a-a antagonists to show the protagonists in a positive light and so on. and i also have little idea how you can fight something. yes, in such art as cinema and the enemy or this evil, do not show in any way. that's what you think about the adopted law and failed it in that, well, certain parts of the intelligentsia. it causes the creative intelligentsia to fear how to continue to create. let's first take as a basis what we are focusing on, however, if we are talking about creativity, and i have no prohibitions, what is possible and what is impossible, if we are guided, for example, by netflix. only, of course, some kind of catastrophe terrible for the creators of the whole world is happening here, if we focus on the church, then nothing special seems to happen, if we focus on the state around us, then nothing special at all. happens. so i read the other day

that the indonesian parliament you must understand what it is for me in due time. it was also just a revelation that indonesia is the fourth largest country in the world, the vast the majority of the population professes islam parliament. indonesia passed the law. a whole series of laws tightening uh legislation in the field of, uh, family and pre- family relations, half a year in prison for relationships before marriage, six months, prison for tourists, it doesn’t matter at all, of course, for the relationship of premaritals, imagine, and we have here, well, we are talking about something. yes, of course, probably illnesses. it is not probably, but definitely for some part, but for creativity, if we take it. to the big school of russian cinema i don't see any difficulties

true, but there is iranian cinema, for example, yes, i don’t think that somewhere in iranian cinema. and there are great directors majit mujadi, for example, a brilliant director. i don't think that same-sex love topics are raised there, there are other hmm countries in which these topics are also not accepted in our country this topic. eh, for now. it seems to me that it didn’t sound so strong, because it does not find a response in the hearts. the majority of the population, and democracy, if we are talking about democracy, it is true, this is the will of the majority with this argue because it's at home. that is why i believe that if the will of the majority is directed in a different way, then those who remain in the minority, well, without having, in any case, a criminal article, as it was in the soviet union, the truth for homosexuality today should somehow orient. true, the world is big. it

is huge, if you are talented and in demand, as a cultural worker, and whoever it is, you also have such an orientation. that's what is looking for that country in which unfortunately, in which, uh, you will be to live comfortably and freely with what you have. unfortunately. it's so i, uh, so personally in general for people to be able to behave as they please inside their, uh, houses. it seems to be tough, but i look like, for example, in islamic countries. uh, they ban the preaching of christianity. here is morocco it seems, yes, such a pretty country, the white houses are beautiful. everything, uh, if a priest went beyond, uh, the boundaries of the church territory into contractors, then he, well, will face immediate arrest and sanctions up to the death penalty. simple ban, yes

truth to preach christianity. uh, and people live somehow with this truth. so, i think that hmm, we will slowly somehow process all this, see how it will be further, for those who will be unbearably leaving , i will not change their orientation, probably, although it would be correct from the point of view of repentance. well, we are far away. now let's go. here is a human thing. so, well, what can you do? well, it's such a twist. or put aside the creative component, but god bless him with a script from films, but after all for sure, among your spiritual children there are people of non-traditional orientation. how did they perceive the adoption of this law. this is how it affects their lives. did they share water? i did n’t answer you, yes, about who will be, uh, who will be the censor, i don’t know who will be the censor, time will tell, i don’t think we will find a good censor. i think that, most

likely, everything will be, as usual, not very high quality. so let's say. although we may find it. hardly a sick question like this, either you forbid, or you allow some kind of censorship by a doctor, we can talk here, and now as regards my spiritual children among my spiritual children. but i will not answer you, even to this question, firstly, because i do not have the right to do so. let's take the congregation, because i have spiritual children. i have parishioners. i have people who go to temples. sometimes, however, it happens that a person appears once a year in the temple or twice a year, or at the age of 5, i know such people and i personally have not heard from them that they feel some kind of serious global the discomfort. in this regard, with the adoption of this law. well, because as a rule, if you live like this personally, yes, then this is your personal life, the law, which is published not as it does not intrude into your personal life. true, if

