naughty 2 the united states has proclaimed that they are the only big system and the only country that controls big systems on the basis of its sovereignty. such as world finance, the information society, global logistics - they are no longer there, in fact, no one, but there is something else somewhere there, the british somewhere, something, but i assure you. them. it won't be soon either. and people. after all, too, as it turns out, there are united only in the united states. and by the

way, notice how the undulation of interest in fukuami. and so he is lifted up, which means that it turns out that he wrote something wrong. yes , he is not educated at all. but who is he at all and that means somewhere a ticket for five to seven. he disappears somewhere. there he rises. now it is obvious that he is on the rise again, he has a book coming out. he is everywhere you are. he will say, well, this is the world of fukuyama, the world, a new attempt at the end of history, after all, history did not end by itself. this is what fukuyama didn’t tell us the story, the americans finished and want to replay. end of frontier story in the eighties and nineties, uh, the nineties, this is their goal, and therefore, it is clear what this end of history will consist of, it will consist of the state and the final unraveling

of what was called russia, after that it will be possible to take the remnants of eurasia. e of the resources of eurasia of the logistics process of the people of eurasia, there is still someone to rake up for themselves in various qualities completely freely and you won’t even have to buy them, if russia is destroyed, if russia is destroyed, as a large system competing with the united states, too, claiming to own sovereignty. what is the main contradiction between the united states and russia - it is not on the land issue, although they are the underground issue and china and more, maybe indie, but this is not accurate and most likely, indonesia is still very few countries. we claim that the post global world be sovereign. well, yes, iran certainly, but germany does not claim

to be sovereign. great britain is in a submarine. yes, it will float, it will not float. nobody knows, but most of the countries countries of the middle east no, perhaps they are ready to delegate their sovereignty. in exchange, part of the sovereignty of this exchange of protection and always they do. here, the main contradictions of the world, respectively, and the main technology of this world. i'll let you see, and in fact, how we wow. dokali in the ninety- first year. this is exactly what they told us . for one reason or another, the communist nomenklatura refused to discuss it for too long now from the formation of its own political space and decided. well, that's the rule. well, we'll play by their rules. they seem to be the normal rules in the west, the court is a democracy. well, we’ll even hold elections there

, something else, but this is a refusal to form our own space of action, our own rules of the game, about which they are attached, they build the world according to the rules. and what should they build, they build the world according to their own rules. and we must build the world by our own rules. and the fact that somewhere their rules do not work. this is normal as well as our rules. some places won't work until we fist to the apostle, and in this sense, of course, now the head, firstly, i would like to say that now is an extremely tense moment, where is it. well, i think that the next 2-3 months will focus on the issue related to the situation on the battlefield, because without victory on the battlefield there are all sorts of political constructions. they do not exist at all and

political processes will focus, because there is no crackling, the west does not crackle, but crackles. this is very important, so are issues related to ideology. it's still dangerous they take a big risk they go for legalization satanism. this is a big risk, they understand, if they take it, then the rate is very high. here are the next 3 months. this is all focused on one point. which can either lead to the revival of us as a full-fledged integrator of the entire eurasia of greater eurasia, and so on. it will be another big game, and then we will have a chance to form a really large political space of our own, or, well, let's take the history of 30 years ago, how it all had once resolved, but i would still end with good news. so i looked at the statement of our

there have been no political leaders lately, but i am very impressed by the article by dmitry anatolyevich medvedev. and you know, things have become more and more called by their proper names, that’s not what it means, let’s not call it here, but here we’ll soften it, it’s not a matter of incisiveness, but the fact is that specific things are called their satani by satanism, there is no radical ideology of satanisms, the destruction of russia by the destruction of russia, they are weakening it, and it seems to me that this is a sign that internal mobilization in russia is public mobilization in russia has reached such an extent that, in general, hmm, the most healthy forces in our elite are no longer afraid to tell the truth to society. yes, not in everything and not

