the second story that i wanted to touch on briefly, if possible. here, the president of ukraine zelensky spoke with the so-called three steps to peace, first of all , peace. there, of course, there is no smell, in none of these steps, but what i want to pay attention to are three steps. he says, a give me a weapon b. solve my social economic problems in determine my external political priorities. you are the western world, these are the three criteria that we operate. these are generally the criteria of a sovereign state,

which he refuses. i am my safety i can't provide. i actually cannot make the economic system function by foreign policy decisions. i will not accept. as you say. i will. negotiation to denote a negotiating position raises a reasonable question. if there is no sovereign state. let's decide that there is more all the time something hints that she wants something, the door hints something that they want something. well, there is no longer a sovereign state of ukraine. why continue this discourse that we are ready for negotiations. we are ready to discuss the necessary guarantees, something else it is absolutely obvious that there is a western community that, through various institutions, directly controls ukraine. this is a puppet government, which does not even deny that it does not take a single decision on any issue, and there is russia that can still act for the local population, the prospects for them to survive at least as a subject on the world stage, so that they

survive, as a people, as a nation, well, already as part of our state, it seems to me, and we must be prepared for what is about to come new year. we all the time, of course, hope for our great success during the special operation, but i have no impression that our western partners are ready to negotiate with us or to solve this problem in some systematic way, all these macron statements that we will be given what there are security guarantees. it's ridiculous, france itself can not guarantee the safety of the game. i'm the only statement that i honestly liked. this is a little sarcasm, but i liked this statement of the polish mead that you said and you don't have to russia to give security guarantees, and we need security guarantees from russia, thank god, this is what i also want. i want the security of france germany italy spain belgium depends on russia so that they understand that only one state in the world can guarantee their security in the future. this is the russian federation so that they stage these negotiations. well, so that there would not be

some kind of hatred moods. every time we hear that the european union is running out of supplies in order to help ukraine what zaka. and this armament does not mean that soon we will be able to make changes. they will look from the side. this means that they will set fire to a greater extent inside our state and along our perimeter everywhere, and in moldova it will be in the south caucasus where very harsh provocations against russian peacekeepers are now being carried out and there is already evidence of this in central asia where every other day start that skirmishes, then something else and we must be ready and every time i repeat this. i don't i want to give the impression that i'm repeating myself there all the time, but uh, i consider it. here is the most priority right now. if we want to cope with these tasks, we have to wait, not to get hit. and we thought about how to turn around from this or like this problem. we need to create so many problems for them so that they do not dare to climb into the nearest space, it is announced that in the

near future there is something about sending systems to ukraine. proter. it's not enough this week. let's prove it's bullshit. well, what difference does it make to us? well you you know, the turks noted that the kurds received 155 caliber howitzers, three axes, and the turks are nato allies, so they are supplied to anyone. yes, these are doubts, nikolai nikolaevich yes, uh, i don’t agree with you overdelf that it’s low to choose to write or there are writers russia is a very creative country people write write for free write a lot, but the question is different, you need to choose to write correctly or and immediately remember experience again. we are returning again to the years when the head of state personally dealt with issues of literature and was supervised by the union writers of the soviet union began to deal with this. unfortunately. this is perhaps another

task for our leader. such is the heavy burden of any russian leader. naturally, this should be dealt with then its analogues will appear and absolutely right. it is necessary and you will agree that you are saying the same thing as me, but this is a change in the ideological paradigm, of course, but you know, when i am now we have a book fair, there is nanfiction, yes , and the writers of donbass do not let her in because of their political imagination, pressure is required. that's the whole answer. yes, the writers of donbass are very important, but apart from them there is still a lot of ideological research. we actually live in a poisoned toxic space. well, mikhail leonidovich called it virtual space. this is a myth the western myth is a picture of the world in which we live in children's fairy tales until the highest expert communities have the highest scientific titles, the information field has been poisoned by the west and exists on western money. the first step - it is clear that we must create our own picture of the world gradually let it grow, but the first

step. where should we start? we must get rid of the dominance of this informational pressure in all areas, i repeat once again, and i will repeat the odessa fairy tales for children. the highest expert communities that exist are the western paradigm and the most unpleasant historical point of view of the paradigm is the historical one that the west has always ruled, but the west has ruled for literally the last 400 years before that was the ottoman empire. before that, there was an arab caliphate, the atana dynasty, a lot and a lot other. that is, here, it is necessary to focus on this, therefore, of course, this work. it should be both inclusive and our year 2022 has been very successful in terms of what we are starting to do. first step. the first step to gaining this year. the beginning of the russian war of independence yes. that is, it is real, we are starting to get out of this paradigm, but an important point. if we want to build something with someone. yes, i allow myself to enter such a sphere that is not very mine, which means the construction of a worldview, then, of course, it is necessary to determine, not today's tasks, as for the turnover of

