ukrainian troops launched a series of powerful strikes on the settlements of donbass in donetsk in the last hours - the militants fired four times , opened fire from heavy artillery of nato caliber, in total , 25 shells of targets for nationalists exploded in the kiev kuibyshev region. the residential quarters of yasynuvata and panteleymonovka also became a part of the joint coordination control center counted 13 hits over the past day in the dpr from militant shelling, one person was killed, two were injured. the minsk agreements were an attempt to give ukraine a temporary strengthening of the army , the former president of france, francoislande, told us about this. he was one of the guarantors that kiev would withdraw the troops, which had not happened before, with a similar recognition , and the former german chancellor angela merkel antonchenko continued that francois

alande, picked up the marathon of revelations launched by angela merkel, said that she supposedly was right about the minsk agreements those very fourteenth years between moscow and the lpr, the dpr and kiev, mediated by europe, an agreement supposedly should have led to peace in the donbass provided for his special status, but in fact turned out to be a cover for ukraine to accumulate forces and weapons. angela merkel was right since 2014. ukraine has strengthened its military potential. it is the merit of the minsk agreements that kiev got such an opportunity. it was alan who told the publication nezavisimy kiev the name sounds like irony kiev is the same in quotation marks, independent from washington and brussels, as merkel was when , as chancellor of germany, she assured the world of the guarantees that the minsk agreements supposedly give and all subsequent numerous negotiations. ukraine dragged them in all sorts of ways, stomping on the spot, training the nazis at that time and cynically, shooting at the donbass, germany

and france calmly watched. feasibly invested in the hype around the minsk agreements, a and b screen in this illusion, creating an illusion. uh, that everything will be decided by the world from the west, what more can you expect? they were always cynical, they were always e-manipulators, and they always lied to the presidents of the hotels in minsk where the meetings of the trilateral contact group were held. waiting, which each time ended in nothing. by the way, merkel recently emphasized what she said earlier to the daily, this time in an interview with the italian press, that the minsk agreements were an attempt to give ukraine time and kiev used this period to become stronger, and nato then could hardly give ukraine as much as today we are talking about weapons. of course poroshenko dreamed about this so much. however, in the fourteenth and fifteenth years, the supply conveyor was not yet in place, in their current form, western kiev propaganda was only being formed before being redrawn consciousness of the country, growing fierce russophobes

kiev needed time. the ex-president of ukraine shared all this, as he thought with the former us ambassador to russia mcfaul, a well-known prank contour, if we draw it on whom these revelations pass, then it all started with poroshenko with the famous prank of lexus and vovan, then merkel, now alant, that we see it's a party of war with us. they say that those who want to search for a conflict, that is, both sides who were supposed to guarantee the implementation of the minsk agreements in germany and now france is now saying that all this was a fiction, in fact a trap in order to have time to pump up ukraine with weapons to prepare it. it is clear why and the fact that merkel's revelations after leaving high posts only adds credibility to the geopolitical cynicism of the west, which is unlikely to be bought by anyone anton sidewall. anna pogonina to lead, the military russia of belarus worked out together it would be training in several directions at once on the territory of the republic, the fighters

acted both day and night, for example. the spotters performed tasks together with the snipers. while some fighters were putting out of action the armored vehicles of a mock enemy, others were destroying manpower. tankers hit targets. both single shots and volleys on command, the foot units trained to fight in urban conditions, in a special training complex, the fighters performed, among other things, cleaning the premises in buildings constantly covering each other. these other exercises help the military of the allied state to act together with the maximum efficiency. the russian delegation flew to the capital of brazil, where it will take part in the inauguration of the elected president of the country, the solemn ceremony is scheduled for january 1 , our country, represent the federation valentina matvienko ode silva injured in the presidential elections at the end of october, during the second round he scored more votes than his rival, the current head of state peoples. north korea launched three

