say a special thank you. they allowed us to greatly reduce the distance between us. of course, they would have to, well, there. in march, curtail, and it would be better not to start at all , well, start negotiations. well , long, but not stupidly. they did it. on the other hand, they also don’t have enough time, but they shortened the distance and said, we

are participating, we won’t let you win russians we won’t , but won’t, right? well, okay, well, you made your move by pawning 100 billion. you trained someone there for the glory of guns. well, the move is very powerful several districts of the kharkov region and a competent withdrawal of our troops to advantageous positions near kherson without loss. notice, by the way, the difference in making military-political decisions, because we saved people, and they put a thousand a day under bakhmut there. and here are some of their pieces of iron. well flying past maintains morale. with these losses, too, by the way, the difference should be taken into account. well, they did. they are this move and now they are waiting with some horror. and what will happen next? here's what's

next, 'cause our turn will be one more shortening the distance, in principle, we were not in a hurry. well, i think that maybe it 's not so bad that this distance is shrinking, because, of course, it will be decided. everything will be face to face with the americans. everything else has almost no value it has. well, as it were, at its level, yes, that is, each level of the event, at each level, is very important, nothing should be missed, but you need to keep the entire pyramid, because at the top of this pyramid is the clarification of our relations with the united states. without it at all nothing will happen, nothing at all. so we must understand that, in principle, we are moving to this point. and we have chosen this path, as there is absolutely no alternative, that's absolutely everything that

i said about 80 years of war for world domination. why am i here in your studio has often been argued very harshly that no cold war. we have not lost the proof of this, i continue now directly , because if we lost it, then, well, there would be no spare parts left of us, there would be no one to argue with at all. this is what it means to lose the cold war. 80 years with different maneuvers, therefore, it is necessary to proceed from the fact that everything will be resolved at the point of clarification of relations between us americans. and i think that in this situation we will come to this point rather quickly. china, of course, is watching, it is determined there on the whole matter. they don't have it yet. although who knows, no one reported to me, though, this is my speculation, maybe

we will see something there, but if everything in history between a global power that holds the whole world, has a gigantic economy and all that, is very strange, here all these here on the tower and a small regional gas station, whose economy does not reach two percent. yes, and that one has already been torn apart twice during this time. it turns out everything will be between these two entities, because e is not important in this clarification. what is your turnover for services? and how many trillions of dollars you can print, it doesn’t really matter in this clarification, if you made the right strategic bet, and i’ll tell you that in the eighteenth year, when they gave birth over cartoons. i understood, then listening to

the president's message, which was within the framework of his election campaign and for me personally. i think that for the vast majority of our citizens, this report of the president made his entire election campaign for this period no pr there, he didn’t need anything else, he worked and made this message, where everything was shown here, therefore, i think that the bet has been placed. she led a bunch of vague, very specific results, and these results are needed only for one thing for this phenomenon between us and, uh, america and the question that there will be no world domination. here dmitry gave a very accurate rethinking of the clause. and i think that after all, we are probably the only generation that has lived in

relative peace for so long, because how did the world turn out at that time was by no means peaceful, that is, it was blazing, the afghan war, the iraqi war, two chechen wars tajikistan karabakh well then you can list a lot, where i don’t say there about the tragedy of yemen, but virtual world of american popcorn. it was perceived as something distant. but if you look, then the natural state for the world is unfortunately war. and by and large, politics is a means of temporary respite for the accumulation of forces before the next military battle. that is, what you are talking about, yes, another stalin quote is just here, which, referring to the ferocious ruz, drew and said, we can be proud of ourselves, because we brought peace to the european continent for at least 50 years, said in

1945 was 50 years old in 1995 , yugoslavia mikhailovich went on a basis. well, i kind of don’t know the details, you can argue with dima, but i completely agree with him. now i will say one thing, which in a sense may be some dissonance. in no way does she implore the exploits of those people who are at the front today, but she nevertheless describes the reality. from the point of view of the alignments that are taking shape in the world today, the war in ukraine is a small regional conflict. in the sense that the decision on it will be taken in a completely different place on completely different principles. this is actually. these are the very negotiations between the us and russia that were discussed. and by the way, i remind you that i explained many years ago that the real share of russia's gdp

in the global economy is not one and a half percent, but about eight percent, but no one is listening. yes, since everyone reads, like you liberal textbooks paraphrase comrade stalin, if democracy is the power of the american people, then liberalism is the power of the bankers, when bankers write textbooks turns out. that's what happens to the question of the war. it is well known that the arab political philosophy of the middle ages explained that if there is no war, the dynasty completely degenerates in three generations. and, by the way, the corresponding saying. there are so many countries in the world, but only they, of course, later than the arabs - they composed it. so here's the key problem that the united states of america has, what problem do we have? we understand the economy there, we have a comprador part of the elite, etc. and here, respectively, they have

