reloading a few words starting countdown three two one naughty 2

what surprised me on the line was contact, no matter who i spoke with, i did not hear any hatred towards the ukrainian people, as such, the nazis, yes, the people never and the general idea was such. well, brothers, well, they lost their heads, but there is no such culture to hear. but let's destroy this language,

not even close. but on the other hand, i constantly hear. destroy russians destroy orthodoxy destroy culture fight with pushkin i didn't hear a single word. the type to sound from our guys. attitude towards the wounded i ask artie , and you have irony, tell me, you understand this, they return our wounded in such a state that you look scary. and they say, many people tell me why we don’t treat them also, he explains what we have, and we are different, this is what he said to vladimir vladimirovich pavel during a short interview that he showed putin’s moscow kremlin with people when pavel zarubin asks, but, maybe it was possible also cheat. we have different principles. we can't. and that's very simple. but we are on

the side of good, so we cannot do evil. and if we start doing the same thing as the creator. we do something at home answer them. they fight under the signs of lgbt plus, which means there is no god there. when they have zelensky trying to congratulate the orthodox country on catholic holidays and demand that they gradually refuse to western days. and when we are told about the terrible heroism and hardness of the ukrainian people, well, don’t tell fairy tales, you will meet the population fled the country. if you are so stubborn, why did a third of the country fled? does donetsk live? then the italian said, if you want to imagine how hard it is for ukrainians in kiev, turn off gas and water for an hour. do

you want to imagine how hard it is for the residents of donetsk to turn off everything and go to the basement for 8 years. come on and run into the basements and the elderly quarters and hospitals, but the europeans do not see this. and igor and i see it every day. i ask you to say that i have not talked with many acquaintances in ukraine, and i will comment absolutely right. you are absolutely right in that what are you saying, that we in ukraine we hear the voices only of those who are allowed to speak there, we do not hear the voices of people, they are afraid, they are intimidated and kill them. if they try to jump out a point of view, we can say everyone even those who disagree, i then listen, what are the hair standing on end , as they are allowed to do, but uh. i would like to touch upon the briefing of the president in words, you know, this is the very thing, it seems to me that

for me the most important speech in this i say he had a lot for everything, so to speak year year. events unfold there every day. but it was it that gave me answers to many questions that we supposed to guess, well, so to speak, well, we were not sure that this was actually the case, because it was not voiced by the supreme commander, if they asked, uh in a nutshell e comment, yes i would say i would answer with the words of the cuban revolutionaries. and this is right. and the only way we can win and nothing else, what is important to me, what is important. i heard no compromises, no more. well, so to speak e conversation about ukraine, we will not completely lag behind in our position, no longer sorry for we will not be led to a divorce. the west and some such attempts for the second time in the next, so to speak, minsk three

minsk four second assessment. businessmen yes , those who left the country, so to speak, that they represent a danger to the country for the country, using our homeland only as a source of income. i would allow myself to add. uh. the only thing is that the magnitude of even more dangerous is officials who have such a way of life so far, unfortunately. e. well, we do not see any such bright, uh, assessments of the action, i will say softly, but we know that quite a lot of such officials remained in power until the last year. they need to be cleaned out, they need to be cleaned out by journalists, we will clean out such people. here is one of those journalists. i mean, well, it's very easy for me to have real estate in italy real estate employee. i am sorry. i didn't break any law. if at least one official violated at least one law, i

agree. laws i'm not talking about all the ranks. i'm talking about those, no, he is in his activities. i agree that this is how it works, but there were so many russian army about it, and the generals, who were not russian at all , knew the russian language poorly and property and relatives. anything was there, but they fought, so it didn’t seem enough, and than after february 24th. eh, so much suddenly cleared up. those who had nothing in the west suddenly became the heroes of the upper lars, and a number of people who seemed to have a lot in the west and they should take it and run. they, on the contrary, said, yes, well, i don’t care, that’s all the man who built the crimean bridge. yes , absolutely rothenberg. he knew that he would fall under all the possibilities. he had something that he said, yes, spitting businessman employees, of course, and i certainly, yes, i am now if we now go deeper, well, it's

just time to say so. i will need to drive a summer house and buy. well, how, well, to the russian treasury, so that the money goes necessarily in odessa, i’ll buy nipples then i agree, yes, the second e and and about what happened? yes, that's when the president quoted. we will return everything except the value. well i am i appreciate it. this is correct, because, so to speak, these are historically or our lands. and if we want to, if necessary, just historically clean the lands, warsaw and helsinki well, i think that we won't go that far, let's say, to be honest, we won't get that far . yes, yes, we are talking about historical precedents, in order to take warsaw you have to be very strong inside. that's the monolith.

