hello, the international review is on air in the studio of fyodor lukyanov today in the program of the international review the events of the week of the chronicles facts comments how does the worldview change the world balance shakes the materials of our program not in a childish way?

so it ends, the year for which a place in history is reserved will be a chapter paragraph or line, we will find out later, depending on the scale of further changes. the more we punish ourselves, the more modest 22 will look, but it will definitely remain in the textbooks. some illusions. divorced others arose, the past has come into the present and even wants to become the future, but the future is also not a miss. he has his views on us contemporaries. it seems that right now everything has turned upside down at once. this, of course, is not the way the prerequisites arose long ago, the train will be long. in any case, by the twenty-second year. you will have to come back

more than once in order to more accurately understand even the latest history, the year 2022 must be analyzed by concepts, not only figuratively, but also in the truest sense of the word. how have the classical concepts of international relations changed? let's talk about the shake-up with two of our most thoughtful friends, ivan saranchuk. today , dear guests, right and justice will present passion and strength about bukhtiyor tuzmukhamedov, not to be confused with the polish party of the same name. hello happy new year to you. let's go. with trump cards, as they say now, ah ivan e, the year is 2022 according to the time scale, where do we send forward or backward? and now, from my point of view, all the main players are arguing about this, they perceive what is happening this year as correcting the mistakes of the past, and not just going somewhere in the past. but somewhere we didn’t finish it a little in the past and now we’ll fix it, in principle, there has always been a

point of view that we didn’t finish them in vain, then in the early nineties and now for a long time, it was marginal. e point of view. she never died, but she was here somewhere. in the shadow so behind the scenes, and now she has come to the fore. here they are correcting it. they, as it has become customary to consider, uh, their own stupidity, or, as it seems to them, actually good, that is, correcting the mistakes of the past for the sake of a brighter future, it turns out, but this, firstly, there are disputes in every country. and to what historical depth it is necessary to check for errors with us. eh, how uh? fedor, you know very well there are those who believe that it is necessary to reach peter the great in correcting historical, uh, some mistakes. uh, actually, uh, in the west, they mostly talk.

uh, here are the last uh of the last decades, well, we are also basically, as it were, inclined towards correcting the last decades, what is it? yes. this is a simultaneous fix for a recent there is no past and about toring for oneself in the future, but if we talk in terms of parties of games, then, well, the games are provided for, at least some rules, where in your area of ​​international law and international humanitarian law, it seems, like for the previous couple centuries to 7 great progress. it is on the one hand, and on the other hand. right now, at the words of international law, many especially political scientists have such wry smiles on their faces. yes, here we are, including, for example, humanitarian law, but in conditions of large-scale and very bloody fighting. it's a total disaster. you said progress has been made in 200 years. and now we are also shrinking for 200 years to a period of 2-4 years and we say that now there is a regression.

let's maybe, cyclically, after all, i don't want to talk about the next two years, when there will be another progress but no. we are now focused skepticism about international law is largely focused on those sections of it that govern the use or non-use of force. this is a separate conversation. i'm ready to continue it but please note that international law. here is the scope of force regulation of the use of force is a relatively new area before. it was precisely this section that was unregulated, damn it, while such sections of the most extensive sections of international law as the law of the sea developed. consular diplomatic law, which continues to apply air law. i am not talking now about the fact that russian airlines cannot fly to the vast majority of countries in the world , as well as our airspace. closed to most foreign

airlines, but regulated nonetheless. in this area, the standards of the rule of law and cao international civil aviation organizations remain. the institutions established by the sectoral international human rights treaties have never gone away. the so-called human rights committees on social economic law against torture and so on. they somehow continue to function. these are not courts. this is not an echr at the global level, but, nevertheless, they make a decision by which the state, but more often than vice versa are uh, sincerely a lot, of course, depends. from the level of cooperation between these states and relevant institutions, as far as international humanitarian law is concerned? you see, i proceed from the fact that the law is not silent, even when the guns are speaking. therefore,

international humanitarian law, in principle, should now exist for him, even if it is vocal. but still, the dawn happens, whether it happens or not. i'm not entirely sure, of course, but still. i am in an article published on march 10 of the current of the year. e called for the fact that in the outbreak of an armed conflict, which i cannot characterize, otherwise than an international armed conflict, that is, subject to the wife of the entire convention and the first additional protocol to the geneva conventions. so, within the framework of this conflict, it is necessary to observe the observance of international humanitarian law by one's own and carefully record the case of its violation by the opposite country. it is necessary to punish both of them, because if the subordinates of this commander are in the field, a fighter, a junior commander does not comply with

