two in a sense, this is the thing that would be very nice to learn how to create an opportunity for systemic action. i understand that now the time is very difficult and, of course, the presence of smart calm, thoughtful and charismatic leaders is very important what kind of leaders there are, and the car with slipping with slipping, but continues, as if even the most go, by the way, about the fact that the pancake shows two things. here in my opinion. together with all

the other members of the administration there, which they themselves arranged in bali comrades and mr. biden, agreed that they would at least 2 years. yes, the elections of the twenty-fourth year will avoid any and all conflicts. they will in every possible way slow down the slide, so to speak, from cooperation to confrontation, and after that the canoe said. i am sending my secretary of state, that is, the minister of foreign affairs, to you. astral picks up the phone and starts yelling like a boy at the uh, uh minister of foreign affairs of the great power. why does he get a complete thrashing? it just shows this thing, the second thing, which , in my opinion, is much more systemic here, what the fuck is stupid, it is that the united states has different ideas from china about how fast to move away from the current state of the world. yes, we

see that the global world order is collapsing. here it is in fact the regions that are coming. as it turned out for the united states, in any case , it seems to some circles in the united states that they will win in competition with china if this happens faster, while china will lose, and this is a very interesting alignment, which is too early for us. and i agree with them. well, this can to be. we need lessons for ourselves in this sense, what does it mean for us, because this is a very interesting thing that flew around today, well, right in the morning, all this news about this conversation. this means not only the physiological, as it were, chargedness of one of the wings of the white house, well, quite a systemic international issue. in my opinion, how would it be very important for us. by the way, also. even sergey viktorovich lavrov said to the united states they want to upset our relations with europe. yes, it was our trading partners and etc. in my opinion, what is important here. here's what i really think. they

did this due to the fact that they simply laid down and slaughtered europe, and in our connection with europe, these were connections with europe before the great patriotic war this was a separate conversation, but after the end of world war ii, europe was essentially a branch of bretton woods the western system is a branch of the big west, that is, we had trade ties and cultural ties and tourist ties and some kind of romantic ties, so to speak. we had exactly western brandenburg system. and these connections were not only in modern russia; since the nineties, since the soviet union, they were no less romantic, and where did the zhiguli plant come from ? so to speak, our passenger car and everything else in the world. yes? yes, that's it, that's all, and we lived in such a paradigm both under soviet power and after soviet power. these ties are now dying for objective reasons, and now we are left without this very

europe, which means that i am not interested in the snot of people who say, how am i now without padermos. for example, i don't know, it can't live there. interested in the ideological justification of our existence, both economic and logistical. and by the way, speaking ideologically, in conditions when indeed many decades of economic and logistical ties were associated with a player who will disappear before our eyes. we won't get too old yet . he will be lost. it's a pity somehow you see, what a pity yes the player, the player is sorry, but here is such a situation there, and now i'm here how to select? this, by the way, big question. this is a separate conversation. here you need, as usual, motorized tanks, and the americans, by the way, have already begun to support here. yes, as a matter of fact. the americans have begun. uh, this is already an operation to select brains and everyone in the world. this is such a

second operation, or a paper clip, which they carried out at the end of world war ii. and what are we, this is, as it were, also necessary, so to speak, here. the situation needs to be carried out in reality. now is the time for a very rapid evolution very well carried out an equally effective operation , they exported both factories and engineering equipment to russia. but it was declassified, i don’t remember how it was. well, the meaning of a nuclear bomb. come on meaning meaning the meaning is that this is also, as it were , necessary, and this is a completely different style of thinking. i literally 10 seconds. this is how putin spoke about his own evolution, when he first put his strength into including russia in this space, and then, when it turned out that in this space there is no suitable connector to our country. this is what needs to be quickly realized. understand here is this very different trajectory. this is where we live now.

