gobble up gennady petrovich or just gena as a gardener? you once again in this apartment, then your big business will be.

the us agreement with my beloved cuba which incidentally led to the cuban revolution they had an amazing agreement. everything is unequal there, almost like poland and ukraine conclude that, ah, everything is in favor of the united states, all the higher united states and the united states have the right to change this agreement at any time, but cuba does not have this is typical of the liberalism they are talking about , and why is this manifesto important and why is it all the time go back to those early nineties, because it is a symbol of the transformation of classical even neo-liberalism into liberal fascism. after all, originally liberalism, when it appeared in france in england it was a great idea the idea of ​​freedom of the people of the liberals are free liberation. that's from

that feudalism and some kind of ossification that was and some kind of new life gradually. he began to degenerate through several stages. a response to the socialist challenge of fascism. with military convergence and finally, this liberal fascism is a contradiction in ideology principle, political practice the assumption of pressure and that's what we see in fact liberal totalitarianism. that's what we're fighting for. this is their weakness. and this, by the way, is what fukuyama described, which can eventually lead to the emergence of the so-called last man, when the fight will be fought just for the sake of fighting. our weakness here said that there philosophy is not interesting. and here she is already so interesting, and who is fukuyama? well , who doesn’t, we have such a job there, the west is trying frantically to look for. here in the economy

the khazins found it somewhere they are trying, so, uh, but they found it, but they believe that you are generally the ideologist of all economic policy. yes, there is another problem here. all our philosophies are aimed at us, but the approach is for them and for them, and their philosophies are directed, it’s just outside that we analyze ourselves all the time, what about khan, what arcs, what dima kulikov well, they analyze us at the very moment we have we have transcendental evil. i liked that dmitry evaluated this term of mine, and we launched it, the fact we encountered. which is now dresses up in the clothes of liberalism, and we oppose it with a deep historical

introspection, which we pass off as philosophy. why was e important here, there was a reasoning from telaudin, because in the course of this struggle the ideology is being formed, in this the fundamental difference between our situation and the forty-first year of the forty-first year, approaching the developed ideology was already in fact marxism. lenism was understandable opposition of two ideologies. now we have these ideas. they crystallize in this struggle, which is why the experience of the ussr and the centuries is important in this regard. this is not just here we are celebrating 100 years ago. here was the soviet union surrendered, we really should start calling things by their proper names. because if we give an assessment of what happened, it becomes much clearer now in the ninety-first year, and not such an unrealizable idea about the legal political assessment of these agreements. i want to remind everyone they say, joyfully all the supreme soviets ratified, and in april 1992, the sixth congress of people's

deputies of the russian federation refused to ratify, and according to the constitution it was supreme body. at that time, a lawsuit was filed with the constitutional court. i will remind the russian federation about, uh, all these agreements, and it was never considered by the constitutional court of the russian federation. if you look , uh, the almaty declaration, which was after the belovezhskaya agreements on december 21st. yes, the former soviet union is mentioned there and the independent state, but the whole procedure for the destruction of the country and exit is not spelled out there. it speaks of the principles of the new life. but what happened is still necessary give an assessment to this, as well as to what happened directly in the twenty-second year, because western liberals imposed on us the idea of ​​our soviet period. something about such a boring totalitarian, where there were some gray personalities, all these terrible malenkovs. e

waiting. here they are all such brezhnev well, in the best there in quotation marks yes bloody coast. here yezhov beria stalin is there almost with fangs, blood is dripping and all around them are such gray apparatus officials. and this is not so, if we look at what happened 100 years ago, how our country was born. why was this? eh, touched by such energy, it was negotiations and difficult negotiations between different republics. it was not some kind. here in moscow they said everyone ran. and how and how difficult it was for the transcaucasians, how they dealt with the georgian question, how in detail. what a discussion there was within the party, how every republic, including my belarusian one, and negotiated certain conditions for itself. this is how our country arose, who knows about it? in our country, it is presented that the revolution has come to authorities. the bolsheviks, it was but such, uh, the centralist empire crushed everyone, there was nothing like that. we must