everywhere, but the truth in our society has become much more. and these are very good symptoms. and we fight with satanism. well, we are fighting rad, we are fighting satanism only on the battle line, there is no contact, and we have it inside the country. we are fighting with it, and how do we define it, how not to be right away. well, let's put it this way. not even conservatives, but obscurantists. i mean, where is the line? we then we must give some definitions, even ourselves we are fighting with satanism. and all the institutions of satanism. we work great. or satanism, where does the institution of private property end? is there satanism or not in the system of democratic governance, are there elements of satanism coming from the west or not in the system of making profit and organizing

capitalist production is satanism, that is, interest is accuracy yes judgment . or we see that there is some much more different meaning behind it. but then we have to say we who are in the culture of education. and we say that in fact we have. well, there are no fundamental differences with the west in matters of ideology. or they already are. of course not, that's what we said. no, we

agreed the behavior was like that. and now we just stumbled on the fact that we suddenly saw that there was the dawn of nazism. we suddenly saw that lgbt people were going there, but suddenly we saw other values. and inside the country, while we have to react for a second, everything is clear there. the author of the check is deeply religious, he is there, and we will now say here, that we are then no longer a secular state or not, we are secular, but only you know the soviet union, this communism was the secular league well, if so, then we must raise these questions. we must answer about them and translate instinctive anti-satonism into some kind of reality, the institutional construction of the idea must be discussed, of course, if they are satanists, why do we pick up the phone when they do not call, it's good if they are satanists, and how can you be with them in the same, and organizations there will stink of sulfur or we will go with garlic and aspen

stake, that is, a million nuances and a million questions immediately arise, but this is our political space. we ourselves organize, and not go into that, the political space where they created and where they define it in practice, well, not practically, but just now all the rules just go in the windows to open, so that the gray weather. yes wind turbines are also an option. well, then the position is declared to explain what we are doing. right now there in st. petersburg yes , some kind of informal vladimir vladimirovich is going on. just there she said thanks, and how are we do we know what works on demons? better than even garlic and holy water - this is the russian language, listen, our peoples are really connected by a common history, spiritual roots, a deep interweaving of cultures and customs, values ​​and traditions, and, of course, the russian language, which is a powerful unifying force that holds our multinational states together let me remind you that

earlier at one of the summits, we decided to hold the year of the russian language in the commonwealth countries in 2023. i would like to thank you all for supporting this initiative. the russian language, by and large, expels russian culture. why does it fight so hard? west why are they fighting it like that? ukraine because it turns out that russian culture, and we still have russian culture, russian culture, really forks them something. well , probably, yes, well, apparently not enough. there is something to strive for, but at the same time, preserving the historical classical russian culture is now debatable where you were just recently formed a new russian culture. here it is also necessary to nurture, cherish to raise to the level of the classical and convey to the entire

population. that's when this satanism will be less. but this is what zakhar prilepin is talking about, who says that right now, well, the pleiades has gone, talented military, uh, writers, journalists, poets, well, amazingly talented people there semyon pegov in addition to being a great war correspondent. he is also a great poet. well, there are a lot of names for such apaches. well, where are they on our television screens in our programs, and where are they on the site, where they are published and we'll see on stupid lights, but this is a fragment, not a state policy, true well, this is a cut nevertheless it is a cut, but it's all the same, of course, but it's still not a manifestation of state policy. and when it suddenly turns out that book publishing is a private business, and they are not interested in the book trade, it is a private business, and i am

interested. but this remove the military theme. they don't want to at all. why are these letters? oh, well, stop. oh well, we understand, of course, it immediately becomes worried that two fighters there we don't have at forty. the third year was this well, guys, well, then everything was different then stalin called. that's how to make such a film. for this you will get. you know, you did something here and the stalin prize, it doesn’t happen. so here, in general, this is how alexander nevsky kazakhstan was told to do alexei he did ivan the terrible how do they say bad? yes, when initially for yourself? i mean, of course. no, they said, listen, what are you going to know nothing about . he said which one i would take. well, historically, at least he took it off as he wanted. he