it will be the honest detective. today is also a day of great international meetings and discussions. here, putin and lukashenko held negotiations in an informal setting, even in a russian museum. our government is working quite hard. i know that you have reported to the government talking, i

was told in detail the contacts. well, there is already something to talk about there, so i am very glad, because just like that on the sidelines of our informal meeting, you can meet together again and discuss what you represent home in some states. during the evening, many dots were placed on and continuing our dialogue with minsky , since he was mainly on the economy. i

thank you for what was finally agreed yesterday. many questions. uh, the government will finalize them already, they can't have any questions for us. we have already decided everything they asked for, so i thank you. vadim ivanovich yes, in general, this meeting in st. petersburg, which completes the twenty- second calendar for the year 22, is indicative, because we will have a long year. it what is laid down, as he said, as president lukashenko said, the year will be a good year it will be a good year, yes, but the trend that, uh, emerged in the twentieth year, will continue. this is how the year twenty-two began with the crisis in kazakhstan. how long ago was that? how long ago was that? and it was. january, the month is only 22 years old and 22 years old for sure. one of his indicators. this is the year of strong leaders. here is how putin lukashenko showed everyone of our

opponents, no matter how we feel about achinsky, nevertheless, he is behind many processes that take place in poland, and where there are no strong leaders. we see that the system works, but if leaders do not appear, if this manager does not appear, then what is called a competent manager in this american system itself. anyway, the system will fight. this is the year of strong leaders, zelensky , you understand, they are trying to stick him out, but this is an endless parody, he started from his presidency, and copying some manners and behaviors of alexander lukashenko, who are popular in ukraine, remember how he drove officials away, but it's all the same it's a breed. this is some kind of copy, such as he was a parodist, so he remained such a parodist. he remains an instrument of political action of other alien forces, and a strong leader himself formulates a program and implements it himself, and this is the year of the return of ideology. we have never

talked so much about ideology. not just as in a peaceful concept, but as an effective method and instrument of political life again, this is the year of return, yes, ideology, and this is the year when you look at how it returns anyway, this should be mentioned by the soviet idea i am by no means talking about the return of the soviet union. but you know, it was the soviet idea that i was thinking about what the ussr is for us, so the leaders gathered. the cis is not the whole. the union is not there, the baltic states are not there. it is clear that georgia is not there in ukraine. although it was a very big victory that the leaders of the cis came, the west really wanted many people not to come, they wrote about it and predicted nothing happened. everyone has arrived. well, what is the soviet idea for us and suddenly i remembered lenin's definition of matter, remember the beginning of the century. yes this objective reality given to us in

sensations, which is photographed and displayed, is copied in our sensations, regardless of them. you see, here is the idea of ​​advice. i’m not a fan of me, a communist soviet person, i immediately remembered the definition of a deficit yes yes, yes, yes, yes excellent by the way, i gave fyodor mikhailovich burlatsky all the time that this is an objective reality given in sensations, but it’s not right for us, here vladimir vladimirovich and there was a shortage and i don’t like a lot in that reality. i remember when i was a little boy i stood in those queues, but the idea still lives, and the soldiers at the front. all the same, the banner of victory and you hang. and all the same, we leave that common country. that warm feeling, whatever. it's called nostalgia and adversary. while waging a struggle against us , this idea is constantly mentioned and constantly re-introduced even in its criticism. and the enemy is a strong system whether this work is very strong. look at how they

work out very subtly at every moment in every story, whether it is economics or politics. here now just terrible repressions against the orthodox church in ukraine and how did it start against serbia and against serbia, here are the key points for the russian national understanding of russian in the broad sense of the word, the forty-eighth year, when a coup was actually staged on the fanor, when the american intelligence removed patriarch maxim v of constantinople put their finar. and now she not only dismissed, but defiantly kicked out the allowance, humiliated , slandered. and why just for the fact that the patriarch of constantinople is sick, yes declared mentally ill, he interviewed there, in my opinion, the first in 20 years, only yes, and even then he refused to talk about this topic, eh. the one who replaced him on the plane of president truman was attended by turkish intelligence, as

