time is sometimes random or what? but sometimes i see your programs, they are very convincing and deep, for which i want to say a special thank you to you. and what are we doing, and we are again talking about the fact that it is necessary to look for investments in the budget. yes, no, maybe the budget today in the form in which it is possible to solve all problems, including investment ones. let's make a decision for ourselves that investment. this is the use of money, relying not on existing goods and services, but on the future of their production. and if so, then let's not be afraid entrust the government, under government control, to carry out emissions into the future production, which is necessary today, including not only the military legal complex, but the economy as a whole, and

when we understand that this is an investment. this is funding for the future. it will be easier for us. here i tried for myself when i was in gear. here can i afford something quite already? well, a very simple example. well, let's imagine that we have 10 enterprises in our economy, these 10 enterprises are the source of budget formation, but the budget is all this - the cost of vc service. social spending this is a huge layer of both income and costs, and suddenly we realize that we are already developing. and this current budget can only provide money for one more enterprise, and we need 10 10 of them, if, based on the tasks that we have, so where can we get all this. let's book without practice the industrial mortgage began to work with the state-private partnership through various concession mechanisms. i am from earth practice. far eastern concession. we are now on this in the program, we are starting to build several factories, including the production of all-terrain vehicles into bugs for

the army, by the way, by the new year we will show the first prototypes again by the spring, so the state has a lot of resources. i'm not saying that i'm not from the earth, because for two rubles a ruble of banking and private investments in the state and are being attracted today. on the ground, i confirm how the governor works correctly, he works, but let's look at the numbers. last time we already voiced disproportionately to us today, according to the calculations correct, based on the text, the tasks that we face need an investment of about 15-20 trillion a year. can the land of the world allow it, but under the control of the state, you don’t have to immediately scare people that all the money will not dissolve. they will be sent there, including the needs of industry, including the military industry, and we must prepare for a response not the current one. and for this, the future, which is actually not far off. so when we talk about delusions so here we must touch on one more topic with you. look at the export and import components. well

, today we have a trade surplus of $300 billion . well, it would not be enough that we are discussing that we have been frozen, either 100, or 300, well, it doesn’t matter 300, but we cunningly resisted 200, which were stolen from us before, and today we are already you where do not go away, and we have already accumulated new 300. that is, we can talk again. i don’t know, there are risks, but still they are the same currency, then what is money. we started with this, this is also always not enough, but the problem is that we sent our real real assets or income there to the west, and we have them in the form of an account in someone else's computer, not even in our own in someone else's, because i said, these are solovyov and kulikov i was told that this is not so, and he said, so when we sell for rubles. how much does this record cost. for a jacket costs 500 rubles. yes, 500 rubles. they lie in a bank of

rubles. no, 13 years old. we offered, personally, i ban dollars. do you remember and the transition of the national currency and economists traveled through all channels something like that no time. and you say that yes, again and it quotes so precisely, because you always say you invest, they are not recorded by the emergency plenipotentiary to listen to the state duma and i will tell journalists how they misbehave. so, let's go back to the truth. come on, you just didn’t say so, and on this polyakova girl you can now return the word margarita to everyone on simonyan the past, sunday raised the issue, postponing the employees i say, do not send an explanation of their position.

tell me how much you bring home a month. i almost didn't find anyone. the rank there is up to lieutenant colonel, who would receive more. wrong well that's wrong. it is wrong when officers commanding guys get less money. i do not mean that it is necessary to downgrade these guys are mobilized. well, this means that well, our whole economic bloc. they must recalculate, but if we conditionally put 200,000 as ordinary, then further, well, the head should turn on for the entire financial block. they must come with proposals and say, based on this, there should be a recalculation, according to which the officers should receive and further supplies went there 30. well, the situation is also impossible when you have an ordinary. gets more than a lieutenant. it's just wrong this disrespect for the profession. well, in my