ballistic missiles towards the sea of ​​japan, trium hub reports, citing south korean military short-range missiles. overcame about 350 km. the government of japan has already sent a penalty, it protests, i note that the launch of ballistic fathers was for the dprk-37 in a year, in total, north korea tested more than 70 different missiles. the legendary football player cristiano ronaldo moved to the club al-naas r from saudi arabia to the portuguese will enter the field under the seventh number until june, 2025, the contract is calculated precisely for such a period, the sports building writes that the striker will earn more than 200 million euros a year subject to advertising contracts. this amount makes the five-time winner of the golden ball and the european championship in 2016 the highest paid athlete in the world. next, our broadcast program is an international review. hello, the international

review is on air at the fyodor lena studio today in the program of the international review of the week of chroniclers facts comments how does the worldview change, the world balance shakes the materials of our program not in a childish way? 2022 is a new year, this is a well-forgotten report from china, the soviet union is no longer a state, and the problems remain the results of the collapse of the soviet states. so it ends, the year for which a place in history is reserved will be a chapter paragraph or line, we will find out later, depending on the scale of further changes. the more it turns out, the more modest 22 itself will look, but

it will definitely remain in the textbooks. some illusions. divorced others arose, the past has come into the present and even wants to become the future, but the future is also not a miss. he has his views on us contemporaries. it seems that right now everything has turned upside down at once. this, of course, is not so prerequisites arose long ago the line will be long. in any case, by the twenty-second year. we will have to come back more than once in order to more accurately understand the course of modern history. the year 3.022 must be analyzed by concepts not only in a figurative, but also in the most direct sense of the word. how the classical concepts of international relations have changed from the shake-up. let's talk to two of our most thoughtful friends, ivan saranchuk. today will present the passion and strength of the actor tuzmukhamedov, right and justice, not to be confused with the polish party of the same name, dear guests. hello happy new year

new year. let's go. with trump cards, as they say now, ah ivan e, the year is 2022 according to the time scale, where do we send forward or backward? and now, from my point of view, all the main players are arguing about this , they perceive what is happening this year as a correction of the mistakes of the past, and not just a transition somewhere into the past. but somewhere we didn’t finish it a little in the past and now we’ll fix it, in principle, there has always been a point of view that we didn’t finish them in vain, then in the early nineties. and that's a long time, it's was marginal. e point of view. she never died, but she was somewhere in the shadows. behind the scenes, and now she has come to the fore. here they are fixing it. they, as it has become customary to consider, uh, their own stupidity, or, as it seems to them, actually kindness, that is, correcting the mistakes of the past

for the sake of a brighter future, turns out, but this, firstly, there are disputes in every country. and to what historical depth do we need to make mistakes eh how uh? fedor, you know very well, there are those who believe that you have to go all the way to peter, uh, to petrovsky times in correcting historical e, some mistakes. uh, in fact, uh in the west, basically, they say this is the last uh of the last decades. well, we, too, are basically, as it were, inclined towards correcting the last decades, what is it? yes. it is the simultaneous correction of the recent past and the forging of one's own path. not in the future, but if we talk in terms of parties of games, then, well, games are provided, at least some rules, where in your sphere of international law and international humanitarian law, it seems, as in the previous couple of centuries, has reached

big progress. it is on the one hand, and on the other hand. right now, at the words of international law, many especially political scientists have such wry smiles on their faces . yes, here we are, including, for example, humanitarian law, but in the context of large-scale and very bloody hostilities. these are total disasters. you said progress has been made in 200 years. and now we are shrinking down to a period of 2-4 years for 200 years and we say that now there is a regression. let's maybe, cyclically , after all, i don't want to talk about the future two years, when will the next progress but no. we are now focused skepticism about international law is largely focused on those sections of it that govern the use or non-use of force. this is a separate conversation. i am ready to continue it, but please note that international law. here is the scope of force regulation of the use of force is a

