if zhukov didn’t take it out, i’ll remind you of the quote from mrs. prokhorova, the memory of the victims of repression and laughter at the executioners. this is a two-pronged powerful weapon, but a thought comes to mind. what kind of people is this that can allow these clowns, mediocre bastards to lead these people. is this not a mockery of the very victims over whom you shed crocodiles and tears do not come to mind. it 's a simple thought, when the victory came she was won under the leadership of these freaks these bastards that they show us on the screen rokossovsky zhukov and what kind of soldiers who could idolize their junior as their commanders? which led to victory. and

this absolutely fantastic moment when the standards and banners of the german troops are thrown at the foot of the mausoleum. when the call will speak , the people won, how itself how well, how, what? just people just people. now let's think a little. and why is it being released at this particular time, when in 5 days a huge event for our country should be celebrated - the anniversary of the 75th anniversary of the giant victory under stalingrad, that victory, after which the front turned back and toothless now

these celebrations on the occasion of the battle of stalingrad of the 75th anniversary. and in the cinemas of the country it goes. that's normal. and what they say, just people who are not even veterans, i'm not talking about them. they can die in this picture simply from humiliation. they don’t exterminate, they do n’t distort, they don’t distort, they don’t lie, what they say, how it will be combined with the victory with the celebration of the battle of stalingrad. it 's an accident. i don't think it's a task. i understand that in this situation, but nothing interests those who release and who makes this picture, for example, they are absolutely not interested in their opinion, let's say the daughter of marshal

zhukov, who looked at the picture, and i ask you to listen to this opinion. i believe that this is a provocation, especially since the release of this film was timed to coincide with the anniversary of the battle of stalingrad. i'm just outraged to the core, we have young people who are not able to understand all the vicissitudes of our history. they sometimes judge wrongly, so i think that showing such a movie is very dangerous. plan for educating the next generation. and here is what a person who really does say. one cannot reproach him for thinking anti-democratic and not liberal, this is the son of nikita khrushchev, and sergei nikitich khrushchev , who has been living in america for many years and taught for a very long time, and at brown university what he says is not an accident, but a

component of that anti-russian hysteria that the united states and england are now raging, showing the soviet leadership as a bunch of fools and bandits, and not thereby drawing a parallel with today's russia only needs to substitute other faces and change the names among, nikichev to a-a. interview komsomolskaya pravda asks questions if they showed the most tragic pages of us history in the same comedic spirit you know this country well, what would the americans do ? illegal, by the way, about censorship, for that matter from personal experience the story of a siberian barber in paris mounted the picture and invited kevin costner it

was not quite finished yet, so that he would look and say that it would be clear to the americans that there was not, and so on and so forth the next day. he sent me two pages of text with incredible remarks. well, for say, uh, editing, state cinema, of that time. it's just a birthday heart may money. there were such remarks, for example, how the heroine, understandable from the film jane, was a prostitute better so that she would not be an american, would be an englishwoman, or, for example. hey sergeant you sing, who does not know this emotion. it would be nice if he knew what emotions are. hey. who allowed the portraits of their mamzels to be hung here, and hung this bad shot here? forward at this level.

time goes by, i come to argentina for a festival, then they show a siberian churchman. people are watching, crying and laughing. everything, as if, if you showed it in odintsovo , the film ends, they ask me, why is it not there? i say, i don't know, i'll call our producer michelle back and i'll go ask michelle why is the picture not for sale in latin america is now just now watching along with people and they are so interested. he says, we have sold we have sold to the whole of latin america brazil, so what? she's not there, why? but because the americans bought out removed the rights to show the film from the payment of lost benefits. why, so that they should not have

such a picture next to them, where jane was possibly a woman of easy virtue of american origin, and olivia's sergeant does not know who such emotions are. do you nerds really think i don't know what emotions are? i wanted to shit on this american monster about yourself you can do everything americans about us you can do everything it is impossible. didn't come out tall. this is about censorship about censorship, in which our liberal colleagues reproach us today. and now let me remind you of a quote from film critic viktor matizan, the public council consists of scoundrels. and if the public council did not consist of such scoundrels, of which it consists, in the opinion of mr. mother and know such people

as mr. matizan, respectable democrats of the just, who stand for liberal values ​​and would show this public council, for example, a comedy satirical about the murder of nemtsov or about the death of politkovskaya? here's how they would rate it. what would be their verdict. how would they defend the freedom of creativity and the ability to laugh at someone else's death, but it comes to mind, in general, dear lord, that on the issue of the ciom, for example, the rating of idols russia of the xx century is such vladimir vysotsky yuri gagarin georgy zhukov joseph steel, do you know what on the issue levada center to the question? what do you think? what role did joseph stalin play in the life of our country 23% answered in full

