on the territory of the russian federation are closed to you, you move to another country. and there you are trying to be an independent media, it is possible in the current geopolitical situation. and you know, this is only possible by the imagination of people who, for some reason. here is perceived this idea of ​​false values. i am convinced that in the conditions of aggravated relations no state will allow hmm to exist to some forces, uh, which will claim neutrality in relation to another state with which this state has bad, almost unacceptably sharp relations. well, i’m saying right now, that is, it’s naive to think that latvia will allow

some kind of political public journalistic force to exist on its territory, which will claim something other than em negative attitudes towards our country. this is a naive belief, which in practice has shown its fallacy. well, just the other day in riga the organist concert was canceled or for rest breaks, in general, for journalism, for politics, which have nothing to do with it. she has been living in latvia for 10 years already. she said that she is more in this country, so she will not perform. and we are seeing such a picture when the radical part of the latvian society wins the radical part, which in fact requires the complete di-russification of the media cultural space. we know that in chulpan khamatova is learning the language in order to speak in latvian in russian, so she is not given the opportunity. me a question. why? do you think the country, after 30 years of gaining independence, still cannot

find a balance of peaceful coexistence of people of different nationalities. you know, it seems to me that the latvian society is very diverse and, probably, not without the participation of some external forces it turned out. so that the decision is made there, just those people for whom russophobia hatred of russian culture and the russian language has become a professional role. the fact is that this part of their own political agenda, as it seems to me, they are on this hatred on this denial. they are building their careers. and this is quite obvious and i think that this is quite in line with expectations. e those forces that in relation to latvia are external and for them. actually. this is not a country, not a people. this is just a certain function of the function, which is directed against russian culture against the russian language. this is a sad situation, but it is typical not only for latvia, we know that in other countries of the

larger european countries, but very often. though so that people who adhere to traditional values, for example in the field of family life in the field of gender relations. they actually stand for a traditional family, just like you and me. they don't have any voice. they are not heard, they are not invited anywhere, they are not allowed to take any interviews, leadership positions, unless they give up their views. this, unfortunately. here's the sad reality found the time. i think that we just need to know these people, either they did not live and keep in touch with them, because uh, i think that the future, if it awaits us on this planet. yes, yes, i mean, until the second coming, in which we believe in christians, it will be built around those people who have retained some idea of ​​​​biblical christian values, including, first of all, those related to the relationship to the family to children to the

traditions to the faith worldview. this is some kind of unity that we must seek and acquire. well, now to ukraine, where a it seems that a second religious front is opening on december 1, on the day ukraine gained independence, vladimir zelensky published a video message to nation, where she spoke about the importance of spiritual independence, that is, the spiritual independence of his country, and last thursday there was a meeting of the security council of ukraine where they discussed the ties between individual religious organizations and the aggressor state. i mean the russian federation just a couple of hours after his statement, but about the impending closure of the ukrainian orthodox church. the representative of the dog, and such a waste, zooria, said on social networks that the charter of the lavra has already been registered as a podsu monastery.

later, however, this statement was removed. ah, well, it seems that something in general is planned. there, what is the situation? by this moment, and most importantly, if the goal, well, let's say, is to take the laurel, but you can not resort to such complicated e procedures. yes, we already just take to expel priests from some monks to put others. why so far failed is weak. what is the difficulty there, and you know, i don’t think it’s so simple, because the kiev-pechersk lavra is, of course, a great shrine, and it, uh, is not a spiritual treasure only the ukrainian people, but also many other peoples, including the russian people. uh, with whom we uh, are children of the same church. and, of course, such is the pechersk lavra. hmm, in the eyes of most ukrainians, she did and nothing like that. and what would explain the attempts of the sbu to arrange

