in the pre-trial detention center, andrei kulakov, accused of the murder, studied the materials of her criminal case by heart, remembers the conclusion of all the examinations, sometimes it seemed that he knew more than anyone else about this. we have convinced the crime was committed 13 minutes. she drove up there, the cameras are watching the lights of her car, and after 13 minutes, it means a double flashing of the alarm.

i have an idea how the events in the car took place. for a long time i analyzed all the materials that i made for myself and everything that all the location of all bios traces, there blood, there and so on and so forth. well, i had time, you understand, yes, and i can roughly imagine how she moved, she couldn’t stand there, she moved, i look at the car. i don’t know at all what they were jammed with, but the examination of the examination of the house made some guesses there, only tights, then with a handkerchief, that he was somehow something else, then they changed her clothes, who didn’t change clothes. here, uh, the examination shows that most likely, from the soul, the hand and body were shifted and the body was shifted, clearly shifted now from the front seat over the gap between the front and rear seats we see yes , most likely in order to hide the body, because the rear windows in his car were tinted. yes, the golden rode a whole directed to this place, and to come there. after 13 minutes

, it turned out that death also gives. i understand that someone called her. and most importantly, she was in a hurry at this meeting, because she traveled the distance, let's say from home to this place, very quickly. well, usually she didn’t drive like that, in general she drove very carefully, let’s say. because of this, she quickly arrived at 6 minutes. i think that the meeting was exactly 12 hours 12 minutes. bad times no one does, they pray meet. here's the infusion, they've been praying for

it for 2,000 years. and how will you not know?

no, it's kind of bullshit. everything is naughty bread. when people talk about india one of the first, what

comes to mind? this, of course, is indian cuisine. parents are residents of the channel, russia 24. i look forward to seeing you. the accusers stood firm in their position, according to them, the former head of the ramensky district, was involved in the murder of his mistress. he is not

admits he motivates his non-participation in the commission of this crime, but according to the investigators - this crime was committed by kulakov, and the motives can be completely different what was the motive of a particular kulakov, in this case i can’t say we believe that the kulak’s charge was justified, but on based on the evidence collected during the preliminary investigation, however, then the investigation formed its own opinion, and the guilt of andrei kulakov and his wife during the polygraph was prohibited. kulakov is involved and he knows the circumstances, his wife is not involved, but she is also aware of what happened, this can explain where the attempt to create an aliba for her husband hurts the daughter of isainka and her husband. according to the

polygraph, they give truthful testimony the first message that the mother corresponded with fist, went to him, and the husband has nothing to do with this. further, as a course of evidence, we use the fact of early service of kulakov's powers after they were actively interested in the investigation he formed the powers of the head and in a changed intention to leave the russian federation, however, kulakov himself claimed that he was not going to flee abroad; tickets to belarus were bought for his official wife and son, and the official himself from the first days began to cooperate with law enforcement agencies to hide to him, supposedly there was nothing. during the trial, previously unknown details of the life and work of the deputy chairman of the public chamber of the ramensky district, evgeny, were revealed, some episodes

surprised kulakov himself, namely, dubious transactions related to real estate. i was surprised by several things, but taking into account the fact that, for example, she communicated, but i needed to drink, some activity connected, for example, with the acquisition. yes , the property was told about it there, so the witnesses, yes, or helped, more precisely, in the implementation of some issues related to the property there. why didn’t i know about this at all behind my back, it turns out like this, which means that she was negotiating with people who were connected in one way or another with some kind of uh filling out some of our municipal contracts there, there and so on with questions from the main settlement. she communicated precisely from the point of view of financial issues she bears in a criminal case, then still on trial with

andrei kulak. we met at different times to sort out the details of this criminal case. we talked a lot about evgenia. personally, enemies. exactly. these are the personal ones that are here, well, then, in general, personal enemies are what enmity is based on. well , there are no such people, i don’t know, i haven’t seen them. i may have been some, but i was about it unknown. at work, there were opponents, there were rivals, there were people who did not like her , who were angry and angry at her. there for her tongue are sharp. as they say, here are some harsh statements there against certain people, but i don’t know how this could lead to killing a person, and i don’t know, uh, in the end, it remained known that yes, they did. there are certain threats immediately after receiving a diploma, and higher education, evgeny saennikova, began to make a career as an official. first worked in the administration of the specific village, then she was briefly taken to the main department of

social communications, the moscow region. the initiative group of the village of udelnaya a sought a change in the direction of improving the life of the village in 2015 and saenkov returned to the district level as deputy director of the ramensky youth center in this capacity, she got into the district public chamber and immediately took it. there's a post of deputy chairman of communications. the 39-year-old woman had a lot during the trial became. it is known that shortly before the murder, evgenia communicated with suspicious opponents who were recorded. in her phone, like a mouse, the ceiling is a white sheet of a turtle and lived-vac correspondence. were kept secret chat one of the applications of all messages. after reading