took it right, as it should have been, but he they said, but because the power of art is that it forms the truth, somehow strange, but the thought is actually correct what the chandeliers say without a conscious imperious movement. nothing in itself is necessary for culture, as for the economy mikhailovich well, actually. this is what is said about our state apparatus, the state apparatus will receive the flesh of our elite of the late eighties and nineties, and it aspired to the western model in the ninety-first year itself. here i am explaining all the time that the apocalypse is worth it. it 1991, when satanism conquered the world, there was no longer an alternative to everything. and the fact that they didn’t succeed, by the way, by the way, they won in the eighty-ninth year, and the special operation began in the twenty-second 33 years passed neatly and so, and the whole

trick is that as long as the russian state elite is what it is there is what he said. we have vladimir vladimirovich 3 days ago, what people who have assets there and who withdraw money there, they represent for our state. danger is a danger with us, by the way, how many officials we have three times more than the ussr had 3 million. and family members 10 million. that is, we have 10 million people who i don’t want to say that they are all traitors, but they all live in a liberal paradigm. they don't see anyone else. they live in it, and then everything is practically no no no no no i am the psychology of the state, at least not in a balloon. i will say family psychology, as the state duma as an

institution, is profoundly liberal. wow, who himself liberal is left. i'm not talking about people. i say the last liberal rafen was in total, rashkin confused that fact with a boar. yes, i confused it with a boar now, which means that the trick is that if you have a system model, here is the western model, you may not like it, it is satanic, but it is systemic, it is everywhere. yes, and these elements are hooked and connected, one piece cannot be pulled out. until now , until an alternative model appears. more than meters

i realized with horror that you have the main liberal. you are you, i am you, the presidential administration. this was the most liberal structure of the nineties. i fought with her.

come on, we did it badly. and we did it very well. i didn't particularly like it. so, unfortunately, e is not available at the official level. this is very important on the unofficial. for example, i am deeply convinced that if we talk, for example, about philosophical thought in the ussr, philosophy was in the corral by and large, and the philosophy of the west was more interesting and stronger. but today everything, on the contrary, the philosophy of the west has become boring. i would say obtuse, a philosophy. ours is very strong. but there is one problem. as only we are reaching at least the minimum official level. then there we immediately, as i am there stingy, hesh do not touch do not touch.

i have risen by one, do not touch well, bird language. talk about completely bird-like matters. that's how they have risen to a disgrace unit. this is what he takes away from him more than me, he has more than you, but now they have survived. yes? horror what correctly all understood correctly. she has no official level of this. it is missing. and everywhere. i forgive attention. at we are completely lacking in economic acuity, and we do not have a development strategy in a broad sense, an education strategy. and not

only does it not exist. even the discussion that it is needed is absent. and this is the key problem, because if we do not present an alternative model, we will not be able to become a real opponent of this satan. dmitry gennadievich this is the key problem, because we are definitely fighting it, and certainly every person, yes, who has some good, means democracy is satanic with all institutions. no, wait, but based on this, and our novelistic - this is no monarchy, the model is already a completely democratic model, onanist i will explain why it is satanic, please, because the united states of america does not mind. explain what kind of devilish satanic i explain, but satanic democracy is yes, in which they were killed in the elections, it depends on money. that

's right, most of all money does not work. everything here, in the united states of america, the model is satanic, because if you don't have three or four billion dollars to enter this system. i mean presidential. yes, there are even fewer representatives in the house, but still it's already hundreds of millions of dollars, and we actually have very similar. system but it looks like you had to pay you want to say that for a place on the party list of money do not take passers. no, now it’s interesting in which party they take it. no, i knew the parties in which they were taken and they became ill now. no, these are passwords in the passwords list. i'm not in the movies now for slander

, the primaries are killing me like that. here are the parties who are trying to avoid the primaries, there, this loophole is open help. and when you have the widest circle, when everyone checks, when the competition is crazy, when you have to go through the borrowed american system anyway, of course, maybe it has not yet been brought to such perfection as they return to the advice. i just want that bad. i understand, it's good that and i'm a little specialist in political science, so here's how to arrange an economic model. i understand how to arrange a political one in order to she was fair and not satanic is a difficult question. i don’t take it like that, full people