say this frankly and the union arose, when, in the conditions of the end of the civil war in october 22 , the red army in the far east completed its campaign. here it was the image of the victory of that social revolution, as well as then, during the great patriotic war, if we look at the events of 22 and 1991 in this way , then it is absolutely clear that there is a civil war in ukraine of pure water, therefore such an intensity, therefore such ideological clash of civil war with a huge element, foreign military intervention. the war is going on in our political and, more importantly, spiritual space. whoever is now in donetsk in kherson, who now again found himself under this kiev regime, feels himself, otherwise they feel themselves part of this space, even in lvov, this one

mentioned and even in ternopil where, by the way, they voted in the ninety-first year against the preservation of the soviet union but even there they cannot live without this antithesis of the russian they are still part of the negativist, but part of this russian world, because under the historical handle they also understand their red russia of the golitsy - this is from the city of galich and galich is that it was a russian city, including yes, this warped happened. uh, warped we see the warping on the ukrainian soul, because any fascism. what is its danger is that germany went through something that so many went through, where fascism broke through to power, because latin america passed, the scars on the soul remain for many years cannot. heal by the way fukuyama wrote about this on the example of chile, where they seem to have carried out a market economy, but authoritarian methods and these scars still remain , our biggest tragedy. this one,

like a woman of activity from portugal, thinks what we should do with the russian people. they also argue with belarusians. you will not do anything with either the russian or the belarusian people, because we will not give it to you, but our great tragedy and drama. this is our fraternal ukrainian people. and this is our fault. this is our fault and what happened in the ninety-first year and the fact that then this they didn’t give an assessment either that they didn’t pay attention, or that they put up and tried to agree on everything, because they trampled and mocked the ukrainian people. all these 30 years. all those who broke through the power of the westerners are those who came from the bandera emigration, but did not survive. yes, we have our own. we had our own dramas both in russia and in belarus, but we did not survive what this ukrainian people experienced. this is our fraternal people. and now we are our ukrainian brothers. it's an ideology. here we are talking, she is for

ourselves, at least she should be also for ukraine, they must see the future with us with us. for the sake of all of us, for our own sake, this task, if we decide, of course, this will be the image of victory. don't stop yet. well, i imagine, of course, given that all your programs are watched, i imagine the problems of the same build, when they evaluate the discussion of my favorite two experts, determines what is hirsch and why they talked about it so much, it will be a big problem , because they translate all your german, but with this they have, of course, i think there will be big questions, but i think they will figure it out. but the fact that karen georgievich started the security council, but i also can’t get past this topic, it would be foolish to assume that the kuleba and the people around him are so smart, so literate that they made this long list. why

is it necessary to reform the security council and how it is possible to exclude e russia from there ? directed. most likely that they will try to bind. this is to someone's plan, which will either be specially developed for this, or already exists and such a plan really exists in 2015, the so -called g4 four large countries are germany japan brazil india signed such a memorandum 2015 - this is already a year after the maidans in fact was it directly related to the events in ukraine, they signed a memorandum on the need to reform the security council in this memorandum. he is on the internet. they can read it they describe in great detail why and how it is necessary to change the speech, it was not about changing the composition of the permanent members of the security council, it was about

an expanded council, and uh, there were a lot of different things like that, but no one seemed to pay attention to it, but the plan it existed and they worked with it very seriously. and i suppose that during the time of angela merkel, this problem or this issue was slightly suppressed. i didn’t really want to come out with this, because then the problems associated with the 1990 unification of germany would come up when there was also a question. how is the new germany? will be a member of the un, and in general, it may be worth immediately and allocate a place as a permanent member of the security council. there was a whole war involved, then, the united states of america and the soviet union, which had its own opinion on this matter. i think merkel did not want to get involved in this problem. and so she kept it like that until a certain time, a barbock came from the streets and this issue began to be muddled again, and moreover

