she is the theologian that humanity itself will ask the person himself will ask the antichrist to come, and it will not be a monster, nor the serpent of gorynych, it will be a humanist. this will be a wonderful person who desires human goodness, who will accept humanity that has come to him voluntarily. giving him a seal and separating those that he took, who came. and for those who did not come, and then there will be an absolute world attire. now comes the most important question. we want this to happen, that is, they are

counting on unipolarity. mira for some reason will have the courage counts. we will be able to close this window if we are true to our historical moral laws, our principles, our history repeats to our culture. it's a thousand times. this does not mean that in a bast shoes in the forest to live in the forest to pray the wheel is not about that. remember the story about this soldier, ivan andrey stalin said weapons, then about the people that they fought not for us, but for russia, i

understood there. not for power or order. for the country for the opportunity to be yourself, as you have done more than once. and to cover the world that succumbed to this city, if you take history soviet union with communist ideology with atheism with explosions. uh, temples and so on . it's all the same in people's actions. who denied the existence of god, they committed acts that are moral. absolutely matched . what in their place would a person who believes, as soldiers do you, therefore. the unipolar world should not pass, and we

heard this in the speech of our president, but multipolarity. what is a unipolar world, no matter how this term is decorated, it ultimately means in practice only one center of power, one center of power one decision making center. this is the world of one master of one sovereign, and this is ultimately destructive not only for everyone who is within the framework of this system, but also for the sovereign himself, because it destroys him from the inside. i am personally interested in people who, as it were, have always been our worst friends, the british. here, listen

to the national anthem in london. well, that's all i wanted to tell you. today, it's probably confusing. this is probably not so clear, but i actually do not expect satisfaction from what i mean here right. no, it worries me, these questions worries me . i do not want to teach anyone, but it

seems to me that the right question is posed. well , that's all. tired mishman krivoruchko looked at the door and said, leave one by one, if that we are geodem, all the best until the next meeting. i'll be waiting for you.

i welcome you, dear friends, to our next issue. uh, besogon tv programs that will be called, who doesn't see that kind of trace, well, in general, uh, we missed you because we haven't seen each other for a long time. we, at least, have not seen or heard from you for a long time, but time has passed and finally, we are together again a lot of events happened during this time and solemn e, festive such as the celebration of may 9 and a stunning parade. well , of course, there were events and, uh, disturbing, heavy and, in general, tragically, at one of these events. i want to stop and talk. about a little er, look at this question more broadly. let me remind you more broadly how this story happened on may 11, a 19-year-old student and us went to school

number 175 in the city of kazan, where he studied before came with a weapon went out for blood or aimed shot all the people children of two amazing teachers who tried to protect their children about 30 people ended up in a serious condition in the hospital. having done what he did, he did not shoot himself, did not put a bullet in his forehead, as murderers sometimes do. and as he himself promised, but simply surrendered to the authorities, being convinced and rightly convinced that in this way he would save your life, of course. this event shook the society, led the society into a state of shock, but nevertheless opinions on this matter gradually began to diverge and sometimes became simply

polar. i regret that we do not have the death penalty, or rather suspended. so i think that this needs to be done first of all , it is obviously necessary to tighten the licensing system, there are signs that he was not independent, judging by their decisions, most likely there is, because in his vocabulary. here is the word garbage. this is a marker that came to us from the west. polite did not make friends with anyone in such a way that it was very, well, generally calm and usually the blade, because he had information technology, he was all in the

computer, but you didn’t even write how quiet he was the way they treated it. excuse now the quiet idiot and comes to the uttermost absurdity. and absurdly very directed. here , for example, is what the blogger, kamika dzhedent, says. listen, listen to what he says, great to you. thanks that commented and comment on my yesterday 's theories, and they are more and more confirmed by the shooting at the kazan school, and i no longer have any doubts that yesterday's shooting was organized by putin's security forces. and this ilnaz was exposed to the extreme parameters of the brains, you realize. the abomination of this is that the murder

was specially committed by the national guard, and this guy was made extreme and the story begins to acquire mythology, speculation, fantasies, but i don’t want to talk about only this event, as events, it seems to me that the question it's much wider here. the question lies in causal relationships, how one follows from the other. why is this happening? here they say that it is necessary to increase the age to obtain weapons. if they sell weapons, not 18 years old, not from 18 years old, but from 21 years old. and what is in the head in the soul in the heart of this killer or us at 18 years old. what are the guarantees that at 21, and he will be different? there are no such

guarantees. i do not have. i do not get tired of remembering the words of my mother, which she said , it is necessary to educate, as long as it lies across the bed lay down along it's late. here, for example, is what lawyer pavel astakhov thinks about this, but the problems of our school began earlier from the moment when the short-sighted officials who led this direction decided to expel them from school education to education, and accordingly release class teachers from teachers. from this duty you will provide everything, but the ransom in the family and the streets, but only today it is not the street that brings up children. and not even a family, but the internet, do you know that today every school-age child has a gadget smartphone tablet laptop computer, especially since the whole year of the pandemic forced our children to study remotely, and without them, modern schooling simply became impossible. do you know you've run into a problem? difficulties in negative relationships, our children

