ah, now we are paying, probably, including for the manic obsession with the idea that it is possible to make friends and unite the capitalist socialist system into one. uh, what, in fact , was born in the minds of some representatives of the soviet intelligentsia, that at the end of the sixties, but in fact, this is actually this idea, it was by no means new in essence. it was a continuation of that european disease, which was infected. even at first, the russian high society, i think, probably from the first, by the way, about which there is a good aphorism that peter and when he cut a window to europe, he forgot it was glazed, and it was definitely winter in the yard along with important technical innovations. there perfections, er, penetrated various and destructive influences. first of all, those who welcomed the total division of russian society since those times, and it turned out that already in the 18th century. eh, such a whole class of russian foreigners was born, who even at home

spoke french, well, there later english german angel clubs in the xix century, then already in the middle of the 19th century went with portlets. afilov with westerners arguing about the fate of russia where to go and it turned out that we really found ourselves in the face of this total disease, a european draw, about which nikolai danilevsky wrote 200 years, which we are celebrating just this year, that this disease can prevent in general, uh, the historical development of the entire russian people, well, the russian people in the context of the entire russian empire and, uh, this geopolitical space. and we saw this one side dishes and nothing when really. thoughts were heard somewhere, either read in some french novels, or in the works of german political theorists. they so firmly settled in the head that a person no longer understood whether it was his thought or a thought that had flown in from somewhere, an apology, and the same the most was. here is e hmm a fetish, and we got convergence just this class of convergents. which subsequently

transformed into a class of effective managers, well, as a matter of fact. well , indeed, for whom the highest value there was uh, there was a wad of dollars, but it's real. here is the end result the end result, but to the policy of soft power that, uh, turn your geopolitical opponent not even into your uh, under control, but in fact into a kind of tool. e that for ages 18 effective managers took greyhound puppies. yes? how are you different puppies? what do you think of the case files there? try to steal railways, listen, all the largest capitals of the russian empire are made exclusively on state orders of the russian empire. every single one the story is less, how much and then, when we speak in europe, nothing, and what language alexander vasilyevich suvorov spoke, how hard it was for him in his native russian, was given about, by the way, we speak classes of europeans here. they were such europeans. yes, the russian army

then in russian science. how much did europeans and europeans really imagine the empress, mother empress catherine ii no, she was more in cut, but not in principle, but there was one difference, they really stole a lot of money, but there was one very serious difference. most of this money remained in the country. this is a very serious difference. they mostly stayed here, where menshikov built houses. bought a business here. here they are, so to speak, on these including. they built , so to speak, some kind of new factories there, in short, here, and now the properties of this era are that all this money goes here. the palace has now built a museum there. now, if he had built a palace in france, sergey alexandrovich i'm just illustrating the cote d'azur in the 19th century. what was the name no, not yet the leftovers, please, directly could have been

specially minted e with a price in frank, but for tourists and pay e-e dali and water in baden-baden and moreover, even immunoil kahn was filed by the russian empire for 2 years, campaigns of the seven years war. he's not from that. yes, well, i'm a little different , namely, the mental change of the mental e approach from the changes in thinking that is now happening already postmodern, but in the west. why is it now demonizing russia so much and actually promoting the conflict in ukraine in the information field as e, an enterprise of a universal scale, why do we need this tool zelensky, in fact, sovereignty in it is just zero without a wand, but it is used as a tool by the same functions, there is a macron-scholz barrel and further down the list in order to create information loaded field about and above this sauce there is a total

degradation and dismantling of europe as a systemic object and, accordingly, there is a complete re-education and reformatting of its own population. 'cause they need a new transhumanist man accordingly, here you are, sensory university, uh, released new words of transhumanist. for example, bleach was canceled therefore, well, this is actually the process is global. and for this, of course, it is necessary to create an image of the enemy. excuse me, but what was different in the 19th century? eh, when there was a war for bulgaria , the eastern question was resolved, all european newspapers, well, the american press then was only not so globally russian, the cunning of the russian barbarity of the russian capture. we are opening now in some there uh spectrum uh, financial. times abdin in one, respectively, as always happens when you start to fight, by the way, here is a dispute between dmitrys in an interesting way. one of the outside players got in the way. glinkin just said the united states could not. but it is the same volume to provide