ukraine but in advance, if you do not think of yourself, how i fear this word world empire yes in the future a few steps not for today at the end of the 21st century, then you do not understand what is your next step, that is, well, they closed the issue with ukraine, just the issue of poland, and so on and so forth absolutely right. mikhailovich says that we need to form some kind of our own picture, namely, the worlds in the region, absolutely human rights, probably, we have different approaches to human rights, but, naturally, it is necessary to dock with the people's republic of china as well. india by the saudis and iran they have their own work. by the way, speaking in this direction, the chinese have a level, even the poliro is a separate organ, rather weak, but they are oriented to this chinese china. of course, what can be focused on. it’s only theirs, there’s a billion of humanity, it’s really still to navigate this and the strength and weakness of the chinese absolutely true, but this is the weakness of their world

precisely in the construction of world space, which the chinese themselves unequivocally do not stretched they will need a major partner. russia in the first place, perhaps iran has started somewhere, but their capabilities are very limited, and so on. that is, this work should be carried out. together, vyacheslav viktorovich volodin is constantly in his colleague or ginshu as the current head of the smp. china meets speaks on these topics, but this is not enough, that is, some kind of commission of a state civilizational certain docking is really needed, but again, we return to the issue of ideology. at the colony. no, ideology. colonies don't have science. at the colony. there are aboriginals there, so these shamans who pretend to be. come on, i don't want to. now nobody else most of our researchers are wonderful people, but in general the paradigm is set by them they go their own stranger, the worst case paradigm depends on western grants so far. yes and no. i do not see any moral condemnation of those who are still collaborating with what i will call scientific centers, such as karrigi, affiliates, the cia and

others. yes, that is, frank work with the enemy fled washington to work there. this needs to be raised at a high level, and, unfortunately, it needs to be done again. unfortunately, he will have to do this himself, another sphere of responsibility of the president, although it is not for us here and to advise him, and so on, but without him, without the first person. it won't solve anything. that is , this question of culture cannot be given to someone else on a boat, this is the highest level. and in china, as decided, in china there is a special commission for affairs. so the creation of e, in fact it is called chinese, which means the commission for development, if i'm not mistaken, but with traditional civilization, the standing committee on the bureau of the military is not the chairman. the pre-trial detention center is dunking, that is, yes, for the time being, yes, but still, we now see that a certain political

system is being reformed. this will end. by the way, are you asking the question vladimirovich correctly? why because in the countries of the east, the upper forest is always a combination and the head of the church, by the way, in england the head of the church is the queen. that is, the king is already hinting at something, and the king is hinting enough that england not quite traditional western society. e, means the ottoman empire and so on and so forth, that is. here china is also moving towards this, of course, constantly asking the chinese of marxism and so on. well, what is it? the communist party, but partly it is also an ideological organization. see leader. he is the head of the ideological organization, and accordingly, he sets the tone for the ideology, and so on. well, actually these are the great revival of the chinese nation and other slogans. this is what he gave to the whole nation. and here is our leader too is doing this. but, unfortunately, we will have to get deeply involved, including the activities of children's writers and history textbooks. we see that this process is underway, but of course, it is impossible to demand everything at once, that is

, we will gradually come to this, most likely, step by step, a short pause. we watch to explore the world of educational programs and documentaries we watch for free without registration. he put on the third part of the blocks dmitry well, allegedly, he certainly understood. well, yes, of course, a serious situation we are. and you are also talking about ideology, you understand, when we immediately clearly had a dispute over whether to ban or allow the cartoon. and in general, what is there in this cartoon, how it generally affects, where it affects at all, this is

not accidental, and i will. you just correct me. you say this most often, so i turn to you. you understand when you say ideology. after all, we are talking, indeed, in some global complex, of knowledge that determines the worldview of a huge number of people. yes, well, not only there the size of the country. we have us the ideological place is not free, it is filled. we pretend that we are, as it were, and i was confused. but i don’t know how she then lives all this, but for the children’s world will come somewhere, everything is there yes , it’s clear how because, well, uh, we’ll celebrate there. how many 80 years of the ideology of world consumption, which was made as an alternative to the ideology of socialism of the common good, well,