do not turn to their parents with questions and protection, and certainly not to teachers. education is outside the law on education, but to social networks, to streaming blogs, and not on the internet, they are looking for help and protection, but in reality they fall into the next trap. we are our own hands we are destroying the system of education and upbringing, and again we are returning to our old topic of education and upbringing, you understand, this is, as it were, a very simple thing from the point of view of understanding and very difficult from the point of view of implementation, the word upbringing has fundamentally disappeared from our everyday life. i am absolutely convinced that our education today, in the form in which it is offered to us, contributes greatly to the result. forgive me my

categoricalness to what sometimes happens. didn't we talk about this danger in our previous programs, and what are the real results? distance education is what parents and teachers children are experiencing, that's really experienced. brain one child still in the family is engaged, well, with two children it's generally some kind of complete trash that's how we work, who spins, who draws on the screen, who turns himself on the screen? you heard me, he also asked the man. vova will not do lessons. we all had a fight with our daughter because of him. he made everyone nervous, he is so uncomfortable on the phone is not visible camera wacky 100 reasons when you talk about education. i would very much like you at

this moment to think me of high technologies, and in the future of the country, which at the moment is our children, because there is not a single high technology. won't give you. a population that knows how to reason, analyze, draw conclusions. it turns out that our state does not need thinking, reflective people who are offered to us. here, look at another excerpt from our besson, which is called the catcher in lies. here is the section the death of formats and therefore the plan should die in 2025 a diploma of graduation from an educational institution a system of scientific journals and citation standards an author's textbook, and in

2035 general education should die. school. research university text book, article as the dominant form of knowledge communication. that is, there is no depersonalization of the lifeless. words of the printed word. and now i want to remind you again. look who is behind this program big business, entertainment, medicine, progressive children's products universities ngos reformers, conscientious parents, regulators, education as an instrument of foreign policy. who's for who

's against organized religion regulators domestic politics academic elite teaching teacher corps parents conservatives but what obstacles can this program have look. black swan, these are unexpected events that the collapse and collapse of the country can interfere with this program, and even the dates 2022 2027 are indicated. does not exist . there is no this program is not aimed at something to protect the integrity of the country. it

may not come true because the country has collapsed, perhaps they don't want to hear it. maybe they can't hear, but it's very clear and simple things, but don't you really understand who is the result of this upbringing? it turns out what kind of person we will see. who will he be, what will he be and how much would they give us with whom ? no matter how many scientists we will tell about this a little later, specialists would not offer us their methods anyway, but still there are no people who are interested in what we are talking about now we are talking about more than the parents themselves. this is their blood and flesh is their children. it is they who must decide the most important thing, and most importantly, the interest, it is only with the parents. what

do you think parents are silent? no? no, they express their point of view. who understands them? who is trying to hear and understand them on may 27, a meeting of the committee on information policy and information technologies was held in the state duma. listen to what anna barrier says. she is a lawyer representing an expert group of representatives of the parent organization. here listen to the russian public association parents, you know, i would like to note that first we need to figure it out. what exactly are the risks in the digital environment for children ? of key importance, we believe that legal literacy courses should be advisory, not mandatory, but

as for the threats of the internet, the virus from equal fakes is, in principle, just the tip of the iceberg, since they are not cover the main issues with the digital environment faced by the parent community and, e, interaction with the state and the parent community is currently missing from the point of view of the parent community. first threat. now this is a large-scale digitalization of education, according to these documents. we should have this environment on a permanent basis on the territory of the russian federation. i would like to draw your attention to the fact that the draft of this document government decree 40 at one time was placed on the governing 50,000 votes. even 54,000 were against only 400. for that is, that the difference is all the same. the draft was adopted practically without amendments. this is to the issue of interaction between the state and society. why is there no word on how the right to study in a digital educational environment is exercised in this document, the decision of the incident 20-40 sucks? a digital profile on the sos platform and the share of tasks in electronic form for students

using automated verification. in the thirtieth year should be 70% of colleagues. this is proof that at least 70% of learning in the next 10 years should become an electronic teacher turns into some kind of application. that is, it does not disappear completely, but it turns into - it generally loses its traditional function in practice. unfortunately, this is already happening. just comes, says the pact directly transfer to get gadgets from the savings and change seats. so on the sber class. this is already happening in practice. look at the scientific expertise, a few quotes. neurologist. psychiatrist mant spiter internet use contributes to memory impairment decrease in the ability to independently search for information leads to independence from the internet resembling arik zigman's first drug injection, young screen addicts show abnormal brains. just like our drug addicts, our armless professionals and ivanov, i quote documents, because i see that the

