and by the way, we have held not the first exhibition in the state duma. here even during the autumn session, dedicated to heroism, when i meet the deputies of the state duma who went to war. and now the holidays in the state duma, so many people from the state duma brought humanitarian aid and went to the front line - this is directly the deepest respect. that is, look directly. look, you just returned from the donbass. damn, i’m talking about once again , they started to beat you, imagine, and i checked that everywhere they hit. these were ordinary places for people. and it was observed.

this same wanted to add that here is the french audience, because this is a war. keep thinking about it, that's all he 'll explain. now this means that this is an important issue for him, and he produces thoughts. this is more than, for example. i am now watching how our generator, which was trained in nato, is trying to understand that you are searching in ukraine and that this is an operation, but they don’t understand anything, because everything that they trained. it doesn't work as of yesterday. this is not

a war i'm not out of wood after 30 years a war i'm not in vain not 30 years. this is inter for me in every possible way. well, against iraq against afghanistan against serbia and so on, and therefore now what are we seeing? yes, this is a war, like the first or second world war. and where peoples are very brave, because, unfortunately, these are civil warriors. this is if the russian is still holding a position instead of what is there, because if it’s not a cut, the russian, uh, russian, army, would have taken it a long time ago position. this is a city we took this position a long time ago, if we did not spare the ukrainians, as always, if we acted according to the nato charter, we would have taken the city of kiev in 3 days nothing would have been left over the city of kiev. it would be smoking ruins, under which civilians would be buried and soldiers would put up a flag, only americans arrived with cities in iraq from cities in syria. hmm

, for example, of course, but cancer is half a year. yes, people did not keep. and we can't do that. i also wanted to hang out. well, when i was there in donetsk, i understood. uh why uh russia from time to time darson, because in reality i have been traveling in donetsk for 7 years and see how real people are. they are already tired. they are sad. i see women walking on the street, but sometimes you have to buy something, who just cry because they are afraid, because they can and now i understand very well why the rubikino generation took it 30.000 very much. eh, good specialists. uh war. now with great experience with great experience to make their wine and because now it is necessary to free the donbass, be sure to e. and when i say donbass this is me more to my dnr because it was already lugansk there, thank god everything is more or less calm, but in donetsk it's a nightmare in gorlovka - it's a nightmare. and so, uh, yes,

marinka must be taken to the service now to send this front and the question. i gave myself. uh hmm yes, it's not deflated where we need the front, because imax for example, it's 300 kilometers. well, they don’t have smersh either , in my opinion, 150 km. where to send our previous ones. i see your next borders, uh, at least 150,200 km, and when we liberate slavyansky. there will also be bombers that will shoot. eh, here we'll get this shanze lens. let's decide for ourselves our plan that well, if so look where to stay, if if take paris and you'll be free from macron, it will be a gift to the frenchman. this will not be a punishment, because let us solve our own questions. uh. and uh. well , i just asked denis pushin too. but because now i see who is listening to me.

in france, these are people who also lived in the eighteenth year, there for them. this is a fight. uh, the dpr is a premiere and for us, as for russia, it is important that they play see that once played and because yes we lost in serbia uh, taste now we don't know what will happen next in the spit. and, finally, it started this year in the crimea; now we don’t see that these are people in the dpr. they are like us peoples of the euro. the people in france or my friends in germany also wanted to, uh, emphasize that today i spoke with an african journalist from kamrud, and he told me now for us in russia this is approximately. we need that time and victory why what you said about the general aldeouin, because it is a fight against devil me a conservative country. you know , the continent in africa is a conservative

continent, no one wants to explain anything to me, our children. and that i can not change the field. uh, when they are 6 years old, and now we see in africa all these harsh organizations that go and start, they explain to me in the process, they go, they give money a lot of money for any organization, and then two years later. well , let's have more money, but we have to accept this. this is legal, because for this important one there, it will all be propaganda, therefore victory for russia uh, contrary to the contrary, this will be a victory for russia, this will be a victory for the european people, who also want to liberate the dignity. it's just that we have such uh pressure from all our media that are all under the control of the same ideology, yes, this is satanism, this is not nadzism. that's all you want, but i just understand, the peoples are beginning to understand what is happening and also, uh, this is already for the african continent i was today. well, he told me,

