thank you very much for talking about the meanings that we carry, then they expect meanings from us. if now, and i will step back a little, then what the americans have now done, that is, they are trying to do. at least, they perfectly understood that there would be no victory on the battlefield. that is, you need to do it now, so that somehow the restructuring of the world that has begun is on the brakes, how can you slow it down, so that god forbid putin does not look like

the beneficiary of everything that happened, so that russia does not come out of there. with great authority because if she comes out of there with great authority, then the world that swayed from the west, it will not just sway from the west, it will simply concentrate around russia, it will require the west to present bills and pay these bills for many many years, when the west was brought up as a colony to to all this rest of the world? what will we bring into this world? what will we bring in terms of the new economic system? can we, as it was said here, ensure faster economic growth in our

country than they have, which is absolutely guarantee our victory if our economy grows faster than their economy, all this is victory. this means that outside our borders there will be a queue for business, whether it be europe, whether it is with asia, it does not matter. and here i am, to be honest. i do not see this leadership in foreign policy. i still see this. well , yes, here we are, we are right. so what? and where is the actual offensive action on the foreign policy front. what do we think? we, they will constantly attack us ideologically, culturally, no matter how we we will just sit here, well, from time to time we will say some caustic words there

. this is an ideological move. yes, offensive action. this is what to do action? what does it mean that we should speak openly? to what kind of world are we leading the world and what are we standing for and i agree with this, but this is a declaration. and here is an action that is good. we are now looking at the president very clearly formulated it there. yes, what kind of world do we lead and we want, but we need to do something, that is, to go to some kind of podium. i am not in the plan to question. i mean that i can repeat the movement to do what i have said many times to withdraw our diplomats from western europe and send them to the east. this is already being done. and this is what can be

done. probably this is not visible, as you can see, if you look at the number of embassies, just here you can see a sharp decrease in the number of diplomatic employees of western relatives, but here we then just leave this clearing. i'm just thinking maybe there's some other action that we're not working on from within the races. you just need to loosen it from the inside, you understand, yes, it is along the diplomatic line, that is, i don’t know, there is a fundamental expansion, there is the sco brix, that is, it’s just that what purely diplomatic things are diplomatic, but this is a diplomatic economy. let's talk loudly about the new global financial system. after all, what are they doing now. they are now they will try to stop this digital dollar again. uh, here is the degradation of the centrality of the united states in this system. ok then. we can state it. and who should declare us in this case, it is necessary

to explain the partners and do it. and what technologies do we have, what partners will go with us? why do they need? how not to read, you can officially say pokhazinsky there, but in our country the volume of the economy is not so interesting as to attract. let's say yuan in our zone. that is, we can stick to him, relatively speaking, but he can’t stick to us, guys unjustified risks, i will lose everything. that is, this system is such that as soon as we win, right? here, as soon as military victories are yes, then, a different zone of influence, then a different idea, but now to say, do not have military successes, but we see how our closest allies and partners in the past will begin to waver. they are already hesitating. naturally , this will not happen without military successes, but military successes will be one way or another, because the country is mobilizing. you know

, you still need to go about them, for example, diplomatic movement. we come out and demand the removal of the sanctions of north korea well, for example, yes, i don’t think so, the federation council says exactly what you say, i don’t think so at all. well, we need to build new logistics corridors, so we need to get out, because if we say that we do not recognize the regime. i think the resolution should be changed. well, here in general the topic is so interesting, in general, that there is diplomacy in modern times, of course. this is interesting, we need platforms, we need topics, and we need to create allies. well, remember, i will support dmitry. when he now said that there is diplomacy nowadays. this is to write notes and also work with the people, but again, diplomacy has always been a raccoon to write, and it

works with the people. you never know, that's why people's diplomacy was called so little. it was in the soviet union that completely different departments conceived one thing, but you wrote, as we remember, at the same time in the thirties. yes, but he worked with the people in another way, he says, very often anti-people structures, such as ino, worked with the people. well, they understood well, just to that question. that's just the next time you understand how it was. it's the same exactly, when we were surrounded on all sides was even weaker. people's diplomacy plus all sorts of other diplomacy. we just need to take now, just a gigantic experience, when russia had when soviet russia was in the circle of the enemy, and we need to use this experience inefficiently to pull out all the mechanisms and then make money. no, i'm just in development. i'm not arguing, you can argue. no, it’s possible to argue that no one knows anything, but we

