nality, but fokine chose a tragic ending, when the composer himself saw the pavlova dance in paris, he was shocked by such a reading and captivated by her skill and plasticity. he said quote madam thanks to you. i realized that i wrote beautiful music today anna pavlova is called the immortal swan of russian ballet on january 4, 1985. born in london. the first child of a surrogate mother, the problem of infertility has worried people since ancient times and solved it in different ways, for example, the old testament testifies that if the wife was childless, then other women were taken into the family, but the legal spouse should have taken the first in the arms of the baby. today, surrogacy is divided into traditional or gestational in the latter case, the egg is fertilized in the laboratory and only then transferred to the uterus of the surrogate mother. it was according to this scheme that an englishwoman ki became pregnant. here he is, who gave birth on that memorable day, she

bore a child for infertile swedish spouses and received 6.5 thousand pounds for this. surrogacy on a commercial basis is not allowed in all countries russia is one of them, but in our country a surrogate mother has the right to keep the child for herself, many women who bear children for others begin to read their relatives do not want to give me biologically to their parents. by the way, kim kod is still worried about this. don't be sorry though. it's a decision she has her own family and five times your children. she says she is happy to be able to give. the life of another child january 4, 1959. for the first time in the history of mankind, a spacecraft passed by the moon, separated from it from everything 6.000 km. nothing by the standards of the universe, it was an automatic interplanetary station moon. tin

created with soviet scientists in the legendary design bureau 1 under the leadership of sergei korolev, her other name is a dream to take her out of the sphere of gravity of the earth, the vostok l launch vehicle for the first time gained second cosmic speed. this is more than 11 km/s. it was planned that the station would land on the moon, but an error crept into the calculations when giving the command to cut off the third stage. didn't take it into account. the transit time and this resulted in deviation from the set course, but this did not prevent important scientific research using the onboard magnet. metra station has registered an external radiation train of the earth. i measured the parameters of the solar wind , found that the moon did not have a significant magnetic field and performed an experiment to create an artificial comet by releasing a cloud of sodium vapor, and then entered the orbit of the sun and thus became its first and artificial satellite, this was the

day in history. i greet you dear viewers of channel russia 24 on our author's program besogon tv today we will talk about liberalism. as soon as they do not scold, liberals, and this way and that, but in essence , in general, not very many are trying to figure it out. in fact, what is the point? what is the essence of liberalism. and today we will try, as far as it is possible. hmm, how to talk about it. first, let's define what liberalism is. liberalism, this is free from the latin liberals. this is an ideological trend based on the belief in the need to implement individual

values ​​and, above all, individual freedom, the origins of liberalism date back to the era of bourgeois revolutions, the seventeenth -eighteenth centuries, the main value of liberalism is the freedom of the individual, other values. democracy legality morality and so on and so forth is interpreted only as a means of achieving such freedom, at least has an idea of ​​what liberalism is, then we can use these formulations, and now i want to read a little. listen to our compatriots, no there is no doubt that public opinion in russia is decidedly liberal at the present moment. this is not a random direction. not a frivolous hobby of society, the liberal movement arose from a vital necessity. it is

generated by the power of things. such a phenomenon can not but please those to whom the feeling of freedom has deeply cut into the heart. freedom is the best gift given to water by man. she elevates him above the rest of creation. she makes a rational being out of him; it imposes a moral seal on him for the inner freedom of man, christian martyrs and human thought flows from the unknown depths of the free mind. deeply unhappy. that heart is still young. i never fought for freedom, i did not feel ready to even die for it with joy. we long-time liberals are fed on the love of freedom, we rejoice in the new liberal movement in russia, but we

are far from sympathizing with everything. what is said and done in the name of freedom, sometimes you don’t recognize it in the face of its most zealous admirers too often violence, intolerance and madness are covered by the name charming idea, how underground forces, wearing the armor of the olympian goddess, liberalism appears in the most diverse forms, and the one who cherishes true freedom retreats with horror and disgust from those ugly phenomena that are put forward under her knowledge of liberalism, which are expressed in public opinion. the lowest level is occupied by street liberalism. it is rather a perversion.

rather than street manifestations of freedom, the liberal does not want to know anything but his own will. street liberal, he loves noise first of all, he needs excitement for excitement and burin. why does he call it life, but tranquility and order. it seems to him like death, where furious cries are heard, unintelligible and impenetrable curses. there, probably, street liberals are swaying and indignant. he greedily guards, every riot, he slams every lawlessness, for the very word. he hates the law. he goes into a frenzy of rapture when he learns that a liberal scandal has taken place somewhere. what happened street fight. let's say in madrid or naples it doesn't matter, know ours. i think he is, but tolerance respect for thought respect for other people's opinions for

the human personality of everything that constitutes the essence of true freedom, and the decoration of life from it. don't expect. he is ready to wipe out anyone who does not share his unbridled impulses. he does not even suggest that someone else's opinion could be the fruit of free thought of noble feeling, a hallmark of the street liberal. the one that he considers all his opponents to be policemen. everything revolves on personal antics on curses used in business. shameless interpretation poisonous hints, lies and slander. here he tries not to prove, to finish, to hurt or to spit, he got drunk and mad, he is a street liberal who grabs for everything