searches there? the show masks actually mock the monks and disrupt the building of church life. that is, in order to justify such actions, and the ukrainian authorities, of course, must come up with something, for this they constantly publish with an enviable some kind of regular news that they found something there some message of his holiness the patriarch in the archives of the lavra or some monastery or archy, but this is all ridiculous evidence that does not testify to anything else but what the church. well, ukraine is not to blame for anything, that it is an organization that does not fit into their political conjuncture in terms of who you are for, they are not for whom they are for christ, and this is exactly what i think most of those people who are on ukraine go to church. here but this haunts the ukrainian authorities. this applies not only to

zelensky and under poroshenko, as we know. very active actions were taken in order, let's say, to inflict some damage on the ukrainian orthodox church, headed by vladyka onufri. we know that thomas was illegally obtained from the phanar was an attempt to take away the parishes. they managed to take away part of the parishes from the canonical church. now they are trying to know how, like in soviet times, probably during the war communism, but any objectionable priest. it was possible to accuse him of anti-soviet agitation and to close the parish by sending me somewhere to the camp, yes, even now. i think that the ukrainian authorities will try to act according to the same scenario. and they, uh, are trying to prove that the enemies allegedly settled there behind the monastery walls, who are on the wrong political side there. this in itself is nonsense. but, apparently, they are trying to justify their lawless, violating all possible ideas about freedom.

his own and conscience, and hmm legality about the rule of law, all possible norms, in principle, as a rule, which probably exist on the european continent. i don't know since the 16th century there since the hundred years war, the peace of westphalia. i don't know when that was the first time they spoke their conscience in european. continent on the sixth of december. well, literally a week after zelensky’s statement, the cabinet of ministers, the head of the state ethnopolitics of ukraine, elena bogdan, was fired, and now ukraine is planning a so-called eternal religion expertise. it’s not enough, of course, who knows who elena bogdan is, but perhaps her dismissal is some kind of sign, given that she was the head of the department that dealt with the state ethnic policy of ukraine, and if this signal is just what, do you know elena

bogdana she became known publicly for her statement that the ukrainian orthodox church, headed by vladyka anufrim, is still. e, the vast majority of parishes belong to e, we all saw very well that periodically ukrainian political technologies publish polls. which show that almost the majority of ukrainians belong to a beautiful dog, but it is obvious that uh, the same bureau for ethno-religious policy has completely different figures, which show that most of the parishes in ukraine belong to the canonical ukrainian orthodox church headed by vladyka anufri. and of course it's true. she apparently cut the eyes of someone from the political establishment. and so they decided to take this god don. although her there is some kind of traitor to ukrainian interests. hard call it, of course, acted in e. the

paradigm in which the entire ukrainian government operates, that is, as an official. it was performed by a function. she just made a statement, which, hmm, actually stems from real facts, and the religious picture in ukraine but, apparently, the truth, let's say, has lost all meaning even with these statistical estimates that you bureau is engaged in. therefore, of course, now they will try to prove, i mean, to the ukrainian authorities, that there is supposedly some dependence of the ukrainian orthodox church on moscow this, of course, has nothing to do with the case of the self-governing church in ukraine. she defines her own life. uh, but i think that hmm is the task pursued by the most radical part of ukrainian political research. let's put it this way. hmm, is to completely destroy everything that in any way resembles the natural intimate

relationship that binds our two peoples. i don't know if you are signed banned in russia from social networks on the ukrainian producer alexander nevsky, but i’m like the question that he formulated here can be rhetorical or maybe not rhetorical to the russian and orthodox church, i’ll quote that, perhaps, you somehow parry him, which means that he’s such a post writes this post is not about religion is not about faith nor about the deeply personal relationship of man with god he is from the church about the organization. ukraine is preparing to ban the activities of the russian orthodox church on its territory, the relevant laws have been introduced to the supreme rainbow. at its current state. the roc can hardly be called a church. this ministry of religious affairs or a department of the fsb or, if necessary, the ministry of foreign affairs of the russian orthodox church of its hierarchy, have long become mechanical conductors of the will, putin and his regime, and most importantly in another

