well, in the end. well, this is probably the legend of the paratroopers. boys like that, they were still on tour . that is, they howl for a long time confidently calmly asking what you want. they say, theoretically, at some point, it would be good to breathe in, breathe out, you know? these are the boys who are the nightmares of those who think that they know how to nightmare, that is, they are paratroopers, 24. they showed me, but

they went there from the enemy’s position to nightmare, well , look at who we are fighting with inscriptions on ukrainian canned fish in belarusian. in german and in chinese in dialect, which is in secret, that is, these are the mercenaries who are opposite. they know them, they take them seriously, and therefore they take them seriously; the task is solved in close cooperation with everyone who is nearby. see the flag halved kitty separately, which struck me in the book. at the same time, war and

chinese philosophy stand from the word at all, that is, it was necessary to transfer with you, which the guys have, this is dostoevsky, this is tolstoy russian language pay attention to the flag, which is for the guys. this is, as you know, the flag of victory, i ask them men. well, i asked everyone question, but victory is when they say, well, as an intermediate stage, it would be necessary to return the flag to its place. i say this, he's in berlin well, then we'll return in berlin. everything is, well, so serious. i'm asking. like, well, right. a very

correct person, i ask, tell me, are you trophying something there? well, because when you asked people from this you understand that they are better at what we say, you know, at first when it was, well, first-aid kits say harnesses there, and now, firstly, everything has become correct how much. that is, they do not talk about themselves, we are there for you. we are not here, this is nothing. they talk, i say so calmly, you know, children's letters help. that's when the children write it says,

so it's necessary here we read their hearing and say we are asked to come back. well , we sent our reaction to the children. hello soldier. thanks for protecting us. i was surprised. when among luhansk? i have seen. volunteer boy, muscovites arrived. curious detail

they are busy. heavy men's work who commands them? well? for this war you need your lion tolstoy i spoke. a lot of star generals and army generals and colonel generals lieutenant general and major general and colonel learn it no rigidity. this is no attempt to yell at someone and decide no, these are people who understand that the life of a soldier is sacred, if at one time it seemed to someone that there was someone who would put it there, for the sake of awards there

were practically none left. that is, now they have christened quite such a correct relationship, respect for each other, understanding mutual training, if the enemy has a tactical tricks and guys, they say they are cunning, so they say, they took apart the garage cooperative. they dismantled the roof and set up a moving mortar there. he says, while they could not detect, saying the muscles say, well, we are smart, we are on the tricks of the meaning. we still know how to do it better. everything, nobody refuses modern technology, computer programs quadrocopters. who what what here? everyone understands everything, they study, they look at publications in a variety of sources. that is, for our eyes, a transformation takes place when there are armies, well, like, it’s very pleasing here. quick and clear reaction of all services of the ministry of defense. we take everything new. we are waiting for

something from the industry, the industry works very well, well, it comes to ridiculous. i say guys, but i have a friend who says that we had him, and this man is a little bit vice-premier of the russian government, who doesn’t say anything to anyone, goes to the front line with engineers with designers with directors for the water of the military-industrial complex and watches on the spot how they work their products. in order not to pay attention to what bureaucratic obstacles immediately make changes so that there is not just a bull, but the most modern and most necessary. i'll tell you, let's say so. thanks

for watching tv. he also looks like a psychologist working. they have no doubts there, so when they watch our programs, they see that total russophobia is happening in the west as well. of course, she shows us the west for them there is no background of events, no history, no simple logic at all washington does not hide its desire to throw russia out of the security council for better just destroy ways not to think of isolation. they say they don't wage war when you're there. do you see how they don't wage war? you just see everything. some

article you understand that everything about him is clear, as well as about them, about all of them, they are all tired of pretending. and i wouldn't recommend it to you. you do not even understand what awaits you and you do not understand. what kind of army is now being gradually, but gradually, but forged out on the fields of these battles. you do n't even understand the soul of a russian person. whatever nationality he is, and when the guinness assembly confirms once again, how yesterday the nazi states again vote against the russian revolution of nazism. we just habitually grin and check the