you lack art in which these values ​​are expressed, then these values ​​are human. well, even if the values ​​for you, the whole world produces such art western world. in any case, for sure, and you can safely download, watch and enjoy these films, there are no restrictions on you watching these films at home. no i don’t see yet what are the significant restrictions on the freedom of people who live like this, i don’t see yet, maybe they are different for themselves, of course, but i haven’t heard, if i answer your direct question. i have n't heard yet about any such deep feelings on this subject. in september, we restarted with a new name, formerly called the church and the world. now we are a church and we are, and after the restart , i asked almost all of my guests the question of what is personally

not in the understanding of the russian orthodox church for them churches. yes, but personally for them it would mean victory in a special military defeat operation, how would you answer this question to all the guests. yes , everyone answered. look how uh very little conflict. now they say that there are no wars at all that do not end in peace, that everything always ends with some kind of agreements, in the end with negotiations. blah blah blah. there are protracted conflicts, we know them, which did not end in any way, yes, north korea south korea turkey northern cyprus cyprus yes, that is, there are sort of dismantling lines, and you just didn’t decide israel from palestine well, and so on for me victory victory. in what is happening now would be the reconciliation of the russian and ukrainian peoples, that is, the return of this

triad of slavic yes belarus russia ukraine not as a state, but as a people . i think that this would be a victory for me. and what conditions would this world have, what would be the configuration of political territorial economic relations? i'm not very good at this. who has to take the first step in order for this to happen? meaning? that is, if you ask me as a citizen, as a politician, or as a christian, as a christian? no, it doesn't matter, as long as it stops. i am acutely aware of the bloodshed. here it is direct can reproach in shorts. everything that is not a man has always been a war. yes, there has always been war. here but you know, here i am remembering, maybe it would be wrong to say so. hmm the crimean war. yes, 150 years have passed, if you open

the encyclopedia you will see there that unpreparedness. there are a lot of similar things in the state apparatus, but then there at the end you will read the loss loss following hmm 522.000. i recently saw 400.000 russians there with some turks. 50 thousand seem to be french and 22,000 english. this is what scares me the most, you know 522.000 and 22.000. i am acutely aware of the loss. i deeply experience the death of people. and this is something i can't agree with internally. so if i ask myself what i would like from what is happening today, i would like only one thing to stop the bloodshed immediately. well, i'm talking like a christian i understand further, as a citizen, as a russian person, as a patriot of their homeland,

all sorts of further hmm, so to speak, technical forgive me, lord, for this rude word in this context of the issue. well, first, yes, stop, uh, murder, brother, but fight. yes, it doesn’t scare you that there is some kind of politicization of the statement of the clergy even after the start from their own. that is, if you read well, let's say their telegram channels are social networks. from social networks, roughly speaking the word shepherd - it turns. well, in general, no difference with telegram channels of vyacheslav volodin and so on. this is what politicization scares me personally. here you go to such discussions with parishioners. you are not afraid of such, as it were, sharp questions. i'm not going here, but i have one of my parishioners, an adult who was subject to mobilization, i was surprised by his

statement when he said that he did not want to go to war. he said i don't want to kill people. so this was the position of an adult almost fifty years old in general, life experience. for me, this is a very christian position, of course. i don't i want to kill people. here, this attention is taken, given the situation, it is probably not accepted. here but from a christian point of view is accepted. i would like to speak only from a christian point of view, in regards to priests and their political lines or about political statements. i am an idealist and a perfectionist. i don't think the church should be allowed to make political statements. you can probably somehow blame me for this, but i don’t think it’s right. i believe that the church has a different task. i read the gospel maybe inattentively. well, i didn't

find anything about the war there. how do you feel about the fact that the prisoners are fighting along with the rest of the conscripts, get up for a huge fight to the death. i mean, i understand how a prisoner is different from a free man, but if he u volunteered to go to his death, uh? that he i think in this way even without dying yet. here uh becomes again uh, part of society. hmm no you. in answer to your question, i don't see the difference. i think it's all the same in the trenches. from the latest news, the bbc published a list. uh, put the greatest women of 2022, there means human rights activists journalists and so on and there is the name of alla pugacheva how do you feel about the persecution of alla pugacheva in russia by part of our