positive? of the 62%, they answered rather positively, that is, 85% of the respondents rated the role of stalin rather positively. what kind of repression are they? they are for golak for solovki for executions. no, no, they are for the country that rose from the ruins that survived the terrible war, won this war, defeated the terrible enemy. today wins in syria, what do you tell? who won our troops defeated our aerospace forces, no one else won in syria, but you don’t need to know this, you don’t need to remind this, but if these 85% of our

fellow citizens will not agree with you dear liberals. he is a very hot sport between those who appreciate their past do not spit on him. who respects him, who is aware of the tragedy of this past, its cruelty, but does not refuse it. and with those who? doesn't respect. this past makes fun of him. who thinks it would be better to drink bavarian beer and play war in germany. that all victories it is an accident that millions of dead are the mediocrity of generals. what is all that is being done now? this is complete crap. that the nineties were holy? and it's a hot sport.

please look at the dialogue of a journalist, and shevchenko with a journalist, a historian of svanits. by the end of the forty-first year, we had three and eight-tenths of a million people in german captivity. but unlike france, the soviet union did not kneel, i apologize by waving the germans rural. union fought. well, in short, today it spits near moscow because the french of the grave and our commanders, our officers, the council fought thanks to the stalinist leadership. we were the only party heroism was the only country that gave grace to nazism and fought and lost almost 30 million. man down and out demons. maybe i'm vile on graves. let's take a personal insult. i got youtube on, dear, what are you doing? yes

, lord, stop what you are doing and pay attention. it's not people arguing from the street. well-known journalist well-known history tv presenters they sort things out like this, this problem is so overwhelming. now imagine if this is how intelligent people decide on the air. here among the eighty percent we've been talking about. eh, there are not only intelligent people, simpler people. and if they want to defend their point of view in this way? what will happen? is it worth it to kindle like that? an inner desire to defend his point of view by the force method, but what the

director himself says about his film, all russians to whom we have already shown the film, including the russian press, said that they really liked it. it's lenta they appreciated it. they say two things. it's funny, but that's all, really, it was said by the director and anuchy, really, that's all, really, listen, well, in general, i do n't have enough words. but if you're shooting a picture about that time, you're trying to do uh portrait make-ups. but at least you can. well, at least find out what the weather was like in march in moscow when stalin was buried. look what happened. but look how it looks in the film, stalin's death against the backdrop of a green forest of

grass and working fountains. what's this? this is a mistake. no, it's like the italians show us jumping off the cops don't give a damn very rude. sounds unimportant. what is it about these winter summer difference. no, it's important. this is not important, but what is shot after the death of stalin on the same day. we did not have time to take the coffin in the house. stalin at a nearby dacha, right there they shoot everyone right away. uh, servants and so on. well, well well, well, well, you want to watch it, look, nobody forbids it, but why are you bringing us all this crap. do you really know our history better? do you really have to evaluate

our life, our past present future, we ourselves know this, we ourselves will tell about it. really tell, and it will be tough, but it will be true from the inside they look. from foggy albion, just imagine if you want. i'll make such a satirical picture about the relationship between princess diana and the summons, and then laugh a little, like this car crashed into smithereens in a tunnel in paris. why not crawl into bed with the greedy or laugh? let me fall over how the bullet went through the head of the 35th president of the united states. why don't we do this. because we respect both life and death and this is in our

cultural tradition and there is no need to be mistaken. this is not a film about how we were, this is a film about who we are today from their point of view. here is what the ukrainian blogger yuriy romanenko writes, saying that he understands. why the film was banned in russia, its subversive power lies in the fact that it shows that russia is ruled by prides, idiots and cowardly careerists, but in plain text, a russian sociologist, political scientist. igor edman, prohibition of death. stalin - this is a typical subconscious winding according to freud forbidding death. stalin's putin is trying to cancel his own inevitable ending in a puddle of urine complete loneliness and an atmosphere of false worship. revealing universal distrust and fear among those who hate each other and his lackeys in the

depths of his soul, not one of whom will come to the aid of everything. not a simple story about us now let's put it all together. we are in a fortress. we have sanctions. the world is against us. why are the sanctions because of the crimea because of the donbass yes, pardon me, don't be ridiculous. tomorrow they will give crimea to ukraine and everything will calm down in the donbass , sanctions will be lifted. no sanctions are not therefore introduced to us, because we are. because there was a man who said there would be no unipolar world. we have our interests and

our rights. we have our desires. we have the right to have our desires and claim our rights. guys, that it was so good, one passed the missiles, the other said, god bless america, everything went so well. american consultants sit here on the fifth floor of the white house. everything fell down. everything is sold, everything is fine. he came to do. i have great respect for my country. and to those people who today survive in these sanctions. who create, who work. those who are engaged in manufacturing raise the agriculture military industry. they didn't