what a problem, but they have the problem is that the instrument of control over the world broke down in 2008, they cannot wait for their system to crumble and they must make fairly quick decisions. unlike. that's when we discussed the situation in ukraine somewhere in april-may. and here we also discussed the situation in ukraine. i said that we have a colossal advantage over the west. and we can afford to wait longer than they do. now, they can't afford to wait any longer. i write macroeconomic reviews every week, and i see the numbers, people, how would everyone look at these figures, and everyone sees them sometimes in the news in a breakdown. but here, to watch every day is a little who does, if you watch every day, you can see no improvement in the economy

in the west. no, yes, they have slightly improved with inflation. they write about it everywhere and nowhere do they write that their retail sales, for example, have fallen sharply. and this is a very important indicator from the point of view. so to speak, people's attitudes. well, and so on and so forth, and for this reason they are. they want to negotiate. but they have two hopes, and one of them they not used once. one of them is to bribe cast parts of the enemy state so that she surrenders her country. that's how gorbachev did it in 1989 , he surrendered his country. and that's the first thing, and we're good at it. we see how it happens, he is the instructions that they give out to this. that's how it's runaways, right? they are all in general, more or less known, what they want and how they

want, the main goal is to overthrow putin for a completely understandable reason, and, accordingly, the second thing. they really hoped that it would collapse russian economy. not collapsed they do not understand. why? well, as if we have the old economic theory, political economy, but they no longer have it, so they do not understand this in their model. we should have collapsed, but that only means that their model doesn't describe the economy. well, thank god to us, that for this reason our key task. today it does not allow our own. this is what we can do today, we have all the resources for this. it is, of course, desirable to move towards economic growth, make rubles an investment currency, etc. and etc. but i have a strong suspicion. here are all of these procedures. well, after all, the intervals are average urgent. that is, there will be an effect. well, at best in a year and a half. and i

have a feeling that the issues will be resolved before there is no year in the average states of america. well, about the european union, we are not talking about the dead or is it good or nothing except rights? yes, that's all. well, actually, these are the dead. here we have a specialty here, yes, but also about this means of buildup. here's another one i caught. e themselves on thought very interesting. here are the people. we must have people to learn, of course, to read and remember all this. today i am reading a review. lukashenka did not succumb to putin’s pressure and refused to retreat into the war, and that’s all, putin lost his joy in general, which means that the leading western newspapers really wrote to the bbc. i think something like that if i got wound up, and then i understand when i was at the dkb. all these events are the position of alexander e grigorievich there they

went out with the same headings lukashenka is completely under putin belarus has completely surrendered putin absolutely controls lukashenka and one and the other, but people who are reading this. no, well, here, as if without hesitation, do not agree yes, they are worried. this is national debauchery, right, on which they are correct and but they write it not only for us, but also for their transfer of the dash dot changed places. yes, but for us today it is fundamental that we should work not so much for their society. first, we will not get through to society. they cut off. secondly, society does not make decisions . and we must work today as western elites. yeah, this is a fundamentally important thing, so to speak, roughly speaking, we should go out. no, we owe them ideas,

they should doubt their positions. well, uh, what they wrote about belarusism. well, it's hard to imagine what they write, belarus who hello, as i don't know, the last prostitutes in a brothel cry out for morality. why are they dishonest? they have nowhere to put a test on this europe, well, yes then

the phenomenon is very interesting to me. what is happening in europe as it degrades faster? what could have been imagined? their troops into sweden well, neutral. the swiss are immediately asked for chocolate and watches brought by the swiss are always

scoffed at, who often brought chocolate. and where your halberd is not, the northern italians, just like that, the belgians will bring chocolate forever. i don’t know what nafig is a lezgi tradition, within the framework. must be brought. well , sweden’s last nato is no longer there, and there won’t be any for that sweden, turkey told them, you didn’t give us this, which they said would not be a fan. these are all bureaucratic legal formalities, and the decision that nato troops will be on the territory of sweden they have taken. go get official permission does not work in finland yes

