stop, i want to talk. i need two who can shoot. you just show how we have a grenade, he wants to throw from his. dad you are your older brother from all coffee shops. and the task is to survive and reach and there is no choice of the righteous, but the chance is an ambulance.

no, it's kind of bullshit. i greet you, dear viewers of the russia 24 channel on our author's besogon tv program, today we will talk about the terrible

event that excited the whole world, which occurred on january 7 this year. this story of the shooting is in the editorial. but before we'll talk about it. i would like to remind you of a small fragment from our besogon, which was called who escapes from the ship. and or frightened hedgehog bare booty? just want you. remind recall what was discussed there. look here please. this is the crucifixion of the place of the face of jesus christ order. lenin banter. you can please, stebaite as much as you want, do not touch only what is holy for someone. well

, are you really expecting that, as a result, russian orthodox people who are very patient turn into martyrs who simply killed those who burned the koran only burned. the man who drew a caricature of the prophet muhammad could not leave the house for several years, because he was afraid that he and he would be killed. that's the problem, it's not a principle. it's all for sale. on december 207, literally two weeks later, what happened happened. and so it arose. an amazing feeling very disturbing very

diverse i would say so, on the one hand, of course, it's terrible, when people with machine guns burst into the office and kill other people. and it can't be justified. with another side, if you look further. there is a question. and why is this happening? and what can excite people so that they take up arms and here, it seems to me, is the most important question of our day. this is a question of changing the vector of life. in the world, this is a question. double-triple standards it's a matter of dropouts.

the main from the unimportant important from the unimportant why is it called a tragedy? and the other thing is no less a tragedy, and maybe even more, at least in terms of the number of victims, as if passed by, it is not heard about it doesn't say that, but before we talk about charlep magazine. yes, i just want to remind a little bit, literally her story of this magazine. the story is that charlie hebdo was born. after in 1970, his predecessor, by the way, the roman journal of hara-kiri was closed by a special order of the minister of the interior of france for insulting the memory of the just-dead

general de gaulle hara-kiri. responded to the death of the ex-president, disgustingly cynical and tactless cover. so yuri alekseev day passed with the execution of muslim militants of the editorial office of a french humorous magazine, the reaction of the civilized world goes off scale, which is the saddest of all, brothers. this is the worst possible reaction. the first european press unanimously reprinted the pictures for which french comedians were shot under the motto you can't kill freedom of speech, you saw these pictures for example, i put one up there. this is an anal work, as if the holy trinity is how the french fighters for freedom of speech

portrayed god the father, god the son and god, the holy one. this picture is a caricature of muslim shrines are no less obscene, what is freedom of speech, we will fight to the last drop of blood. indeed, the second most difficult of these guys. now the progressive part of humanity is diligently sculpting martyrs for the truth, they have almost been canonized by people. turn on the brain that humanity has inside its wild, beast, religious intolerance, religious fanaticism, religious fascism, finally, we will not evaluate, we simply state that it has always been and most likely will always be. what should a person do in this case? it is reasonable to try not to wake this beast, because people once lived for thousands of years nearby

praying to different gods with varying success, but still they lived. and then some kind of bastard appears, who begins to poke the animal into the lair with a stick to wake up, yes, tease to enrage the beast, and the bastard himself is at a safe distance from the beast, as he thinks. yes, even under personal protection. i am a reasonable, cynical and completely non- religious person, but i also have my pain points. if someone tries to do some dirty work on my mother's grave. at bloody boys will also dance in my eyes at this moment i shouldn’t give it to my hands, an automatic machine. kalashnikov any of us can be turned into a beast. if i try, i read excerpts from these papers, because there are a lot of them. for some reason, everyone

diligently calls these anal pranksters journalists. let me ask why a journalist is not from the word magazine magazines are pornographic, while pornographers and their models are not journalists at all. didn't they know then, i explain to the journalists. these are the ones who run around with cameras under bullets in iraq in syria in libya egypt somalia in ukraine at last and sometimes they die. by the way, do you know how many real journalists died last year according to the world journalistic corporation 128 people, and that progressive humanity went on a demonstration? it demanded

an investigation punishment, murderers a damn thing, it didn't even remember these real ones. i also rank myself as a journalist, although the points were reported by the ideal of politics, the ideal of the struggle for human rights pussy, right and the cause of journalism. what happens next what happens next huge consolidation. an unprecedented number of people around this story, millions of people are going to take it in their hands, and a poster, large

