the new year 2023 has already begun in all regions of the country with new year's greetings to the russians , the president addressed in his address. vladimir putin surrounded by fighters who are doing their military duty at the front he also touched on the topic of a special military operation. it was a year that put a lot in its place. he clearly separated courage and heroism from betrayal and youth. he showed that there is no higher power than love for one's family and friends, loyalty to friends and comrades-in-arms,

loyalty to one's fatherland. it was fit fate. they have become the frontier that lays the foundation for our common future, our true independence. today we are fighting to protect our people in our own historical territories in the new constituent entities of the russian federation, building and creating together. the main fate of russia is the defense of the motherland - this is our sacred duty to our ancestors and descendants. moral historical correctness is on our side and the president turned to the topic of those who do their duty. died promised that no one would be left without help. in our the people acquired special significance such

qualities as mercy, solidarity and active responsiveness. more and more citizens feel the need to help others. they unite themselves without any formal instructions. i want to thank you for your sensitivity , responsibility and kindness for the fact that you are people of different ages and incomes who are actively involved in the common cause organized to deliver parcels to our soldiers in the war zone to the affected residents of cities and towns. send children from new subjects of the federation you, my dears, provide tremendous support, they gave their lives to the families of the dead soldiers, protecting the lives of other people. i understand how difficult it is now on new year's eve for their wives, sons, daughters, and

parents who raised real heroes. we will do our best to help the families of our fallen comrades raise their children, give them a decent education . get a profession. i share your pain with all my heart and ask you to accept sincere words of support. well, now about how the new year was celebrated all over the planet sydney for the first time after covid put fireworks over port jackson bay this year. this is a rainbow of colors over the harbor bridge from the sydney opera house and the rooftops of neighboring buildings about 10,000 volleys were fired thousands of people lined hong kong's victoria harbor to see the light show a symphony of lights fireworks taking off from the skyscrapers were synchronized with the dance of light beams on hong kong's footbahn unique the light show was also watched by the residents of beijing for the first time pandemic first new year in china crowds of thousands of people celebrate on the streets on such a grand scale

residents and tourists, despite the fact that the traditional chinese new year will come only on january 22 in dubai met 2023 with a light show. on the tallest building in the world, the burj khalifa skyscraper, its height is 828 m. walked. a huge musical fountain was also involved on an artificial island in the center of dubai, channel russia 24 i look forward to seeing you the side where you want to live and do nothing the country of the daughter of lithuania the principality of lithuania was not just russian, but also an orthodox state.

i greet you, dear viewers of the channel russia 24 on the next issue of our author's program besogon tv it will be called a letter to comrade stalin, i will begin. in

order to read you a certain post by mr. mikhail fishman, who is a russian journalist and tv presenter. and also the editor-in -chief of the weekly primorsky times. that's what he writes more fun than a comedy about stalin, only a comedy about how they banned comedy . first, the minister of culture stands at the forefront of the rights and freedoms of the individual, when asked if the ban will be answered proudly, as a true opponent of any censorship, what, well, what, you would be banned here , does this mean that there is no political censorship in russia, of course. mr. fishman writes, and what a simple thing in russia, according to the law of the genre, you have to pretend that it doesn’t exist, and here is such an excellent propaganda one, a goat, and in your hands, how not to lay it out, but then suddenly a

fight is started for life, and to death with a paddington bear . two someone very powerful in the industry. it also obviously calls the ministry of culture and says, remove the teddy bear so that the blockbuster about basketball, we collected even more money , we remove it, but then someone quite influential calls to minkul. return the teddy bear to its place, because this is impudence, which no longer has a name, and then the unfortunate humiliated maine cult is proudly, like a starry center, forbids a simple comedy to show that he, too, is in a war with a mustache. we write with the head of the gentleman and it’s not a boy here on our parcels, but he himself knows how to punish and is cute. well, as you understand, and some influencers by jesus, so to speak, your humble style, i immediately say

right away. and why never to anyone therefore? at least i didn't call. well, no, this is important, but another important thing is that the ministry of culture. i really wanted the protectionists to help the domestic film, which today has almost collected 3 billion rubles, which means that it is in demand by the audience. and for this, the ministry of culture invited the owners of the film about the bear cub, the volga company, offering them to postpone their release to february 1. they agreed, but nothing was signed. they agreed that the rental permit was issued on february 1, but no one took it. and there was no way to contact anyone.