, throws anything, forgetting all shame, having lost all sense of decency, the street liberal has an implacable hatred for everything that rises above the crowd for any authority it never occurred to him. that respect for authority is respect for free thought, for labor, for talent, for everything that gives the highest value to a person? or maybe it is precisely because he does not tolerate authority that he sees in him those educated forces that make up the pride of the people and street liberals raise their serpentine heads, twirl their tongues and in impotent fury try to pour their poison on everything that does not belong to their envious

family. this is an important phrase, the second kind of liberalism can be called oppositional liberalism, but my god, what seems to me here , a motley mixture of people. how many heterogeneous motives, how many diverse types, but who is unfamiliar with this critical mood of russian society, which appears in such diverse forms. well, for example, in the form of presiding irony poisonous deaths that show that the critic stands somewhere far ahead, infinitely higher than the surrounding world, or in the form of mockery and anecdotes, denouncing the dark machinations of fools or the vision of violent attacks, in which, at the same time, with the same fury , completely opposite things are required. in

the form of poetic love for the elective principle, for the self-government of publicity, or in the form of a restless desire to talk and fuss, in which one can see the distressed pride, the desire to betray oneself important or in in the form of gloating, in every bad measure, in every evil that befalls the fatherland, or in the form of love of freedom, they are always ready for despotism and independence, always ready to crawl and worship, one cannot enumerate those countless shades of opposition with which the russian land astonishes us. their whole business is to agitate to lead the opposition to make demonstrations and demonstrations, throwing out liberal tricks to arrange some kind of trick for someone. squeeze an article into the list,

let's say with mysterious hints and liberal effects, or even better to print some scolding abroad, to gather around me all sorts of discontented people from the most opposite camps and with them to lead the soul in innocent fury, especially to protest and protest at the slightest pretext, and even without any pretext at all, i will stand there and eat. and i and we will achieve everything comes, only slavery or chaos, but it is incomparably more convenient and pleasant to criticize. is it really not necessary to understand here the hard work of thought is not even necessary to act enough to speak with enthusiasm and pose with some effect putin is a thief farther than cancel allow destroy

numbers. yes, there is no need to go on horseback, well-being seems to be freed from all laws and from all restraints, many and many oppositional liberals sit in warm places, make excellent careers, and nevertheless consider long, at every opportunity of reservation, the government they serve they follow the order that they enjoy, but that an independent person dares to speak a word in favor of power. yes, something will rise up to you that you will not recognize your own. this cringing ambition venality. it is known that every decent person must certainly stand in opposition to the authorities

and scold. it is written. 152 years ago in 1862, just think about it. it was written by a historian. publicist professor of the department of state law of moscow university boris nikolai chicheri, by the way , this is the uncle of another georgy vasilyevich chicherin, who for a long time was the people's commissar for foreign affairs in the russian federation and the soviet union, and there was such a time. in the same 1862, a wonderful writer to all of us famous nikolai semyonovich leskov writes the following. if you are not with us, so you are a scoundrel,

holding on to such a principle of ours, liberals order russian society to renounce everything at once. what did it believe? and what has become of his nature? reject authority. don't strive for any ideals, you have no religion, except for notebooks, feuerbach and byudur, do not be shy of any moral obligations. laugh at marriage over sympathy over spiritual purity. otherwise, you are a scoundrel, if you are offended by the fact that you will be called under the face, then you, in addition, are still a stupid fool, another pole a few years later, in 1867, the brilliant russian poet fyodor tyutchev writes, one could give an analysis of a modern phenomenon that is acquiring an increasingly pathological character. this is the russophobia of some russian people, they used to tell

us and they really believed that in russia they hate the lack of rights, the lack of freedom of the press, and so on and so forth. what exactly is the indisputable presence of all this in it that they like europe, and now what do we see ? as russia sought greater freedom, it is not the love for her of these lords that only intensifies, they have never hated the former institutions so much, as they hate the modern trends of public thought in russia, as far as europe is concerned, as we see no violations in the field of justice. morality and even civilizations have not in the least diminished their disposition towards it, in a word, into a phenomenon, of which i speak of principles, as

such there can be no question and only instincts act. well, just think about it in in 1867, moreover, it was said by a difficult person, but a great man by a brilliant russian poet fedor, tyutchev a year later. in 1868, fyodor mikhailovich dostoevsky in his novel the idiot speaks through the mouth of the hero yevgeny pavlovich roddomsky. perhaps, he says, russian liberalism is not an attack on the existing order of things, but an attack on the very essence of our things, on things themselves, and not on the mere order, not on the russian order. she herself is her russia, my liberal has reached the point that she denies my russia, that is, she hates and beats his mother. every unfortunate, unfortunate