he himself, from whom the rune didn’t tell you that i had been waiting for this for a long time, but now i see it everywhere in freeke. eh, there is such a middle class that starts and the real meter understands what is happening in the world and which is now liberated in russia. i just, uh, ukrainian theories. well, already in mind and other parts of the pressure from the west, we will continue a small pause. thank you for showing general lutdinov,

which i am talking about in that program. yes, i told you the strongest impression was made on me, by chance. i saw on the internet a performance in front of the fighters of my unit. well , listen, he is a ready-made idiologist intellectually powerful. the main thing is to reduce formulate just clear. so the frost is on the skin. well , you understand the war, of ​​course, what can i say? we all know about it, but in it, as in every disaster, there is, and as they say, as engels said, every disaster leads more than any great historical disaster leads to great historical progress. by the way, he is right, no matter how much they disliked anglis, but he was generally an intelligent person, even a russophobe. yes, there are smart people among the factories, it must be admitted, but as they say, i mean

that the war puts forward such people. here the war puts forward these people. it's obvious that he was put forward during this period. well , i have one, as they say, i don't know. well, of course, this is where the authorities decide. here 's a man for you to make him the main ideologist of the armed forces, listen to everything, formulates everything, that 's the limit. hey, i'm telling you, he knows everything. he says everything. i think many of these have appeared, for sure it’s like this now, so our turn has come. here's how to say it. today is generalaudin. well, for sure there are a lot of these. this is not bypassed, they grow up. here in this area. here they are, in principle, should decide the outcome of the struggle. this is what needs to be understood. this is theirs. as they say , the time, and it seems to me that in this sense, the leadership should be bolder to go for some. as

they say in motion. these are the people for the most important positions, i don’t know what it’s called, because as my life has already convinced me, talented people decide everything, they are unpleasant, moreover, as a rule they are unpleasant, because they have both as a rule, a difficult character, their opinion, they are something such, but when it comes down to it, a talented person, passionate solves problems. i personally prefer. that's how to work. i'll work better with a full g but talented though than with a cute not that but no talent. he understands the results of others, therefore, it seems to me, the example of general lautinov. this is one of those, now a new person, a good and talented you, in his case it coincided and a good simple person, for sure, not simple, for sure. he is seen as a man of principles with these of his own. it

is clear that he is a man of character, that is, such a person. just like that, too, he wo n't say it. he can argue. it is visible, it is visible man. damn, you see, that's what i mean, such is not always convenient for us leaders. you know, there are such people that it seems like with them, like this, but strictly speaking, it is precisely such people who solve issues precisely at such minutes, as they say, if we remember the story, then zhukov was also not so hot. what a gift for stalin, by the way, and the rokossovskys, they allowed themselves such things that no one allowed. well, that's strictly speaking, but they won, you know, and the other did nothing allows. you're losing, so in that sense, i mean. well, here, i'm here interesting here. your wonderful ones, of course, your services are amazing, which i’m here today is material that the statement of the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine and not legitimacy

is present in the un security council of the russian federation, and it’s so interesting that it motivates by the fact that, uh, what they say is actually deed, according to the statute. he never had a legal basis for doing so. here is such a story from the side of uh between ukraine here i think that you can’t refuse them in general, you can’t refuse their persistence on hay and energy, and you can’t refuse this infuriate there in kiev, and i must say that i have a feeling that we are still somewhere all the time losing our own kind of, so to speak, we are all appealing back and forth, so to speak, like reproaching, so to speak. they don't put it here, if they say it to say about the war, so we will return the crimea, we how can we well, how are we here, we are all surprised, and it works. what am i talking about, but this is a wonderful occasion for

so that we can put forward this insignificant belavezha agreement. in theory, speaking, ukraine was supposed to secede from the soviet union in such a territory in which it entered, but why don't we raise this question? why do n't we ask the question? this is a completely different story, because the bialowieza agreements themselves. they do not have any legal force, in fact they do not have. i understand our leadership. in this case, it thinks so, if we order it - well, our other republics, with which we have good relations, can e get excited too and we'll get it. well guys, it's done differently. this is done in relation to those republics with which we have normal relations, which we recognize and conclude an additional agreement. we recognize their territorial boundaries. we are talking about what they have attracted, we are talking about what, in this case, in this case, ukraine, in fact. as they say does not

