naughty 2

ukraine is not a vest state such was not when the us was born there was no state. ukraine the united states will commit and ukraine will be 5 minutes. so what, honestly we divide there is a contender on earth we decide together with you you report yours here we are, respectively, it’s clear let’s fly ashamed or later , about the same thing will happen, but only everyone will pretend that we are observing the charter from our side. they from their side and so on. and uh, the highest to our deeds, what are they ideologically destroyed we

we see e do not speed up, not counting philosophy. yes , but we don’t have a very big rich man, this is philosophy, and for this institutionally it is impossible to have a black cable. wash to white as you know, we are sorry, they are all brunettes for 30 years, institutions have developed in which people live and work. all the same, they will think like this before the meeting, but they brought out the loson, of course, that's how i will need to build new institutions. in the field of education, reforms are not going in the opposite direction. this is me in my head responsibly. uh. it slows down for various reasons. and uh academy of social sciences. the new academy is new, and what about the society of that, and how will this help you learn, what did you say about the poverty of our philosophy? i'm

just about to this, and it turns out, let's go there, like, but not in buildings. where do you get the frame from? yes, and where do you get them from ? how will you find them? are there caps? i have heard this many times. i heard so about our players. here are the players. i was cheating the rest. he is 22 gods. i can not find one ball to drive, but the question is different. and the staff, well, this is the main question. here you have some new cards. i'm not going to give you names there. uh, i can write you a last name there according to a history textbook, someone is now writing some, and everything is decided in a maximum of a year. i repeat. we

are slowly pouring out idemic anti-projects at the old institute . this is a new frame. rather bloom. yes, they will merge into the old system, because all these things are still working there, this dmitry is always a brilliant explanation, but i generally say to another, you understand, and social sciences. old fur, yes, i would say in new ones. and you are correct in your suggestion, but what you propose is still in the old furs, because even your new institutions will be in the old system of management of these institutions. this is the same problem. it's no coincidence how it worked. yes, not what napoleon said, the revolution is 10,000 vacancies in fucked up, i would say. the first new policy is not economic, only the policy of the new economic policy

needs to be changed even where they do not fall. why, for example, here he offered completely choose differently to eliminate distances should be education, what are we going to do? what he generally said is that we need academic institutions, in general, with the sciences on their feet, we see how they were in soviet times. who even said that this form is still working now? say don't touch them. why don't touch? you proposed a parallel system, because we do not want to submit to the revolutionary, to whom this parallel system will close on what. academy of the new academy of social sciences right? this is the new academ garlic. who will we bathe? who is the president of this new academy, that is, well, you still propose the old structure. what, for example, is the academy of social sciences in america, which includes ren corporation? i don't know where they go hans hansson, where he enters, it's completely different there. yes, we have where they enter us in the

nineties. now it also depends on our fields, as there were quite a lot of clubs. well, of course, not so much as in the usa. it’s better that most of it was taken care of, either as an understandable hospital for the administration, or a composition in america. but no institute there is no social sciences, there is no money, who needs it in china? well, china is different. there is an ideology, so under this ideology. and if we don't have an ideology, we won't have anything first communists. at first there was an ideology, institutions serving it were built under it. and we want to build institutions without saying what we are talking about, firstly, in general , it was not russia that gave birth to the academy out of a day. we will go for this in ancient greece and on what to talk about the eternal men of the united states or asked there. secondly, the academy of sciences, soon e anniversary, she can’t have her destruction of tsarism destroyed the academy of sciences

was not older than the academy of sciences, and was born under tsarism. and what's next right because the bolsheviks were smart, they shortened the time of the academy of sciences, why didn't they restore tsarism? well , it's strange in osvoih. that is, if you take a manifestation, there is a tough one, yes, they did not restore a secular religion, then, uh, i complete your answer to your many questions. uh, short phrases, while i offer a burnt one. yes, we do not want revolutionary. that is now i don't want revolutionary i don't i want parallel. but i want, but i see that he doesn’t want that the revolutionary society was asked not by you want to hang on poles, or something, but you have another option for dismissal. no, that is, academicians began the academy of the national economy, to this day one person needs advertising.

such an interesting discussion, we are developing here, yes, therefore, i will have to say a few words, but about, by the way, first about the serious about production. uh, i won't talk for a long time, but uh, the priority is to learn how to produce ourselves. now this super-task in absolutely all areas. how to do it? can we discuss? here are some that i don't like. it means no need to mobilize the economy

