americans in general, from my own experience, from the experience of all treaties, they, but physically do not accept destruction. here is the disposal of technology. they just, well, they can't stand it, so even this last one is that they are uh fooling us. well, it’s not that they’re fooling, in any case, they resort to such not very decent schemes, e.g., saving launchers, when they remove the membrane, they put the lid on and they say it doesn’t count. well, in general, uh, the same thing happened, for example, when we signed the treaty on conventional armed forces. us, when we withdrew 10,000 tanks beyond the urals from the area of ​​application and put them, e, in just under the open sky, and it was clear that for a long time they had no e hangars there were no storage facilities for the sky, just under the open sky, that they would rust and turn into the americans forced us to do nothing, well, the truth is for their

money, and so we drove for four years from behind the urals to the rostov region and cut these tanks, and the americans, withdrawing their fifth and seventh army corps, took and put all their m-60s to nevada for storage, so all these stocks of this are basically m60 m48. i, uh, well, they can, of course, supply these tanks to ukraine, but these are not the tanks that the ukrainians want. now one more moment here we are. many reproach that when we show, last week they showed the loading of the yars, for example, there in the mine or we show our, uh, our rocket rs 18 stylet with the avant-garde. and for some reason, all this is regarded as a signal that russia is again threatening to use nuclear weapons,

that is because russia, so to speak. here is this has a weapon. i think that makes sense. eh, completely different. so, when we show the launching of new submarines, there are borey classes or, uh, volley launches. uh, were you there from, uh, surface or underwater loading yartsev and we show that despite the special military operation. the modernization program of our triad it is in full swing consists, but because they should know they are running out of resources because they are talking about russia, why? why do we need three squads? it's uh, it's a guarantee a guarantee that there ain't no one, so to speak, a politician, a serious not, uh, will think about the fact that ukraine needs to be split there into some there, so that

they are not afraid, then let them be afraid. let them see that we are putting on combat duty. if necessary, we will not translate it to be used at the same time, as the president said, we still need to look carefully, it may make sense to take into account the situation and change doctrines exclusively preventively, that they are against us by what they have, they are fighting, they substitute everything, and we will speak our main, trump. no, no, we won't, no way. no, i do not rule out that if you are a nouture, that we should pretend that we box with them like flyers, i am vladimir. by the way, the president also rarely says anything at all, it’s just how it’s being developed now. new military doctrine. i think that there, uh, it is quite possible that we will change our position on the use of nuclear weapons. and also, uh, let's write in there the possibility of delivering a preemptive strike and exclude the impossibility of using nuclear weapons. the first is therefore yes it is uh, well a nuclear tactical nuclear weapon. i really don't

understand. allows you to destroy all bridges across the dnieper and create exclusion zones through those territories through which ukraine receives weapons from western countries. and nothing to pretend is better than they will come to the land of donbass and kill russian people. well, you understand, yes, the transition, but this is a new stage in the escalation of the use of tactical nuclear weapons. well, how do they respond to that? uh, i don't think they'll answer because they're the only one who can use tactical nukes. it's the americans the americans going on first, no im not do not care, because they understand that if they use their tactical nuclear weapons in response, then the conflict is a strategy of conflict. yes, it will grow immediately. uh, so to speak, so they will put them. there are german tanks, the germans still bent. already now we are ready for the fact that they caved in, they delivered planes to them, and they will be supplied with everything, we

now see how it is already. and with their weapons. well, it's just that sonic is staffed there. this is how they fight with cleanliness, so then we pretend, well, fuck and say. goodbye, where did your polish units stand there? polish parts are no longer worth hmm well, why pretend or watch ? trace no i think i think that the war lasted for many years, so we need now here is the winter campaign. i really hope that there will still be a winter company, despite all these western spells, that there will now be a pause, that the russians will not fight in the winter. now ukraine will try to go on the offensive. well, direction. it is clear zaporozhye and sweet criminal. judging have worked. let them probe there, cook here, let him try, but i repeat once again that you need to win, and win without dragging on. if you want us to win, why do they use, then the whole

arsenal of cutting power that we have, we use, probably not all. i think that we will use the entire arsenal of, uh, available means, with the exception of nuclear weapons, of course, nuclear weapons - this is the transition of the conflict to a completely new stage, which uh. i repeat once again the very big risk that it will be just mutual destruction if it's a military man, so i can't talk about it here. but when we see, when the whole west is really at war with us, having found this, if you like, such a philosophical gap, when we regret something all the time, and no one pities us. there has been no ukraine for a long time, but we do n’t need to use the entire arsenal for years, then we need to work, because when they say in all seriousness of our policy that if there is a patriot, then we will use them to consider them as a legitimate military target from