relatively new area before. it was precisely this section that was unregulated, damn it, while such sections of the vast sections of international law as the maritime right. consular diplomatic law, which continues to apply air law. i'm not talking now about the fact that russian airlines cannot fly to the vast majority of countries in the world , as well as our airspace is closed to most foreign airlines, but, nevertheless, regulation. in this area, the standards of the rule of law and cao international civil aviation organizations remain. the institutions established by the sectoral international human rights treaties have never gone away. the so-called human rights committees on social economic law against torture and so on. they somehow continue to function. these are not courts. this is not an espch at the

global level, but, nevertheless, they make a decision that the state, and more often than vice versa, relate to, and with respect, a lot, of course, depends. from the level of cooperation between these states and relevant institutions, as far as international humanitarian law is concerned? you see, i proceed from the fact that the law is not silent, even when the guns are speaking. therefore international humanitarian law, in principle, should exist for it now, even if it is local. but still, the dawn happens, whether it happens or not. i'm not entirely sure, of course, but still. i e in the article was published on march 10 of this year. e called for the fact that in the outbreak of an armed conflict, which i cannot characterize, otherwise than an international armed conflict, that is, subject to

the geneva convention and the first additional protocol to the geneva conventions. so, what is within this conflict must be respected to ensure the observance of international humanitarian law by one's own and carefully record the case of its violation by the opposite country. it is necessary to punish both of them, because if a fighter, junior commander subordinate to this commander in the field does not comply with international humanitarian law, such a thing leads to the fact that the higher commander loses control over his army reiovich raised a very important issue about the strength of the village with us international specialists. this is the basic category of relationships. and here with one sides. the holiday on our street has come to strength. here again, i, and especially the military, returned to the center, and on the other hand, you look at all this feeling that applying it, the

result is, let’s say, not quite the same as expected, the xylie have begun to relate in recent decades to some kind of miracle we are to this , unfortunately, the americans taught them themselves , and they created such an impression for others. here everyone is seated. but now there will be both, and something wonderful. uh, it seems to me that it started with uh the first war in the gulf. e, which passed through concept that he proposed. uh, their chief of staff, this is a war with a position of absolute superiority. and here is the power, which means almost miracles - some kind of miracle happens. yes, everything flies beautifully. it shoots, and now it turns out, the result is obtained. one

us air defense system costs about half a billion dollars, the pentagon told cnn. at the same time, one shot will cost 4 million for maintenance, a team of 90 people is needed and it will also take more than one month to train them. in israel there is an iron complex dome for the last 10 years. he fights with shelling and the gaza strip, the interceptor missile does not hit the target exactly, but explodes nearby and destroys it. each launch costs israel 66,000 euros, and the cost of a rocket that flies out of the gas is unlikely to exceed several hundred dollars of the vietnam air force during the war and counted slightly more than 150 aircraft. while the us only multirole f4 phantom fighters lost more than 700 pieces. moreover, 20% were non-combat losses in 1965, a ford mustang car cost 2.400

dollars. the phantom is more than 2 million, that is, for this amount it was possible to buy almost 900 mustangs, moreover, for every 2 hours of flight. it was necessary to pay one more ford, today the situation has changed, the cost of one f-35 is about $ 100 million, and one pound will have to be paid not for two, but for one hour of flight, in general, more than one and a half trillion were spent on the f-35 dollars. this is more than the gdp of spain, mexico or saudi arabia, while the program has been criticized for more than 10 years. the pentagon has repeatedly reported flaws, and the us congress even threatened to stop the purchases. it is not surprising that not every ship is suitable for the flights of such aircraft, for example, the american nuclear aircraft carrier exactly the trader entered the guinness world records as the most expensive money for the cost of this multi-purpose carrier ship with a nuclear power plant. 4.5 billion dollars

professionals know very well that strength is , uh, blood under uh, horror uh, suffering and always something unforeseen. eh, even the clausian wrote that there is a war, that there is a war, including the spirit of war. that is, this is some kind of ongoing dynamics and just the art of politicians not to succumb to the spirit of war and not to enter. here, in some kind of hostility, not to be in the logic of the war itself, but to preserve political, uh, goals. uh, the goals of the war and do not retreat from them second. but in principle, for several decades now, we have been observing a situation where it is easier to deprive someone of victory