see, maybe a little later, just a little later. yes, you now. you see, in the short term, uh, and on the deadlines. that is here, as if the president is already enough. so you are not in a hurry. we say so, well, that's right. we must protect the lives of soldiers, there should not be a repetition, so to speak, of the mistakes that were made at the beginning of the operation, therefore, it seems to me that this is a very correct approach regarding i think it is absolutely correct. you can’t treat ukrainians like this bandera unclean, who is upstairs today, and we only see her, i was talking. i have a fairly large social circle, when i was in ukraine now. well, of course, narrowed, but nonetheless. so i was talking to a friend of mine recently. he speaks to me and listens. well, here you are. that's what you've done, we say to them. that's us, we wanted to here, uh, there we want, it

's us further right. we want to europe, we want to fly there, we want to fly here, we want to live. that's it. i say, here you listen to me carefully. why did all this happen. yes? did you get all this? why do you think the whole world loves you so much. uh, they gave you without a visa from you. ibid cheating with you run with you because you are so beautiful. no for everything. it is necessary to pay free cheese, it happens only in a mousetrap, and then it is, of course, a free rat pays a fee for him with his life. for here is your well-being. these are american missiles. in kharkov they are aimed at moscow so you have decided? to pay for your way of life is our safety, and it is for us. for us, this is categorically unacceptable. i tell you this , you can understand this, you never wondered if you would have been treated like this if you said, we are not joining nato. so i say, i'm sure that the

attitude towards you was completely different and what i would like to say, uh, what else to say? we've got used to the last of the fourteenth year of poroshenko i agree. this is already the final, zelensky is over. but it’s not only they who don’t understand. they are already in the final, all this began in 2000. i remember then. i thought that all of a sudden you started talking about nato, what does it have to do with it? why do we need it? now? i understand that all the politicians in ukraine who once advocated joining out of the blue. certainly them. the west allowed to spend and use for stolen goods, would allow to plunder to hide the west even put on money, he simply allowed them to spend and plunder money in ukraine in exchange for the implementation of their geopolitical plans. have you ever wondered when they say there, they caught an official for money laundering, that is, two people. i would love to have two people doing the same thing, but

one is a villain criminals, he sails away money, and the second is a wonderful and wonderful person and handshake in the west. although they did absolutely the same thing, it means that only one did something, not in a way that did not suit the political smell, and the other, so to speak, e and the other does everything, so you need to start when, so to speak, the time will come for analysis everything that happened in ukraine, not with poroshenko from zelensky, but with a bunch of my son-in-law pinchuk, and ending with timoshes in stages. the rest of them couldn't help but understand what they were doing. they could not help but understand what this would lead to and they could not help but understand what kind of reaction this caused with the side of russia is like this here and here, but by that and including even yanukovych, primarily yanukovych, who surrendered and surrendered. yes , of course, that's shown . you, yes, feel like donetsk residents,

drive your children into basements for eight years and make them learn lessons there, like poroshenko, which means he bequeathed to donetsk children. well, try it, why is he not interested in them at all the fate of these same children. eh, well i think this is a rhetorical question. we understand perfectly well that they do not give a damn about death, blood, the suffering of the people of donbass , russian people, and in this sense, the melody is, of course, no exception. moreover, well, everyone who was not asked, they wanted to spit on this , moreover, by the way, when we talk about the children of donbass, we now need to think something, now we can’t wait for the summer. what to do to join? exams for children of the dpr, especially the dpr, since in the lc. there, at least the educational process is still somehow going on, but in the dpr it is interrupted, that is, for exams, where are the russian universities at the institute by itself? i don't think there should be any steps. you understand this, yes, that is, anyway,