opinion, again, moreover, for men, they howl not for money. well it should me vice versa first of all come defense first. how many times did you have to raise salaries, and then each time it was cut off each time by the financiers, they said, we we won't give you any money at all, will we? how many of us cut off a smaller one should be a lieutenant general, i won’t ask how much they get. i flew one lieutenant general into a tank man. i say how much you get, well, there are peers almost over there a year younger than me. he says, volodya does not ask how i can immediately say 130,000. that's all, lieutenant general combat, but their logic is such that the mobilized will receive these 200,000 a year, but increase it. if we say so for all the armed forces, all rates are so to say. here always have fedosist. well, you know send to the

front lines all these logic in a moment will become correct in a moment. officers are the elite, he must be protected in everything, including the lieutenant. we have a lot of them, don't we? well, reality, look that we have a lot of officers. yes, look at the guys there, they all know each other, but it turns out that the professional circle is very small, everyone knows who is worth what. everyone perfectly understands everything about each other, so i support it, that's why i return it back that we need a new economic ideology. that's when we say we must not vomit. and we must systematically approach to explaining that we have begun, and i will finish, or rather, with the topic of exporting imports. you led us to this: the excess of the excess of the trade surplus is a minus for our economy, because we have already indicated this. i want to say the next thing is actually here. e complexity. what is what? uh, when we talk about the budget surplus. we must understand that he does not work for the country and here, no matter how we say

about what he's already doing. we're just looking at your show. and how many criticisms and how many solutions? what solutions to the issues should we come to an understanding that it should at least be structured under the control of the government, and even better to reduce and do not be afraid of this. but if the money is outside the country, we can not use it, if it does not work for our economy, then the reduction in exports, in this case, is an opportunity to consolidate resources for the development of our own economy more addition to structure it to raise the structure to increase the structure of exports, then the amount of production, which is more value added. we must reorient. there is no need to be afraid that the markets will disappear. well, yes, somewhere we will correct the markets, but at least this money will work for us for the economy itself. let's look a little at, uh, the budget surplus, and on the other hand, what is the separation from our economy of what does not work. so they say they can object to me, so after all, if we do this export, then a thousand people, hundreds of thousands of people

are left without work. and let's look at and appeal to this kind of question, but we are afraid, because today these people of the political and economic point of view work for what they create a real product that does not work for the country, that is, in fact. today we pay. it's generally terrible. we are a private public campaign paying these people to get a product that sells. no, work. what are we afraid of if we reduce exports ? there is a planning macroeconomic model. we will begin to reduce or reorient it, which means that hundreds of thousands of people can be under the control of the state, and there highly qualified people are reoriented to the production that we need, and we need to produce aircraft and ships. yes, all sorts of sophisticated equipment. move them there and don't be afraid. you, they will not be left without work , and the state can afford to pay a whole year, if not two salaries and the state of people is going through. i tell you

defense department. first, a shiny set of clothes. yes, in the beginning shoigu was carried by a handsome man. the first kit that was perfect there with fleece. i like everything very much, then gradually behind my back there is a clap-clap with a knife. four factories, thousands of people or simply sent to the street, no one remembered it was not necessary, it was not necessary, and there was no need for export either. but here we are talking about something else, that in order for this to work for the country, it is necessary not to close, but to reorient. or maybe better money. if you could get there were no conversations, and when the proceeds are there records and the same baryl happily say, but we don’t give a damn how much they take, but we won’t sell anything to them either. and you can’t do anything here with this money, and it turns out that you substitute a real product, and in return you get kisses, then either the

barter system suggest that we get something dragged, as in times he either, let’s go for those markets that are really ready for us to trade with us for this treasure. fuck resources, i don't proshafters now to speak, or what? no, she downloaded anyone in any audience. trust me danger. no, it is not people who need to be cut. you don’t hear each other, and the supplies going to those countries that give candy wrappers are a real product ; moreover, we are talking about the need to sell everything for rubles, but if rubles don’t work. let's get back to the k-learing system. that is, reciprocity. well, let's get the actual size of your products, what we need, the chinese adults, guys. now we have agreed. but this end full times these 300 billion. it is clear that not