international humanitarian law, such a thing leads to the fact that a higher commander loses control over his army. here bakte reisovich raised a very important question about the strength of the village in our international affairs. this is the basic category of jonk relations and here, on the one hand, the holiday on our street has come to strength. here again, i and especially the military returned to the center, and on the other hand, you look at all this feeling that the result of applying it is being applied , let's say, not quite the same as they waited, the xylie began to relate in recent decades to some kind of miracle. unfortunately, the americans taught us to do this, they themselves got used to it and created such an impression for others. here everyone is seated. but now there will be both, and something wonderful. uh, it seems to me that it started with uh the

first war in the gulf. e, which took place according to the concept that he then proposed. uh, their chief of staff, this is a war with a position of absolute superiority. and here is the power, which means almost miracles - some kind of miracle happens. yes, everything flies beautifully shoots and here is the result. one american p3 air defense system costs about half a billion dollars, the pentagon told cnn. at the same time, one shot will cost 4 million for maintenance, a team of 90 people is needed, and it will also take more than one month to train them. in israel, there is an iron dome complex for the last 10 years. he fights with shelling and the gaza strip interceptor missile does not hit the target exactly, but explodes nearby and destroys it. each launch costs

israel 66,000 euros, and the cost of the missile, which flies from the gases, is unlikely to exceed a few hundred dollars of the vietnamese air force during the war and counted slightly more than 150 aircraft. while the us only multirole f4 phantom fighters lost more than 700 pieces. moreover, 20% were non- combat losses in 1965, a ford mustang car cost $ 2,000 400. the phantom is more than 2 million, that is, for this amount it was possible to buy almost 900 mustangs, moreover, for every 2 hours of flight. it was necessary to give one more ford, these days the situation has changed, the cost of one f-35 is about 100 million dollars, and one pound will have to be paid not for two, but for 1 hour of flight, in general, more than one and a half trillion dollars were spent on the f-35. this is more than the gdp of spain, mexico

or saudi arabia, while the program has been criticized for more than 10 years. the pentagon has repeatedly reported shortcomings, and the us congress has even threatened to stop purchasing. it is not surprising that not every ship is suitable for flights of such aircraft, for example, the american nuclear aircraft carrier exactly the trader entered the guinness world records as the most expensive cost in the world. multi-purpose reindeer existing ship with a nuclear power plant more. four and a half billion dollars professionals know perfectly well that power is, uh, blood under uh, horror uh, suffering and always something unforeseen. uh, back in the clausian he wrote that there is a war, that there is a war, including the spirit of war. that is, this is some kind of

ongoing dynamics and just the art of politicians not to succumb to the spirit of war and not to enter. here, in some kind of hostility, it does not appear in the logic of the war itself, but to preserve political , uh, goals. uh, the goals of war and don't back down from them second. but in principle, for several decades now we have been observing a situation where it is easier to deprive someone of victory than to win, that is, to prevent someone from achieving his goal by military means to raise the price. ah, the price of war uh make it unacceptable to try, just uh either. uh, here's to increase the price of war, or ignite this spirit of war, so that the war has captured everything and political goals have been lost, we see in a number, for example, a number of regional conflicts, that this is easier to do than to endure, uh,

consistent and effective application. ah, the use of force. this does not mean that this should not be done, uh, it must be abandoned, but uh interfere uh, it’s easier than achieving u positive u goals and the third point, it stands in the fact that in the modern u world, but very hard to strike a balance of power. but in principle, forces have always been used for what , in order to adjust the balance of power and reach a new balance of power and, on its basis , reach political agreements. now fix it. the balances of e forces are very difficult, because the confrontation is not only military, it is, as they say now, hybrid, it takes place in parallel at once in several areas on several sites with different tools. therefore, there is always a possibility, if something does not

add up here, to tweak the situation on the neighboring field, and on the neighboring field, the balance is exactly about this. e. well, my philistine idea is that law is a product of balance, that is, when there is a balance of power, a certain hierarchy, a certain system is established. right here the right of the rule arises, and so on, if i absolutely agree with what ivan says now, the balance is generally hard to imagine. and then what about the norms and rules, then, well, as the fitter of the swordsmen said about uh, consent is products. that's when this non-resistance of the parties is achieved then there is, uh, the norm. our outstanding international lawyer international authority and gregory ivanovich tonkin wrote about the approval of volt to the state. true, some followers. uh, they added to the will the will, expressions, that is the state not only demonstrates its will backed up by force, but it declares what