readiness of our personal weapons. everything is clear about you, when germany and japan vote against , they don’t even abstain, but against a resolution that condemns nazism. this story, because you know, here it is, what is important, not only tosh, but not only because you saw it with your own eyes and spoke with these men. what do you call them, but they are really real men who are there, but they are fighting, but this is important for understanding the meaning the ongoing meaning of this war, because it is impossible to imagine a man at war. well, i can’t say that about myself

, but since my father is a front-line soldier and, uh, we talked a lot about this. uh, always a man who goes to die and risks his life. he must understand. and why does he do this should be higher value in order to go there, not because i send the president to the commander. ah, because you're going there out of conviction. what is happening in the world right now is this transformation, when all these fig leaves of this western civilization, which supposedly is a kind of standard of the modern world, and everyone should strive for this standard, and for 30 years we have been trying to form it in this by various means. e in this illusion that this is the historical goal to which every person and every

family and every country should strive. and now these masks are slowly being shed and when, as you rightly said. on a question that seemed to be some 10 years ago , there was no doubt at all. there you are zaya or against nazism. you condemn nazism or do not condemn nazism, and suddenly we see what does it mean for all this enlightened europe , including. how did you say germany is voting against the resolution why are these guys there like to say? there is a basic script you started with. the scenario that this

western civilization is living in is connected with the fact that russia is such a global historical rival on the path to the implementation of all these plans. and, of course, the basic scenario is designed to dismember and destroy there. uh, economically death or militarily somehow, but to destroy, but at least e to make sure that in this historical space, which is called russia, there is either no russia or there is something else. we discussed many different scenarios in this studio many times, both from the inside and from there on the 26th territory. well, there are a lot of other options and it’s clear that if there was a chance at least some minimal chance to solve this problem quickly and efficiently, well, with the help, for example, there, a military military unconditional victory in a nuclear war about this and also, by the way, talked about. we know

that such a scenario was also being worked out and this scenario was based on a way out of the well-known e construction about because it was then that there was an idea that it was possible to win a nuclear war to create such a shield that was not determined by the russian ball and then, so to speak, the russian counter strike , turns out to be stopped, which means that the blow that our opponent inflicts is effective and inflicts a total defeat on us. if it could be done it would always be done. and in this connection seems to me very important. to talk about the article kishery, because the grandfather is certainly very smart and at the same time very insidious. this article is very insidious, of course, and this article contains one very important account of the plot, which, it seems to me, not everyone saw who, but analyzed it, because for some reason everyone began to talk about what kind of scenario it offers about ukraine in

order to solve the ukrainian crisis, he really proposed. this is a way to resolve the ukrainian crisis - this is a kind of panama that kisiger offers, solving v in a global sense, a completely different task, because he is, of course, the faithful dog of american imperialism. speaking in the old, e language. he, of course, serves this god and, of course, at the basis of all his activities. it will do so in order to preserve the american-centric world. that's, uh, what the high priests did. yes, he did it and is doing it now, but he is smart, and therefore he is looking for an approach to solving the problem of giving a little differently than those who are looking for this button, how to press it faster and realizing that for some reason the button does not say so is pressed. listen to what he says, kitty , when he offers, and there is a program for resolving the ukrainian crisis. he

allegedly makes some kind of concession to us. he says you are wrong. those who believe that russia should be excluded from the system. well, it didn’t get to the quote and the system, there is european world security. no, he needs to include it there, and she says to include it there. and for this, let's sacrifice something. what sacrifices are offered. he says, let's put aside the issue of crimea well, crimea is supposedly such a story. he really says amazing thing. he says, when he first talks about crimea, then he says that these new territories, which russia seized, of course, are a condition for negotiations. ira should be russia's departure at the border on february 24, but let's discuss the status of these territories, because they have changed hands many times over the centuries, which