they just released. as they were supposed to release without any warning. well, what do you think, this is generally quite an offensive thing, yes, but for the ministry of culture in general for a person. if you agree, then you agree. if not, say no, no. culture is produced, of course, absolutely says, how is it, but there really is someone even more influential than us themselves with a mustache. makes a scandal, so here's what the vedomosti newspaper writes about today's scandal once again shows that the ministry of culture has problems with issuing distribution certificates for the film, a representative of the russian government apparatus told vedomosti well, apparently, those who deal with culture, instead of rules that are clear for the market, some decisions constantly pop up that undermine the trust of all

participants in the industries, the representative said, he reminded that after the story from the film the adventures of tone boy 2 prime minister. dmitry medvedev instructed to study the system for issuing rental certificates. this work will continue the newspaper in question, and some the source of the government apparatus, which, so to speak, reported the question arises. i have and in which government in which country does this source work? when the natural desire is the ministry of culture of the country where the same source resides. trying to help the domestic cinema is not to me we ourselves with a mustache, but to the domestic cinema that is in demand, when it laments that it is trying to help this by negotiating partners. is it an unnatural desire to

help your cinema, which is so choking on american products? and it's not only here, it's not only here. it reproduces all over the world. and now i want to return your attention to the article in the vedomosti newspaper. this quote from some source from the government, instead of clear rules for the market , some decisions pop up all the time that undermine the trust of all industry participants. i have a question. and you are the source, he knows about the open letter that, uh, real industry participants wrote to prime minister dmitry anatolyevich medvedev, tattoos from this are read letters the ministry of culture protects

the interests of the state. and this, in our opinion, is his direct duty, when the collections of russian films are growing, we again have hope for a full-scale revival of our cinema. here are some of those who signed this letter vladimir bortko director actor director bondarchuk fyodor sergeevich vladimirovich khotyanenko director alexei german director alexander domogarov actor andrei konchalovsky pavel lunkin director actor yevgeny mironov excuse me, is this not a real participation of such a source in the process government real opinion of those who actually raises the question who

does this source in the government work for? i make sure that i left the cinema fund in time. because for such sources, the light in the window and real art is nuriev's member on the back of the bolshoi theater let's move on , the story does not end there, even the volga film company prepared the film death, stalin, this time all the documents were correctly executed, everything was fine on time filed and the ministry of culture, having no leverage other than the criminal code, which spells out what cannot be shown, issues a certificate. well, everything is according to the law. but then a certain incident happens, so that this film yes, its release . these are lawyers who write to the minister of culture some kind of notice

that they are looking for something in this film that is really written in the criminal code. the minister of culture has already learned bitter experience, so to speak, communication with government sources, but is going to. quorum, which includes more than 200 people and representatives of the public chamber and representatives of the supervisory board of the ministry of culture and directors and screenwriters and producers journalists, deputies and so on and so on watch this picture the picture was supposed to be released a week before the celebration of the great victory of the battle of stalingrad, which is practically the key victory of the great patriotic war. and this just caused some bewilderment and embarrassment and soft

giving birth, that it was decided that the ministry of culture, taking into account the request of lawyers and this viewing and opinion about the film and the upcoming, so to speak, upcoming anniversary, and recall the battle of stalingrad temporarily for good. tny certificate until the moment when it is clarified what can still be combined with this film and, so to speak, whether it offends our compatriots in the form in which it is, and it should be presented by sight. but it naturally absolutely caused, eh? a storm in our liberal environment, and i will read you a few lines. so victor matizm movie wonderful i laughed horrified. it

's an absolutely beautiful beach. that is, i have not yet seen such a thing on the zhukov screen exclusively he’s good, by the way, the cutest one there is zhukov, such a brutal handsome man, in orders he doesn’t stand on ceremony with anyone and shoots beria, but of course, they couldn’t take our anzhi to the public council consists of scoundrels alexander nevzorov, he also spoke in defense of the picture in general to mock all this, of course, it's time already. they think that this film cannot be shown, because zhukov is there to see or funny. although, in fact. he 's not funny there. it would be funny if it were calculated. how much was stolen zhukov, if we were talking about those hundreds of carpets that he stole from poor germany glory, yes, but irina

dmitrievna prokhorov’s commentary on the film’s ban reveals how deeply moral degradation has penetrated into our society, the memory of the victims of repression and laughter at the executioners. this dual powerful weapon is not without reason. authoritarian regimes always fight against it. and here are the comments of film critic anton dolin, by the way , if you calculate in percentage terms. how much mr. dolin talks on radio and tv about russian pictures and how much about the american ones, it would be better for him, of course, after all, he was working on cnn than on the russia channel, well, let's continue further. what can be solemn and monumental than the combination of these two words death and steel nothing those who initiated or supported at the

state level the ban on the comedy stalin's death thereby admitted aloud and unambiguously. yes, we are stalinists. and what does ksenia sobchak think about this film in general and i in historical events stalin died 65 years ago, he was buried in the center of moscow and it is high time to rebury his place in stories next to hitler i would say that he lives only in the hearts of those who protect him, but it seems to me that they have no heart, and the prohibition to joke about stalin is beyond. stalin is dead and laughing at him is the kindest thing we can do. so you listened to the opinions, so to speak, of critics of public figures. and now let's see.