surprised from well done, but, that is, a weapon that we are against on our own, and so we are how you considered them. no, but what, what is it to be formulated in general, too, the question is far from obvious, americans. not even reputationally so to say. i think it's not there, that's all, then he will say that there are crooked instructors. although it is clear that the instructors. there, the instructors will be american, so they will be reproached for curvature, and if they supply someone with an air-launched missile there now, that is, they, in addition to helicopters, at some point time and the planes will speak again. no , well, it's there. general alexandrovich proposed and no, we won’t touch any military infrastructure of the uk, only the military world, of course, but listen to the military bases, well, they are striking at the location of our strategists, it turns out now we politely said that those

drones that attacked the crimea were produced in america in poland in america is no longer in poland from the american, the constituents clearly named the company that was made in america in poland before them they flashed and checked how they fly further, they equipped it, which means that in odessa and nikolaev there will be a charge and sent. and we will say no no, no one is participating. and why not strike at the places of deployment, both in america and in poland, because you say, well, this is a completely different transition of the conflict, you mean, in crimea you can use strategic bombers at our location, and when we say guys, then if you please we say, well , it’s impossible, it’s, well, not good, but to fight to fight, of course, absolutely, absolutely nato, uh, not you really need a piece now indirectly, but if you transfer, uh, hostilities to their territory, then their aviation will already

rise and, therefore, will begin to bomb our citizenship, so to speak. now she doesn't . to be honest, she doesn’t, well, she doesn’t do it when we look, like undercutting, when we look, but these are single isolated ones, so to speak, drones around moscow, then what shall we say? yes? yes, well, on new year's eve, but i will say that they are planning it and do not hide it. at the same time, americans represent everything now and we see them preparing it. what's not good is how unbelievable you didn't convince me that it was necessary to switch to the use of nuclear weapons. and i don't think it has come to that yet. clearly, a blow to moscow, then we will respond. then, in response, we will inflict a corresponding blow. as a muscovite, this will be very pleasant for me. i'm sorry i don't know about it, but theoretically. i will be very pleased, israel to observe nuclear weapons, the americans will strike at moscow a. we do our best. that's good. here they struck

at the location of our strategic cloakroom attendants when these drones were flying. maybe they found out what they are charged with. we were sure it was you asking me. yes, i didn’t have it, because, unfortunately, the buttons knocked us down, because i’m just a journalist. i say they should have come from where they were sent to shoot down. they should have been vladimir putin - that's another air issue, and they take the issue. what would happen if there was another charge, if there is a nuclear attack on ours, in any of our objects, the answer will be nuclei. well how do we know americans, no one can ukrainians. there is no ukraine, nuclear radiological. maybe, yes, a dirty bomb. maybe radiology , maybe we say so. no, well then, then there is no need to destroy the answer to the meeting. that is, they banged us, people died. we say, but let's still change the

conceptually, the supreme has already said that we need to look. may be enough. like this every time . be good well, again, i'm an evil person. here, i look at the men passed on. i feel sorry for them american british nazis. i don't feel sorry for the word at all quite an affinity. as a jew, i am not accustomed to the nazis at all when i see countries that vote against a resolution condemning nazism. my fists just clench well so that they clench in the correct shooting position. in general, the problem is with kislin’s article, it ’s not that he is calling us somewhere into some kind of trap, but that they are going into this trap. i'm talking about this, so they want to go, so we really need to speak openly,

what's in our elite. and, perhaps, there are a sufficient number of people in power here who wish russia defeat. yes, partial yes bashful. yes, a little bit here, yes, maybe we will later, well, let's just call a spade a spade. let's talk about the fact that all their manipulations are political, and over the past week there have been a lot of them again and an article in the new york times. it's not only about the fact that an assassination attempt was being prepared on the chief of the general staff. there are a lot of interesting things written and names. there are very interesting names. she is including part of this manipulation and without having to make some hover. pour out and power the amount of these manipulations will only grow and the number of

people who will internally be ready to go. where will kissinger call them? well, it's understandable that i think he hardly even read the article he wrote. well, where will this collective kissinger call them? this is where it will grow. i was also in lugansk this week. no, i was not on the line of combat contact, i was only in the city of luhansk pedagogical civilization from here yes, the state pedagogical university. and he said, i was in the republican clinical hospital. many have many solved there is a problem some. but this is the problem. simply, well, what is called regrinding, he came to them heavily . you can see the serious injury here. and

we will fight to the end to the end. what percentage of the elite is ready to sell? this is the question we must ask ourselves every day and every day ask each or every person in the position he saw an official. ask what he did for the soldiers, what he did for the army. and you will immediately see a lot of shifty eyes. awesome guys at the university, and lectured by students. at they had a festival. understand the young say. and now you understand that the young guard will now be. they gave me a book. it used to be

