the opinion of liberalism and fascism of their commonality does not arise today. and it is put forward not by critics, but by supporters of liberal ideology, let's turn to 1932 by the time when the national socialists came to germany, who was under the impression of the fascist project, the famous writer. h.g. wells urges listen progressives should become liberal fascists and enlightened nazis wils ideal of this time a totalitarian state run by a powerful group of benevolent experts. liberals appears rather strange at first glance. i am political and political. well , really look latin america is

liberalism plus the middle east plus muslim brotherhood regime baltic liberalism + movements of memory of legionnaires of the ussr ukraine liberalism plus neo-banderites turkey liberalism + turkish nationalism white land movement in russia liberalism plus extreme nationalists liberalism and fascism turn out to be politically united. so let's turn to the statements of people who are considered by theorists to be the ideology of liberalism ludwig von mezos. born in 1881, he was one of the founders of the philosophy of libertarianism. here is what he writes, it cannot be denied that fascism and movements close to it, striving for the establishment of a dictatorship, are full of the best intentions and that their

intervention. at the moment, it is the merit of fascism that has saved european civilization and will remain in history for the evening fascism is considered the ideologist of liberalism. as the force that historically opposed communism and bolshevism, but did not oppose and did not oppose liberalism. here's a quote from another founder, uh, libertarianism. this is friedrich august von heiki, by the way, speaking of the 1974 nobel prize winner in economics. that's what he writes sometimes the country needs a temporary establishment of dictatorial power in one form or another. you understand a dictator can rule liberally just as a democracy can rule completely without liberalism. personally, i prefer a liberal dictator to a democratic government that

lacks liberalism - the dictatorship, it turns out, is consistent with hake's understanding does not contradict the liberal ideology of the dictatorship and liberal and geology. now let 's move to the new age. as if american history is personified through a series of figures of the presidents of the united states of america. what unites them? firstly, they were all liberals, adherents of the liberal system of values, but secondly, they were all slave -owners. value position than freedom - this is very

important, and the ideology of superiority. this is the ideology of fascism. so pay attention to this scheme of the ideology of superiority derived from it fascism. racial superiority clans ancestral superiority corporate superiority of power we conclude. that fascism is a derivative of the ideology of superiority, that is, freedom but freedom for some, and not for all; now let's turn to quotes from the statements of those who are today considered leaders of the liberal movement in russia, for example, ksenia larina, a journalist columnist ekho moskvy and see how diverse, how colorful and free the world

of liberals is, and how dull and one-dimensional the world of patriots is, how they are dependent on this infection of pagan worship of the motherland i do not love the motherland for a long time and with conviction yegor gaidar russian statesman the death of people are not able to resist these predeal, of course, valeria novodvorskaya is one of the largest opposition political figures russia is not only a country fools, but also a country of boors. and in general, in the seventeenth year, we were ruled by boors in greased boots in russia, everything spreads and hangs like pasta from a spoon, a sixth of the land was inhabited by invertebrate protoplasm. i never celebrate may 9th and i don’t advise anyone to do it. they arrange such parades as

we can only complete losers who blow everything else away who need a myth that proves to themselves that they still mean something boris akunin writer in russia live side by side two separate, not at all similar peoples and these peoples have long been fiercely at enmity with each other, or so that this byzantine eagle with two heads fails. what kind of phoenic symbol was chosen by ion iii as our coat of arms? we have them and we have our own heroes chekhov there mandelstam pasternak sakharov and they have their own ivan the terrible stalin dzerzhinsky now. here is putin ksenia sobchak, a tv presenter public figure , first in 1917, then immediately in 1937, two consecutive destructions of the elite led to the fact that russia became a country of genetic scum. i would

generally ban this country evgeny chirikova, in short russian politician leader of the environmental defense movement of the moscow region. it is significant that in 2011 she was awarded the us state department's bravery award. here is what he writes. this is a brave woman russian people are in many ways similar to cattle, scott they will endure anything. that's probably because of this. courage and she received an award from the lord of the board of the united states. but tatiana tolstaya, by the way, is the granddaughter of the wonderful writer alexei tolstoy. nikita's childhood is absolutely a brilliant story. here, she writes, the country is not such, in order to correspond to it, it is necessary to drag a fat-

