well, a very large selection of vacancies in the whirlwind of life is more successful than luck. hope fills you with their lunch, fritme workers have a lot of tasks your break fills their meat sauce sytin hot meat with noodles fills crying warm sunset over the roofs you need to fill your whole life crying represents getting ready for christmas together delivery for free

another step another success. thank you for being with us for 30 years. megafon is just the beginning. i help adults and children not get sick polyoxidonium for colds and flu sovcombank should you think about savings like sovcombank offers excellent interest on deposits. and now you are already skimming the cream from him in the sovcombank clan in the branch and online under 9% per annum of taste in one glass. when does planning confound? deer deer,

who on holidays without discounts. and this elk is the first sale of the year tecno smartphone with a discount of 6000 in m.video and eldorado apartment in moscow just right, two three total three purchases from 1.000 rubles. for any credit. sberbank is your chance to win an apartment or a cash prize. and if you don't have a card yet, get a free credit savings card 120 days without interest. win the most profitable credit card in the country. russia 24 at the next issue of our author's program besogon tv today we will talk about

culture, one woman wrote me a letter. this is what you want to hear, read or see again. and the question arises, concerning today, and there are many works that exist today in our art in cinema or in the theater of literature, which we want to see, hear or read again. and it occurs to me. very much like that. persistent doubt that you want to see, hear or read a second time? why do you know me,

in general, this question is quite understandable, and the motives that lead these or those artists to the directors of shocking. they are clear to me too. the fact is that the artists of the beginning of the 20th century, who moved away from the classical manner of painting. and they were looking for new ones. and, by the way, speaking of them, those innovators who today, with whom we are dealing with today, refer in many respects to the fact that these artists were moving away from what they already knew how to do. any of them in a jack of diamonds or in donkey's tail, by the way, grandfather washes konchalovsky was just in the jack of diamonds. they were sazanists, they followed the new trend of impressionism, but they knew how to

draw with a pencil the most difficult parts of the human body, say, a hand or a foot, so that it stands, so that the brush does not hang in the air, and so on and so on. they were skilled. they left what they already knew, because they wanted to, but because it seemed to them that what they already knew in this, they achieved. absolutely true. you do not really doesn't matter. but they were masters. when do we see today that there is such a thing. funny, but, in my opinion, true, so to speak, fair at least, a joke about what is how to define a performance, and what is an installation, what is an installation - it's uh to shit in front of the door and call, having run away, and the performance is to

call and sit down, so to speak, sit down. wait, and in many respects these are fair, because for this nothing is needed, except for the desire to do what, so to speak, the artist does, but uh stands behind it a strong powerful lobby, which has the ability, so to speak, to bring it to the rank of art. and it becomes a grandiose market, and in which almost everything, as they say, is for sale, everything is for sale. this is just the outrageousness that can make e out of a person. which has nothing to do with painting to feed, you can make that artist whose paintings and works are successful and bought. do you know, nietzsche, when did you say such a phrase? he said that art was given to us in order not to die from the truth. it seems to me that

today, uh, we are dealing perfectly. eh, a mirror opposite, but a time when and we need the truth in order not to die from the art that sometimes surrounds us. i don't want to discuss. uh, in detail what happens in our cinema or in our theater. let's say though. uh, there's even a story with asteranger. in general, it is quite understandable, it is understandable, and the fact is that you understand the outrageousness that caused such a wave of devils, facing one for the other against. it would seem very good when of someone's work of art causes such controversy, but it seems to me that there is some kind of trickery here. because when , for example, they refer to merhold or other innovators, then after all they risked, they risked a lot. sometimes even their lives are practically

their innovation. it was wrought out. it matured inside the artist and then poured onto the stage. let's say upstairs or watchman they drank about it, because they could not help drinking. it fills them up . today, in many ways. this is done, in general, with a cold nose, so to say, without those, uh, internal messages and arguments that were then those innovators whom he refers to look at himself, and the director kulyavin says that well , what is shocking, maybe it's the holocaust or, shall we say, religion? well, for some reason there is no queue. hmm, so to speak, overestimate on stage and rethink the holocaust in the opposite sense, because i think that this would not have caused such a reaction of support.

the encroachment on the prophet muhammad, we know how it ended. it shouldn't be touched either. because it's a risk. but orthodoxy, it is somehow safer in this sense, you can enter into controversy. it does not threaten life , health, well-being does not threaten there. and behind it. i think it's a fairly simple calculation. i repeat i don't want to analyze or condemn in detail. it's just how i feel inside. well, it's kind of embarrassing when you see a trick being done. do you understand why he makes himself so different and how he does it? and this is, in general, immediately. m-m somehow internal stops you in order to continue so say, but be surprised, because you see the population or on the screen, well, i

wanted to talk. about the other, i wanted to talk about the culture of the other. a different character than we say. uh, the word culture is formulated in encyclopedias. let's say. here is the word culture. uh, what is the word of latin origin, meaning the cultivation of education, education, development, veneration culture - this is what is created by people in addition to nature culture is a set of material and spiritual values ​​that expresses a certain level of historical development given society and individual. so say everything when you parse these phrases. but you seem to be immersed in them and it seems to you that you understand the meaning of this and even so to speak. and you think that you are something this definition