means they are lying, of course. this is absolutely untrue, because what kind of kherson where he went there, how he founded it, and the empress miss potemkin. so he has always been, so part of, uh, the russian world or modessa, in my opinion, we recalled there, allegedly said she cited this figure that at the beginning of 2013, 4% of the inhabitants of odessa called themselves ukrainians. there were no less among the 10 of their nationalities who lived in odessa, there were no little russians. well i i were greeks. i'm telling you, everyone was there, who is not there. there you confirm it, it confirms my thesis equally, if we talk about the donbass we remember lenin's formula lenin said donbass is needed in ukraine in order to have russian working blood. eh, that means dilute the ukrainian calves. well, not

literally. this is a quote, nothing went over there. this russian russian world is part of russia and the russian state. well kissel and let's discuss it and let's discuss it. well, maybe we'll hold a referendum there. no, but at the same time, ukraine is already in nato well, i'm a man, yes, let's hold a referendum. what if they speak in favor of living in a state where russia is allowed into russia if they suddenly say we will give it back to russia, he says, kissinger it’s not a fact that you can do it and that’s a plus. yes, cherry on the cake, but the issue of nato and ukraine has been resolved. this is not discussed here. well, if we give in to russia, if we integrate it into the system of modern european security. be kind. accept that ukraine is becoming part of nato like this. and if you read kissinger correctly, er, the way those who should then make political military decisions should read it, then the main thesis is precisely

this one because the fundamental issue that was not resolved and did not ensure russian security is how far the nato structure is from the russian federation of the western direction directly western ex-russian. ex-e, soviet union this was the main issue that led to the story that we are discussing today, and when it is proposed in the amount that let's discuss something with crimea, let's discuss something with the donbass. it’s not a fact that this will be decided, but we are discussing, yes, as a condition for some kind of negotiation process with russia. but the issue of the consequences of ukraine’s date is not discussed, and now the most important thing is why tell this? i think there are two western strategists have one basic scenario with respect to russia. we discussed the need to find a way to destroy them, but it seems that not everything, as it were, does not grow together, not everything works out not with

economic sanctions from a victorious nuclear war, then there is another scenario. after all, putin launched this special operation, which he publicly announced in order to reformat the whole world and inform the security system in europe to provide a guarantee of russia's security. let's come up with another scenario. let's propose a scenario for russia's integration into that the same old system that was, well, under the new conditions, the level of more favorable more pinpoint successful er more so to speak today. e susceptible. uh, the russian elite is nothing the world should remain the same should be. it's the same about him already completely helpless the same, so to speak. the same voting system, all these structures that exist today. and of course nato which will move to the russian borders. and in this world we will immerse russia and let the most important thing,

let the russian elite accept this scenario. let her exchange this war that we are waging this special military operation, which is certainly for her, for part of this summer, it is uncomfortable for someone to lose their business. someone has children in london, someone, then, and someone is under sanctions, well, it's an uncomfortable world. let's pitch to this elite who will say we don't need to win this fight. we need honorable conditions for reintegration into this western world on the old conditions, which will be somehow brightened up. here is the scenario that he proposes. in my opinion. today uh talented, to put it more strongly, yes, political scientist and strategist henry kisenger, and he, of course, uh, i must say this frankly, he u already contributed. uh, in our

expert community. i've read some reviews that say, listen. keith is, in general, all cyclical, he says, healthy. and what would we like not to look for, but the solution is on this way. well, why is it crimea? here we will not discuss crimea, but the referendum is also a way. eh, sort of re-perspective of solving this problem. here is kisya's trap, the master from these historical traps. he calls us into this trap. and if you imagine that russia today will agree to this scenario. this will certainly lead us to a historical defeat, therefore, it seems to me that today it is very important that in our society in our political elite. everyone who makes the decision in our business has been maximally consolidated around the question of where we are going and what we are fighting for. firstly,