always, all by proxy, and you know what the last reason was that the patriarch of constantinople resumed the tradition of walking, after the service, he was saved earlier in russia and then he passed with the soviet ambassador. this was one of the reasons, you know, even any hint of the strengthening of russia somewhere in the post-soviet space entails retaliatory actions on the part of the americans and they will beat will use this tactic, and thousands of small cuts, but, because now this is their strategic plan to drag russia into a big war. it's over. they knew what to do in february. they knew what to do in march. they understood what had to be. uh, economic close creek what to expect color revolution splits. elite expected a lot. now i am convinced this plan has ended, they want to defeat, but it works in many ways. situational, but now they are working out what dmitry warned about, they are working out the patriotic

ultra-patriotic part of the spectrum and they don’t care to raise a new type through it, so i’m now seeing how many nudity, especially those who allegedly went to the front line , got hit by the back foot to the front line and sit around. these are and time is famous for speaking out against putin, so he is for them the personification of the enemy. why did you start talking about strong leaders, they are personifications for them. they are deeply convinced we see throughout the rhetoric on the actions will clean up in erdogan will be another turkey will be removed orban will be another hungary will be removed. lukashenka is bent, belarus will be removed. putin all problems will be solved. here they personify, therefore they constantly mention his last name when describing any of their problems and will bet on it. this is one of the key ones. uh, the threats that are now facing threats to our leaders. yes, i absolutely agree that it is

true. we are now witnessing a kind of conflict. e world of personality. uh, let's say so humane, uh, the approach is personalized and the approach is uh, hmm gray u soulless mechanistic system well, of course, no system works. if there are no people behind it, it could be a financial international or a financial aristocracy, as in london, for example, or in new york , it could be some kind of technocrats, like brussels, but really, here is the collapse of the globalist model, and he is now so obvious that he no longer talks about it, only lazy. as for the tactics of our enemies, and in his last interview, our minister of foreign affairs clearly called a spade a spade. he said so give enemies. this is very important, no partners. and let's not even say so, not an apartment for negotiations. and the enemies, uh, very clear. and i get the feeling that the tightening

of sweden, finland, nato, uh, flirting with various destructive forces. and either these are some kind of non-nazis in ukraine, or these are some kind of ultra hmm troybialists. e, for example, in the expanses of the former soviet union e. this all means, firstly, and smoldering chi chaos is a personal fire around the perimeter, and it is very important that money is being pulled out of europe and those who have taxes and i have a feeling that this mechanistic system in the states is preparing a shift up at home. uh, let's say a departure from global e-dominance to isolationism, but before that they will turn the whole of europe and afghanistan into afghanistan after the withdrawal of nato troops, that is, respectively, throw everything even their own violence on their own strength. eh, left accordingly. maybe there are some kind of shootmanshafts in the form of an army of the baltic states that will look after, uh, some

europeans coming out of this mainstream, but, according to indeed, europe is becoming the main economic and ideological victim. e of this trend. well, this is a trend, it comes with far-reaching consequences. excuse me, where did you get that from? well, with all due respect, but let's see the statistics and where they reduced their presence in military bases yes , they left afghanistan, but they came to europe even more powerful, well, south korea is very, very easy to show in fact. we're talking about military power, pumping out and exploiting economic interests. doesn't mean isolationism. in the outer politics, one can say that before the withdrawal from afghanistan, they increase the contingent by one and a half times. almost where in afghanistan and in europe it's the same now in europe the contingent is more or less like in afghanistan well, you never

know, but in the east they have more or less, they probably closed some bases. they are returning to afghanistan. we will see them pumping up europe. there are conditions for robbery and control of its consequences. nobody comes out of the 19th century. this is already another round of isolationism. but here from socialism you will have many perimeters. here american bases in europe that will actually control this future rebellion. this is the outer perimeter, and as for the technologies that they are now actively pumping over to themselves. eh, finances, i'll transfer it to myself. this will already be the internal economic contour, respectively, here. but what's the most dangerous here, first of all, they're trying to force us to play by the