position of rotation of psychiatrists' robotic biologists is not reflected here at all, therefore, i ask you to hear it. you have noticed how fussy, how hastily mrs. anna schwabbauer is reading her report. you didn’t pay attention to how she feels that she, that they don’t want to listen to her, how this one is in a hurry to collect most importantly, because there is a regulation, because because what she says i don't like. to those who organize this round table. the results of scientific research are scientifically darova, but this is just a blow to the cognitive and analytical abilities of our children, and when it is said above that a computer is a solution to any problem. this is a lie of an it company lobbying its interests and blocking the position from independent experts and scientists. may i please, i think we are discussing a slightly different topic today. we now we will talk a lot about health, but our topic today is digital literacy. sorry but i can no longer honestly say low digital environment and

health literacy developers. i can no longer stop interrupting. excuse me very bad, because this is the key thing, the beautiful figure 600 says that the pump will transfer to 100% of children, as it relates to the constitution, why where is voluntariness, and when the order of the figure says that 70% will be e-learning, this is the teacher 's room 70%. that's a lot hmm i don't i know, on the contrary, i see this as a big plus. and we see the minuses, because their teachers should not replace electronic content for me. a billion is needed in today in electronic content, and in living teachers this can be done . our children have the right to live education, even in the depths of a huge number of rural schools that are not provided with teachers. here, some billions will not help, and visual materials for this should be directed by the policy and understanding of what e-learning is. this ai n't teaching that kind of money no to teachers bring rural schools to give them housing and provide a complete set of qualified teachers, rural schools, such

opportunities. no. here's what the psychiatrist says . andrey kurpatov, we used his performance in one of our bezogons, it's not a sin to repeat. listen now this is basically a digital autism epidemic. digital autism is a condition in which young people cannot maintain long-term psychological contact with each other. they are not interested in the inner world of another person, and other people for them, according to the essence of the matter became replaceable, because they see the value of each of them individually . a very interesting study in the seventeenth year was three groups of students who performed creative and thought tests. the several hundred person differences between these groups took place as follows: the first

group to complete the tests had to leave their phones outside in the rooms in which they completed the tests. representatives of the second group could keep the phone next to them or in their pocket or bag. the third group had to put the phone in front of them with the screen down and continue to fill out the tests. it turned out that just the physical location of the phone affects, on the one hand, the level, the amount of ram - this is the first graph and the second on mobile intelligence. this is the second graph of the small column - this is the phone standing on the table, the large column. this is when he is in another room. your working memory and fluid intelligence increase when you don't have your phone with you and you get dumber when you you have a phone. and we are experiencing, in fact , the division of not only the world into rich and poor, but the world into smart and stupid, so what? i

also remember a small episode from my picture twelve, what the hero i play says everything yes everything fades condemned waved, smoked and everything and everything, right? nothing, now in ufa 21 schools accept the sber class program. this program is directly correlated with the education of 20-30. now they will say again, we are against digital against artificial intelligence. you're not so it's not at all so we are against dependence on numbers. you are against dependence on artificial intelligence. remember, i gave you an example of

this incredible story with putin’s grandfather who, during the first world war, saw an austrian soldier aiming at him, shot him for the first time, but didn’t kill him, and then at night climbed over the bar access to him and bandaged him. he held his hands and kissed his hands, and then escaped in horror back, so that they would not call him a traitor, would not shoot him and returned to his perch. why why did he do it artificial intelligence arithmetic average of the world? i would have given him such a crazy idea instead of killing the enemy in the war. crawl to him to bandage him, what is this? this is a part. the souls of the people are part of the culture of the people, but this

is the only human individual created by god. how to deal with this and here the struggle is not for life, but to the death without bombs, without missiles, without guns. without everything, there is a struggle for self-preservation. and this war. we are still losing 4 years ago. we've already talked about this look. well , that's exactly what was not in soviet schools, so these are textbooks that would bring up in children hatred of their own country and admiration for other places. it is not difficult to guess how it looks like for 40 years that the transformation of the humanities under the guise of removing communist propaganda from the history textbook almost completely removes information about the kursk and stalingrad battles. they are mentioned only once, separated by commas, in one line in their message to

the federal assembly. very grand. he says that he is perplexed after viewing the history textbook that schoolchildren are still studying, you know, so i open some school textbooks with surprise. i look at what is written there, as if not about us. who writes, who skips such tutorials? it's amazing what's written there. i am on the second front only about the battle of stalingrad. nothing is said, it happens it's just amazing. this generation has come. here's what they know about the great patriotic war of the great patriotic war.

this is a line. no, it's serious. i don't know but it doesn't stop anyone. listen, there is already even a proposal to teach through tiktok, as if in order to be closer to the psychology of these children who are addicted to them, teach through tik tok in order to be closer to children in psychology. you know, this one reminds me of me. well, my story, which

i had when i was filming the barber of siberia, the great artist petrenko alexei vasilyevich. he was supposed to speak the heroine’s english there, and he was hired by a coach from a teacher from london, a wonderful and friendly person, but i passed by the door where he lived and heard there how this teacher spoke some phrases from the text. ah. alexei vasilyevich repeated. with the fact that i was leaving kostroma, the only one who could not leave on the train with us. it was this english teacher who was drunk. and he swore obscenely, like a cabman, now, won't it work out for us that our teachers after they teach?