is enough for you. but i think that it is much wider and much deeper, and strange as it may seem. sometimes it does not concern the formation of erudition at all, but hmm the right holding of a fork and knife in the right hand, and communication with people. yes, of course it matters. this is important. it's all brought up and so on and so on and so on, but we see, so to speak. how many times have people who have been abroad bought into this porcelain smile, these hawa yo-fights and so on and so forth, when, so to speak, they ask you how you live, and you must answer that you live well, because that they don’t ask you to tell you how you live, so that you can start intimidating with you, who asked you, you understand me, my wife left altogether, and he thinks, lord, why are you telling me everything. i didn’t ask you anything, how things played into the pet. all of us

cultural people. we are intelligent cultured or don't burden me with your problems, i attended in america one such autopatit of a smile. but this is all wonderful. how many times do you buy into this i say. ah yes you have you say what you say to you, it's true, you raped. ah wow und believelet, another day. you answer in the studio, say, or on the street. he can't even remember. who are you at all who where did you come from. and why does he need you? they played there, we played this game and there was a couple enough, maybe with my wife on this autopatit glasses pieces of ice are beating, they are talking to this music, they walk, a healthy one approaches this pair. in this one, to a friend. how are you? oh yes, and the husband himself says that we are going to be different, and this person also apologized for the holidays, who came up with a brilliant question. he says, why

think about this, that is, what is the point of your trip? is there a business there? or have you been invited? how? why are you going there so far, that is, the thought that venice is even me to venice, even this question would not require an answer. i'm going to venice everything enough or there i am, you know, i'm going to go to the louvre, why yo, why are you going through? well, really. why buy nothing can not be sold too why and in this, so to speak, this very second world of communication. all this is the wallpaper of the same broth in which there are intelligent , decent, respectable people living, so to speak, in e in the modern world. but this has nothing to do with culture in the sense

that i would like to talk about. and about this feeling of the world which cannot be formulated. or so say e lead to some natural unified formulation to such a natural common denominator, for example, how to decipher the depth? with this phrase from jan buddhism, throw stones at me. throw dirt at me. i am a river. just think about this image, how it embraces. it just covers the universe. throw stones at me. throw dirt at me. i am a river. at this level, that's what i want to talk about. and it

seems to me that one story that was with me when i was young, when i studied in afgics, is very revealing, the story of me is simply shocking, and she shocked me then, but i only eventually realized the depth. that's what and then from what happens from what happened we, uh, i read an essay by such a wonderful writer. the publicist yuri chernichenko about vologda lace makers and i was so struck by this whole atmosphere in general this is the ins and outs of what this lace is called, and bryak from between couples, as they say , when lace is woven these carnations are braided needles, they hit each other. they swear. there between couples, that means between spring and autumn fallow, that is, when there is no

work in the field, when the peasants, in general, are at home, and they walked in this amazing absolutely they, uh, they walk through the forest, as they, when lace weave, they sing something, so as not to be bored with something from purring in oneself to allow. they pick up the tone of these, like leshas. that is, they walk through the forest, hit the trees and listen. yes, yes , good. from this tree or from this branch they make them. here and then of them they make bobbins, and when they sort them out, they don’t rattle with these, but with bobbins they sound in the key that is convenient for drinking, amazing by and large. this is what culture is, so to speak, it is it, it is primordial. it comes from the soil, it comes from the energy, so to speak, the centuries-old energy of the earth and life in

this space in this space. we have arrived at this village. let's not name it so as not to embarrass the citizens, but a small group of geeks. we came to see these surroundings. by the way, speaking i transferred this phrase to my thesis. calm but money at the end of the war, but in which seryozhnikenko and natasha arin basharova starred in this wonderful and northern vologda dialect, where was he born, how many did not ask? sometimes tried someone did not hear, such craftsmen say, vologda and he asks lace, where is it? famous vologda lace ask where this

lace art is, here the strings of the stick, look at the clubs rattle rattle. amazing village our little lake is there? it means that there are no men in the village, they are knocked out wars. eat one, or his name, here are two teeth, one on top, one on the bottom of a small stature, a thin one commands all these women there. he 's so wow. so to speak, drinkers, of course, and his wife nastya to the question. what does kolya work as konyukhov she says, and on the weekends there is and says there is, of course, a day off, they say, she beats such an input.

and often yes, every day, so she does his work for him and does you do your job, but nevertheless, so to speak. the law is the law on friday, the men are soaring, he is alone, which means that the woman is not, and on saturday the woman. means, this is a bathing day for women. well, he's single and settled. we are in the house of one woman, who hmm absolutely instantly got stuck when we were in her house, her husband did not return from the front. not so much time passed in the sixties, but before the end of the war. she immediately froze up. she internally somehow something so terribly excited her, and she just didn’t appear. she brought some milk there and something left. she did not spend the night in this house and she was not around, because this is the presence of a man, like whom in general in the village. no her scary, how to say, squeezed, just

like that. she turned to stone. so she lived these years without a man and without a master's house. and here she is, so to speak, a friend, completely went inside herself, so to speak, i won’t throw it out, i probably don’t know. well, we talked, talked, talked, and we gathered them all. they began to sing and drank some vodka. they sang brilliantly did not drink at all. and i and i throw pebbles of the pond from the steep, the bank to the familiar strait there in the words in the song lapiruv for atlaperuse, but they don’t know that laperose, that's why they're easier there, they're dumplings ruza again lenin's therefore i'll catch up with her such a strait of the line of roses. well, god be with him. so, they told that in the story, how they all lace up the clips here, and they told everything , so he says, nastya tell me how tolik returned with his own and nastya told the story and whether he was sitting next to such a ruddy one, he was listening