were treated. here we have our political scientists, who work as a unit. i'm like nicholas i'm a republican. and as an economist, i am a liberal, but not in a satanic sense, but in such a general humanity. here it is now, both of you have no answer about the economy , there is about the political system. no, i clearly understand that at least talk about this topic. now we don't talk. let's official level we here is the official level. far above the way , putin constantly talks about this. he constantly raises the question. you understand about putin and raising the question. so, no , maybe 10 years ago, a little more, vladimir vladimirovich tried to force our people

to compete with housing and communal services. so i remember, he personally addressed when he says guys. create public organizations and start fighting. i personally will. as experience in our country shows. about the initiative from below does not work. well, or you need to have a husband. well, really bad, nothing happened. nothing just worked for some reason, that now it worked somewhere, maybe the war of the society is working. so it's a general question. yes , everything has begun to organize society, and this, by the way, is a key point. i think our society has come to the state in which it was in the forty-second-forty-three years, when it is, as it were, as it is called, it went like this, as if the russian stubbornness of the hunt, they want to kill us. well, then we'll show them. well, i think that we are actually vainly abandoning our historical experience.

good must be with fists. here, i look, right now there under bill, yes, i would go out. uh, the sabotage group of ukraine fortunately liquidated it. but i'm looking at how many dormant cells there are, and we'll all be playing liberalism. i watch this when there, uh, suddenly someone finances. the coronazis, and they have property here, i see how a friend of the west is now declaring there. and now we will take a decision to arrest all russian property. and we only need dmitry anatolyevich in response, look, then we mean directly say that we well , just let's, as it were, call a spade a spade. come on, when they set fire to the military registration and enlistment office there and they are almost there. well, it’s good that we told in the program and were ready to let go, like a hooligan, they are on a terrorist attack. this is purely a terrorist attack. this is a net 156 times, i repeat

it does not happen in a war zone, so that there is no death penalty, how will you deal with looters and rapists and hooliganism. you will judge them, give them a life sentence, as they now thought they accepted and hooliganism in the zone is called terrorist attack. there, of course, there is nothing to play around here should be understood. there is no time to take you anywhere. nobody will volance. you caught a saboteur who was going to undermine there. if you now say something , talk, or what, we will pay lawlessness when people decide for themselves, you understand? i think, then you will take somewhere, exchange something, make things by their proper names. and we are still playing some kind of liberal game. as i correctly said. two minutes to the captain senior lieutenant paratrooper when i said, listen, i

at war. to kill, he says, the enemy, you do not kill the enemy, you destroy. well, let's understand, if it is the enemy of the enemy, it must be destroyed. i understand mercy for the surrendered, mercy for the extreme is understood, but the enemy is a criminal terrorist, what are we talking about? and this is where the most interesting part of my opinion begins, since we must clearly and distinctly explain that the people who help the enemy here we do not have citizens with a full set of rights, but criminals questions.

everything flies right away. you have to talk to people. today it seems to me that i don’t know such two main topics of the fukuyama of the ussr, the ideology is history, i try to touch on both of them, because, francis fukuyama, he actually wrote this, why are we talking about him, because medvedev mentioned him in his article. and lavrov yes, all the time to him, we return to such a manifesto. the west is actually a manifesto of war with us. they have it completed, he did not consider that the war had already been completed, but that is not the case, but he assumed an important point here. he assumed that they would incidents, he wrote about it, there may be some new ones, and an authoritarian alternative, but in fact why is there such a contradictory attitude towards him? this is a speculative work, he picked up there from hegel at the plateau, but nietzsche has his own postmodernism

. here he freely interpreted the quotes. hegel said, here you get it and the west ate it, because it corresponded to the level of education and understanding. they themselves admitted that we are pursuing a fukuyamov foreign policy. but we must give him his due, and this is their weakness , their contradiction, which he fixed. he writes there that liberalism will succeed, apart from its principles, liberalism must succeed, apart from its principles. what does it mean that ideology is already an ideology of lies? so dmitry gennadievich said they wanted to force us to play by their rules, nothing like that, according to what rules, rules that only they know to the end, but they won’t tell you and they reserve the right to change these rules all the time. here is their world, this is typical colonialism. a terrible

feisty or just gena the gardener . if you stick your nose into this apartment again, then your big business will feed, so it will not seem small. cheburashka