. don't like it. think of something else if it scares someone, for example, there is a search for harmony from space. i don't know how to say it, yes or how it doesn't matter. set clear priorities for the development of your own production. define, uh, the timing of the toolkits, and within those toolkits. it can be anything state participation is not for the state investments. the main thing is to achieve tasks, because now there is one problem everywhere. this is a lack of what they used to buy abroad or a complete inability to do it, or they forgot how to do it or they never knew how to do it at all. production, including, in my opinion. uh, in an emergency mode, changing the law to ignore all copyrights wherever it is, for example let's say it concerns hostile states. at least de facto, it is possible not to dara, including simplifying the regulations. this is

a real problem that a huge number of manufacturers are now facing there, well, roughly speaking, there, uh, it’s the very thing they decided to make cars there without yes, because about this, well, we don’t do it ourselves, but uh, in fact , in order to in order to document this, you need to go through 27 circles there, hell, and this is all these all these all. well, i like an example of all sorts of new certifications new documentation all these things take months. look, we don't have that option. we do n’t have the opportunity to go back and forth with papers for months, that is, roughly speaking, it’s still a good term for mobilizing the economy this is simply vital, because we are succeeding. anyway, you know the movement at different speeds, some really understood that the situation is such, which means that others cannot slow down. actually. yes, they slow down from all forces or try to live as if nothing had happened, that is, at different speeds, so to speak, these very flows are going. yes, and this

ultimately does not act to reduce efficiency in achieving a good result. as you say, the military-industrial complex is being done. i er, so to speak, myself very much at it. i hope that in addition to the military-industrial complex, we have a huge amount. well, very important tasks where we click to forge. own production is a super-task, under which everyone should be imprisoned, the first second about, uh, this very historical, what is called creativity, too repeatedly. we discussed here. incidentally, i'm hmm here, maybe happiness, vitaly, then support the part so to speak, i'll say something on my own. in general, i say and believe here that we are actually entering an era. uh it is quite obvious that the degradation of what was called democracy, as supposedly systems are universal for the whole world, and ahead in my opinion, ahead. in my opinion, it is very complicated and maybe even risky, but the search can be for the most exotic device systems that in different countries will be suitable for specific specifics. and for us. this is also a real creative challenge. this is real

historical creativity, all these, uh, imitations, relatively speaking, imitation of parliamentarism, democracy, so to speak, that's what we held on to. all these 30 years. all this is a thing of the past. if we keep it all. in fact, this will not make any sense. here, perhaps, revolutionary steps are not needed, but it is necessary to think about this topic, because i think the future it seems that elements come from classical political science, but these are just such models that will most adequately reflect the reality in a particular country or group of countries and will most adequately solve the problem of refraction of specific specifics behind them. the future is theirs. they are behind attempts to find some new universal model for the whole world. either this is how it should be all over the world or this is how it should be all over the world all over the world, actually it will be this way i at least i think we are entering this era. maybe again after there, relatively speaking, 100 200-300 years, again some kind of universal e, then we’ll come if we don’t burn until then, which i really hope for, although we won’t live, but, nevertheless, some kind of universal . so to speak, the device is to the fact that in every

place in every state it will be necessary to look for such a model that will not repeat something, but will be sharpened to perform tasks, this is something to correlate, well, with a cultural architect depth. if there is in russian to say, which will e soul local, so to say that the culture of history will resonate as much as possible with this soul as much as possible and will be as close as possible to the point that this people will have. e, closest to e, associated with the perception of truth e, true justice and so on. here there can be no ideals, as it is universal. well strives for it. i think it makes sense. because i think that we are just entering an era when the maximum number of completely exotic models. let all sorts of strange worlds begin to emerge. by the way, again. well for the sake of simplicity the same relatively speaking, china yes, well listen, let's be honest. this is not capitalism. not socialism, not democracy, not dictatorship. this is the search creative search for

some model that works best in china for china around. china, although they also have, so to speak, it is clear that there are some costs there, and it is not at all ideal and effective, but as a path, that is, you start not from being like someone, but from the fact that we we ourselves need and what people from the inside perceive as what is needed for our country. so what solves problems. if here in this paradigm the task in view is not solved. this means that the paradigm must be changed, and not try to adjust reality to fit your paradigm. well , a simple thing, but nonetheless. it seems to me that it makes sense to repeat it periodically, you can think about it. narusa, says, i don't want to be a senator, but i just want to be, in fact, such people are in the new model. they are treated in any models. it's understandable, but at least. they don't have the importance given to them by the systems that bloat them. for some false tasks. here you are said, including you just said, but to a large number of absolutely exaggerated