you won’t accept everyone at once, something starts some kind of introductory. no, i believe that it is necessary to make quotas in the best dpr, they are interested in whether they exist this year. here, there, anyway, internal exams were held, because you still won’t take it, and now we understand the educational process. astana why can you use the experience of the soviet union once there were workers' schools? well here's what you do separate preparatory. i understand that something will be invented, that you again did not have an assault. how am i sure that it was now that i was talking with my parents. here are the applicants in donetsk, yes. they don't know what to do, how to act because. uh, well, teachers just can't come to school. do you understand? previously, even though they taught children remotely, yes, they are constantly shelling. today, the kindergarten again has arrivals, and so on , of permanent schools, in general, they are shelling all

the central schools of donetsk in this sense. it there will be a big problem. if you don't do it on time, as far as it's concerned. er, here's the theoretical part. you know, here on wall street, jordan just wrote an article published an article about the fact that around the problems in putin's entourage there are fewer and fewer people who, uh, look at the back somehow differently, more and more people in putin's entourage who, uh, mean , share the view that the west is just sleeping and sees how to dismember russia, that's the problem. listen, they themselves openly speak and write only the lazy ones don’t write there about how they they will, uh, dismember russia, you understand, now it’s out. they go, more precisely, the january february issue. uh, such a global magazine number von fs, dedicated to ukrainian issues, i think we need to study and study these articles that are written there, firstly, they understand the scenarios for the defeat of russia, and there are no other scenarios

. so you know calmly. they understand it. here, in any case, in any outcome, one must think about how to dismember russia and, most importantly, how to ensure the safe transition of russia's nuclear arsenal as a result. whose vision is this? this is someone out there surrounded by putin, uh, paranoia suffers, or they directly talk about it and offer. the main thing that amazes me the most. here's the scenario, when russia uses nuclear weapons in ukraine well , then nato will have to join in and strike with conventional weapons at russia there's nothing to be done and russia will then simply lose everything yes, that's the point, i think so, well, really, we should preemptive strike then by smell. they even even now even know in any terrible sweet thoughts. they are inspect, they don't even seriously. well, yes. but how is it? what do we have to do with it? yes, but most importantly, here i pay attention. in my opinion, this article should be carefully studied

, e, a large software fundamental article was born. in the same issue, robert kagan. and who does not remember does not know let's say. so the husband of wikinuland is better. so let's say, yes, actually the most famous ideologue of the liberal liberal hegemony of the liberal world order. e, who more than once advised everyone there, the most inveterate russophobe adviser was john mccain hillary clinto. well, and so on and so forth, uh, they, like you, you know, have created such a closed family clan cycle. yes, robert kagan provides the ideological justification for any military aggression. the united states was the architect of the invasion of iraq, giving out false information at one time that saddam hussein was associated with al-qaeda, which means banned in russia, that’s his brother frederick kagan, which means he is a lobbyist for the military-industrial complex worked and works as an adviser to petraeus. uh, the former head of the king, who

is now one of the talking heads accordingly, on american tv channels about the military effectiveness of ukraine, his wife frederick kagan created and headed the institute for the study of war, which is referred to by virtually all world media. well, here's the top. this same family clan was attached to the american budget by vika nuland, who ensures the implementation of all these theoretical developments. i’m a closed one. unfortunately , the budgets are for a very short time, there would still be a closed cycle on blood for this very war in ukraine, and now it’s good that there is none. here but i why and here he is, in fact. does he know what the article is about? we have been listening to you in the west for a whole year. uh, that russia is in what the main war of the world violates the world order

based on the rules. you remember putin recently in many of his speeches, he says that those who saw them are the rule, we are not going to fulfill anything, where these rules are written down. so, as i understand it, he decided to fill this ideological vacuum and explains that all the rules. in general, the world of world order comes down to one america usa always right, no matter what happens there, it doesn’t matter if it’s a democratic country and so on. he writes right there. uh, defending ukraine is defending liberal hegemony. and, accordingly, we must defend ukraine. that is, this is also a theoretical justification for why the united states of america should , as a result, enter into an open military conflict with the russian federation directly and openly without embarrassment, and in this sense, of course, we must understand that this is uh, and he says it right there, this is the very world, based on the rules, when america has to steer unreasonable europe and asia in the right