need to move him, because we still work out very little, for example, religious diplomacy. here is the most here its relevance increases. look, if we talk about religious diplomacy, they celebrated in kazan in the summer. 100,000 years i think, yes, uh, i could be wrong. yes, yes, they came to live in russia everyone see the key side of the islamic world. the largest country in the islamic world is now waiting. how will she enter the world that after china will be the united states for me. we just have everything well and well worked out. i am short now. i want to show a fragment of carlson's tucker that draws attention to what we are officially not paying enough attention. he

criticizes in a completely different way. zelensky here. listen to zelensky there were a few people who didn't listen, including us florida and lauren from colorado and when they didn't start they did n't applaud. they learned first hand what happens to people who dare not applaud, and i quote for all who refused. we need to know reported that you are not applauded. explain on tv to get the message across to viewers or see sources of messages. i think one more thing i would like ask, this is the number of members of congress almost all republicans who did not come

tonight and who came we refused to clap and wanted to know why it was for two reasons, first, you are a civil servant we have the right to know these things. you must tell us. if you serve in congress, what was the reason? do you love putin or are you just against democracy? or is there something else we have a right to know. we have the right to know your thoughts. you thought you were a free man capable of making decisions on your own. you can love him hate. whoever you want to be free do you love putin why don't you applaud the man who banned the christian denomination the man who arrests the priests carries out the plan of the monastery seizes the church the opposition media declares illegal the political problems that advocates his own. the main political opponents is what they say about her. the absurdity is that they describe it as the

opposite of democracy. there is no democracy in ukraine, obviously the ban on the christian denomination, shut up but he did so why such hysteria carlson speaks about this about our religious leaders officially and is silent. this schismatic bartholomew fucking captain of the turkish army, be quiet. he is not silent. he issued such an article against us, but now an attack on christianity has begun, and he is silent about it . he wrote against us, by the way, but we practically do not understand this topic. i am talking about a high level now, not about ours. well, in principle, it should sound like we should constantly pull out this topic. and we will find a large

number of like-minded people. no need let's go modest france yes, for now, of course, what carlson says so, as long as tucker carlson is alive in america, is a living democracy. e. i think that now, since we are talking about religion, it's time today, december 25, is christmas uh in the western world uh, congratulate them uh on christmas and you know, there is a difference e summing up, but a special feeling of love of the world of sympathy. here i read their press. i didn't see anything like that at all. they are not only uh, there in ukraine tourniquet these perform pagan rites. they are in the soul for this period. yes, probably just some kind of colossal hatred was raised earlier by this abolition of russia - this is russophobia and belarusianophobia. they destroy their

humanity. this must be an amazing christmas for the first time in many years, in which the world enters with such bitterness. after all, they are fighting for the past world. they do not offer a picture of the future, even in this article kisinji has already voiced his not his many times. well, signed. them. in the same place, what is offered, we will return, we will return to where it was a warm bath was good and everything was fine like that it won't be, therefore yes we have to offer a picture of the future. and you know, it probably requires such a broad sketch right away, maybe this task doesn’t follow. small steps, maybe small, but effective ones that you show us at the front. you show us when you go from there, this is a specific person in a specific place. here is an armata for you. here are the living conditions for you, and this is the picture

of what is happening there. we do not require you. give us harsh plans for this and wrong it and don't get there part of you don't know, we'll think so upstairs, yes, but in fact it is. here, look, putin and lukashenko met for just a few days , the president of belarus is in star city preparing a belarusian cosmonaut. yes, and launching into orbit he meets our russian-belarusian cosmonaut oleg novitsky, and they are planning the next flights. this means that there is a plan for the future. this is a demonstration of confidence that we have a future. and if we have a future and on it is from the plans, then we will have victory. this is a fundamentally important moment, which, of course, symbolizes many others, as far as diplomacy is concerned, the correct offensive tactics, probably, maybe the strategy, and it also consists of small steps. here, look. what a high dynamics has become. meetings in the post-soviet space one after

another csto. i am an eu union state, now there will be an informal cis summit and putin is not going to the big twenty, but all the post-soviet summits are attended and come to him. well, sometimes they write. where is result? that's why they didn't declare the case as a result of the case and diplomacy often, er, is to constantly maintain this contact of an ally must be kept at arm's length. maybe even a little closer to shake that hand in time, after all. let's face it, a lot of our partners ended up 10 months ago, and that's it. it's time to be scared. and now these diplomats are frightened. let's say, who are the same americans as american es ambassadors who ran into their palaces and offices there and i say. oh, all of russia is all you are there look. let's. you see what is happening. you understand how china already has