accumulated during the year. it is here that i do not want to abuse or speculate on the numbers they have accumulated. well, look at the inflation figures with you. for there are calculations that this year they formally lost 26 billion dollars, but it’s good, not 26 years, 15 is not enough trillion rubles. maybe we ask, maybe someone provided for it. four grand for a dollar, of course, but also in europe and america in japan yes, anywhere. i am sure that, of course, there is an answer to this question and i hope that this money is not lost but if they are lost, i would like to know how, so the new economic ideology is the answer to questions. the nearest is not the future. and the real one, damn it, yes and uh, i want to remember mirkel, yes, with her this statement , poroshenko, who was frank before that, anton said a few weeks ago yes, when vladimir vladimirovich was just on this topic damn , to be honest, it was absolutely unexpected for me. this is disappointing i did not expect to hear

this from the former federal chancellor because i has always assumed that the leadership of the federal republic treats us sincerely with them. yes , she is definitely on the side. uh, ukraine was supporting ukraine but it still seemed to me that, uh, that the leadership of the federal republic always sincerely sought to settle on the principles, uh, oh, which oh, which we agreed and which were achieved, including within the framework of the minsk process. here is what has just been said and only says that we did everything right from the point of view of launching a special operation. why because what turns out? uh, all these minsk agreements, no one was going to execute the leadership of ukraine , uh, the former president. poroshenko also said this, he was not going to sign it, he was not going to execute it, but i still hoped that the other

participants in this process were sincere with us. did they also deceive us, and in uh, the uh meaning was only to pump up u ukraine with weapons and prepare uh for hostilities. but we see, yes it is. hmm, apparently, we are too late to orient, frankly, we be earlier. all this had to be started. she just counted on mine that we would still be able to agree, uh, within the framework of these peace agreements in the minsk peace agreements, but, but what do you say to that? now the question arises, of course, the question of trust. so you trust , of course, almost zero, but after a statement of this kind, of course, the question of trust arises, how to negotiate, what to negotiate and where?

of course, the question, but still ultimately have to negotiate. i've said so many times that we are to these agreements, but it makes us think, of course. think about who we're dealing with. you see, a responsible person is not afraid to admit his mistakes. even putin admitted his mistakes. what, maybe earlier it was necessary, we are not afraid, nothing. it's you here all the time remembering about all sorts of other politicians there , i have respect, i treat the memory of vladimirovna. well, we actually just talked about helicopters, on which i, too, who had, i remember how serdyukov came to shred this system. yes, here is the syzran school. it means that he tried to liquidate me, as he liquidated. here the academy means missile strategic troops, because the building is in the very center and there were dozens of them. you should be talking

here, and i'm talking about the mistake of specific military leaders who were in this ministry of defense. you're talking about watching one show. i criticize each program specific from this. here i am in my fourteenth year. i can you just now kicked badly. deputies, here i answer you. here you said, i respect dima khuibezov. well, you say he, uh, what kind of round tables on smoking. yes , here are the questions. darkness in any area, a responsible deputy. and even more so, the presiding committee should solve them in its place. once you are elected, there and one. i love respect. we are friends with him. well , why, well, go then give your post, and each deputy. here i am, for example, mini ashamed. here you are talking rmd. e rocket, and these same contract. yes , medium-sized missiles in the fourteenth year. here putin speaks. uh, so deputies, wait. i told him then to liquidate. get out of the rsmd