look, please. maybe you better check, maybe you better shut up before we both get shot. all lies dead. in a puddle. some samomati chuckled slightly. you guessed it. i want giving a speech at my father's funeral is not a problem, theoretically. yes, but practically, when i said, no problem. the country needs a new leader here. the main thing is who

is the first. it looks like i will. i'm a shrew, a bespectacled race has begun, i need to come up with a plan of action as soon as possible. can't intrigue on the run. i don’t understand anything at all, they shot her in front of him, you will throw it into the pit with the rest of the settings.

you know that you all kiss my soviet ass, death, stalin without panic, there will be no executions, i promise. this is what you saw dear viewers. this is approximately 1/10 of the abomination of lies and mediocrity that this picture rings with. we cannot but have the right to show clips from the film, because this is a copyright infringement. we can only show freeze frames. i will comment on them for you. for example, marshal zhukov passionately kisses khrushchev. and here is comrade stalin lying in his own urine. but

look at this, comrade stalin is filmed in the presence of members of the politburo and his children, where a drunken son shoots at the ceiling. please note how this operation is done, yes? with a saw in this frame, stalin's son shouts what to give to the americans? at the same time , the entire politburo is present in the courtyard. moreover, then it is doused with kerosene and set on fire, and all the characters continue to talk to each other, the person in front of them is on fire. they are talking khrushchev says an incredible phrase about what stinks of burnt horsemeat, while stalin's daughter is present whom

khrushchev convinces to leave. and at the same time, a person burns, just burns. and after that, in the same yard, the nkvd officers with a shovel on the wind let ashes of beria. let's take a closer look at the image of zhukov here. i remind you that nevzorov's quote would be funny if it were counted. how much was stolen by zhukov, if we were talking about those hundreds of carpets that he stole from poor germany, and mr. nevzorov, he is in general, but in the know. how many valuables were taken out of the occupied countries, including from us? but did he know that black soil was transported by echelons with ukraine to poor germany, and after that he can tell us about some carpets that zhukov took out of poor germany, i

recall the quote of mrs. prokhorova, the memory of the victims of repression and laughter at the executioners. this is a dual powerful weapon, but a thought comes to mind . what kind of people is this that can allow these clowns, mediocre bastards to lead these people. is this not a mockery of the very victims over whom you shed crocodiles and tears. doesn't come to mind. it's a simple thought when the victory came. it was won under the leadership of these freaks, these bastards that we are shown on the screen. did not have marshal konev rokossovsky zhukov and what kind of soldiers who could idolize their junior commanders, who led them

to victory? and this absolutely fantastic moment when the standards and banners of the german troops are thrown at the foot of the mausoleum. when the call will speak, the people won, how itself how well, how, what? just people just people. now let's think a little. and why is it being released at this particular time, when in 5 days a huge event for our country should be celebrated - the anniversary of the 75th anniversary of the giant the victory at stalingrad of that victory after which the front turned back and toothless now these celebrations on the occasion of the battle of

stalingrad of the 75th anniversary. and in the cinemas of the country it goes. that's normal. and what they say, just people who are not even veterans, i'm not talking about them. they can die in this picture simply from the humiliation of an insult, but just people who respect their history know it. they don’t spit, they don’t exterminate , they don’t distort, they don’t distort, they don’t lie, what they say, how it will be combined with the victory with the celebration of the battle of stalingrad. this randomness i don't think it's a task. i understand that in this situation, and nothing interests those who release and who makes this picture, for example, they are absolutely not interested in their opinion, let's say the daughter of marshal

zhukov who looked at the picture, and i ask you to listen to this opinion. i believe that this is a provocation, especially since the release of this film was timed to coincide with the anniversary of the battle of stalingrad. i'm just outraged to the core, we have young people who are not able to understand all the vicissitudes of our history. they judge wrong sometimes, that's why i think that showing such a movie is very dangerous in terms of educating the younger generation. and here is what a person who really does say. it cannot be reproached that he thinks anti-democratic and not liberal. this is the son of nikita khrushchev, sergei nikitich khrushchev, who has been living in america for many years and taught for a very long time, and at brown university. that's what he says, this is not an accident, but a composition.