or small, where it says i'm charlie. a huge number of leaders and top officials of other states are marching along with politicians in paris and in other cities too. well , there is something here. inconsistency at least for me i think, for many others i have read about it. fine. we are against killing journalists. but it turns out that we mix in one glass and our struggle against terror and the opportunity to offend. a shrine for a huge number of people to offend their religious feelings to offend

what is fundamental to them in their lives. but let's still separate the wheat from the chaff. do not confuse one with the other, because it turns out that if i say that i am against murder, i immediately automatically say, i am in favor of insulting the shrine of a person belonging to a different nationality and professing a different religion? it's a hoax, it's wrong. this not fair. surprising in that sense, uh, the observation is very sincere and uh, that's what i would say. painful writers yevgeny grishkovets this is what he writes it was not disgusting to

see how the mediocre artist francois allah hardly hides his joy from what happened, he behaved on january 11, like a birthday boy, like a full-time actor who was unexpectedly given a magnificent benefit performance, and he suddenly had a chance to be in the spotlight and the opportunity to play a new role. he periodically even forgot to portray grief. and when he portrayed it, he was bad. it turned out to be his the appeal to the nation was like a meaningless campaign speech, consisting of slogans and appeals without the slightest attempt. realize what happened to admit their mistakes and directly blame for the mediocre leadership of flirting with the islamists, both inside. so

because of its borders, for the weakness and incompetence of the special services for the mess in the brains and discord in french society, in which the ultra-right are gaining strength and shining armor, and gay parades are held on a larger scale than the celebrations of bastille day, i expected from the leaders of france on such a day and in such an hour anything but pompous nonsense. i expected from him what we naively expect from europeans, a very accurate observation. i understand that i understand that it will cause such a huge amount, so to speak, of indignation and how can one talk about it about this terrible tragedy. yes, of course they repeat tragedies, but if you don’t understand this. if you take everything in one bottle. i personally do not want to

be among those who hold the poster. i don’t want to justify for myself the right and opportunity to be rude and mock at the fact that for someone is a shrine. and what is happening around? well, as an example, lord khodorkovsky proposes, as a sign of support, as a sign of solidarity to all the media, to publish cartoons of the prophet mohammed. solidarity solidarity in criminal rudeness to unite people around permissiveness to gather them around themselves in order to

spit in the face of those people for whom this prophet is a shrine. for which they are ready to give their lives. here is what he does not write about this. this is a sermon snippets. khodorkovsky acts like a bolshevik while he is generally fighters for light and liberal paradise, completely pure bolsheviks. although no one takes as many dividends from communist horrors as they do for other people's money and under command in english, they are trying to excite the masses and beat russia in the stomach on takeoff like lenin, they don’t want their own country to be defeated in this new world, which was not unleashed by us, and

now khodorkovsky, returning from his shushenskoye and running across his finnish border from his thin ice again. armored. calls for some reason the media caricatures. yes, you draw a nice person yourself a caricature of a khalifamara or the prophet mohamed. yes, it will increase it. yes poster. yes , go, you even to kazan, even to ufa, even to ingushetia, walk around the center there and come back joke. why are you calling journalists under the knife? yes, by the way, call navalny and kasparov with you, we will rejoice, we will rejoice not about your painful reflexes that evil destroys itself with its stupidity. our local prophet of liberalism showed how many and

they used to know what was under the democratic veil, but many who did not know should think about it. there is nothing sacred for an inhabitant of the plastic world, except for the surplus value of even mother and children. they love only out of inertia and more in words, if you love at all, and their laughter is not gogol's healing, but demonic against shrines. yes, below the belt russia, a country where islam is one of the traditional religions. whether you like it or not, it is so much a duty of love and mutual respect that a russian is obliged to understand islam, even though slightly and in no case to giggle at him with depraved laughter from atheists. believe christians of your faith, a thoughtful acquaintance with

islam and even ordinary inquisitiveness will damage it obliges you to learn the fundamental basis of this religion that is neighboring with us and respect its people who practice fasting, they know it, just like we know the concept of prayer and alms. if they have it, they do not expect a terrible judgment, and they hope for entry into eternity already in this short version, they are much closer and more understandable to us than atheists, satanic mockers. i always said that without changing their religious beliefs. we must respect the faith of a neighbor living behind the wall, a religious jew who strictly observes shabbat. do not turn on loud music on saturday and do not drill the wall with a drill at your neighbor's religious chamber. believe god will bless you for this