, assenting to the owner, all the same there in general these same aunts. everyone goes under him, because he is the only peasant in the village. and you are also so wounded somewhere in forty-three he gets a vacation. she gets a vacation for 10 days and travels, which means that it is winter from the front by train to vologda, february is more than 30 degrees below zero, everything is sinking. he is in vologda on some kind of ride. yes, and he has to go for a long time further , and, in short, already somewhere in the morning at 2:00 at night at 3:00 in the morning, and some man drives him to the fork, says they won’t take him further. then i go home on roses. and this is a little bit of wheat with a knapsack, there he has canned bread, there are some

spirits there, and he walks eight or 10 km left on foot, so frost goes to his village. moon silence creaking fiddler no sprinkling . he reaches his house, the village sleeps, naturally knocks on the window, and at home. nastya means two children, and she heard this chair, went to the window, breathed piglet and saw in the moonlight, whom and through this eye he looked at the roofing felt, or was he standing there. an illiterate person in general, well, so to speak, if by and large, how much could he end up with out of sight? well, then in the village school, yes man, uh, simple

we’ll be completely tangan, yes, i didn’t read it, he didn’t read dostoevsky. he did not read tolstoy. he does not know anything about chekhov, but there is something in him that does not allow him to destroy it. this is her dream, and he stands in the cold looking. here in this, thawed piglet and sees in this light of the moon the face of his wife and she will not just think about it. he continues her dream. he doesn't want to destroy it. this miracle is happiness. as the horse writes in his book, and to the potter, that happiness, when it turned out, yes, when it turns out, when it works out for him now, he prolongs it. here is the concept of being or having like a flower? yes

, a flower is growing. you approach him, and how he likes, how you want. you took it off and put yourself in a glass and enjoy it wonderfully. it is you who have this flower. and you can be, that is, be next to the flower without tearing it from the root. he is. he is yours he is with you, but he is not your property. you do not break it, it is to be and to have. he stood outside until dawn. and only when it blossomed and she realized that this was not a dream. he entered, that this blockage is the result of shock no no. this is the highest degree i can not find another word for culture, if you like, because

this is the truth, not the general truth. for everyone. this is the truth of the moment when a miracle is happening and when a person does not want, it is a miracle that has happened, a miracle created by him, to destroy any artistic creativity by the brute force of the natural needs and desires of a person. in order to achieve what you want. not external, but internal. desirable desire to hear you. for example, to play chekhov as he wrote. and to see innovation there is not

that three lesbian sisters from uzungah are homosexuals and the numbers one second third are written on their backs and this is such a shock. just. well, just play it in such a way that this internal energy of chekhov, who put into every word, touches the audience. he won’t say, well, what time was it, and why is the conversation not true, because classics are classics because they are based on the simplest and most eternal things , love, illness, death of parents. children, there is no other hunger. everything revolves around this. great dramaturgy is, so to speak, not fulfilled love, usually. take

shakespeare or the same, chekhov i love me, they don't love me. i don't love we beg each other we can't love. i'm talking now, not even just a man of women love as such, this is the foundation. in my opinion, any, especially russian creativity, but the task is just , it seems to me, the most interesting and most important. so that today's person through you today's reader, reading, let's say the russian classics. heard the one who wrote it and imbued. in what and how wrote, if this is really a real classic, i do not at all call for banning and stopping experiments, so to speak, but there is no need to look for new readings, and they say absolutely not about it. i'm talking about

that. that any reading can possibly take place under one condition, when you risk yourself, as i said, i am into adventurers who risk their own skin, and not someone else's. therefore, when the director risks the skin, the author is theirs. when is he free? because this is a new reading. and this gives rise to, in my opinion, the very thing dependency and speculation, which, if visible, disembodies those who do so . i told this story about roofing felt, not to show what should be filmed and

how, or what should be staged and how not at all, this is a story. it seems to me that it is strong because there is nothing external in it. but it has a huge inner spiritual and spiritual strength. which spill into the world when you touch the truth for you becomes the risk that you take on. and before god, that's actually all i wanted tell you today. i look forward to seeing you on our next show. all the best.

about the main events of this minute in our news release. in connection with the instructions of vladimir putin, the minister of defense ordered the troops to introduce a ceasefire for 36 hours from noon on january 6 to midnight on january 7 along the entire line of contact in the zone . russia calls on the ukrainian side to declare a ceasefire and give people the opportunity to attend services on christmas eve and on the day of the nativity of christ