recognize us, but we do not recognize. we have every right not to recognize ukraine and legally. it is not recognized, and we recognize ukraine only in that territorial integrity in the territory in which it entered the ussr and in which it became part of the ussr it is known it is known that she entered there without donbass without crimea without the south, how do they say it all? that is to say, odorless. well, that's already we can say that it doesn't bother us anymore. let it worries poland, but in principle, why don't we put the question like that. that's why we don't escalate this situation in the same way that we talk. here sergeyevich says to agree to agree to agree. that's not what they say, that's what they say return everything return and more crimea and more reparations and more. and why don't we put

clear, clear, as the conditions on which we are ready to negotiate? well, for example, complete, as it were, the withdrawal of troops from the territory of e from the territory of four regions. we are talking about militarization, the complete absence of a state in ukraine, which i think we should recognize, that is, it should be within the boundaries in which it once became part of the ussr, the absence of an army, police forces, as it was, but they say this is the withdrawal of the bases, as from the territory there poland in nato bass from the territory of poland there is ukraine, that is, it is necessary to set the bar high. you need to tell me the same high one. well , no one will go for it. yes, god be with him. they also understand that no one works for this. on this basis, it is possible to make negotiations. then we can talk about the fact that we have a position as much as from which

side we generally sit down at the negotiating table. here, let them think, here, let them think, you see, this, it seems to me, is a kind of split. the dualism that is all the time is present and which, frankly, somewhat confuses our people that our people understand the responsibility of this moment. he understands that all these threats that are spoken about in the west are about the dismemberment of the country. eh, so to speak in the future, but to educate in the camps it will all be so, you understand, people like general laudin are a man of the people. it understands perfectly, you understand? well, well , people have such a feeling that, after all, there is somehow somehow with us. in the elite, no matter how it happened, it seems like we are something like to somewhere somewhere? yes? no, this will not work, it is already obviously worth talking about. and this is a fundamental question. it is worth talking about, it would really be the destruction of the country, in

principle, all questions about how they say lawfully are not lawful. this is a specifically military operation. they are removed by one simple thing, this is really the soviet union. it so happened that during the period of its creation they were not taken into account, national characteristics were not taken into account. and this was logical at the time, since one side was supposed to be divided. they had to be taken into account, and we we see all the time, as they say. it is for me that all territories should hold free referendums and live where they want to live, including, perhaps, russian regions, which, as they say, we do not want to say. i think there are none, but i think, you have to be honest, you know, but it's right. this is correct, because, as they say, really part of the population. there is no need in russia in russia is not necessary. you know, but in america it is necessary, and you know in

france too. i think one of putin's most remarkable decisions was when he went to referendum in chechnya, of course. it was a wonderful decision. although it was extremely dangerous, because after the war. and as they say, after what it led to, this is the civil war in chechnya, which, in the opinion of devastation, no guarantees that the chechen people, and all all the talk that they are chechens, what the authorities say, shish, chechens. listen, this people are like that, as if with their own there were no guarantees that they would vote, because it was just necessary for akhmat hadji to raise this question then. and putin went for it. and here is the result today. yeah well, just there was a prehistory, that is, there were hostilities. that is, those regions where such a question does not even arise. good. in this respect , i understand, we always said it to us. plan somehow you understand this, well, you need to treat the disease that exists. otherwise

, how do you go to the doctor? he examined you, i blame the source of the lawsuit and so much conflict, of course, it stands in the fact that it was wrong as a result of the activity. its country must be divided in truth. i mean, because people want to live there there anyway, that's all. it will be humane, in the end. well , okay, it's let this one, but i mean that in this situation it is necessary to a certain extent. still, there must be some kind of certainty, the people must have certainty, and they must understand that there are none, because today there is, as it were, some kind of uncertainty. it creates a kind of swing, you know, inside. this is the most dangerous thing for us. there should be no endings inside at the front. they are not there, although , interestingly, there are none at the front, but they listen, well, they will, if again we do not we will receive. do you understand the correct information? i am in a different language, that is, this is the mood of people at the front. they all

