estimate and secondly, you all decided that there are two of us and fedor dobronravov and cheburashka soon. having accepted their offer, they said difficult who do you have you agreed half a year has passed russian grain is going somewhere.

first, first, the president speaks clearly about what and with whom i spoke from the very beginning there is nothing with the american president negotiate with the americans before you achieve victory in ukraine after that you can talk to them before that it is useless to talk to them until they feel the power of russia, they will never agree to any agreement. only then will they arrive. they only understand power. they are who the americans are, if you're talking about it and haven't started yet. therefore, i don’t understand the power, only when it feels threatened, there’s nothing to lead if you don’t start with someone yet. why are

you constantly negotiating at least one negotiation? have you finished anything, and who is your twig? i like you. you are a citizen of israel , you criticize us, when i answer you about your state, you say, leave israel alone , class, call me then. which side of the world negotiations were conducted and why they were conducted very much correctly and were deceived everywhere in the entire history of mankind, there is not a single negotiation that would go to a conclusion that would ultimately not be violated for as long as the question was tom why are you entering into them? do you understand that you are being deceived take away the question. what short-term medium-term means to decide what gives you absolutely, well , to talk to each other, to each other too, well, you heard the same. look , well, first i'll finish. he's also interested. first i i will finish what i started, and then i will speak among myself. well, first i will finish what you then say with respect, but this is not always the case. well

, the transfer is also in the transfer, if we are citizens against you , they are waging war. during the war, they fight, and you say, we haven’t started yet, they started a long time ago, and you haven’t started to start against it yet, and i agree, but she declared war on us. why don't we bomb them? they don't bomb you. well, they started a war, so we have the right, and you forbade me when i called for shooting down their planes, which were carrying military cargo war - it's not just bombing cities against you waging war by all means, except the military you are responding to. you answer it. and we will negotiate with you. i'm talking here on this field, when you agree on what and with whom you want to negotiate, when there was not a single contract that would have been fulfilled for a single month.

we are really bad. this is the full quote. no, this is how you interpret it. and who is this war? must end first and then negotiate a war without negotiations when it will end then negotiate so it was in berlin until the end, there were no negotiations. no one to negotiate with is not about what to negotiate it is useless to negotiate because negotiation is a compromise. it is always an agreement an agreement two parties give you give you deceive. you

will receive instead. i do not want to say what i said, putin is a trust problem, now we do not trust anyone. yes, it's gone. not yet. and no, no, the door another fertilizer, they don't know for sure, they are not for sale. they not in that quantity without this agreement is not present. now we are selling ships, but that is not the point. it doesn't fundamentally change the fidelity of what you say fundamentally, well, fundamentally fidelity. it is only then that what i wanted to say works against you. a total war of annihilation is being waged against you

in all areas. therefore, i propose a war, i answer a war, therefore i propose sarmat or poseidon a. you tell me early, but i think that if there is a war, then all means must be used. but if we do not have an objective economic levels, there are no nuclear weapons, because our economy is incomparable in size. well , let's just say it's worth it. it's a miscalculation no, that's the point, in general any economic answer will not lead to such a why because different things i know are completely different. yes, that’s why i’m citing completely different things, but if there is a war, then a war is waged against you, what means should be used, and you respond to negotiations with the same means, so we must use the means that are stronger with us they accept the rules of the game imposed by our adversary, if they are against us

economic, well, then we must respond asymmetrically. why should we answer them? the same places? this is nonsense. why accept the rules that the enemy imposes on you in direct connection with berlin, editor-in-chief of the world conny publication, alexander sosnovsky and i see that there is also a problem in europe, only we started talking to the patriarchy konstantinovna well, of course, i should interfere with our little european problems in your russian israeli, sport hard, so i listened to everything attentively difficult, but what are the 600.000 euros that were found in bags, at the house of the vice president of the european parliament. well, in general, it's like pinsk, as the germans say. but in fact, a scandal, of course,

for some of our colonel zakharchenko, is just a trip to a restaurant. he only bathed in billions of rubles, right? yes, well, that's pretty much how it is. you see, when i watch the news and see that the father of the vice president of the european parliament was stopped in the street with a briefcase. i do not know what she has her dad and what kind of suitcase he has, but for some reason they stopped him, they opened the suitcase. and there was a suitcase full of banknotes. well, they searched her house, her husband and relatives. uh, five people were arrested, they say, in just a few plastic bags, literally 600,000 euros. this is, of course, as they say in germany and europe now. this is a gigantic corruption scandal. well , it’s clear that for europe this is really a lot of money, but absolutely nothing new. but what are we talking about, why are we suddenly raising such a scandal if just recently ursula fonderly you remember just