society. so you know, it seemed to chekhov that if our society treats the arks differently than merchants, so to speak, it seems to be a person, then it says, well, these are the features of our society, you know everyone should. i feel like doing my own thing from the other side. everyone has the right to say that you are expressing alla borisovna something is expressed by people who do not agree with her position, but everyone expresses something about how to relate to this. i think what happens what happens is transferred to us. eh, we want it. or not to another reality. and in this reality, a very terrible reality, where blood is shed more terrible than blood and there is nothing more real than blood, only the spirit of the arrival or departure

of someone, whoever it was, no matter how, he was not loved or unloved by the people, part of it is necessary never mind. it does not matter. you forgive me. you know, i look when i i read telegram channels a little, though i hardly watch tv at all. that is, i simply don’t have it, the yellow press and everything and similar things and everything that is around the stars should be now not something that people are not important and not interested in. it shouldn't be. uh, the society has not been rebuilt so significant yet, apparently, the monastery, which was said so much and, in fact, the russian orthodox church and the department of the russian orthodox church on the relationship of the church society with the media society filmed there, because it was this department that signed the review the reviews for this show are negative. at

the same time, i know that there was a consultant from the russian orthodox church, and who helped the scriptwriters in writing the text, the main complaint, as i understand it, begins somewhere, starting with the fourth series of the series, where the nunnery is shown. and in the opinion of the hierarchs of the russian orthodox church, this is hmm a caricature image that does not correspond to reality, like hysterical mothers and so on, real monasteries in our country are not like that. have you seen this series and how do you do you generally feel about the fact that the ministry of culture requests a review of the roc before issuing a rental certificate or not ? is this a healthy sign or not? i haven't watched the series and i'll tell you honestly, most likely they won't, because i have no time to be honest. and as for the content, but if i did not look, what can

i say nothing in the second part of the answer, huh strength? do you think it's okay for the ministry to ask? i think vox-po or vox day if society. passing through serious transformations, it passes through them, society will make a decision unconditionally. yes, by a majority of votes, let's return to democracy will decide that this kind of censorship relationship between the ministry of culture and the church should be assessed. i think that, ah, those who make tv series or films in which the church theme appears. in any case, it is important to have consultants from the church, because unfortunately, most of what we see on the screen is not accurate in terms of

images of the service of how a priest can behave with or how he usually behaves i didn’t watch the monastery, but i watched the first episode hmm i don’t know . here are the series that are called parish. so i watched the first episode. there, too, you play a filipino priest who was exiled to the provincial capital. in the demonic series that's me, i mean, he showed me the script once before he started filming. i strongly dissuaded him from this step. that's what i wouldn't i would approve, i do not know how it will develop further. i don't know if he filmed further, but it made me the hardest impression, the hardest impression on the topic. e churches. the theme of god the theme of priests is more and more in demand in society, positive

negative from the point of view of pr is positive from the point of view of how it all looks negative, of course, because unfortunately the majority of our baptized population is absolutely not educated in relation to the church and has the most vague, unfortunately, some do not know prehistoric yes on the level the era of dinosaurs ideas about what a church is, that's what it is eaten with. in this sense, of course, we should be admitted to censorship, but not in the senses then already. here is first of all. it's how the church is represented. well, for sure, yes, because after all, it is desirable that everything look human, but in no way such a surrogate or some kind of semi-finished product, as we see it today? well, i’ll also say in the semantic field in all these new

baked series of their films and so on, but the film which is perhaps the most famous, where featured russian orthodox church. and this is zvyagintseva leviathan what do you think about this film? i don't like, uh, anything dull and i don't like anything meaningless. here are the films of zvyagins, for example, i am not offended. it 's a long nonsensical dull story. i don't understand why this should be done. that's about ilya guards. i've heard a lot. but, well, yes, well, such a vision. here i strongly disagree with this vision. it was a long time ago , shortly after filming. and teriberka is a completely different place. you know that uh in due time, how this large oil or gas company