assed, inert fool along with it. now, maybe the leadership is trying to comply with being the same as the people are stupid, like the people are as lagging behind as the people artemy troitsky rog , a journalist, a music critic, one of the first propagandists of rock music in the ussr i consider russian men for the most part to be animal creatures, even not the second, but the third grade. and when i see them, from cops to deputies, i think that they are in basically, they should die out. here are other quotes not up to the person. it is biological at first glance, completely identical to man, a creation of nature with hands, feet, a kind of brains, eyes and mouth. well, this is a completely different terrible creature. this is just a likeness of a person with human-like facial features, which is

spiritually much lower. than a beast. this is an undermansch subhuman pamphlet, 1942. here are other quotes worth the world. how we want to see it beautiful, orderly, socially fair a fair world, which may still suffer from some shortcomings, but in general a happy beautiful world filled with culture, and on the other side there are 180 million people a mixture of times and peoples. whose names are unpronounceable and whose physical essence is such that the only thing that can be done with him is to shoot without any pity and cute gimmer. the reichsser of the ussr is russian in the generally accepted sense of the word, revealing

pronounced animal features . well, look at what trinity novodvorskoye sobchak says and writes, and so on. and how what they say today about our country, about you and me, coincides with what himmler goebbels said about us, and so on and so forth. including about our army, which defeated them to tula on may 9, 1945, all the standards from the third reichs are intended to be

footstools. well, isn't this an ideology of superiority? that same from what the word liberalism begins freedom freedom for whom? freedom for some but they fit into this freedom for others. who thinks differently, they do not match with them, they are pure fluffy beautiful smart talented, then what the writer was talking about and there are others. others who should die out sooner because they are subhuman. they do not fit into that world of that freedom which is preached by those whose qi quotes are now read out. i want to read some small answer to this. my very beloved person and writer zakhar

prilepin. i will not read all this from his essay, which is called. why are they liberal, but i think he sums up what we just talked about. here is what he writes liberals are sure that other times have come and in these times only the chosen ones will enter. those who do not drag carts with belongings of the soil behind them in chorus, raven in the head and so on. that is, as soon as he is a liberal, he enters the new age, as if with his head he also offers others to undress. leave everything behind and follow me naked without your imperial complexes atomic bomb plow with us. and so you left everything naked , covering up, the shame of two hands is not enough yourself everywhere. you yourself are a complete shame and shame blinked your eyes and suddenly it turns out you were deceived, he is a toilet. our new friend. he is not at all naked, but on the contrary, dressed up, charged, moving antennas, adjusting locators. scans everything

. we bend our fingers on the charter of rights, he has economic expediency behind him , the power of good. he has honest eyes, good english and even russian is better than yours. and you don’t know how to speak your native language either. here, look how intricately our friend does with his tongue and we take out enchanted. he achieved everything himself, it was only we borrowed, took away, stole. this is our history of slavery , the torture of a whip, and imagine he has his own own past memory of him the pain we have of the ashes that knocks in our hearts is not there, but he also has his ashes more ashy. we have already developed ours, but its ashes remained, and only it makes sense to talk about our ashes

offensively in this certain something extremist, its history of the world always begins with the european choice. as long as there is no european choice, there is no history at all, only polovtsian dances and solovetsky executions, remarkably for sure. in my opinion, the observation of the writer prilepin. let's look a little deeper, here, and into these liberal ranks, into this unity, about which liberals talk so much and suddenly there is a feeling of some kind of sectarianism, in my opinion. it was sectarianism that cost only one of the most prominent liberals. just one of the main proponents of liberalism in the soviet space, and in our country in russia, anatoly chubais, but to say what the liberals do not like. it

immediately caused incredible and it was said, it was in a series of other words only that, like me i understand and know chubais a little as a person who thinks, understands, sees and evaluates to say what torments him. but this does not coincide with the rules of sectarianism. he said only in whose other words? this is where we all need to stop. i emphasize to all the power of the opposition liberal communist nationalist it's time for everyone to stop and at least for a minute to think. in general, in itself, especially a person.

yevgeny kiselev, moreover, note that nothing special is said there. just like a completely peaceful liberal proposal. we heard this is evgeny kiselyov anatoly borisovich, don't you think that with these words you only managed to put flowers at the place of your friend's murder. here he was betrayed. excuse my frankness, anatoly borisovich, but with all due respect to your past merits and undeniable managerial talent, i have to state all these past 15 years. you preached a policy of conciliation with the

ruling regime of non-resistance to putin's sound. alfred koch you man was the deputy prime minister of the russian government. where should the position stop, or whether what liberals should stop in the process. they must show humility in christ in which you do not believe, what exactly they should do, what they do wrong, tolya you have already closed your mouth and are doing your so-called business, mastering the budget. in the cinema, i master further who is stopping you. so the opposition didn’t kill anyone and didn’t call for liberals to kill, they did n’t put anyone in jail and didn’t call for jail, and borya will never forgive us if we stop now, slava rabinovich is russian financier russian society must rear up , right now. tomorrow morning sunday all the time until it stops.