something there, and many people believed in it. and how did the russian ambassadors and russian diplomats in these countries act at that time. and we know how we acted over the previous many decades, and they told me about this in many post-soviet capitals, when they offered to say, let's our elite, send your e, universities under the government of the russian federation says, here's the bill for you in short, an account. so we have here in brussels according to the program washington says for free, well, go there for free, when in moldova, which we now know what is happening, they offered to send their officers to study at the general staff academy, the answer was about the same, and we can multiply such examples separated by commas over the years, if all ambassadors will start working in a new way, like boris slavich gryzlov, i won’t say that he is right everywhere

he is noticeable in the information field, but his role is that cooperation is concrete steps without loud statements of exits to a tribune and so on, because belarus has simply come out on top of the operation of the belarusian industrial enterprises of the regions of russia with the republic. which never happened. hugely this is due to the fact that the human being is afraid, not just the ambassador. or maybe he was originally a political heavyweight, so maybe the most important section has come. here in these key countries for russia. after all, there are such heavyweights who, with their authority, the fact that they have direct access, including to the highest kremlin offices, they also provide a level of trust after soviet space. this is the new diplomacy, because you need to understand the psychology of these leaders as well. they also want to be close. they want to feel this warm allied. this is also important, especially

when we talk about the countries of the east, so we declare. let's turn around to the east to give. he means that you need to understand the psychology of the east, that means you need to give up a little on this, and western european cynicism and cold calculation. and their diplomats act like that. you have no idea, i can give examples how do western diplomats behave under uh, some regimes in the east dancing to music dancing while there i’m not talking about the post-soviet space, if necessary, but if necessary they will come from harshly declare this and there is that very new diplomacy and at the end of oh, but military actions. here at the conferences now there were a lot of the valdai club and others had to communicate with the former military mainly, well, high-ranking with combat experience jordan iran and india i always asked how you evaluate. what about a special military operation? well uh, they say what's what

doubts? well, in the west they write, they say, in the west they write. and they have reason to analyze something. in recent years, they have shown the highest level in afghanistan, for example, nato, or let's say such an assessment, the intensity of hostilities is now much higher in a number of positions than in many operations of the second world war , partial mobilization, which became the subject of criticism in the western press. uh, they almost tried to make fun of them even and how many countries of the european union or nato, even in such a partial version, in principle, it is possible to carry out this mobilization and the military say that, in principle, the government may not even begin. it will simply fly off under such conditions. and most importantly, these are the people. these are the eastern military, these are people who once again emphasized their combat experience. it seems to me that this is the most important assessment, in general, any war is judged and evaluated at its

end, and not in the middle and not in the first thirds, conclusions are made. yes, but the final assessments are given according to the final result, and it seems to me, at this stage, at the end of this year. this is the most important conclusion aleksandrovich vladimir vladimirovich well, first of all, hmm, let me allow myself all the same about your trips to the battle zone. well, i can’t get past this, because, well, firstly, what we see is hmm, something like that to me as a psychologist. that's important, even the psychological component of what you show, well, they won't praise you there, and so everyone is praised for these films. well, there was one point that i just want to dwell on. well, it’s just that for me it’s amazing, it’s clear that where you came because of probably questions security, nobody knew you were coming. i assume that it was all sudden. when you enter the kitchen, and there is a cook in

an absolutely clean apron with a snow-white cap, i, of course, understand that you can say whatever you like, but just look at this cook to understand what order and how everything is done there, this one, and the back psychological line, to which, well, i can’t go to the village of certain legal issues myself and see, at least i did it, of course, it’s fair pleasure. but i'm looking at these psychological moments. i just want the audience to understand this, so that they see not only the tank, so that they see not only the kalashnikov assault rifle, so that they see these backgrounds, because these are the backgrounds. they just reflect. well , some, well, for me, this cook is like that. here is a symbol of the purity of order. well, i remember my years like that, though, it was a very long time ago and it was a little different, we have an army. they rarely wore such whites. here are the caps on myself, and it was not the front line.