from teriberka began to build a gas pipeline there, they were all offered to leave there, there are 700 people. the population to leave for murmansk to build new apartments for them in teriberka is a creepy place. let's just say. in terms of infrastructure and everything. everything else is slowly improving there, but it all makes, however, a terrible impression, and not one person, not one, agreed to a new apartment. in murmansk, no one wanted to leave tantrums. i do not see where there is some kind of despondency, melancholy, sadness, our people reacted to the film in an amazing way. yes, people began to come when there are roads there, which really isn’t there. good people began to hold some kind of festivals there. shop shop. some kind of rocker life began there, and you come there, there are car numbers from all regions of russia, that is, the people are directly against what they saw on the screen, really. this is the same people. well, you ask him for someone to take it off . you want to say that everything is so bad. yes? not so, everything is bad, very bad, but not to discuss it like that. it is necessary with

those. who lives inside this organism. they look from the side. yes, you know, that ’s all, everything was bad, it was bad, it will be bad, it’s bad. ask people, then go there. uh, hit the road and look carefully at some festivals there. why people here they want to leave, talked to people, don't impose your vision, sad yes uh 140 million . i think that there are countries where it is sadder to live at the end of such, maybe even a philosophical question, because it started on february 22 of the year. in my opinion, when will it end and how will it end? i think it's a long story, and i mean, not specifically an

operation. in general, what started. so i think that the result of the end will depend on whether everything in russia is always the same depends on the people accepting god's will or not and god, in general, because i do not yet believe that our people have accepted god will the people of god and god's will accept one final will not accept the people of god and god's will about themselves another finale, in which we have entered a long transformation within this period may be different. this concerns not only our internal history, because the whole world has entered a period of very serious turbulence. this is so a change in the

economic structure, here is the technical structure. that's what it is that we're seeing now. i really, really hope about it , believe me, daily heartily and deeply. so that hmm the lord would have mercy hmm on us, as a people, and would lead us out of this turbulence with the least possible spiritual human human economic losses. think, that this will be the result, but the period is long. i am not a prophet. so i don't presume to predict, but this is not a year or two. many thanks, father dmitry, for giving this interview. thank you.

traveling requires a faithful and reliable companion that will support the largest networks along the way. the whole world saw these horrifying footage of how ukrainian servicemen treat our prisoners of war.

i understand. maybe he's shaking to find a

real friend. i know what is now the concept of sharing fenichuhayut 10 days this season issued. 11 maybe only he is brothers and sisters. i came up with a reboot a few words start countdown three two one.

always wondering where it all starts now? the makers of good things want them.

argentina champion has just finished the final match of the world cup in the frame, which is perhaps the most dramatic in recent decades, the argentines defeated the french in a series after the penalty shoot -out. tens of thousands of fans took to the streets in argentina for a holiday three-time world champions. the first half was

completely for the argentines. they closed the french, did not let them catch themselves on their famous counterattacks and advanced the passage of demoria in the french in the french penalty area led to a penalty, which cold-bloodedly converted a month and then di maria scored himself and with such a score of 2:0 the team went to the french substitutions, but almost the entire second half, too, could not only score, but even get close to the argentine penalty area, but if argentina has messi, then france has two hits, two goals in within two minutes. from nothing, what is called one spinalti another from the game. and this, when the argentines thought that the championship matches were already in their pocket 2:2 with such a score , regular time ended, he again scored again brilliantly in overtime, but then another penalty kick was already in the goal. argentina flag. he also scored a hat-trick. well, in the series after the penalty shoot-out matches , argentine goalkeeper martinus decided everything. and, of course, messi and company are not a single miss the world champions

more about the match the great match match in reports. the face of kazakov squadron we will know all the details in the next hour, but for now let's move on to other topics. the gorky moscow art theater is holding the results of the 125th anniversary season, despite the large-scale repairs, the theater management in november decided to temporarily open the stage and remind the capital audience how the country lived in the nineties, the performance unexpectedly caused an ambiguous reaction, but the director considers this the price of the production mahat vladimir kekman , my colleague talked to him about the interweaving of art and reality. maria valitva.