it would like to achieve and then this negotiation process begins, but returning to what ivan e said, you understand, and the war in the hall the first war in the hall, memorable also by the fact that resolution 678 was passed by the security councils. well, as they say now, but the essence of the powers and the security council of the state. he, as was said in that resolution, who cooperated in assisting the state, that is anti-cancer coalition. that is, the security council thus said that we have no power. we do not have the ability to somehow influence this force. but there are those who are ready and able. e interfere in this situation . charter he about which in such a philistine view they say that it prohibits the use of force. no, he does not prohibit force, firstly, he specifically

stipulates situations in which the use of force is possible. immediately, the situation of aggression, that is, the illegal cross-border use of force, is heard. second, reading between the lines and these lines do not really run up. we find a situation where the use of force is permissible, even in the absence of a real armed attack that has begun. i remember how, in 2008, after the act, which, other than the aggression committed by georgia against the russian federation, was more precisely the contingents of the russian armed forces on legal grounds, uh, in a separate territory located by us? uh, so in that situation of the russian federation, through the mouth or hand of the then permanent representative of a in russia, he came to the late ivanovich churkin she presented her document, in which she explained briefly and very clearly. why on

what basis is russia using force and what are the goals of this use of force, we are summing up, i have one question for both of you, a short question, a short answer. e ivanovna ievich, what did you teach at 22? uh, let's say those who deal with international relations. the main thing, so to speak, is the conclusion that we should have made. we are used to the fact that if history, if not stopped, as fukuyama said, then at least she was tamed, uh, on her the bridle of international law, and on it the saddle of various international institutions. and and here is a story that means no one has ordered. it turned out that history is not a pony at all, there will be no such story going around in a circle, just like that, uh, yes. this is the mustang is

something we go beyond e regulate. we are like a story we open something. u something new and uh, i think we just opened this door. the door and many were horrified. many people have a desire to close the door, and there is such a desire for a ban in those countries that we now attribute to the majority of the world, yes, and many of us also in the country oh, want to slam this door into a wild story, but it seems to me that this is no longer possible, maybe it will be possible to close it, but here is the real story. she us uh, she sucks us in. uh, it only means one thing, which is mine and new in this historical moustaga. we, of course, after some time will curb it and learn how to deal with these

processes. but we are faced with a major new one. here, if not figuratively speaking, but more scientifically. e, we have e, very interesting new reality. everyone in the world is very connected. it’s just impossible to fence off, to separate, to fence off, at all. this is now a loss for any country, because it will almost certainly have very negative consequences for economic and social development for progress in the broad sense of the word. so we are very closely interconnected, but we have stopped moving towards ideological homogeneity towards something in common, ideological disunity is growing very different, very close and horror. and yes, it really is. horror, because

if you look like this, not even for a few decades. she several centuries ago, we had some kind of dominant idea that it’s easier to cooperate as the same, it’s easier to live side by side with the same, and we enter the world very different and growing different and all cultivate our difference, but at the same time very closely. everything is very crowded in early december, the us congressional research service admitted that the sanctions created problems for russia but did not lead to an economic knockout, some media even ironically compared anti-russian sanctions with a shot in one's own foot according to trading and comics in the united states this year, inflation has reached a forty-year high. although, against the background of the rest, this is not so noticeable in the traditional leaders of zimba in venezuela, lebanon, syria and turkey here. in general, nothing has changed,

the figures in europe do not look so scary. but i noticed the jump right away and in vain this ranges from six and a half to 23% depending on the country, the worst situation is in lithuania, estonia and latvia where it exceeds 21%. in poland, food prices have risen by 20%, and twice as much for energy in germany, goods and services have risen in price. and even more than 10%. this is a record for the last 70 years, but it is much worse that the industry is suffering, as the british financial times answered, due to rising gas prices, chemical giants are closing their factories. bass cuts have affected sectors such as glass-to-metal ceramics, paper and textiles, employing at least 1.5 million people for having failed to live up to the bleakest forecasts. in november the british magazine the iconamist, even came out as a subtitle,