the separatist diaries it released. employees of the lugansk state pedagogical university are all there. here , they, too, in the sixteenth year, i did n’t know how it would all end. but very recognizable, i read these people on the train, i was reading. and you get to know everyone here, well, almost everyone there, you met with their professors there. candidates doctors of sciences associate professors with candidates these are the people they will be to death. that's when you are in the center of this, in general, not a very large city called lugansk, you are still standing there. broken houses from city

battles from arrivals there is a high-rise, if it is straight and the only actually high in the city, pieces of concrete have been torn out. here's how it went. and how close was it? and how close the nazis came then in the fourteenth year of the rule to the border to stop them. but do you understand how much it was all on a string and how much these people fought? in order to to become russia there is another thing i want to say, a whole series is being carried out now. measures to integrate higher education in new regions into the system of higher education and science in russia , so i would not recommend our wonderful political block, the block of political management, to look carefully at who from some higher educational

institutions goes there to give lectures, what kind of lectures. they read what values ​​they broadcast? why were these people sent there? tell people who kept diaries about how to kill them are going. and they send people. which a couple of times talk about the values ​​of tolerance. liberalism and so on why , how and who implements such programs? well , the last thing i wanted to say. by the way, in the center of luhansk there is a monument to the heroes of the civil war; it was built somewhere in the late twenties. it's very

interesting there. there is a bas-relief of the order of the red banner of the rsfsr, ukraine did not have its own market of the red banner of war but by the time this monument was being built. well , you can put the voice of the allied put it like that rsfsrerovsky there, and it is written once in the ussr they knew whose earth they understood part of the earth the whole problem is what the westerners are doing now. it is not that they have not yet deployed their military industry, they have deployed it, and not that they are afraid of the victim, they will start to be afraid hard when they have to fight to the last german. until the last pole, well, the glade of europeans, not quite people. well , the third grade is not marriage, but not people. the problem is that they are beginning to understand that it will not be possible to destroy us safely. here what the brush wants already he wants to win

safely without scratching the shell of the american egg. this is a problem, but sooner or later they will decide on a total war and the whole story with the so-called patriarch. e by bartholomew of constantinople is a running-in of the mechanisms for transferring a limited war. the west against russia of a hybrid war is a total war, therefore they are morally ripening to fight with us totally. if you continue kissanger, and then i liked a little something else there. i looked it up that kitty he also spoke about the breakup the russian federation, however, set the conditions that this time it will give a patsas, a vacuum that others can take advantage of, that is, the collapse of russia cannot be like this, uncontrollable, it must be controlled in the american now, so to

speak, mainstream. i would say there are three main areas. well, the first direction is presented, of course, conditionally it is albabs. yes, this is the person who is talking about the fact that russia needs to be destroyed, it is necessary to wage the war to the end in ukraine, to weaken the pressure on all fronts. in short, the collapse of russia and the point in any in any direction, the second it has less influence. on naturally. although there are such figures. what are here? well, i was attracted by another article that was published in the cavity. everything to clean it, and published by thomas lynch this man is from the national defense university, which also speaks. yes, ukraine needs help, but still there is a question that one cannot overdo it, overdo it, because there will be negative consequences for russia, a country located in eleven time zones. this is the mass of territories in uncontrolled decay. this place is simply occupied by china

, therefore, either it is necessary to synchronize the collapse of russia and china or go the other way, that is, go for regime change in the russian federation. this is not a war, as such, not a hot war using military equipment, even nuclear weapons, namely the collapse of russia along the way. well, in general, the formula was take sovereignty. as much as you want, this was the form, if only 10 more years. this lasted for zero years. i think we would come to sovereignty there 405 subjects. and so on, perhaps even quasi-political unity would have been preserved, but there would have been no non-economic, military or other unity. here they have what sits in their heads, the third direction is the smallest. it's a military military like, uh, the same general miles or his tonya is happy to kenneth his counterpart in the uk who say you guys can

do whatever you want. but here, let's still reduce the military rhetoric a little, because we are now in direct conflict with russia over full of full conflict. this is indeed a nuclear collision. we can't go. it is acceptable to me, because now we do not have such opportunities that will give us the opportunity to hit russia and not get an answer, not get an answer that will put an end to us all. here is the main idea. what is the main idea is to concentrate forces and means in europe, they will be pumped up if we use nuclear weapons, well, firstly, in ukraine we will use them on our territories. these are our people, these are the people who we want them to be our citizens. understand that now, even now , attacks on infrastructure began on october 10th. we don't hit the e, peaceful quarters, we don't drink, but this also causes