rules anyway, which is basically like, uh, rivalry and a race of expression. we are now forced to increase our military the contingent in the northwestern district is being recreated by the moscow leningrad military district, which is, in principle, justified, but all this, again, requires enormous stress and resources, both human and financial. well , corny, where can i get so many new officers to form 15-10? you can't learn in 3 months. it's still a certain process for 3 months. yes, you can do everything one at a time, that is, to train, not to train, to retrain before now mishustin announced the creation, there is the sixteenth to the training centers atzer and will be excellent junior for russia was to have such a small army quite right. russia, which has always grown to the officer classes, when the military aristocracy has always been, well, a pillar of russian society, but this actually does what is necessary lev

nikolayevich lermontov read that everything else and everything and everything is primarily officers or, in short, primarily nobles, then officers, because it was impossible, yes, then it changed there, and this makes it necessary to completely translate and not only the economy, but also social life itself on a war footing, in fact civil, elitism and understanding that it is indeed the military way of life and not only the economy, but above all thinking becomes categorical for us. why did the civilian militia of russia live a large army without civilian militarism? not enough of this civil lilitarism leads to impoverishment, of course, it undermines its head, like the 1980s civil militarism. no, and the 18th century had no civil militarism. always lead to exhaustion of the system. he is harmful in his own way,

so putin said we are not going to play this game. no, why is it just a profession crying highly dear but civil militarism. this does not mean that everyone must necessarily serve in the army and at the same time or there immediately increase the military contingent by two or three times. this means , first of all, the emotional state and spiritual state of society, respect for the army and the prerogative of the army above the position. it 's a different concept, of course. the civil of another, like the military, like the labor of the army, there is something else that is tired of women's observance there, the only beginning of the lack of discussion, how shall we say? yes, if we go like this civil militarism, we will dry it out by society, we will kill it, because in society there should still be a discussion of another question that

this should not be on e, overgrows, that is, the discussion must know certain limits, therefore, it means the presence of everything -the same physiology is replaced by something once or twice, if you are such smart civilians, why don’t we arrange it , and this is already a variant of the eternal discussion between speransky. where it is not right, it turns out that not one is not the other, it can be said more broad sense and legacy of both for animals. they were both right, but in fact, this is a spur of the fate of russia that has been going on since the middle of the 19th century, russia is certainly rich in its diversity. i don’t know, there was no expansion in the times of peter the great and catherine, there was no strong army for everyone all over the world, we are still becoming no civil militarism. no, well, from the heyday of the arts, and i say that every official, or

every civilian in general, should find a military man there either. by the way, by the way, i agreed with officials, but really, uh and definitely ideologies, perhaps not dominant ideologies, but certain ideological highs of a kind. these russian universal economy, which should be obligatory hands, respectively, their attention to ken that is now at the cathedral of the competition. well, how little? what do you understand, really? that's important last week in many discussions there is a president said, by the way, i'm talking about america, what's uh? well, we can’t talk about the west either, since they have a different philosophy. we are different. we others further indicated the sign. yes

the spiritual material divergence began at the moment of the divergence of the christian branches, and it is the main one here this stupid question. you know english well, well, how would liberty be in english? it is freemen, in the sense, speech by civilizations? therefore, our soul is different aleksandrovich well , it is clear that it is impossible to do this in english, because putin is to blame, otherwise it would be, if putin could find, of course, some meaning of this word for me, but i have very much glory to putin yes , as he says, there beauty is there like it or not like and also and that's already yes, that's all. it's uh, that's the law. i, actually, i have a