, well, the army, no, it seemed to you that switzerland is neutral, like a neutral country. they regard their troops as sanctions yes join the eu sanctions as they send their troops as part of a military alliance against another state on the territory of a third state. here, switzerland too many holes, and i don't know, here the competition between the poles and the british of stupidity is going on with varying degrees of success. countries

tell me where these degenerates are raised by pets, they have a nursery there, after this idiot nothing to be surprised. who was after him the chocolate minister of foreign affairs, this is probably, probably, they already have it with british politicians. this is a different disease of cretinism at the genetic level, one infects another. well , how can a man who was the minister of foreign affairs? breeds such nonsense, it is in addition to the fact that he said that it is impossible to speak with putin on the phone, now he is

impossible in latin america the dermatologist spoke. that's the degree, and he's not a former yet. it's even worse. it's even worse. when, when he no longer left his position,

he can afford it, but he is now and that's how his office presents his conversation with the leader. negative attitude to putin's threats

but this is not enough. turns out he disagreed. russia's aggression, the war in ukraine, and to add also, as it was confirmed in the resolution of twenty they say that russians look at a book, see a film, they don't know how to read. when i read the chinese version, there there is nothing like it, nothing on the twenty they said yes war. it is necessary to stop the war, there was not a word against russia. it is in their inflamed fantasies, but they believe in it, they repeat it. why is it important? and what to say?

there will be no influence here it is not clear what he meant. here is a chinese, here it is not clear, therefore, it is not yet clear that it is impossible to fulfill. but what surprises me most of all is that this is what nato leaders see. one of the biggest threats to nato from whom from china what a threat from nato to china and should we to counter the threat to china, the most important thing is that they believe in all this, but if you read all their

messages, what is underneath them they are all concerned. m after the end of the war, as they call it in ukraine and what they care about, when the war ends, the defeat of russia military operations will end russia completely. that's how we will arrange the world in any way, because we have not collapsed head another option theoretically. well, when politicians say this, i understand, if professionals say this, they say, look, there may be such an option, for example,

it won't be incredible. well, what will happen if russia does not lose. well, do not say in the game this option, do not consider this can not be, because this can not be. it's like kozma ducts. there is no such animal. there is no such thing that russia will win in ukraine. no, there cannot be a touch. i talk to him behind his back. back

beat like a united states grandsman here's this congressman who said, but i didn't understand. and why the united states does not attack russia, indeed, in three days we will defeat them , exactly this man. deputy congress world i do not understand the natural selection. well, of course, i look, but from they press the buttons. after how much time they will be destroyed is often enough that the psychiatric clavicle.

idiot, you forgot that the united states, after 45 years, has not won a single war. and they didn't win world war ii either. well, i still want to continue the conversation about the family , let's talk about dads, because i have something else to tell in addition. well, it’s interesting, of course, what is now remembered about pius the twelfth, and the pope, who in basically, hmm is considered to be well aware that the barbarossa plan is being developed by the way, just like for me it was news. i have already said about this, that he also fell, it turns out that he was involved in the development of this plan and also took part in this, but this is a separate issue. but the vatican in those

years is the end of e, the beginning of the forties and the end of the thirties. they worked very closely with various organizations. e in germany this is very important to understand. i'm just now moving on from the past to the present, and work. you with they were mainly specialists from the department from the department of himmler, in particular, specifically dealt with all issues and relations with the vatican, calton bruno, this was his department. it was his direction in which they had to work. they worked long enough. we well know the story of how they refused to help jewish refugees. what role did they play in the holocaust? i don't use it now . now i once again recall the role of the vaticans comes to the power of the hitlers, yes, when voting. in somehow she called this one them parliament, but there were not enough votes, and therefore, the decisive vote in riga belonged to us in this vote of the catholic party of germany, which was very strongly represented and

then promised to provide financial and tax benefits. the vatican put pressure on the leaders of this german catholic party to give their votes in the voting should be yes, yes, hitler well, i wanted to say at the end of my speech. i will return to the german catholics. yes , everything is absolutely correct, and approximately, starting from the forty-third year of the department himmler began to deal with the question of what they would do after the war, and they had two options, one option, they lose, and the second option they still thought that they would win if they won. i already told you there was an idea of ​​himmler, there was a general who was involved in the plans, mm, which were called a united germany, a united europe. excuse these plans. until now. they lie in the archives, it is very difficult to get to them, but these plans, in principle, are, let's say, such a tracing-paper future united europe as we know it.

now it was developed from the plan of the department of hymnblers, and the second was the direction. it was already engaged in this content personally, when they began to understand that they would have to hide from those people who they really needed, and they began to build what we now call rat trails. these rat trails led through the vatican . nu-kartendur bruner had many different paths. how was it possible and how was it necessary to take out, uh, the highest ranks of the ss, uh, from the police, from the gestapa, from politics, from the economy. they developed these plans. they were coordinated, including at various levels. uh, the vatican took a large or direct part in this one of one tanks, and now i don’t remember exactly his last name, but it was a man who, a, then swam out after the war.

we need you only young 50.000 hour 3 hours minimum wage to return your youth. find a true friend i know what the same concept i share fenechuhay 10 species of the season.