than to win, that is, to prevent someone from achieving his goal by military means to raise the price. ah, the price of war, uh , try to make it unacceptable, just either increase the price of war, or kindle, this spirit war, so that the war took over everything and the political goals were lost, we see in a number of, for example, a number of regional conflicts, that this is easier to do than to withstand, er, consistent and effective application. ah, the use of force. this does not mean that this should not be done, uh, it must be abandoned, but uh interfere uh, it’s easier than achieving u positive u goals and the third point, it stands in the fact that in the modern u world, but very hard to strike a balance of power. but in principle, forces have always been used for what, in order to correct the balance of power and reach a new

balance of power and, on its basis, achieve political denominations. now fix it. the balance of forces is very difficult, because the confrontation is not only military, it is, as it is now customary to say, hybrid, it takes place in parallel in several areas at several sites with different tools at once. therefore, there is always a possibility, if something does not add up here, to tweak the situation on the neighboring field, and on the neighboring field, the balance is exactly about this. e. well, my philistine idea that right. this is a balance product, that is, when there is a balance of power, a certain hierarchy, a certain system is established. this is where the right of the rule arises, and so on, if i absolutely agree with what ivan is saying now, the balance is generally hard to imagine. and then what about the norms and rules, then, well, as the fitter of the swordsmen said about uh, consent

is a product of the non-resistance of oxygen. that's when this non-resistance of the parties is achieved then there is, uh, the norm. our outstanding international lawyer international authority grigor ivanovich tonkin wrote about the approval of the volt state. true, some followers. uh, they added expressions to the will, that is, the state does not just demonstrate its will backed by force, but it declares what it would like to achieve and then this negotiation process begins, but returning to what ivan e said, you understand , and the war in the hall the first war in the hall is also memorable because resolution 678 took place the security council was made, but as they say now, but the sourcing of powers and the council security to the states, as was said in that resolution, which cooperated in providing assistance to the states, that is, the

anti-cancer coalition. that is, the security council thus said that we have no power, we do not have the opportunity to somehow influence this power. but there are those who are ready and able. e interfere in this situation . charter he about which in such a philistine view they say that it prohibits the use of force. no, he does not prohibit force, firstly, he specifically stipulates the situation in which the use of force is possible immediately on hearing the situation of aggression, that is, the illegal cross-border use of force. secondly, reading between the lines and not really spreading these lines. we find a situation where the use of force is permissible even in the absence of a real armed attack that has begun. i remember how, in 2008, after the act, which, other than the aggression of

georgia against the russian federation, was more precisely the contingent of the russian armed forces on legal grounds, uh, in the border territory located by us? eh, so in that the situation of the russian federation through the mouth or hand of the then permanent representative a in russia to the un, the late ivanovich churkin submitted her document, which explained briefly and very clearly. why on what basis is russia using force and what are the goals of this use of force, we are summing up, i have one question for both of you, a short question, a short answer. e ivanovna a. '22 has taught hmm let's say those who are involved in international relations? the main thing, so to speak, is the conclusion that we should have made. we are used to to the fact that if history, if not stopped, as fukuyama said, then

at least she was tamed. uh, she's wearing an international law bridle. uh, it's the saddle of various international institutions. and and now this is the story that feather grass means, this is no one's order. it turned out. wait for the story. no pony, there will be no such story going around in a circle, just like that, uh, yes. this this mustang is something we transcend. uh, adjustable. as you history we discover something. uh something new and uh, i think we are just opened this door. the door and many were horrified. many people have a desire to close the door, and there is such a desire for a ban in those countries that we now classify as the world's majority, yes, and many of us also