assistance to kiev. today i decided to go to afghanistan, which, by the way, is a very profound phrase. it shows the justice of our president, that they prepared for this, prepared consciously prepared in advance so that all these phrases about unprovoked and unfair when they talk about our liberation campaign only shows that the first emotion was merkel who said that the minsk agreements were sham deals, so in fact she should be brought before the court, because the dead confessed that the un security council was wrong no one has ever admitted to making a sham deal by defrauding the united nations security council therefore, in essence. merkel should be convicted and thrown into jail. one phrase let me just peacocks case. he is not talking about money. not about money, of course. he says that at some

point, if it started in ukraine , they would help like that, we would very quickly come to an agreement with very local interests. so we won’t be happy to name them and a similar situation would arise, of course, why do we believe so? damn, first of all, what he said to glinkin by and large . now i said to a chinese comrade, while a special war is going on, an operation in ukraine urgently take care of taiwan, because america does not have enough strength at the same time, helping ukraine and taiwan blinkin is pushing the chinese comrades with a cardinal decision. accordingly, uh, of course, and uh, indeed, we can probably agree that now the process of reformatting the world is accelerating and, uh, and as i see it, the united states is now slowly changing its

entire tactics, that is, uh, according to essence of the matter. now the collapse of globalization has followed. and it is possible that something will now go back to isolationism, creating pockets of chaos throughout eurasia at the same time, dragging technologies from europe to things, uh, returning their industries, including those from china, who have led and, accordingly, covering their political position with a privileged position, will simply er, gradually sow. this is precisely the chaos throughout the eurasian space. here we will cope with this world fire, uh, which our anglo-saxon strategic opponents are fanning. this will be dealt with, first of all , here, strengthened from the environment, refined and concentrated for a long time, but chaos can be fought only by structure. structure means that within the country there must be a different level of organization, but also the level of your own structuring, which can be transferred, of course, which can be transferred to the external,

if you do not have an internal structure, you can not project it outward, but house to america this will not help us, but you are already creating there chaos, there is destructuring. here alexander will not solve the basic tasks, at all, three statements by vladimir putin, mmm, interested me. well, the first is, of course, the spoils. after all, he said, absolutely clear phrase sounded clear, we will destroy them we will destroy them and this is very much correlated with what today's german newspapers write about, which really say, and what is this, and really these are the systems that need to be there. insert what they will give and whether it will happen in this way e, whether the situation will develop in such a way that in the shortest possible time the russians will destroy them. they write about it openly, the russians will destroy them, and then, as it were, germany will be next in line. indeed,

germany will be next in line, because i do not military, but as far as i understand, in addition to the german one here, they have already delivered one piece to ukraine more. now no one can deliver anything, but germany does not have these iris. they have not yet been able to build for themselves and do not know yet when they got there, they did not show anything at zero. yes, this is the only copy. she they, in principle, they set. well, where these tests are not necessary. yes, i can continue. how much their activity is less i was silent. dima it's me i appreciated how strong their actions are us. i think that in fact it is really valid in germany. this is also well understood, because no one has tried them yet, but one copy has been delivered to ukrainians. and they just put it in the form of a test, so all this is such a moment with which no one knows what will happen, how it will move and most

likely, germany, but gently, but still will start from participating here in handing over their petri, they also have several batteries that they were ready, would be ready to hand over. this, by the way, those which they took at one time from turkey there were four batteries, they took them for themselves. there has been a long dispute now. here, they, it seems, would like to pass them on, but i think that they will not be, therefore, this conversation is kissing the hand and so on and so forth, i think that this is about nothing vladimir putin quite clearly it, uh, it said and here's the german mm, the first german first channel of television rd about these dances. as you said, they wrote the failed dancer, but this was the last step of ukraine's desperation, meaning, in general, zelensky's entire trip to washington a and hmm one more thing. one more remark. uh, putin, which i am extremely interested in this nord stream-2. well, the fact that russia e has

no explosions on nord stream has nothing to do with the two. well, personally. i was convinced from the first day, moreover, i want to remind you that in fact there are questions that are known to everyone. this is a question about death in 3 weeks. before that, petra grizzima. she is the person who led the maintenance of nord stream 2. and it’s still unclear what happened there, but he just flew over this thread this and uh, the participation of american ships that were in this zone of this last information from two incomprehensible. well-known courts that did not pass without sign identification, all this is all this exists, that it is a resident of russia. in principle, this is a signal for me that some further steps will probably follow. here i have a question. and since russia is not normally allowed to this investigation, but nevertheless, in fact, sabotage was committed on the property of russia, and who in general is in the world