break. they didn't break. who else was standing? well, who is nobody nobody that there are people inside this besieged fortress who want this film to be shown here? because there are always people in any besieged fortress who are ready to open the gates from the inside to meet those who besiege this fortress. and now if we summarize. all that has gone before it was said earlier in our discussions on this topic that everything that we are saying today is to summarize and imagine that this is a liberal intelligentsia and a like the heroes of repin’s painting and where the zaporozhians write a letter to the turkish sultan, and they would write an

open letter to comrade steel. here, what would this letter be. listen to the letter of the liberal intelligentsia to comrade stalin we settled in your socialism. we divided the country created by you. we made millions in factories built by your slaves and your scientists, we bankrupted those built enterprises and took away the money received by you. beyond cordon, where thousands of real palaces have been built for themselves, you have never had such a dacha, and you are a freak with your back, we sold the ice drifts and nuclear-powered ships you laid down and bought yachts for ourselves. by the way, this is not a metaphor at all. this is a fact of our biography, so your name itches and itches inside us

, we want you to never exist, but in secret we know, if it weren’t for you, there wouldn’t be ours, we don’t want to be grateful to you for our lives. mustachioed, bitch, this is the usual law of human existence, no one wants to be grateful to someone for a long time it is tiring, we want to be indebted only in ourselves for our talent to our courage to our intellect to our strength to get rid of you. we come up with more and more stories in the genre of alternative history in the genre. cheating cheating in the genre of stupid lies, in the genre of delightful and vile demagogy. it's not we killed the russian

village, russian science and did not anger the russian intelligentsia to the level of barefoot. and bastards. it's not laugh. that's it, you died 60 years ago. day of the bastard, and we don't care at all how. it was in your presence that people were killed, but in our presence they died themselves. you didn't even have time to kill so many of them, how quickly they die today of their own free will objectivity. do n't we still confidently say that the victory took place in spite of you, let's talk that you yourself wanted to unleash a war. although we haven’t found a single document proving this, we say that you killed all the red officers and sometimes we even put the military

specialists you killed on a pedestal from those you didn’t kill, we hate to trample you killed tukhachevsky and blucher well, he left voroshilov and budyonny, therefore the last two mediocrity and blyudki, if it had happened the other way around, and left tukhachevsky and blucher alive, then without holes and bastards. if they turned out to be, no matter how, then we know for sure that you beheaded the army and science, that under you we had an army and science in spite of you, but you can’t see it with us. neither one nor the other cancels our confidence in what we say, and we say that on the eve of a terrible war. you did not want to negotiate with western democracies. despite the fact that some western democracies, as we secretly know ourselves, perfectly negotiated with hitler, while other

western, as well as individual eastern democracies, professed fascism and built fascist states. we have forgiven everything and not forgiven everyone. only you. you stood at the head of the country that won the most terrible war in the history of mankind. hatred for you is proportionate. only your deeds are hated by those who do to those who do nothing. no, no claims, what did the heads of france or norway or, say, poland do when that war began, and remember, no, they did not force teenagers to work in military factories. they did not impose brutal sanctions for being late for work, no, millions and citizens just calmly and responsibly worked

for hitler's germany what claims can be made to them claims from the whole world addressed to you were laid the foundations for the conquest of space, if you lived a little longer. a space flight would happen in your presence and it would be completely unbearable. and instead of kiev, cloudy and peaceful nagasaki, you made russia what it never was the most powerful country on the globe, not a single empire in the entire history of mankind has ever been as strong as russia with you

scoundrel. whoever this may like. we are trying very hard and we will not be able to squander and let your legacy, your name, replace the bright memory of your great deeds with the black memory of your yes real and yes monstrous crimes. we owe everything to you. damn you. liberal public leaving one by one, if anything, we are geologists until the

next meeting. i will be waiting for her impatiently. all the best.

i'm changing your eared puppy for your quiet life. the russian defense ministry today announced the disruption of kiev's plans to carry out attacks against our country, on december 31, russian troops attacked the defense facilities of the industrial complex of ukraine, as well as parking and storage areas of ukrainian drones. on december 31, 2022, the armed forces of the russian federation delivered a strike with high-precision

long-range air-launched weapons at the facilities of the military-industrial complex of ukraine involved in the manufacture attack unmanned aerial vehicles used to carry out terrorist attacks against the russian federation, storage sites and launch sites for attack unmanned aerial vehicles were also hit. the goal of the blow was achieved by the plans of the kiev regime to carry out terrorist attacks against the russian federation in the near future. in the past year, a real sanctions war was declared in russia. well , russia has created a powerful margin of safety, the president spoke about this in his new address for the first time vladimir putin said it not against the backdrop of the kremlin next to the military states of the southern military district, besides speech. it was the longest of all the new year's addresses of the head of state and lasted 9 minutes. since 2014, after the crimean events, russia has been living.