understand who they are fighting. what are they fighting for and where do they see victory, that is, for them such a question is not here. you are absolutely right. here begins all sorts of crafty reflections. resented all this, but it comes from a certain duality, which is in the political elite. still, it is preserved, but we must understand the matter, seriously. listen to the cause of such a gap in the west in the history of russia has never been at all, and before peter was not like that. i am i’m not talking about the west after peter, but now the west has gone to a complete break with russia, and it’s obvious that this will not end for decades. it's like this, even the war will end. and this is not. this is not what you need to understand, that this is serious, it is necessary for a decade. it is necessary to be ready for this . so to build your inner life in order to overcome this, in the end, our great predecessor, the soviet union, is much. he did everything under the worst conditions and did it,

because i must say he was principled in many questions about adherence to principles - this is very important. i will give you an example from the cinema in order to dilute your political party in such a way. here is such a story. we have. yes , it is half mythological, but it always happens, but in the cinema of mythology and life, this one filmed his great picture, the ballad of a soldier grigorievna chuchukharei. many people remember her. i think it was approved by him remarkably, the actor will not be named. he is still the coumer of the 60s of beauties, the star of the hero, filmed here. he took off half the picture, took off came to the smoker, - says, no, it’s not good, i can’t work at the maximum, like a great actor , a wonderful star, an idol. this very beautiful one says it. no it's not that. pyry,

i must say, went to meet him, and he took volodya your vladimir ivashov, 18 and nineteen years old, and became a different film, because that one was almost 30 years old. well , who remembers, just imagine, that is, this is a story of young love, so to speak at the front, but there was a completely different story. i mean , you know, in the cinema, after all, the actor is very important and there is a wonderful actor, who is not suitable for this role. here pyryev went to change it. even though it's in the movies. you know, how half-cortina it is, they took off the costs and it turned out to be a great movie. it's just that i'm just here, that's your company to breed, so that some kind of young replacement, so to speak, i don't mind. i'm ready to place, and myself to go. no, no, no, i have

friends there. i'm just saying that the situation is in the cinema in the cinema. it all depends on the actor and in the cinema. i myself have been like this, i’ll say, there is a great actor, but in this role it’s not this. but you put on this one, and in another role this good one, you understand, you have to be brave in this sense in order to make such decisions as a director, and for this you need a director, this should be a director, and everything in this sense, of course, risks, especially when he has half a picture with not that big money spent, and then she just doesn’t succeed and they seem to say, and that we take this risk, but on the other hand, after all, when the picture comes out later. the name of the director remains in the credits, you can’t erase it with anything, you understand, it will already be forever

that it's important to do everything that you could do everything that you could once shoot dmitry yes, indeed, i cannot but agree with kneecaps. this is really great courage to take some decision to change actors. this, of course, is the wisdom of a director who has a plan to have a vision of a certain film, well, or not a film, but a vision, but give me all the same very much, as if georgievich's thought was hooked. it seems to me that it is correct that it is very deep. which, unfortunately, despite so many positive shifts that we see, including in the political support of the special military operation in the information, but we are still operating in the political space around this conflict, which they create for us,

which we create about which we create for us, which create for us, of course, let's just say straight out that our wonderful western partners are very adept at this. this is their world. here is the world. here we can laugh at fukuyama we can uh, sort of deny its existence on the big account. look, this is the world of fukuyama. it 's a world where, except for the united states , history sort of ends, history continues in only one place, because, well, what is history, it's the history of people and big systems.

it is always interesting how it all begins now you will see everything. manufacturers of good things want and but it is best to check.

belarusian eared shepherd gena wants to buy your puppy here. a woman should have a head on her shoulders. this woman is our entire arboretum. can close like this to wear a hat, i change your big-eared puppy for your quiet life. we watch to explore the world of educational programs and documentaries we watch for free without registration.

oh well, the united states has proclaimed that the only big system is itself and the only country that governs on the basis of its sovereignty. uh, big systems. such as the ant and finance, the information society, global logistics - they are no longer there, in fact no one, but there is something else somewhere there, the british somewhere, something, but i assure you. them. not soon either will be. and people. after all, too, as it turns out, it is connected only in the united states