still. well, now returning hmm to today's main topic. you know what struck me with the information that i managed to read today. uh, including on telegram channels that a foreign agent of the venedikts is doing an interview with charles michel, the chairman of the european council. well, what does he do with it. well , it's clear that venediktov is grazing in europe. i see and every day i read some of his materials in the mass media banned in russia. i take advantage of my privilege, and and such to watch, but there are a few things that sharmy and shirvin said past that i can't get past. this is an absolutely clear declaration of war on russia, and this is an absolutely clear understanding of how this should be done and in what direction? well, the first most important question. this is a desire to urgently resolve the issue of russia's presence in the security council. they said here, well, it’s clear that they can’t do this, but we understand

perfectly well that there are probably balls of the head and they are already working on this direction and they are looking for some possibilities, how to frame all this legally, in order to try to exclude russia from the security councils. well, in this way, to actually take over the organization of the united nations, this is said by a person who further begins to develop his idea and says that russia must be defeated. and, in my opinion, it was he who said that those 300 billion that we froze are the money of russian oligarchs, uh, that were earned on the backs of a russian citizen, but firstly, 300 billion is the money of the russian federation as far as i remember, not the russian oligarchs. there were separate sums. this is the first. second and these 300 billion. these are whose banks and where they disposed of this very money. it was russia that disposed of the money, or, after all, during the summer, maybe for a decade, they

were in the same european banks and american banks, on which they first of all earned. and by the way, now the big question. if they freeze these funds, then does russia have the right to receive at least interest on this money that has been lying in these very banks, the question is ridiculous, but it’s a legal one, in principle, you can put it and you can talk about it, and then he starts to reason , listen orders that mr. zelensky handed him, and one order. he got it back in 2021. that is, long before the special military operation began. he was awarded, in my opinion, the order of yaroslav the wise was awarded, if i'm not mistaken in this, as if in the fact that he is the owner of two orders, well understandably hands over to the head of major political. organizations award orders of the state - this is a normal practice, but still, this is an abnormal practice when

you have two orders of ukraine and you allow yourself openly. stand on the side of ukraine and promote war against russia by the way, i would like to remind you that mr. charmichel charles michel represents belgium. this is the same country that at one time supplied two corps, in my opinion, the sss, including, uh, those that fought both on the eastern front and including on this occasion to recall those, uh , units that later defended them like that , and one more thing about whether there will be or whether there will be a big war or not, well, i ’ll say right away that my opinion will be. well, i want to sum it up a little. such are theses. well , look, let's say there would be no ukraine , let's say there would be no ukraine, but we know well, at least with the information that is available to us from what putin said last year from what other politicians say we understand that prepared for this war in some way. how nato should prepare

for war. how could they move their armed forces, so close to the borders of russia in order to be able to collect and accumulate, that military fist with which they could resist against russia, but ukraine was needed for this, because what is happening now is pumping up weapons to ukraine on the one hand, this war of attrition with russia on the other hand. this is absolutely not even hidden, but a clear opportunity for nato countries move their weapons and their military units to the east to the place from where, if necessary, they can start and conduct hostilities. and if you closely follow what is happening here germany is paying us empty warehouses, and at the same time, they are going to buy these f-35s a few dozen, they have laid down new leop tanks. they will create new infantry fighting vehicles. look at what sweden is doing with

finland as it was rightly said about the arctic, which is not going anywhere and that's all. this whole machine is moving, and it seems to me that it cannot move without somewhere in the heads of the eggs of the heads there would not be this plan at the end point to meet directly in a big war with russia well, if we assume, if so, go along way e did not look at vladimir volfovich, then, i would say, so , uh, probably 24 years old. e time, the election of a new us president when it will be necessary to either support or not support one or one or the other candidate. they will probably be ready. oh to this big one collision. it seems to me that it ’s simply impossible to do without it, because even if according to the classics, well, the gun that they have now hung on the borders with russia from china is actually among them, but it can not fail to shoot, or it needs to be urgently removed . they are not ready for this, or it will shoot.

well, probably august 2024. and why can't each candidate have his own piece of america ? yes i i can clearly see trump coming out and talking. such a conspiracy turned out, who said that the border of the united states is treated differently. a constructive idea is precisely the direction of diplomatic work. although hardly through the ministry of foreign affairs of the russian federation, but the americans are especially numerous. they say that because the united states of america - it's wrong forward the united states of america well, this reflection on the future is now advertising after we continue, but it will make the monster

return the memory of dissociative amnesia not i remember what happened to him. and who is he the brightest events of life. he, too, will remember everything else to restore youth. we need you only young 3 hours minimal salary.