it seems to me that the russian people will not accept such a russian elite that will give in and this is now something that needs to be understood, and the second very important moment, when we see how one of the political scientists or political figures begin to vibrate it just from the ground in order to look at them carefully, this means that fungus is activated. this means that bookmarks pop up, so for the competent authorities. this is just useful information for decision making. we need to understand very clearly the task of the authorities to prevent. even the illusion that 1916 could repeat itself in the country. it seems to me that now people who are in power, who make excellent decisions understand this. and this means that it is necessary to act harshly, but expediently, when you look at these pictures of the destroyed cities of donbass, uh, once again

you come to the idea, which i always say, that there is no such thing as civil infrastructure. here we are all the time. uh reproaches that the russian armed forces are destroying civilian infrastructure, in particular, the energy infrastructure there, the transport infrastructure. that's when puts, i say the kindergarten of the school is a residential building, but when there is a tank on the ground floor or when there, uh, on the territory of the kindergarten, uh, they will place hymes, uh, then this is no longer civil infrastructure. it is subject to destruction, and therefore what our armed forces are doing. here, starting from the tenth of october on friday there was another raid. this is just the destruction of military potential. for ukraine, this decline is a sharp decline in their ability to carry out transfers to manage communications, and i look forward to the moment when this

quantity will turn into quality and indeed the energy system will completely collapse. you noticed that the track was worked out with nuances, with such military tricks , missiles were launched. yes, deceptions were revealed by the systems. e, air defense and destroyed four air defense systems, while this was confirmed by the ukrainian side. yes , yes, absolutely fair, i also wanted to say about this that tactics change, they change with uh, so to speak, more and more new means are used. uh, obviously tasked already uh, destruction of the repeated destruction of the system air defense of ukraine because in the first weeks of a special military operation. well, according to various estimates, somewhere around 75% of ukraine's air defense was destroyed, but western supplies. of course, they are doing their job, but they want to create an elanized system, they will probably create it.

if we don't stop it, we will. i'm just destroyed. single launchers of the air defense system, just by achieving a common victory. because if all this is, really, how they expect to continue, there is more than one year, then, of course, with uh, the total aggregate power. uh west and uh, you see, here's our talk about how they're running out, that they're already gesturing, yes, they're running out, yes, they're, uh, well, for completely natural reasons. they ruined the military-industrial complex of europe and western europe in the nineties, the americans drastically dropped, so to speak, the power of their pc, but if they switch to a military footing, if they restore the vc they, uh, of course, their potential will not be easy for us. in general, significant

more than that, last week i had a statement there from one. retired too general what alas, you underestimate, the united states has huge reserves. uh, weapons for storage. yes, this is true in nevada, they have, uh, a huge training ground. uh, well, not a landfill, but a place of storage, and in the open. typical ukraine program we talk about what made ukraine the way we know it today, typical and, of course, unique. that's what we're interested in. hope you're interested. and do you sometimes have time by chance, or what? but sometimes i see your programs, they are very convincing and deep. for which i want to tell you separately.

thank you

it's always interesting how it all starts. now everyone will see the producers of good things they want and most importantly, but it is best to check. and americans in general, from my own experience

, from the experience of all treaties, they, well, physically do not accept destruction. here is the disposal of technology. they just, well, they can't stand it, so even this last one is that they are, uh, fooling us. well, not that they are fooling , in any case, resorting to such not very decent schemes, e.g. saving launchers installations, when there removes the membrane puts the lid, they say it does not count. well, in general, uh, the same thing happened, for example, when we signed the treaty on conventional armed forces. us, when we withdrew 10,000 tanks beyond the urals from the area of ​​application and put them in, e.g. e. just in the open air, than it was clear that for a long time they were there, there were no e hangars, there were no burial places just in the open air, that they would rust and turn into nothing.