direction, because the united states of america turned away twice and this led to two world wars. oh, interesting, the truth is some kind of turning away. i don't remember, especially the second edition organized about new york is well known betrayal of the jewish population during the conference is well known. well, here's the twist. you understand ukraine where liberalism, but it's no one. this is why this is true liberalism orthodoxy destruction political opposition, the destruction of freedom among them, that is, the cult of non-pagan e, beliefs, this is not liberalism. but the main thing is that it's all under the flagship of gb well, yes , a lot has changed this year, and i often told you in the studio that the most difficult moment in ukraine for people will come when, uh, they have

to comprehend real life, and you don’t see it from tv screens. it is clear now after we started to regularly carry strikes under dual-use infrastructure for sure no one here has happiness from the fact that people are sitting there without light. no, but they start somehow. it's like not in italy let's turn it off for an hour and try to understand how it happened. and finally, in ukraine , alas, people understand how they lived in the donbass for 8 years, how they lived in conditions when the completely illegitimate ukrainian government started the war, and then continued two leagues united by poroshenko and zelensky, and it seems to me that people in ukraine and power - they feel it very subtly, as it seems, they begin to think at all. what happened for 8 years? yes and for which all these 8 years they abandoned the world in order to now find themselves in such a situation. i just looked at the action of power. here is the one who gave

an interview, in my opinion, a week or a week and a half ago and said that i needed only 300 tanks. so, uh, 500 howitzers there means 600 bmp, and we will return everything to uh, the time of february 23, the person who commands the army, which at the time of the start of the conflict had 700 tanks on the move, in my opinion, one and a half or 1200. uh, in e storage plus. he received another 800 tanks for everything. it's time away from the country somewhere and at the last moment. he says, and now i would have another 300, and in general, i’ll just roll it out until february 23. well, that is, the impression is that he was engaged in borrowing from you, yes, he bought some kind of lottery tickets or somewhere and invested money, drank, and then came. i have another ten, i'll definitely buy a lottery ticket, and you won. these are military e against the background of these stories . there are other processes about weapons. they are visible even in social networks, what is now gone this new hidden wave of mobilization of people is enough in minibuses in shopping centers. and

this is also, uh, peculiar. e. i know one place where there are a lot of people who can be grabbed on the ninety-fifth quarter. there are so many fat-faced people who can directly go to serve. and this e exactly to the thesis of reznikov that we have a million people under the bayonet in all power structures. we don't need any more, so we can handle it, just give us a weapon, it seems that not only the weapon is missing. and zelensky also felt, it is clear that there were many different reasons for his visit to congress, but one of the main ones, which you will later. uh, what did he stick out, to be honest , i brought money to ukraine. i brought peter and everything is there, a miracle weapon, it remains to wait a bit, and people live in the conditions of the wrong war, which is far away in the donbass, which, by the way, is not very good even in mariupol. well filmed knew yes but did not feel very well. i'm not talking anymore, dnepropetrovsk-kiev was ruined there, all 8 years. well, yes, something is happening somewhere, some acquaintances, and they live in exactly the same conditions. great discomfort caused by these

events. people begin to think about them, to think and power. i repeat. it feels very subtle because it has already appeared. i follow the social networks for uh, what is in the ukrainian youtube went uh, ideologists and western ukraine who mean to speak uh, in various cities of the provincial capital there in kiev in poltava begins to tell. what is a war, anyway? she gave a lot to ukraine yes, of course, we are against war, war kills people, because, well, here, look, look, we really wanted to go to europe well, no one turned to us hmm did not turn his face. and here we are, literally in these 300 days, we already have one foot in nato, we are already a little bit more, nato has come to us a little more and we are. if we are already in europe, this is good for us, and i understand that these people seem to acquire the main benefits.

always wondering where it all starts? now he will see everything. manufacturers of good things want and most importantly, but it's best to check.

the bone is small, the claws are medium and the ears are huge. this is not necessary valery zavgorodniy , a specialist in exotic animals between parrots, monkeys, and this is already logical thinking, but in animals, this does not happen to every person. it happens to be a real admiral. i bought a giraffe from your admiral, but you don’t starikov

for free without registration.

so, the main event for this minute in our news release, ukrainian troops are shelling donetsk and makiivka will be killed from nato. howitzers. they also opened fire on gorlovka and the red partisans use the scorched earth tactic. methodically destroys the entire infrastructure aiming at schools kindergartens and hospitals. one of the shells exploded near the saltpeter storage on the territory of the aster chemical plant. the russian army repulsed the attacks; zelensky's formation was lost.