, another memorandum was written around 2020. it merkel also created a memorandum that provided for some kind of reform of the security council, in which these four countries were supposed to go there, and on a certain one in a certain one. that is, at the beginning, as it were, changing, but maintaining a permanent place, and then moving on to this general group, from which it would then be possible to expand the advice, to stand here , increase the number of permanent members from five, let's say to seven, and then pay attention to the number january 14, 2020, that is, this year, well actually a month before the start of the special military operation. uh, ministry of foreign affairs. e germany suddenly publishes one document. it is also available on the internet. look it over carefully. this document. this is no longer just a memorandum. this is an absolutely clear plan for reforming the un security council and this clear plan for

reforming the security council there are two things that, of course, need to be addressed first. well, as far as we remember, the united nations, uh, was created by the victorious countries and the countries that lost or the countries that started the war at that time do not have a place in this anymore . uh, japan and germany , they are joined by two countries that are part of the brix and which, in principle, if they are part of this g4 and participate in this together, they become such oppositionists within the brix to a certain extent, because suddenly they get completely different options, and moreover here arises. eh, completely different. eh, it's a completely different situation. if we take this memorandum now. uh, this is meade’s explanation on january 14 of this year and to add to this kulebov’s letter, which we read it there today, that is, it becomes, probably, quite clear to me that now it will not be about ukraine

trying to push through your idea. they are now syruping up their idea. that's it for this memorandum, and they will now try to use these four countries in order to launch this machine for reforming the security council. well, i understand, well, they didn’t. the composition does not correspond to reality and that the voice of asia, not only china and africa, not south america, that is, yes, we are, but certainly not germany japan, but the problem is that germany decided that there is no historical guilt anymore, while here very interesting speaker, but there is also such a funny one. well, not funny, but very important point. look, after all, the assessment that america gives with its satellites to what is happening in ukraine testifies to the deep imperialist russian view of the world. that is, they think that

what is happening in ukraine is terribly unprecedented, but at the same time, it’s the most cruel, that it’s a lie, because america’s aggression, which was not provoked by unjust and unjustified against iraq, was an order of magnitude more cruel and bloody aggression, a country against syria is an order of magnitude more cruel and more bloody against livy an order of magnitude more cruel more bloody. but if it doesn't happen on the european continent then the anglo-saxon rulers of the world think it doesn't matter. this is an absolute manifestation of the imperialist colonial thinking, that's why the arab world despises them anyway. they didn't give a damn about you either, but yugoslavia is for them, but they didn't always hate for what they hated in yugoslavia most of all serbs whom? of course for what for the fact that the first have always been anti-fascist. yes, i

told this story about a former orthodox and anti-fascist about a former major politician who showed me a map of, uh, 43-44 years of germany and every time. here he told. so the serbs pushed aside all the time, and when i said, listen, well, serbia, he says, it's not they are against they were not with us. this is a man who later sat very high in the highest government circles in germany, and he is still there and he adheres to this line, i don’t understand, he listens, of course. natalya blue. why kaliningrad can be an enclave? yes, but serbia can't. well, if the serbian people say to the russian people protect how we should react to this now. at least the sea has tribes there. i understand, well, let him try to shoot down our planes with a distance, which will fly, you know, there is something else left of anti-aircraft guns, or they have already sent everything to ukraine. well , let's see what europe is good for, or we will give an opportunity, once the russian tsar, when it was necessary, volunteers were sent and

saved. true, sometimes those who later betrayed us, like the bulgarian little brothers, managed to get on the ground in 92. that's about the day, but he did not have time to wash, because there were serbian armies, of course, now because no, the serbian people are a people, a great fraternal people. this is for us there. we are talking about the serbs, that is, not a question. the question is for us and it is not simple, it is very difficult and very difficult and very difficult. i am not going to push our political leadership in any way, i do not have such powers, but this is a really big question. if we see how many of our brothers will be destroyed now , we should write, what options do we have, what can we answer? or again, the third world territory war will break out in the balkans. how did the first one start? this is