muslim neighbor in his fasting month of ramadan, do not eat in front of his eyes and do not fry in the common courtyard, so that smells everywhere carry your strict abstinence of a person and do not tempt him for this little you will find a friend in him, and on the day of trouble an assistant otherwise you will get what you usually get mockers of someone else's faith due to the lack of their own. these are the normal rules of behavior and existence of people who profess different faiths but who live god on a small piece of land. as simple as simple it's self-preservation. it's interpenetration without

making someone believe in your god. but it's a possibility. and most likely, the only way to balance different religions, different traditions, different cultures. not exterminating each other and not putting yourself under the knife of the person you offended. somewhere very interesting thing. ilyin once said you have to live. for something to die for? brilliantly just say you have to live, for the sake of what you can die for. these people who practice islam, they live for the fact that they can die.

and they are dying and millions of other people consider them martyrs and come out before the demonstration, praising their names. but if so then answer, are you those who stand on the other side of this idea of ​​​​justice, are you ready to die for the caricatures that you draw yourself or not? then here let's balance, they are ready to die zamahamida. and you are ready to die for the caricatures that you draw then everything is fair. but you, you come out with millions of demonstrations in the struggle for this, defending freedom of speech. that's what is amazing you free word call the ability to offend another person. what is democracy, as i would like to understand and believe that this is an opportunity to be

protected from being offended by everything upside down democracy today. this is an opportunity to offend and nothing for it get. they come out. yes, and suddenly, suddenly, automatic bursts are heard beautifully in the morning. there is one more thing i want to read to you. this was written by olga dukhanina much earlier than these events took place. but look how interesting it follows one from the other, that before me the main event was the reaction of civilized countries to the massacre in odessa for the first time we saw how the beating of civilians in europe. the country was greeted with such cold indifference. west just turned

a blind eye to it happened on my mind now ethical catastrophe of planetary oil. all the endless pile of words about humanism from tolerance about the right of a person to freely express his opinion. everything that was built on for decades, western and liberal propaganda fell into a kind of black hole, there was nothing left this shock, when in the peaceful city i burn people who went out to the peaceful protest, and then they finish them off with sticks while recording smartphones and video cameras will remain with us for decades further things can happen much worse, but the beginning was laid precisely in odessa, everything is under jurisdiction all western politics that instigated

and financed by the states the coup in ukraine all media executives whose buildings shrugged off odessa like an annoying fly all those who looked at the photograph of a dead woman determine whether she was pregnant or not, it turned out that the truth was the dostoevsky western world, abandoned in the new millennium from christianity almost completely showed there is no god, and everything will be allowed. i think this is the clearest example. how selectively the world relates to what is happening. how selectively? this

ours is freedom of speech. we defend this, despite the fact that freedom of speech is understood, as always, freedom, as the right to offend. and this is not ours, this is some kind of odessa, and it is unknown. maybe they set themselves on fire, as they say and they set themselves on fire. and anyway, who is to blame? and in general i am now busy 1 second. i'll be right there and that's it. these are double standards, which lead to the fact that we cease to understand, and most importantly, to be responsible for what is happening, we don’t hear, we don’t want to talk then. when it doesn't work for us it was not profitable for the world to see odessa and it was beneficial to see what happened in paris, and this is probably the most terrible thing, this is the lesson

that i think they should understand today, everything does not exist, white and black life, human god given. it is holy and it should be appreciated, regardless of where it happens in paris or odessa, all the best to you. until we meet again. urgently make it possible only we naughty two.

devour

gennady petrovich or just gena the gardener in this apartment, then your big business.

ruslan khasbulatov died, the last chairman of the supreme soviet of the rsfsr, he was 80 years old in grozny, graduated from moscow state university, worked in brother scientific organizations as the komsomol. at first he supported yeltsin, then he became one of the leaders of the opposition in 1993. yeltsin dissolved the supreme soviets and the congress of people's deputies. the constitutional court, recognized the decree illegally by my supreme council, chaired by khasbulatov, in turn, terminated the powers of boris yeltsin as head of state and placed