authorities. and why did they appear, in addition to all sorts of intriguing, so to speak, reasons without time, in addition to all this, they appeared in order to demonstrate them to someone, because we legitimized ourselves, through their model, of course, through their approval. and so, in order for them to approve us, it was necessary to have, so to speak, a number of such freaks who performed certain tasks there, and this is, as it were, one and the same the main task is to get away from this and perhaps despite the complexity of the present moment. he really gives us a chance. finally. find yourself to really become free, because the constant with stamping. yes , the constant attempt to imitate this is the inner lack of freedom. and here is about the internet. there, in short, partially ready to support him. for this, of course you need. new philosophy ideology, in the end, whatever you want, it's just that here's the thing, uh, with what i want to argue with you a little, yes, when you let's change all institutions, cadres and so on, in fact, there was no contradiction between you. there is such a thing here when the task is set. let's change. they are everything at once, then most often, if it is not about a

revolution, nothing changes, so uh, anyway, yes. uh, there must be traffic here and it's one of the main problems. this is personnel , of course, personnel, because, to be honest, the whole corporation, so to speak, in our economic science in our education, has been formed and, in principle, they can understand in the nineties in the nineties zero do not allow this thought to move. it’s just that they really don’t give everything, because there are other things, many alternative concepts cannot be born, including, because, and here i’m ready to agree with you , including, because it’s impossible to prove that this is scientific thought is impossible, for example, let's say relatively speaking on such a topic to defend a ph.d. thesis it is impossible to break through a huge number of these classifications, in which you cannot go through which you are not scientists and so on. this requires institutions. well, like something that needs to be moved. this is perfect. exactly and the last thing i will say about yes , that eyeliner e, we discussed these, so to speak, e wonderful people in quotation marks, but they still got lost. i seem to be completely lost. eh, in these

historical realities, so to speak. yes, once they really cheated, including the state inflated them to an incredible amount of self-conceit and they began to turn out to be, they are unfortunate people, it began to seem to them that indeed, they are the salt of the russian land, that they really depend on them. there is the fate of russia, what is it really to say so, but there are arbiters on it, judging by now they are engaged in these all sorts of fantasies. uh, but i think you know, maybe that's good, if our enemies, u conditionally rely on such people, then they will fail, because these people categorically do not understand the essence of the processes of many who ask in russia and what is called russian russian people do not understand. they don't feel it. they are internally so far from these things. what yes, you know, you can even schematically write out the prerequisites that, theoretically, there are prerequisites for stabilization in any country, but behind these prerequisites, you know, there is the spirit of the law, there are the letters of the law. here is the spirit of the events taking place. they obviously don't feel it. and by the way, speaking about it

testifies. here too here. eh, this is the phrase one of the means of one of the characters that were shown. where to put all this people. yes, you won’t get him anywhere, and these people are not fooled kremlin propaganda, as you like to think, he really is like that with him, really something despite all your efforts. there is something left that is really not readable and is not considered on the calculator, and at a critical moment it begins to manifest itself. here's how you can discuss it here, for example, let's say the same. uh, it means the thing about really all the people's support for our military. uh, millions of people, no one forces. i know this for sure, because, as it were, they are also being replaced, no one is forcing them, no one is threatening them. none of them no incentives they do. this is because they feel something that these people have not felt for a long time. or maybe they never even felt it. i think this is important, and this, among other things, is the guarantee of our victory. well, i'll say it. just for what that's when you go, i say most

of all it strikes when you say all the dead. because they westerners believed that they would be the main element, or when you talk to the wounded, because the westerners believed that the wounded would be that audience, which is the percentage of wounded military personnel, who, after prosthetics, if they have lost limbs, are ready to go back to fight about the central ones, who return to more phenomenal. and when mothers say that we are proud of our sons and are ready to take the place of those who fell in battle , they help, in whatever way we can, this is something that westerners cannot literally literally, if possible a couple of times really about the wounded. i also had impressions of hospitals. and yes, and the mood will be different for people, heavy and fighting, so to speak, but nevertheless such that, relatively speaking, what are these

hope to be ready to run for american candy. there is no such thing there and will not, of course, and will not actually offer something in this sense, as it was proposed, relatively speaking, in the late eighties and early nineties. it ’s just that the west has nothing to offer, roughly speaking to the people, those calf candies and the people who worked in the late eighties and nineties really worked. now it is no longer working, also due to the situation we are in. i just think when i have msu msu mgimo like this, so that not in a row now mgimon, that is, i am surrounded by deans, yes, as you know, i was born from moscow state university, what was i born from? but he himself, he himself, and the first testament, how interesting the latin academies.