it was specially designed to be extended to the whole world. here nikolay even agreed in china actually. she she is the leader. well creek by the way, that's about human rights, as they said, a durable boat that allows you to hide the modern state, like a can opener. and nothing more, but it is simply part of this very ideology of consumption. well, brezhnev signed it, you know, the other side. here you say, the world's claim, or it's not you who said you, well, it doesn't matter. that's all that was sewn up there, including the right of the nation to self-determination. everything else, everything proceeded from the

logic of the world soviet socialist union, where the russian woman was to become one of elements, but this very world union. and so all this was designed for well, and he does it quite consciously. well, as a result. i'm just well, why do we well, we have our own history, yes, well, we must have our own history, after all, but to be insensitive or not? well, as if part of the comment was part of the comment, right? it is only clear that this will explain something, comrade. lenin claimed that he would build the globe according to his plan for almost all revolutionary activity.

well, no one has answered yet. was it tactical retreat from marxism or fundamentally strategic and was it socialism? and was it socialism, we do n’t really know anything about it, you really don’t know , you really don’t know the sales of the last 80 years of history, what was it? well, what 80 more than the seventeenth year is already 100 e 80 after the victory, we almost do not know the project. here the president speaks about social science. and we do not have knowledge about ourselves about ourselves, because these years, well, could not pass without a trace. they couldn't, well, you know, well,

for example, so we know about stalin's repression. yes, comfort, here we will immediately begin immediately from the field of consolation consolation. why am i saying? so we constantly found discussions about ideology with you? you see what's the matter, firstly, i believe that the time is global in this sense, total or universal ideologies. well, for a certain amount of toilet, it took quite a long time. because because what they did to the world. well, there are several such global ideologies for the nineteenth twentieth century. here you need to understand that the human system is self-learning system people learn. so i say, as soon as someone here, for example, writes here and puts the state seal on the volume that will be called ideology, then the first thing that the vast majority of us will begin to do. uh, ask the question that

yevgeny yanych was now shouting loudly and impartially, what kind of fool wrote this? well, and cured this, as it were, i'm talking about whether you can act like this action as a mechanism for our social organization, reverse side. that's what i'm talking about, therefore , you have to live it, what i mean, for example, again touched. here it is necessary, together with everyone, to answer the question. well, from below the western world with the world majority. well, that's interesting. well , if you start talking to them, and let's come up with our own concept of human rights, well, or our own concept of a person who will film the production to hell. with words that are absurd, well, any lawyer will say there can be no right without duties duties no one saw the man. well, in the legal formulation of the question, there is no right without duties. they exist in an unbreakable shipka

, and any lawyer will also say so, a freshman of the faculty of law will say this, and, accordingly, a concept of a person is needed, and not his rights, which will squeeze out this nonsense, heresy. this one to hell was posed a question. well, here are our brix allowable. well, you are ready to announce a conference at the level of deputies and heads of government, at least or the head of government. with a discussion of the concept of a non-western man, such as the topic will such. explanation, because it is important to run through, and human rights arise. at what point? for example , does friday on a desert island have rights? friday right? yes, that is, we immediately yes, we approach a completely different concept. this whole crap

does not withstand an elementary person. well , let mowgli tell sher khan what rights he has, but robin sold friday, it seems that she is not necessarily in another. what kind of human rights communal will prove? well, that is, you know, only at a certain age, kipling was cunning, he was scout. yes, he wrote that there is a law of the jungle. in fact, no one saw him. there, as if in a jungle book, therefore mowgli, although he is a man, he lived according to the law of the jungle. it is very important to please. barelia, well, who said that it is not that he is a man, but the point is, by what law does he live. man leon - this is right here right then other questions arise, so i say, not the western concept of man. and now the heads of the government come down and hold such a

conference. you think they will come now, no. well, more they won’t come back home now, of course, our closest friends and chinese won’t come, indian and so on. why why won't they come? well, or it will all take a long time, so to speak, burlitz, because such conferences are held according to the results. victories in a big confrontation, of course, they are held there, you understand, in the meantime, grit your teeth, we must go to this very victory open which will open the door, for example, to this issue. they lied again, they lied again. okay, let's remember, uh, countless contracts with indians, well american. and when not to lie, here's an advertising break asked, here's a question. how we differ i can answer in ice. we did not create the