this is a desecration of our country over us over all our freedoms that we won by destroying the ussr, this stinking evil empire that putin wants to revive in his most monstrous reincarnation, the 21st century, death to the killers another desire for freedom through the blood to rear up russia slava rabinovich you want russia to rear up. and where will you be hang when it happens? why are you calling for this? or are you no longer here? or

are you not scared anymore? modern russian liberalism ironically does not depend on words. full of dignity and very visible contempt for all the rest of those who do not fit, but in this framework of the generally accepted sectarianism of our modern liberals. i want to read a very revealing saying. e viktor shenderovich, we are very, very many normal people capable of empathy, understanding the price of human dignity, feasible overcome sadness and fear. our problem is

that we are not people we are also pure people and evaluate them in the human nomination without understanding. how is it possible to lie in the face, spew vulgarity, kill, arrange monkey dances around the murdered. we mistakenly believe that we belong with them to the same biological species, in which this is really impossible. environment it is said about 80 percent of the population living in our country. she is with you. we are the environment for this elite, but

you must admit that this is a figure of speech, so to speak, worthy of any of the reikfer team with a simply most organic image, coinciding with the thoughts of goering and goebbels and himmler. other i am interested in and i think it is very important. and what is the driving force? now i'm not talking about people who come to bolotnaya square. i have already spoken about this, these are people who really want improvement, in which it is bad, who are offended by officials, who do not have enough medicines , there are many, many problems in the country and there are people who take to the streets so that they to tell them to be heard. i'm not talking about them. i'm not talking, but i'm talking about others about those quotes she read out and there are a lot of those that lead them. and here, it seems to me, a

brilliant russian philosopher answers this question remarkably. ivan alexandrovich ilyin that's what he writes, they are driven not by anxiety for russia, anxiety for themselves. he sits. time goes by, his best years are leaving him and his annoyance and resentment, and his ambition begins to starve and swell. and so, as one witty observer of man put it, he begins to teach the clouds from the word duchi, that in italian, which means the leader of his daughter teaches and inflates. this is what i think is very important. ambition and figuration you look like they are all a delight.

posing for the camera. with what pleasure they are distinguished by their courage and the opportunity to speak from the rostrum and call millions to fight and to resist. but what does ilyin say to russia or do they think? that's not what they care about. and quite another. just listen, i'll read you a quote from yuri gusakov journalist director. listen to what he writes. listen carefully the country inhabits bestial, rabble that just shouldn't be allowed to freely choose this rabble should moo costly, and not break with dirty hooves into my cozy air- conditioned office. for this,

our young guards and other cattle were invented. but it is not necessary to get out of this country now, when our and other sovereigns here , let's say a rude word, idiots. we are building and going to get out of here. it is necessary precisely when all the bestial mass, when these animals will be allowed to choose their worthy power. here, then i'm the first to the american embassy lomonosi, and now the attention has passed. and now everything is fine to earn money. you can bark at the kremlin in liquid, you can fly anywhere, you can and don’t need to change the child’s jewish surname to russian, so that he enters moscow state university now with complete freedom. liberalism liberty

freedom and here it is freedom what else do you need? yes , here it is freedom. here it was formulated by yuri gusakov. what freedom can still bark at the kremlin to earn money. well, here it is freedom until you have to bring down. it means that freedom is not of interest. what about power? power name again we come to the conclusion we spoke about last time. this combination of intolerance of envy and lust for power figure. what ivan ilyin is talking about and what will happen to us? with this environment.

if these chosen ones come to power. how can we be? where and how will we end our lives, led by the fact that we are offered an ideology. think about it. to summarize everything discarded, it seems to me that the words spoken. this is a thoughtful result of his life in the country to stop stopping does not mean freezing and waiting for someone to come and help you stop. it means for a second

to think that you, with your ambitions , are still a part of this huge country and a huge people, and you don’t need to lower this people to that bottom, from which it will push nothing living around itself. i think there is. thank you for your attention. i'm waiting for you next time, goodbye. it is urgent to do this only we listened to two.

gobble

up gennady petrovich or just gena the gardener