, get out, because they are not profitable for us. okay? from day one. why it was not necessary to do this, you understand, just as it was not necessary to move, i want to agree, there the minsk people agreed that they would, that they would now be of this faith no well , just so as not to run through. i understand correctly that you are condemning those deputies who are not to be condemned here for their language. everyone has their own event. and you know what he said. well, he told me dima, yes, you, that i will be in the house to carry out the provision of medicines, the military personnel of the hospitals, then you pull. you know what to humiliate is, but in a minute, i know we have deputies ready for you. what does it have to do with? what are you, what are you from the communists, what do you want, and we

flew off and do our job is not necessary. you just said. what do you want, i do not understand. you just said that you just told me on the last program about my colleague yushchenko with whom you fly to kazbekistan, i'll tell you something else about mine. wait. you ask me? i to you i answer the hero of the dpr, and where is the hero of memkhanov, of course, but and what does it have to do with it or not? next, what will the regiment do, or what? or there even a deputy will be enough for me for a battalion. you're just saying you made a mistake. i’m sure the deputies are still smoking round tables to hold nothing wrong, i accurately quoted the words of the deputy who told you, i’m saying for sure, i didn’t make such a mistake. i accurately quoted the words of a man who is a brilliant surgeon, well, and who are more often a journalist who does not know that you have to go. if i didn't go there traveled, what right people, remembered this without

humiliating. on the contrary, i'm not sure learn to listen mp. listen give me, i'm already listening to you. when you will then you will understand what is at stake. come on, come on, tell me, i asked you, which of yours fights instead of making excuses? give the names of the guys who named correctly because they deserve tremendous respect, because a number of them with a brilliant military past, a brilliant medical one, they will earn respect. they are together with their people. when you say that a number of other people stayed working. this is not opposition. but when it sounded to you that this person did wrong, he went, or rather with this. it's just that i just have to say no rounded tables without anything, but he said everything, i don't see myself doing this job. i wrote a statement. somewhere and went to fight. he's late now. that's just an honest man said, i asked him for your position there. you can listen. i also submit. that's how i

have the right to express it. just like dima khubesov, of course, you have and do not need humiliation, they should give a salary to state employees. look who i saw in the house hero of russia you have such a, well, i tell you, then tell the general, what are you doing in the house. and i asked the lieutenant of the prostate committee on turnover himself about these salaries, which you say rita should take care of. he must all the time, and here is the cure for medicine. no need to do before. colonel-general card semi, from the first day i have been contacting us. it is necessary with the request to send them to the fruit of the day. excuse me for saying things to you who are there, what you said correctly. you correctly said that there are commanders, a lot depends on the commanders. right. you correctly said. you praised everyone. well, he said, if not, the commander, here the commander admits his mistakes, the president. yes, there are

commanders at a different level. here is. you must on your every teaching. i am grateful that you are already traveling for the third or fourth time, every sunday and showing this is the work of journalists that they did not finish, this is work, including. information floor of law enforcement agencies, which they do not very not very nicely works on the sheet. she, of course, this work is needed, but at the same time it must be done with talent, shows and speaks, our correspondents turn time to tapes of meaning. wait, come on, uh, so, uh, military operations shows hmm auditing our entire system yes you say, she audits it. she looks at her. she looks where the gaps are, what needs to be done and we are each in our own area. we are trying, in addition, to eliminate these projects. in addition, each has its own meaning. here everyone once there is a soldier. yes well, you are not only a salary and not so much salary makes sense for what he is ready to die 100%. chosen damn , why does putin make sense, who was on all the glossy

magazines in the total of the year, everywhere the leader was still in order. well he had it pushed. he would have said so. why did he go for it in the crimea, before that, on the network, because that the meaning of the country's security is still understood by many of the country's security, and now about the meanings that take us inside. here's what he said alexander mikhailovich, after all, it is not necessary. there, boeing would have stopped supplying sponges there and immediately began to make our own planes, but here are chemical fertilizers. here, i look at who the fertilizers are, which means oil is a petroleum product. i say this again and again around us, a huge number of our former countries were once in the same family. so i was just in uzbekistan, i always like to kick these cis, they are such and such of his dkb. they are so and so generally speaking, this is the only one who has not yet turned away from us, in addition, there are some more there is india, china, which drove the countries in such a way, yes, these fertilizers to them. they will grow everything and bring you. this is a completely elementary operation. well