community has the right to conduct such an independent investigation, who has the right? where can you file, and your claims and who should be responsible, because, as it seems to me, in russia it has the full right and should use this right to file the appropriate claims. this is gigantic money. this is a gigantic question that concerns both image and politics. who is he? i'm not at all sure the european court of justice has nothing to do with this. who can sue who can make claims, and claims you need to present it, because in fact this question is about nord stream 2. uh, well, in my understanding, this is waging war outside the territory of sovereign states. now we will have no one to sue at all, because the americans have just introduced an amendment to the budget, and according to which it is somehow difficult to formulate, they give themselves the us senate

voted for the inclusion of amendments in the draft budget, allowing to confiscate the frozen assets of businessmen from russia in favor of ukraine to canada, yes. yes, that is, it just an official form of law on the right to plunder, uh, which, in fact, all this means, yes, it means that american entrepreneurs who have something in russia can say goodbye to their property as a result of retaliation forever. but here it is customary to decide this, but here they will definitely be accepted, there is no doubt, but here they have more of this property than ours there, well, there is more to trade in dollars, of course, this, by the way, is obvious. well , the third. here you mentioned merkel but in a strange way hmm to me it seems to me that merkel should be blamed not only for confessing, but for lying in a lie that

she lied to the united nations. here she is today with yevgeny yanych, there was a very interesting conversation about merkel. i think that she can still be accused of that it was she who initiated the russophobia that we are talking about, i will explain why. well, i won’t talk about lies from this issue many times. she uh, she's our man. she was brought up in d . she is in the communist youth union, that is, she, in principle, lived in the same ideology in which we all got into a completely different hmm on a different path and becoming chancellor. and even before that, she was in an ideal situation on the one hand. she did not have any past of her parents that would connect her with nazism on the other hand. she had a great command and understood that such a socialist communist

ideology was connected with it. and when she entered into everything, it was she who did not feel that the guilt felt by the germans, that is, she had nothing to apologize to the russian people for. that is, if e salt, you can say that your ancestors fought there, and e, therefore, they have a certain guilt. and you have to ask for forgiveness. and when you laugh or when you say something else, then it does n’t go anywhere at all, then merkel has no freedom from this. she is completely free to communicate with her past and you are there, but this model of behavior. eh, then they took this russophobia. uh, russian liberals. that's absolutely. this is the same model of russophobia. that is, they were actually brought up in that past. in which we were brought up and we all separated ourselves from this, having adopted a completely completely different ideology and became. uh, many years ago , many years ago, well, about

the time i was in germany, they began propaganda in the west. we are now asking questions and talking about a completely different russia. and what they don’t understand or don’t know there, sergey alexandrovich said money there. here they were talking. here exactly what sergei alexandrovich was talking about, they were talking about russians. yes, they are corrupt, they have corruption. they drink never talked about the russians, what they said, they talked, they talked about money, and alexander did not talk about money. they just talked about it. you didn't record. yes, no, no, yes, it’s precisely in this regard, i understand, yes, alexander, roughly speaking, they were those people who sold everything here, they passed off as russians, in general they exist and this is what they created for themselves such an image, such as the russians used changed over time. well, the last e about russophobia. so we say, well, how

is there some kind of flanders, they can talk about russia like ah, listen, you know what it is, probably, maybe not not a normal example, but still they will bring a flantre somewhere is located between denmark, somewhere in the same in the same, well, not far, belgium is belgium, well, it is nearby. denmark is a little higher norway , listen to what we will talk about. oh, how can they talk about their attitude towards people or towards russians or how can they treat anyone at all. remember the unfortunate giraffe marius, remember marzhiha freya. remember these unfortunate monkeys who were recently shot in sweden they don’t give a damn about everything they just don’t give a damn about everything for them there is no living being, and for them russians are living beings that can be treated in the same way as they treated these unfortunate animals in zoo, so when they talk about something, they

carry it over their whole lives for them, this is where they are. and it's good everything that exists around. if needed, split giraffe, mourn other animals. if the monkey interferes with us, let's shoot them. well, i think you know this, here's an old story about that rabbit that german children had to raise and then when he grows up. we don't give a damn to them a rabbit, well, we didn't beat them here, but we didn't butcher schoolchildren. yes, with us they did not understand something. we are not a rabbit. we bear paws, we wave, bashkat these ads now, after that we will continue with the new line-up. gobble up gennady

petrovich or just gena the gardener