in the country, uh, although to slam this door into wild history, ah, but it seems to me that this is no longer possible, maybe it will be possible to cover it up, but here's the real story. she us uh, she sucks us in. uh, this means only one thing, that we have a different historical mustang, of course, after some let's curb time and learn how to deal with these processes. but we are faced with a major new one. here, if not figuratively speaking, but more scientifically. uh, we have uh, a very interesting new reality. everyone in the world is very connected. it’s just impossible to fence off, to separate, to fence off, at all. this is now a loss for any country, because ska is almost certain. this will have very negative consequences for economic

development, for social development, for progress in the broad sense of the word. so here we are very closely interconnected, but we have stopped moving towards ideological homogeneity towards something in common, ideological disunity is growing very different traces. very close. and if yes, it’s really horror, because if you look like this, not even for a few decades, it was several centuries ago, then we had some kind of dominant idea that it’s easier to cooperate as the same, it’s easier to live side by side as the same, and we we enter the world very different and on the growing different and all cultivate their difference, but at the same time very closely. here everything is very crowded in early december , the us congressional research service

admitted that the sanctions created problems for russia but did not lead to an economic knockout , some media even ironically compared anti-russian sanctions with a shot in one's own foot according to trading iconomex in the united states this year, inflation reached a forty-year high. although, against the background of the rest, this is not so noticeable in the traditional leaders of zimbabwe in venezuela, lebanon, syria and turkey here. in general, nothing has changed, the figures in europe do not look so scary. but i noticed the jump right away and hardly ranges from six and a half to 23% depending on the country, the worst situation is in lithuania, estonia and latvia where it exceeds 21%. in poland, food prices have risen by 20%, and twice as much for energy in germany, goods and services have risen in price. and even more than 10%. this is a record for the last 70 years, but it is much worse

that the industry suffers. as noted by the british financial times , chemical giants are closing their plants due to rising gas prices. bass reduction affected such sectors like glass-metal, ceramics, paper and textiles employ at least 1.5 million people . in november, the british magazine iconamist, even came out with a subtitle, hinting that on the european continent, due to colds, lack of energy , mortality could increase. with wp, for example, an expert on russia and i'm not from the club believes that the hardest for russia is yet to come. the main place to stay, especially, according to hans hypertert. china is also experiencing

economic difficulties from the conflict in ukraine, but experts still admit that countries that did not impose restrictions on russia have new economic opportunities. from the beginning of february, the volume of russian exports to china, brazil , india and turkey increased by at least 50% compared to the previous year. the frame has learned something this year, or is also now trying to close the door to history. well, first, ferris. and you invited a historical political scientist and a lawyer in order to, probably, somehow push them together, but we succeeded. and we get some kind of homogeneity. first of all, consent, i completely agree with ivan, you can’t close yourself. you can't close and you have to. uh, hmm can't close. well, since both of us are still in addition to our areas of activity. we are also

representatives of the academic world and we must not close ourselves in the academic world. what about disappointment? yes, a year of disappointment, but nevertheless, i did not understand my professions. i am sure that my specialty needs to be convinced once again. here, too, international law provides the institution with tools that e would not be a sin to use. well , let's hope, anyway. thanks a lot. our guests were ivan franchuk and the barrier was also mukhamedov. during the year, the conflict around kosovo smoldered by the end of the year, it escalated, in addition to the fact that serbia is not alien to us, the plot itself, the landmark power transformation of the former yugoslavia was the first major undertaking of the era after the cold war. and now this the era just ended from the kostovo mitrovica, a report by analogorbovich. four

hearts were in a complete blockade by the albanian for several weeks, the police occupied the settlements, where a mixed population lives and at least 20 of them have police posts formed, people live in fear after dark. the serbs are locked in their homes, from which they do not leave until the morning, which does not give us the basic rights of freedom of choice and movement, the right to work. they deprive us of everything now everything depends on the will of the albanians. we must return to a normal life. exactly this. the main thing on the streets is dmitrovets, cars are smashed, our houses are thrown with stones, and people are beaten almost every day, constantly the same story before the albanians were in the form of the liberation army, kosovo is now police with weapons. side duties