serious topic, but i'm still preparing for the program. i accidentally stumbled upon the ukrainian news of 2016 and saw with great pleasure that in lviv, which they call lemberg there, they produce a beer called a, which depicts mrs. merkin, and i specifically asked if they still produce and you know, they told me , which yes it produces, but only they don’t sell it openly anymore. and this is a limited one like this limited production, and they are working in this direction, that is their aspiration. uh, the ukrainian nationalists of the nazis, their desire to turn everything in this direction, but it is simply not exterminable. well, what is it about? ukranian well, as i understand it, they are expecting a love letter from me, mrs. norman extraction, so we regard and do not want you to sit in a german katalashka. no, i can’t, by the way, it will be

approximately the german sound of the catalog. if i say, they will understand me there, or rather, if they tell me so, i will understand. and on the contrary, well, the extraction is normal. you know her demand, which she has repeatedly expressed and what she has expressed. right now, let's make preventive deliveries. let's not think about what is needed in ukraine even now, but think about some future time periods. let's think about what will require the delivery of aircraft, and not just the tank but in general, everything that is possible, let's deliver , deliver one question. and who is this mistress of extractions and uh, where did he get such a military spirit, but it should represent the very literature to which it is fear yes, but the lady who represents the very liberal party, the free democratic party of germany, which, in principle, in their principles in this oil, they generally prescribe absolutely peaceful

slogans. and in this direction all the time. eh, they say and demand compliance from others. here are some peaceful conditions, but at the same time, of course, no one will forget that the beginning of the yugoslav crisis was laid by the liberals, led by a general, who then launched actually the whole car. and if we today , uh, will talk about today's situation, then here is ms. already traction, which vividly represents the liberal party, she actually uh with her statement today. she sold a great state and a secret. i think that this state secret lies in the fact that hmm here we are in europe underestimate germany when you think that voth is just going to supply his tanks or his weapons to ukraine, it’s not by chance that germany is pursuing politics, but let’s guys you all around here is everything that you have ours you supply to ukraine and we will supply you. and

why is it all so i asked myself for a long time . why? this is the way they go. well, not only because they are afraid of some kind of direct confrontation. not with russia, all of it, i think the trick is, uh, that , after all, i’ll repeat my assumption from sunday evening that probably 24-25 years - this is probably the year there will be such a big clash battle, when there will already be participation of various parties, including nato and, in general, the entire west and russia so germany they are playing a very uh, germany is playing a very tricky game. they throw out their warehouses. look at the lists that instead of this, i am now buying eighty percent of the defensive armament of the air defense system a for pontoon railway schemes yes , a few dozen more f-35s are being bought, but the main ones are these 100 billion, which the germans calculated that they should re-equip the army. they empty their warehouses, give it all

to others, you do it all. and while we rearm and by that time, if this big war really takes place, then germany seems to be the very country that will have the newest, most modern, most rearmed army, which by this moment will be able to. well, they probably won’t make it to the twenty-fourth year, of course, the production process there is much longer and it can be said that in 2 years they will be able to build new ones for themselves there. there are at least a dozen tanks there, hardly the same as these systems and rests. but, and in many ways this explains why they, if they give anything they give ukraine something, it is for this reason that they will test their defensive equipment, which they want to order for themselves. use in case of a big war, because in this case germany will again be in the oil. well, you were handing out there, you did everything. you gave it all to you. we honestly agreed with you, but now we have a completely new army with completely new weapons. this is my

version, i do not claim to be correct, but i think so. here dima nods his head. he doesn't really agree i'm rotting, but you're pumping okay, well, i still continued, because otherwise i'll go astray. in a sense, and although i saw your head shaking, i paid attention to it, lost my way. i mean, no, i didn't get lost. completely twisted the meaning. this means that vladimir vladimirovich began his speech today, the assembly, and hmm but berg has a certain relationship, as it turned out, with a liberal. i am very surprised today. e, i read that in 2003 germany is changing its ambassador and count alexander iii will come to the place of today, and in 2020 in the third. yes i have become 2003, yes 2023 changes its ambassador arrives count lamps is healthy. well, starting from the fact that this person represents just the liberal party, and he is the deputy chairman of the liberal faction of the bundestag, a was