russian fact excites death in him, and almost delight, he hates folk customs - russian history. everything is everything, if there is an excuse for him, so is it that he does not understand what he is doing and takes his hatred of russia for the most fruitful liberals. after quite a bit of time, just a few years. dostoevsky writes in his novel demons a continuation of this idea, but it becomes more voluminous. clear convex, and most importantly, a poignant point of view. in terms of holding what awaits russia watch an excerpt from the film vladimir khotinenko demons look at the dialogue of verkhovensky

and became the motherland, think about it, listen to these words. you don't offend anyone and everyone hates you. you keep with everyone equal in everyone is afraid. it's good, terrible aristocrats when an aristocrat goes to democracy to charm you, it means nothing to sacrifice in life neither one's own nor someone else's. you are just such a leader. shots

lawyer defending an educated rich killer already she schoolchildren killing a guy to experience the sensation, the beach is ours our administrators and writers are awfully many; they don’t even know it themselves, everyone has a mind that is not their own russian. god saved before the cheap stuff. the people of the mother are drunk. foam children go there for generations. let a generation grow up one or two generations of debauchery that is necessary genuine, when a person turns into a vile cowardly cruel

scum he loves. here she listen. who are you who i will say no more kissed your hand, destruction, such a buildup will go, which the world has not yet seen, the earth is foggy according to the old gods. ivan tsarevich whom ivan tsarevich you let's say he's in hiding. it is there, but no one has seen it. he is hiding. about what kind of legend can you let the main legend proud, as god does not seek anything for himself. with such inspiration, with

such breathless delight, i listened to the leadership of verkhovensky such a rule of a revolutionary destructive on katochis, when everything was subjected, and to the destruction from the face of the earth of any laws of any rules of everything that in one way or another determines or should determine some kind of order, some kind of construction family statehood does not matter, does not matter, but the design some in which there is a basis of the main order, what happens? she put on red bows and waited with such delight for a happy future. vasily

vasilyevich rozanov writes about this wonderfully in 1918. this is a wonderful union of writers. maybe he writes, having fully enjoyed the magnificent spectacle of the revolution, our intelligentsia prepared to put on fur-lined fur coats and return back to their cozy mansions and estates, but the fur coats turned out to be stolen, and the mansions and estates were burned. what does it consist of and what does it lead to? where does this denial lead to? behind which is nothing but denial. nothing is built there, it is only denied and used, as we have already heard, and in one’s own interests, something that one way or another can

benefit from that power or from that structure or from that state for which one has to work, but a liberal, who , in their free time from work, cover this power with their last words. this is a connection. blindness and deafness alone is fair, is it true? and intolerance and envy of others here on this connection arises tsunami revolution tsunami civil war. the most terrible war that can be is the civil war of law natalya narochinskaya, a wonderful political scientist and historian. they say that only between brothers can there be such terrible cruel, destroying bloody battles. which are civil wars not without reason. she gives an example and rights that the first murder of a brother

occurred out of envy, when a stone killed an air. on this wave, incredible distortions of human consciousness and human essence arise, remember, at least would be one character. the red wagon is the inspirer of the red terror in the crimea , rosalia zalkin, nicknamed zemlyachka, who saves the cartridges of the red army soldiers, gave orders to those who had already surrendered, surrendered their weapons, and to drown the white officers with barges in the black sea. watch a short excerpt from our sunstroke picture where she argues. and by the way, speaking very logically arguing what she devotes her life to is very important. but

they say that in our ideas. well, in general. this is not the first time i hear this, crafty tactics have nothing to fight, so let's cling to white corolla of roses. ahead of jesus christ for hundreds of years for centuries, they made us bend our

backs so that they feel good, here and now, but we and we were promised a reward there and then in heaven, and we don’t want there and then we want you here now to him. damn character oh, lit up again. you can't even talk about it calmly. there is logic in what the countrywoman says. definitely there is definitely but only the methods of achieving they are completely different, so i say that the revolution is a civil war, when does it unite? blindness and deafness and the indifference of some is power, and the

impatience and envy of others, but the whole point is that. what about those who are unjustly offended? who wants to change, who does not want to put up with poverty, disease, injustice, bureaucracy, and so on, there are many of them and they have the right to vote, and they have the right to fight. but this is a struggle for creation, not for destruction, which, as a rule, is the basis of the life of a liberal society, because on those barricades on which these people are destitute and rightly, those who want improvement on those barricades, there are no verkhovensky ones. they push them they pull them they provoke them they

excite these masses. but they do not go ahead with an open chest. they are already in another place they continue in another place. i think about how tenacious this type of russian liberal is. how does he mimic in time, how does he adapt? how does he change the task? i just remain a character anyway. about which chicherin or leskov and tyutchev and dostoevsky write 150 years ago. i hope we will talk in our next broadcast. i thank you for your attention. and i look forward to seeing you at our bezgorev. all the best.

and in the main events of this minute in our news release, the frigate admiral gorshkov went on a long voyage across the atlantic indian ocean and the mediterranean sea on board. including hypersonic zircon missiles. they are able to reliably overcome any air defense system command to carry out assigned tasks the crew received denis alekseev from the president with details gorshkov begins to carry out combat.