recently all these pandemic things of hers, and the german minister of health with his masks that were purchased. there's millions from his own friend. he is a spouse and who then do not know where to go. and this is all this, of course, when you listen and read today, uh, the anti-corruption commission that is fighting, that is fighting, and all these greek cases. you know, i have one question that i would like to ask, including a german a and a european researcher who is this figure. and what about trade here, with those weapons that were recently discussed. and the black market weapons that went to ukraine, it is not known where and where and where this money came from, was it also a certain corruption scandal, only which, of course , no one will ever raise. i do not have any specific data that i could voice, therefore, on this topic, but this is a topic that lies in plain sight. these are billions. these are

billions. this is really gigantic money and remember. uh, the investigation, the so-called investigation of mr. grozny related to the explosions. in these military warehouses, emelyan gebreva of this bulgarian, bulgarian arms dealer. it was all that went to ukraine . and where did the money go? who in the european union did this? who in the european union has ever specifically dealt with issues of, uh, finances and issues of receiving money or paying some money , and most importantly, they blame qatar. well, cator, of course, may be to blame for something. but, probably, rather, only in the fact that it was necessary to transfer the money not in plastic bags, but still in some other tara, but uh, here , of course, several things immediately catch your eye, well, the first is kicking the boat, because it was necessary to do it and everyone does it with pleasure, the second one

starts to crush greece and, uh, finds it instantly. moreover, so the whole cohort. e meps are the most sympathetic, which are beginning to take revenge. because she's cute and because she took some money. well, here it also binds more bartholomew to this. and right there, we immediately start shouting, and that, in general, we should probably check all the churches that had to do with this, uh, something to do with the pope of rome, about whom he was mentioned, and here, by chance , suddenly, it turns out that the gentleman hesitated, uh, who accidentally visited the pope the other day. this is a continuation of this whole conversation and he read to the pope and reprimanded. what about dear dad? here you spoke about the chechen. this is where you stay. and you please more do not meddle anywhere in any other business and silently, everything, the vatican calmly perceives all this and that's it. it's watching and the conversations are all spinning. uh, now

about that, so who will collapse first in europe , whether the european parliament, in which a case of corruption suddenly began to hide and it is not clear some. uh, family ties, either the catholic church will suddenly begin to collapse now, or maybe the catholic and bartholomews with their church with their affairs will also somehow be linked to this and it seems that this purposeful like that. eh, brownian movement, which is controlled from the outside and is aimed at creating this controlled chaos. now, within europe, it is simply impossible to assess it otherwise. just controlled chaos, which, uh, really argued with yakovlevich about something, but negotiations. well, this dispute here in europe is taking place on a higher tone than it was happening right now in your studio, because there are real fights going on here. is it necessary to

negotiate? is it necessary to negotiate? with whom i i have the feeling that the anglo-saxons are doing their best to ensure that if these negotiations are carried out. they were conducted only by those who were specifically appointed from washington. here is such, uh, that one, very beloved and also beloved by me, dear jeffreys. ah. well, you know, for example, that since 2021 he has been an adviser and participant in the pontifical college, and in the vatican a this is such an educational institution quite serious, where they, among other things, create various scientific e, write in works. well, everything else different in such garbage. just a few months ago, jeffrey saks, yes, i specifically used the word bullshit. this is common among us germans. as you know, it is customary for volodya to use these words. there type, tone and bullshit. well, somehow there you still say depth. in general, it's all in this regard, all the scales

a few months ago, jeffreysaks proposed a plan for peace negotiations, which i think no one in the studio knows, and i just recently found out about this and the peace negotiations clan. as proposed, it seems to be, well, like this. well, we understand russia but at the same time, if you carefully read this plan of peace negotiations, there is not a word there, not a word about the donbass there, not a word about the fact that ukraine began shelling long before actually the start of the military operation special military operation. and here are the plans that are now emerging, here and there. well, at least i can test them and list them against this background. these are all scandals, uh, with uh, little corrupt bribes. well, what is 600,000 euros nowadays? so what can you buy with that money? well, in general, well, you can’t buy a hamer with some kind of money, it won’t work. now go to a restaurant. how did you say it right? well, she has a husband, so this question is

no longer there. there, about the same amount of outraged americans was spent on biden and macron's lunch . in this regard, i mean that it’s not for us to go to a restaurant, but these guys alexander thank you very much larionovich wanted to add to this information with the brain of this operation with a scallop. yes, there, as i understand it, they were preparing favorable for qatar a report on human rights. so there was an italian, the former head of the european parliament commission on human rights. antonio panseri. why do i keep doing these things? this is because in the seventeenth year, he personally, being the head of this commission in the european parliament, prepared a report on ukraine on how remarkably the rights of russian-speaking religious organizations are respected, he was also arrested and how they are oppressed. uh, the occupied donbas crimea and so on. that is the schema. do you know how much he