state and civilization to plunder other states of civilization. for this they created all these barbarian tribes. we do not think about profit for us is not the purpose of our existence grinding for them. that's just for them it's just not bad, because sometimes i came to think, and i did not accidentally take advantage of our folk psychology. no, the word robbery is missing is the goal of social organization. for this they gathered in gangs in western europe to rob rome; this was the purpose of existence. they could not reproduce rome, unlike absolutely right. it's just that rome was going to and we are also talking about

the same thing. just when you are a person who tells himself that i am engaged in robbery, he immediately puts himself in a negative. and when he says, i make a profit, he all the time begins to seem, honestly, different. once upon a time you swore at the gops on the air, but i'll tell you. by the way, they won't answer me, by the way, i just wrote everything down, you understand, you publicly have to believe, and in the kitchen you can say you shouldn’t do everything you want duplicity, which is the principle of human self-determination. he fixed it there in this book of his. he wrote on them not about us. well, duplicity for a man of russian civilization. this is probably the biggest sin. well, the last thing, you understand, you can go so deep, but again, you are talking outside the religious concept of the concept of sin, it definitely does not exist at all. i have a question. what are pancakes? there great of course, a thinker,

i do not argue. he will answer me what was such an indulgence. because before writing from totalitarian states and the device, it was necessary to answer what the concept of sin is in the catholic religion. and what is inside this concept of indulgence, you are talking about the truth dear, uh, comrade, dikan said, you did not hear that he, and i report, the truth entered, things are incompatible. and once again i told you about the fact that he asks this. dimitri listen. i

told you that he wrote this, thinking that he was writing about tatarism. yes, really, yes? that's it. why are you surprised? dima, this is a brilliant idea, absolutely, though not in vain, so to speak, of course, because for them you are the most holy, what do you give in order to renounce sin, what can you have more holy in this life than money? it's clear. it's so fitting. yes? for them, right? well, he cut off part of the calf. but you know that i'm most of all, if the historical discussion is relegated to this one, so that i like it better. yes, i'm seriously reorganizing, so luther nails the steadfast there, the principle, great we can’t with this, it means the church that sold out is rotten there, we can’t organize a new new church, announces the way to

enrichment in paradise, of course, but it’s still clear who was removed will fall. this is very different from selling. the picture is no, no, no, wait. by the way, you are in vain, by the way, a deep thought in our time, because what luther did, he brought the idea to its logical conclusion, when he said, no, look, this is what artyom you say when he said if you committed a sin, they paid it. you redeemed him. now he says something else. if you are rich, then it is no longer a sin, of course i am. i, in short, developed that it was called as protests. in fact , everything is cool with god, the principle is the same, of course, and here the concept of sin, like, you know, religion, there are religious and there is a church , but there is no concept of sin, then it becomes a sin to be poor. well, yes, well, this is absolutely clear, but it explains the mortgage auction, of course, but

absolutely its own. yes, a protestant. that's why we now we have to go through the chains in the teeth this way and having gone only this one. the way, why i have been saying for many years, you have our ideology now for the next decade to survive, not just to survive, but to preserve civilization, the country, the people, the state , to preserve all this. this is our ideology for the next 10 years. i'm shorter. i remember. i read mowgli as a child. i was not spoiled, on the contrary, there were a lot. i watched what it is. it's gorgeous. this is a very classic children's she teaches goodness. she teaches communication in different forms. this is not this, this is

humane. although, like kipling, he is still there with him, well, the work itself is magnificent. so there is nothing in this and i also read the fairy tales of the brothers grimm absolutely. he loved, he teaches the child. how to cope with the cruel reality and maintain a human appearance, that's all, do not be afraid of fear. he already has brothers' fear. he is a natural child who must learn to overcome fear, because immediately these are naturally these qualities of a person, if you do not teach a child to overcome fear, then he will grow defectively. that's the green brothers taught him, downright fear.

such a place, when he was writing, they wrote. this is for the children of ethics, here refused. sometimes they return 10 years after

the arrest of the serial killer of the angarsk policeman. mikhail popkov, his victims interrupted the silence of the dinner and i was thin, i remember that his hands were huge, he began to speak, she was closer to her legs. he was a hunter who found and killed in the irkutsk region, where for the most part this beast was wielding, they were afraid of him, like fire after more than 20 years. you recognized this person. this is the same policeman who mocked you. you i liked you live. how many more crimes on account of the murderer and rapist mikhail popkov worked with me, who activated and what lies ahead for the bloodiest criminal of the modern world. we took on the case and conducted our own investigation.