anyway, you won’t leave us here, the senior of the united states of america, two reports came out on new year’s eve. e one report from the rent corporation, the second from the hudson institute. the first report is unique because it is based on a hypothesis consisting of three water and all three input unknowns. that is, they have neither facts nor data confirming this hypothesis, but on the basis of this they project various scenarios, the essence of the issue comes down to the fact that russia will definitely strike at the territory of a nato member country; the only question is how and the question is how nato needs to respond because, as stated in the report , it is necessary to

react in such a way that russia does not react to it later, uh, also a certain form of sluggish schizophrenia, because i want to ask the authors of the report. you last at least six months. say what russia in ukraine is losing. we don't have a fracture. soon we will allocate crimea, then, you see, the ukrainians will reach vladivostok, and on this the history of the existence of our country is over, they will start working there on cartridge works. how are we going to strike at the territory of a nato member country in such a situation and why is the most important thing ? discussed in our country in telegram channels. he is promoting people already building some. in general, hypotheses about why he came out? where is our report? why don't we have a report that will release a report that will tear

the media space of the united states of america for a week with regard to the second report of the hudson institute. it is even more interesting than the first report. he builds his entire camba on the fact that russia will fall apart. we must now decide how we will work on this territory. and that the americans most importantly will have to regulate territorial conflicts, interethnic inter-religious conflicts on the territory of russia, we all understand that this is an attempt to analyze russia as a model. there, the ninety-fourth ninety-fifth year until 2000. that is, they remained approximately in that period of time, but the question itself is posed. here we have no doubts . this is the real goal-setting of our opponents in this environment as well. i want to absolutely and completely agree with you and sergey as regards the reaction of our former fellow citizens who are now from abroad, and some, in a surprising way inside the country they want the defeat of our

armed forces. we have an enemy, this enemy says that my goal is not that in russia, let’s say, the armed forces were withdrawn from the territory of ukraine, our goal is that russia does not exist, and our internal enemies and those of their representatives who left , including from here. they say we also stand for exactly the same thing, this is our main goal, and i want to be here. uh, you know, sorry to bring everyone down to earth. this is not because these people have some deep value landmarks of persuasion that this corresponds to their ideological attitudes. the reason is absolutely pragmatically cynical and selfish, there is no other scenario in which they can return to russia continues to live, as they lived before , except for the defeat of our country, because the victorious russia will be a country in which the authorities will not want wants. their power to appoint something else to some positions, this society will not return back.

it will no longer be able to live in the world in which it has been in the last 30 years when our heroes will return, who today are destroying the war equipment and their specialists. the structure is winning this war against nato when they return home, they will absolutely not turn a blind eye to this colossal injustice that has reigned all this time because of these people. there is one citizen. ours spoke with what it says. and why those people who oppose the sfo? why don't they want to listen? why do they not have representatives in power and why are they not building a dialogue with them? why are they subjected? it means that such ostrogism , firstly, i must disagree with her, because, firstly, she replaces such people with the concept of speech, not even about those people who do not agree with their who you are, maybe you do not agree with the words in that sense that it should have been started in general in 2015-16, there may be different points of view, but we

are talking about people who say that the more russian soldiers there are. they will kill them there, the better for us we are talking about those people who say, i can no longer identify myself with the population of russia who say i can't use. the word we in relation to ourselves and the population of russia these are the people we are talking about, and unfortunately, i must say that she is mistaken in both cases. firstly, there are a lot of such people and they are represented in various power structures, there are a lot of such people in education there are a lot of people and a lot of their culture in the economic language on the street at mass demonstrations. and why will i answer this question of us people who think the way we are in the country is not that the majority is not that the vast majority. this is a grandiose number of people of these people, minuscule. well, like any minority group. they are more mobilized than most. they have more effective network structures, they may be in the minority in the team, but you cannot

break through, because they are mobilized. they work together. they have a common goal.

manufacturers of good things want and most importantly. but it's best to check.

head on the shoulders of the

disobedient 2 it is extremely important that now we understand that these people put spokes in the wheels and the presidents put spokes in the wheels with our armed forces to our security agencies. they are mobilized to the limit, and therefore the task of us citizens of the country who support the president and support a special military operation is to mobilize their efforts, not to wait until they decide to remove someone from above, to establish cooperation with each other as much as possible and move forward to establish the horizon as much as possible.