made from this? by the way, i'm allegedly vladimir vladimirovich, i want to say that you don’t understand anything in our policy, we troll them when we talk about negotiations, we troll them like that ads explore the world educational programs without registration it was really discussed, listen, well, there are many such reports, and yet it should not be overestimated for one simple reason. it was published in the public domain. this means that at that time he was not hired. here's what they got to work. now hard enough to say. and yes, many of its

provisions somehow fit, but what is happening, but still you understand, that's when it is being prepared there, even for those reports for which they paid, but it is published in the public domain, which means it is not taken into work. here, yes, maybe, yes somewhere later, somehow, and so on. and here it is, but now it's really serious, because when it's been going on here for quite a long time . here it is, so to speak, the struggle against orthodoxy is a war. orthodoxy in ukraine and already as if they finally got to bartholomew. he is already beginning to speak, so to speak, from which well , in general, well, i don’t know for a believer, i don’t know, frost on the skin there, even for an agnostic, in principle, should create a clear impression that this is a civilizational struggle. it's just somehow. well, through the mouth of a person who takes it formally, after all, there is really there, probably some kind of brush told you, who is he, what is he and so on, right? as it were, well, formally, this is still one of the

hierarchs. uh orthodox church, so to speak the world i am and when he begins to say such things with these words it is obvious what is it? well, just a declaration of civilizational war. you had some kind of third rome there, right? how can there be two romes , so to speak, the third is worth and the fourth should not be. it turns out to be the 16th century, if my memory serves me right, that is, 100 years after standing on the eel. here, ah, that is, it is, as it were, a concept that, as it were , has gathered, in general, our entire state. well, in the form in which it exists now, yes, then it was not yet within these boundaries, but this is what that began to gather us. this announcement is just a direct somehow such an ideological civilizational war. yes, i emphasized it again, even if you bend, if a person is a believer - it's just that a person should just have a tremor, so to speak, in all members. well, because that's it. this horrific thing is not true. it's terrifying in this sense, it becomes understandable. yes, so that all levers will be used. here, i cannot but agree with all men, because the war

is waged by absolutely all means sometimes, even military means. there somehow they count, well not even that effective. how much information can there be ? zionic technological cultural uh, ideological economic there and so on, uh, and in this sense it is necessary to understand here that the situation really is. she has already reached a certain social state. and right here, in fact, you need to understand that really, probably, historically it more or less seemed so, that it has always been like this since the time when mackinder was there, this, here is one of the founders of halford geopolitics, mackerder, designated that eat hartman, they supposedly need you. he is not related to kinder surprise. you didn't seem to anyone. no. no, it just seems that most likely they christened big mac and kinder surprise and it turned out to be makinder, yes, and it turned out to be geopolitics and point and as a result as a result. well, yes, his idea is, what kind of hard is it, as

it were, the center of eurasia where there has always been historical russia who owns khalt owns eurasia who these eurasia owns the world? and then somehow you know, the simplest, but simplified, more precisely, as if interpretation, well, from the western sides. well, it’s clear who needs to be cleared. i have to defeat him when he is destroyed on our part. well, it's understandable why she's all attacked. that's quite mechanistic in fact. a model, because every time there is this geopolitical geocultural confrontation with the west. it manifested itself, intensified, weakened there, and so on, but every time at least, of course, they would be happy to destroy us completely, i understand it perfectly, but every time, every time, starting, probably, from those times actually, when this concept of moscow was formulated, the third rome, and to this day, all the time, this is the concept of containment. maybe it was not always called that way, well, constantly throughout the history of our state, throughout our history, which we should, as it were, be fully aware of. as part of ourselves, we are the continuation of this

story, because their story ended there somewhere, we don’t. in fact, their main task is, first of all, the first. main tactical. now it's e to carry out such an eruption that would prevent us from being real great power. because after we cease to be a great power. well, it’s known , as it were, a set of what a great power is, a great power that can broadcast its own meanings, which are very difficult to defeat by military means. this is a power that is economically capable of providing for itself. and by the way, another such thing, so, which establishes cultural, political and economic ties at its own discretion. these are, by the way, these secondary sanctions - they are from here. well, by the way, i think that not only india and even china, yes, now they will try once again to restart the iranian deal. well, because, well, as it were, here we cannot install at our discretion. by the way, i don’t understand why he behaves so passively? for example, i believe that it is possible now to unilaterally

lift all sanctions if we support at least some against iran and remove all sanctions if it supports at least some against north korea in north korea did the un jointly approve the minsk agreements? and we we see how the countries that are members of the security council took part with their nato partners in an outright deception. and here we are in public. let's say we think it's illegal. yes, well, to reproach, by the way, taking into account the right to self-rotation. yes, now there is no right to reproach me for being his nacentric person. that's why, of course, yes, as if sleep is also necessary, but there is one problem here. the problem is related. by no means is international law itself somehow such, and here is the value for some kind of essential there, yes, the question here is different, which very often takes. the top isn't even skinny. interesting. just some you