hinting coldly that on the european continent, due to colds, lack of energy , mortality may increase, as long as there are no serious problems with heating in the european union, but attempts to explain the effect of sanctions do not stop , scientists from the berlin science and politics foundation from wp , for example, an expert on russia and i am not from the club believes that the most difficult for russia is yet to come. the main thing is not to stop. especially, according to hans hypertert. china is also experiencing economic hardship from the conflict in ukraine, meanwhile, experts still admit that countries that did not impose restrictions on russia have new economic opportunities. at the beginning of february, the volume of russian exports to china, brazil and turkey, increased by at least 50% compared to the previous year. the frame

has learned something this year, or is it also trying to close the door to history, well, firstly. you invited a historical political scientist and a lawyer in order to, probably, somehow push them together, but he leaves. and we get homogeneity some. first of all, consent, i completely agree with ivan, you can’t close yourself. you can't close and you have to. uh, hmm can't close. well, since both of us are still in addition to our areas of activity. we are also representatives of the academic world, we must not close ourselves in the academic world, as for disappointment, yes, a year of disappointment, but nevertheless, i did not understand my profession. i became convinced that my specialty was needed once again. here, too, international law provides the institution with tools by which e is not a sin. would still be useful. well

, let's hope, anyway. thanks a lot. our guests were ivan franchuk and bacteria , also mukhamedov. during the year, the conflict around kosovo smoldered by the end of the year, it escalated, in addition to the fact that serbia is not alien to us, the plot of the landmark power transformation of the former yugoslavia was the first major undertaking of the era after the cold war. and now this era has just ended from the kosovo mitroviltsa report, an analogue of lvovich ta , for several weeks they were in a complete blockade of the albanian police occupied the populated areas places where there is a mixed population and at least 20 of them have formed police posts, people live in fear after dark. the serbs are locked in their homes, from which they do not leave until the morning does not give

us the basic rights of freedom of choice and movement the right to work. they deprive us of everything now everything depends on the will of the albanians. we must return to normal life. this is the most. the main thing on the streets is dmitrovets, they break cars, throw stones at our houses, and people are beaten almost every day all the time same story before the albanians were in the form of the liberation army, kosovo now the police with guns. on the side, that is, duties on the situation, attend classes online, younger students go to school, the streets of cities in the north, kosovo are patrolled by the international forces of key for and eurolex , there are still products in the shops on the market, but the stocks are running out, the stalls on the market are empty sellers. no, because they are afraid to leave the house every night in the north, kosovo, local residents hear explosions and machine gun fire in the spasich eight family people live off agriculture and

animal husbandry. at least, there is no need to worry about ideas, but grateful apiary is afraid for the life of his loved ones, we live hard, but i am used to this crisis situation. we have non-stop. so we won't be celebrating new year's eve. mladen's wife , nadik, says her biggest concern is the safety of children here in kosovo, being a mother is very difficult. we cannot allow our children to play outside in the current situation. they must be in our field of vision at all times when the kosovo authorities brought their special forces to combat readiness, serbia pulled the borders of its army and that's it. this time almost 3 weeks on 15 barricades in the north, kosovo was parallel life. people gathered there, were on duty at night, took refuge in tents and warmed themselves. campfire. they did. it's not just that, in fact. it was their only way to defend their right to life for the serbs in the

north, kosovo was one of the requirements, as was the creation of a community of serbian municipalities. even 10 years ago, the authorities did not agree with this and signed the brussels agreement, but now forgotten about it. whatever the outcome of the current confrontation in the north, kosovo it most likely will not solve all the problems between ethnic serbs and the authorities , this time the armed conflict was avoided only thanks to pressure from the united states and the european union, but the serbs here say that the struggle for their rights is not yet finished. your advertisement again history and modernity the centenary of the ussr is a rich topic for

399 rubles. you can test yourself or subscribe to sber prime plus experience vivid emotions from watching wokka movies at home sber prime plus access to films and series of the wolf of music in hi-fi quality without ads in the sound and other benefits of sber prime plus subscription profitable 399 rubles. you buy one smartphone, and the second as a gift, because we are smartphone agents.

the qr code in the application is capable of more . scan it before paying and with every purchase. we will transfer one percent of the family fund together for the construction of family houses so that children can be close to their parents during long-term treatment. order from a scooter in a sbermarket and receive an order with 15% discount. in 15 minutes, a savings banquet. shipping is free. we have new year's not once a year.

therefore, a gift awaits new subscribers every month when you connect, your gigabytes will constantly wait for tele2 to double, everyone will become our opponent on january 17th. december 30, 1922