, it's just me all the time. i've just met the presidents. we talked on the subject yes im a russian textbook. give us russian textbooks. give us russian schools. and you're here today. oh , they don't want russian. oh, they kazakhs are so bad. yes, the kazakhs are the only thing here, indeed, where sometimes they talk about secondary sanctions there, but they do it. we need to look at this cis is here is the same russian world. let them be kazakhs. let them be uzbeks. here they were more than 300 million once in the same family and we have where to put these products, because when i see how cunningly interesting, here we once said to the central bank, we arrested us. well, we have arrested his foreigners here investment. after all, this is also clear to us. yes, but at the same time, look at what process is going on in the country, the same avtovaz seems to have been transferred, yes, nationalized. there are a huge number of hundreds of enterprises that have gone from mcdonald's to there like that. autocomponent. well, very cunningly, foreigners transfer it to another owner not to the state with

an option back. if everything goes well. we are there in a couple of years and we will take it back in 6-5 years. and it seems that you will already confiscate a little if our reserves are confiscated there and here it is, you know, a foreigner, sort of owns it. well, with deferred ownership. this is absolutely the wrong approach. it must also be eliminated. and he takes the state i give. uh, to the same wisher who will be there, then this one is for rent, please, at the expense of the profit this time. well, when i said meanings, i meant something else. in a sense, for a soldier, on the one hand, they are in protecting the security of the country, and on the other hand, he must see. and what is going on behind his back. and what about how they how they act, including on ensuring me how they act? what system of farms than me? well, cherish it. why so socialist idea embraced? it’s not only minds that we always say, china, after all, you don’t finish talking to us here

. let them not those communists there, which were, but they always change, but the idea is to provide 800 million. people were pulled out of poverty in general by patients. yes, it exists, yes, russia is always leftist in its ideas. yes, of course, by the way, and putin said the capitalist has exhausted himself. well , let's embody this idea in a material sense in what material sense? how many times have i told you, volodya well, they don’t take it from you, yes, give it to your neighbors cheaper to your neighbors and take it from them by barter. give it back, the population is cheaper than fuel with pleasure. everyone will ride it was in libya it was. means today in turkmenistan there are many, of course, the capitalist does not like it. get out of the imf you see from the wto what the hell why why? first, i am not complying. and then you sell a disparity in prices abroad, and you still need to raise the same amount internally, and you lose your competitive

advantage. you have oil. you have gas and you have to cheap labor and produce a cheap product and that's it. give industry. give businesses. it's not even so much an investment, not so much a record of these down to dollars. blimey. this is us they have always had this, hydropower is excellent, nuclear power is excellent, oil is gas. that's even it not to mention there on other things titanium sponge back and forth on the aircraft industry. and this will give us meaning. yeah, the state nationalized the state took away and gave away the population. and here you are, an additional meaning arises to this. i urge you to scold the deputies endlessly and the communists. who else is driving? javadxan mp fate such advertising. i’ll find myself listening too, so as not to miss two miracles. hello this is mine

kindergarten. here i have many friends and girlfriends diana is 4 years old. i know she has autism. i heard that she used to not know how to make friends. she didn't speak at all. she couldn't be left alone even for a minute, but now it's obviously different to receive a special program. she is learning to play with us. i'm on the cool diana my friend foundation, naked hearts creates a free system of services for special children of their families. can you support the work? help us help more.

gena if you stick your nose into this apartment again, then your big business will charm, so it will not seem small.

by the way, i understand leonid's emotions because well, in fact, a normal man, of course, feels responsible when this happens in the country and the simplest. you just think sometimes. you understand everything, there is sometimes confusion.