know transactional thinking. we are now like this then these over there this over there aha well, for now, then it won’t be here for now, let’s leave it as it is. here , like this, this small one begins. by the way, europeans and americans taught us their masculine phenomenon, so to speak, thinking of this kind, but you need to understand the question, because if you cannot understand it religiously. so, so to speak, ontologically, what is called in general they say it's all a nightmare. i don't know if it was in the nineteenth century, somebody would have heard, they said, the antichrist has come. well, guys, and he came. yes, he came. now we are all like this, well, if this is so, then we must begin to think. well, at least geopolitically, if you forgive the agnostics. because, well, well, at least that's what it's about. that's what, as soon as we are restricted. where does all this peter's northern war come from, where does the constant attempt to make war with kazan with uh crimea to expand the borders remove from their borders? here is the muscovite state, as soon as it arose, the third rome cannot exist,

which bartholomew so attacked without being protected by the great great great great derzhak. we have no conclusion to be a great power or not a great power. this is historical. so it is clear and understandable according to the state of things. we will be able to protect ourselves in this coming new world after globalization, only if it is a great power, and in this sense the question must always be put specifically. here is the surname pose a question. specifically. remove the third card risk from the board. remove the third and everything will be fine. well, whatever it is, and then we will play our games in our own, by the way, there were many among american politicians, and influential orthodox e. that's exactly the greek here, so to speak, the universal patriarchy. well, there, in my opinion, one of the directors was even there, i don’t remember. now i will tell you how the presidential candidate behaves. yes. yes, yes, yes, well, there are so many of them, that is, i don’t know how they will play you there. for

us, this is for us, we just need a specific production all these all these questions. and this really needs to be done and unfortunately, in general, listen, well, you are absolutely right in saying that, you need to realize that, well, it comes in the last times. well, it's real, if you speak, if you speak in a simple and understandable language. hmm the veil is falling, that is, we see now absolutely evil, but we still treat it somehow like this, not to go off with some restrictions. we have them an existential threat that we face is still such a childish question. and there the call should be a year or two you don’t understand that the war that is now going on, it will come to every family that the west has announced to us, will come to every family in one form or another, and what is now connected to

constantinople. this just shows how seriously everyone here absolutely agrees with this night, that in general the very topic of negotiations should disappear. and the rhetoric should change, i’m just surprised that the president’s rhetoric sounds in one way very clearly, clearly and precisely, and people who, well, are, as it were, several steps lower it's like they don't understand what's going on. well, of course they speak for themselves. well , listen, this is also very clear. everything. it is also very difficult for them to quickly reorganize internally. by the way, this is what needs to be done. by the way, the formation of the elite, which will be adequate to this war, which is being waged not only by military means. there is even, in principle, the question of how long there will be a call or what? this is also, by the way , an absolutely technical question, because in fact the war is being waged in very many planes. well, just a man, even who has never held a machine gun in his hands. he will never take it anyway. here, by the way, here and never will

take. he still participates in this war, of course, what i'm talking about, there are no questions left about your children. yes, you will dive into your relatives, because they have a diametrically opposite point of view, when will change, the usual form of holidays. that is, it is simply necessary, you understand. all this is here somewhere, where you will spend the ruble. where are you going ? who do you talk to, who don't you talk to said nothing. you didn't say anything. it's all starting to play a role now. everything is every step and here is what bartholomew arranged, of course, this is just a manifestation of such things and, of course, state rhetoric should move away from this that was imposed on us, so to speak, in the nineties, two thousand years. this is the corporatist, and this is the culture talking transactionally. now we 'll just talk about this case. yes, even with some in anglicisms. so the question is stir up they say it's really an existential problem. this is a social battle. and here, by the way, the sarmatians are not necessarily poseidon if we have enough consistency,

enough certainty, if we stop talking, including with our people , you know, you, too, with such words that only confuse everything. and start talking specifically. specifically, there is a satanic genie, yes, with which a serious full-fledged struggle must be waged. it doesn't matter, we won't eat. yes, yes, and when is the wording, what is not? well, we have no task to change the government there. sometimes they return 10 years after the arrest of a serial killer. angarsk policeman. mikhail popkov, his victims are interrupted by a dinner of silence. i remember that his hands were huge, he began to speak. i found arms, legs and killed me in the irkutsk region, where

this beast was mostly wielded, they were afraid of him, like fire after more than 20 years. you recognized this person. this is the same policeman who mocked you. i liked you live. how many more crimes on the account of the murderer of the rapist mikhail popkov are with me.

and now satanic power is located