negative. who has the population. understand that, uh, i just understand correctly that the vlasov army was our people. they didn't have to shoot. there was no need for bandera, our people were not necessary. this is where the payment had to be shot. what is different, and these are peaceful civilians, peaceful civilians, people who are peaceful civilians, who run and they shout to the muscovite naked, which is joyful. and everyone is running and screaming, we will choose. maybe then we didn’t have to shoot at berlin either. we are the same, well, as in the same place we, by the way, speaking, it is necessary to take shots, here it’s necessary to take berlin, there weren’t our people, if not ours, maybe then east germany was berlin real anti-fascists. they were razed to the ground, all our people are just like that. when these people of ours are caught in a film, they return. guys in such a state that it is impossible to convey such direct people about how

that there is no need to do this. this must be done for sure. we need to stop testing our people. yes, there, of course, well, and that these are not our people, but what people live in the donetsk region now is occupied . but these are just not our people. here are our voronkov people, people in kiev started well in kiev. yes, seriously, right? see exactly how much you signed up. please write a list of ours to distinguish from the list of non-ours. it depends on who is walking, how he shoots and what he does? well, just understand, let them then, well, come out, then there is a hammer and sickle so that we can see. these are our people, we don't shoot. well then, andrey , there is no need to throw off illusions, not illusions, they ended long ago. you know, cain had a goalkeeper. well , it didn’t help alyo that he had illusions and so on, hit everything in the cities

to cause a migration wave, to weaken the e you district, but this is what these people are for a whole band, practically our people, who are now donetsk heap in peaceful quarters. this is what our people do, not ours absolutely. well, there are the people of kiev, there and sunchan, there and poltava. there were russian-speaking poles always good. that is, they raised it, you can fuck off. no people were found there. we don’t need to agree on the day of petrovich, because we will be de facto transferred to yurov, war, yes, and this is bad, so it’s good when you are ready for this war with nato for real. suggest that therefore let's now we will watch how they will kill us, this operation showed. in general, there are quite a few, yes, uh, different shortcomings of weapons in the same drones, because we originally

prepared a wide no other, skin type, stop, stop. we now have an advantage in strategic weapons, it is believed that yes, right. and in other types, was it considered that we have superiority or not? in which other types there is no conventionality, right. then why don't they use their advantages by fighting with what we realized is not so easy for us then, in my opinion, this is fucking logic. do you know how people there lay apples for the winter so that there are fresh fruits and then every day they go and look and what an apple with rottenness and they devour it, and so it turns out that they devour its rot all winter. maybe then we’ll wake up a little feeling to come and see what our advantage is , after all, calmly tell the west, guys, the topic is simple, that’s not an abstract red line, but specifically, we consider legitimate goals. that's it, that's it and that's what you want to try

flew. and we want to try the reverse blow, yes, survived, because victory begins when you are not afraid of your own actions. and when you see that you are everything increase time. and every time you give in to you and they start to put pressure on you. bye bye. what kind of response to a blow, can they have, how can they answer, how they also have nuclear weapons correctly, which how they work, how much more effective than ours they understand, that this is also to check how much more effectively our triad works against them , because you offer to seriously check. how effective are their tanks, their missiles, their air defense system, their one and a half million people, which they will now take from europe and go to us fight convention. that's when we will seriously check, when the attack on the crimea will take place, when the strike on st. petersburg will pass on moscow, and then we will finally give strategists. this is offer no, i offer this. i don't suggest this. bye bye the concepts of our

commander-in-chief of the military leadership. who told you that it's enough second? they are not not on a new level of confrontation. we may rethink our strategy. well, it hasn't been well reviewed yet. and when they are revised, then you will immediately say everything, that's for sure. we've been waiting for this for a long time maybe half a step forward and think about it. what could be that rejection is disgusting. this this is bad, of course, well, let's just have an ordinary opponent. it is look. we knew well from the beginning of the tanks they have more correctly with us. well, they have a billion. how many trillion billion population and trillion budget are there. well, well, well, because they can put everything they need, and then we will do what? if we do that, if we move on to a military confrontation of this level, we will apply so we will already apply to it moved on. how can you not see it. here on the front line. there is no doubt who we are fighting, there is nato in full growth and not only

all their intelligence, not only the system of precise strike. yeah, all this will appear and soon the rest will turn out. let's wait for it to show up. but then yes, how many more thousands of russian people must be donated to make it good and then fuck. well, as we are considered, we bear less losses. just don’t explain why they don’t oppose now, for example, some western tanks will appear there soon. why do they think that they will appear, please, schultz now stated that you do not want to deliver so said that he said that we do not want to deliver alone and we will be the first to act alone agreed they will deliver everything return the memory

dissociative amnesia does not remember what happened to him and who he is the brightest events of life to find a true friend.