moscow patriarchate betrayed its parishioners , primarily their ukrainian part. and this is a third of the entire pasta of the russian orthodox church for you to answer this alexander rodnyansky. you know, i'm always touched by those people who obviously have nothing to do with our church. uh, uh do some their inferences. am i convinced that rodnyansky does not know what a church is. what is the sacrament, uh, what is the task of church service in this world, but at the same time, he probably heard such a phrase somewhere that the church can be called either some kind of ministry or department of the fsb and the foreign ministry in general, what is it like this the opinion that it is very and as if it allows you to convincingly criticize the church, but hmm i think that such statements are some kind of another attempt to please, as part of their audience. here is his new, let's say, targeted audience. this is

, accordingly, hmm, that part of ukrainian society that adheres to the most radical and intolerant views. that's this part of ukrainian society. he tries to please. this, unfortunately, looks ridiculous. because the church, of course, pursues its own views in its life in its activities, but at the same time it always remains with the society with the people. uh, and let's say she lives by what the people live in the conditions of a special military operation, the church provides the spiritual assistance of the russian army to russian soldiers who are on the front line supports those who suffered from the war. we have a huge social activity, which, as you understand, is not supported by any fsb or other state structures of the power bloc, because this is church activity - this is a calling and many people. volunteer priests

take it that way, so you know, it's just uh, primitive let's say propaganda primitive accusations that people who don't have nothing to do with the church or christianity, most likely some. himself to the people. and how do you respond to the accusation that the third parishioner of the russian orthodox church located on the territory of ukraine turned out to be devoted to the moscow patriarchate? you know, but this is some kind of nonsense, because no one betrayed ukrainian parishioners. uh, with many of them, we, uh, say we make up a single whole in the canonical space, except for those who themselves are leaving this space or trying to get out? and we pray, to the same saints we receive the same the very sacraments, therefore, uh, despite all the political moods, despite the wars that, unfortunately, would and will be in the history of

mankind. and also think it will be healed early. and again, so to speak, we can speak with one voice. as they say to praise one god, the arakean will praise the power that he is now trying to prove his loyalty to this week, and the last point was put in our country after four letters. the lgbt president signed the decree. from a total ban on lgbt propaganda to internet in fiction on the screen on movie screens and so on. in this connection, can we say that this question has been finally put to rest or not? you know, it seems to me that from the point of view of legislation, of course, this is a very big achievement. this, i would say, is a breakthrough, because finally, something that could not be

done before, uh, the church, uh, which has always testified to the malignity, uh of sin, and the perniciousness of the propaganda of sin, has received some kind of feedback from the state. yes indeed it is sin it destroys the personality it destroys the society and therefore we will not allow this ideology of speech to be freely propagated. it is the ideology of the ideology that undermines the integrity of the human personality, which decides the person. e opportunities to create your own happiness. we think so, it's our spiritual religious beliefs. and we are very glad that these beliefs are a value, because , finally, only a traditional family has values. so fixed and protected by this prohibition to say that we have now the family crisis is over. i can’t, because there is still a lot to be done to

create an alternative system for protecting promotion in the public space on the legal basis that has now been created, and hmm , ideas about family happiness, and the union of a man and a woman, and having many children about the value mutual service fidelity love support all these patterns of behavior all these talking points. they should return to the public space again and so on. i think that the russian family will get a chance for their revival and our people will be. really. let's say we are protected, maybe the president of our country has already stated that one of the goals is the existence of our country. these are the savings of the people. this is to save the people. here we need to build a strong healthy family again, which will be a place of comfortable life for spouses for children for grandparents for all family members in the

broadest sense of the word. well, and the end, but the sensational one, which means that in the series the monastery, which the ministry of culture banned after the russian orthodox church was recalled to it, as an artistic product that offends or potentially. e, capable of offending the feeling of believers in our country. here i got a document in my hands, and directed in min-kul. and signed here you are. do i understand correctly that for this series, how would you form a conclusion or was it some kind of expert colleague, and you already wrote it in a letter, well, let me read out a couple of phrases about the decision to refuse. filming was accepted due to the fact that the script contained a distorted caricature of the monastic life the creator of the film nevertheless managed to agree on filming a in cyril belazersky monastery on the river of the official position of the russian orthodox church a,