the hardest clubs and what is happening there now. it is very difficult. it's such the level of responsibility that now rests on political leaders that i don't know who in the world wanted to. here. now take it upon yourself, what level of responsibility? this is a very difficult question. well from safety tips. still, i returned a little more to the internal affairs of russia. i just read the news that khristogruzev was put on the wanted list, that he is on the wanted list, that we don’t know where he is sending the brigade? do we know where he is? well , look, this is an interesting situation, because this is the fifth column, about which we have so much have been talking for the past few years. it's all quietly here, the main part of it is open. they moved all the easterners gave her leave, and they got the opportunity. it's very good to settle down there. this is the system in which they now have a great interview with alba you don't

understand. you come, there are people here, they explain everything. he has a great interview. albats where he says that he doesn’t even earn money at all. she looks like you don't earn? no, i don't earn at all. i just spend it for free work, but 300 georgia you are human. who over the past 20 years has been building his network of people who have been trained in organizations that have brought him relationships. this is a part of these people. now they have moved to the west, they are located a and including germany, and now he is well done. but our profile ones, who were supposed to herd him 20 years ago, yes, they are his. i think they gave him a roof. i assume so, most likely, because to imagine that a person could turn around in such a way that they are the special services, and the police. well i don't say that the special services, but i say that our own work knows the roof of it, but he had the opportunity to start. yes, he worked very well with his media company. he had

a lot of them. well, you know, this system, when they say today that this is supposedly a system of points, how can they recruit people there, this is some kind of bologna system. they turned inside there when they are going to work with people who ended up in the west, you know. how do they work there? they work a little cunning. it's very easy there every refugee who gets there, we are talking primarily, of course, about refugees. he necessarily goes through an interview, usually goes through an interview with representatives of the special services or the police, usually, if it is even the police or not even the police, but some kind of civil immigration service. they are related to the secret services. having passed this conversation through some strainer defined there. he is already getting the first points and with these points. he then goes further. e in the hands of various non-profit organizations. they still give him some points some more points in the end. these people are all in the hands. these are the very same fifth column that moved to the west, and now they are working quietly in the west, but you just

mean that they are still making money in russia, including, and i’m not talking about myself. well, here you are vladimir dol'fovich and the people who work in russia. they know these people very well and give them an opportunity. the opportunity to earn is not you specifically. i mean russia in russia they are given the opportunity to earn. they can list the last names there. please provide these people, and we are behind the list, it is not behind the list. this is for no one. no. i can say that, i will . let those bodies that you just spoke about deal with this, we know that they are, we know that they exist, and we know and read their materials in the western press all the time, so here is a list of problems of no insolvency. they are printed there. no printed. they do n't print everything on this either. here see you tomorrow.

for this case it will be an honest detective. used to watching videos stopped working , install, open, watch russian channels, and all movie series and cartoons, educational programs and documentaries for free without registration, watch in the

application or on the website.

typical ukraine program we talk about what made ukraine the way we know it today, typical and, of course, unique. that's what we're interested in. hope you're interested. and do you sometimes have time by chance, or what? well i sometimes i see your programs, they are very convincing and deep. for which i want to tell you separately. thanks to the

light of the union of soviet socialist republics of the ussr the people had to accept a red project to strengthen the skeleton of the state, making an economic leap. ideally , the peasant should have been destroyed as a class during the great social experiment. the soviet rocket program and peaceful cosmos, a red project of a systematic approach to the soviet economy, was bearing fruit. the ussr lived a stormy heroic life we are his heirs without him we would not exist.

new year's eve meeting in an informal setting, the heads of state of the cis came to st. petersburg to traditionally sum up the results of the work of the commonwealth of independent states before the holidays, talk about plans for the future and discuss issues of concern to everyone on the regional and international agenda. what statements will anastasia efimov tell today? states.