anticipating the deliberately negative reaction of a significant part of the believers of the church relations department. the public media considers any official support for the film to be contrary to the goal of preserving the strengthening of the traditional values ​​of russian society. plus or minus what you just talked about, and everything that we see, watch, read should contribute to the formation of a positive image of the family and traditional values. but you yourself understand that any negative review of the roc is our most effective advertisement to remember at least the film matilda and i see it by e, it means the review of people who write on instagram that the ban of the roc was the main motive for them to watch the series. why are you doing this? look, well first, i want to start on the positive side of this whole story. uh, our church is very active in this relationship with cinematographers, directors

, producers. we have a positive experience here - this is a naughty film that was shown at the box office, so to speak, and on television, too, it will probably be shown or has already been shown , the second part is being prepared, that is, we are ready to interact with the cinema. we give the opportunity to make films, including those films that are feature films, which are not, you know, some kind of cloudy reflection of orthodox life. they contain some kind of criticism, maybe not complimentary approaches, and so on. that is, we are ready to cooperate. we think that e christianity church life. it should inspire creative people. we are interested in this creativity, we are ready to assist in every possible way, but , unfortunately, films are monasteries. not the same story at all. it seems to me that its creators were originally intended to create a false image of the monastic life. i think that there

will be nothing wrong if those people who did not want to watch it, let them watch this film and understand. that such monasticism, which is drawn there in nature, does not exist, it is worth seeing, to make sure. this is an absolutely fantastic false, distorted picture of monastic life and monastic quest. too. that's what i think people will say. here we have seen it, we understand that this is not and can never be, and also some kind of effect. well, i heard that the film actually from the official church, after all, had it. eh, counselor, what did he advise wrong there and all this happened. i do not know how they say that he advised there, because the film contains a huge number of blunders. uh, not even distortion accuracy where i think. oh, the seminarian would have seen the inaccuracies and corrected the game, it's hard to talk about what it was, so to speak, help or counseling . and yes, and therefore continuing what. i

said again, um, we welcome any creative people who really want to make movies about the life of the church and do. it 's beautiful, interesting and captivating. uh, sometimes even provocative reasonable degree of provocation. in my opinion, it is quite acceptable for creativity, including creativity from the church. eh, and there is already an example in the film is a novice, and to which i have already said, i think that this is some kind of example that indicates that our church is able to interact with some kind of graphic community, i know that it is supported by your tv channels. it is very good. eh, it's coming out. the second part of this movie is coming soon. we have seen the scripts , of course, we will not do any spoilers, but in my opinion. it is interesting. the film and i think that it will inspire many people to make even more interesting and alive but about the life of the church , the monastery and the naughty two. yes, we will be waiting

looking forward. many thanks to the second vladimirovich for coming to our studio? thanks to a quiet life on any trip, a faithful and reliable companion is important, who will support the paths and who are always nearby rosneft is the largest network of gas stations where warm meetings and a profitable loyalty program await you, we are always responsible for quality and take care of those for whom the gas station works rosneft is a reliable companion . on all the roads of the country, rosneft drives us better.

return memory dissociative anesthesia does not remember what happened to him and who events life.

but it's best to check. accustomed to watching videos stopped working, install, open, watch russian channels and all movie series and cartoons and documentaries.

about the main events of this minute in our news release, joint projects in the energy sector and the creation of a gas hub in turkey were discussed by vladimir putin and rejeta and erdogan, taking into account the results of the negotiations in istanbul , the chairman of the board of gazprom, alexei miller , they also discussed expanding cooperation in other areas, considered and execution istanbul agreements, and the export of ukrainian grain and the export of russian agricultural products and fertilizers, the leaders emphasized the need to remove the obstacle for supplies from russia