, users were instantly deleted. well , some managed to revolt. for example, a certain citizen, nicknamed shish, wrote, a fool all his life and you run through another strange object turtle rumors go looking for you. zhelvak wrote that the following in this flattery was not worth it in another way, we will decide the council from the ceiling. you better hiding karib hints that time is running out the clock is ticking in many cases of the deputy chairman of the public chamber of the ramensky district. according to him, evgenia really communicated with the authorities of the entrepreneurs of the moscow region with the fact that she was the decider. i have an assumption.

if only return again to the issue of compromising evidence. could kulakov be framed in this way? well, it’s also a moot point, because, well, for 2019, there were a lot of questions for him, because, uh, there are a lot of cameras along the way to the place tragedy, and not a single camera provided information.

with the evidence base and how it happened that there are many inconsistencies in the case, for example, going on supposedly last dates at home. from it, she did not call or write to anyone, and from the applications she used only the navigator, in which she laid a route to the address sent to her from an unknown number when examining this phone. a fingerprint was found on it, not at the nearest one, neither to kulakov, nor to sankova. and none of the members of her

family of a white mercedes was found dead from the boot, judging by the examination. it does not belong to the explorer of the area. and who exactly slammed the door with his foot, the investigators could not figure out for some reason it was on the night of the murder in a fairly large territory of the ramensky district that there were difficulties with video recording, many journalists wrote about this, given private and city surveillance cameras, either completely disappeared or did not give there is clear pressure on the routes of yevgeny isaenkova and andrey kulakov, and in this area there is a camera in a specific area, where the crime was committed. there it, in principle, is generally not there, because, well, that is, this site, remote from all moments , also a lot of controversy arose around the

apartment building where the ex-head of the ramensky district lived, the investigation believed that on the night of the murder of evgenia kulakov imperceptibly left the entrance, not getting into the lens of the surveillance camera and got mysteries by paths to the crime scene. however, the concierge on duty that night stated that on the first floor there was quiet none of the family members. kulakova did not enter and did not leave, as it would be, maybe through this the safest thing there was all this. this is a door, there is also a magnet on a magnetic one, and then he heard it, when there was silence. and then these are the doors, i have not even heard this case. but of course, if he came with his family, he can go out somewhere and what to do such a thing is 100% excluded. so for the murder to be hung on him,

this is such a person who cannot hear it, they checked the testimony of the concierge and came to the conclusion that the woman, being at her workplace, could not see the person who used the emergency exit, the second entrance door is located out of her field of vision. but despite the fact that the investigation and the state prosecution insisted on the absolute guilt of the ex-head of the ramensky district, andrei kulakov , the arguments of the defense and the defendant turned out to be much more convincing on october 27, 2021, five jurors and six considered that

kulakov did not personally kill his mistress evgenia isaenkova . the same day the defendant was released from custody in the courtroom by these shots. we showed at the beginning of the program. and here is the reaction of the official wife of kulakov i always believed and hoped for the best, so he can’t tell me that i’m surprised. thank you , we have been working.

in this high-profile criminal case, the investigation and the state prosecution lost the defense. kulakov turned out to be stronger, and the ex-official himself spoke to the jury. so most of them believed him, many noticed that she was the defendant worked for two experienced and highly paid lawyers. they knew their business well. and we can say that but there is no direct evidence of guilt, so andrey nikolaevich kulakova they just don't exist. i believe that in this situation, of course, he would never have gone. he is such a crime to be there. it is no coincidence that i called this case a tragic mysterious incident. because there are no answers

to this question. and maybe it won’t even be never, because you can only ask them yourself, you will never ask them. unfortunately, she died on november 2021, the judge of the podolsk themis, on the basis of the jury's verdict, delivered a verdict of acquittal to kulakov . from that moment on, the former head of the ramensky district is considered innocent of the murder of yevgeny sankova. to a certain extent, a surprise, since we were convinced that the amount of evidence that was presented was at the disposal of the prosecution. he was more than enough than guided by the sworn maker 's sympathies. and whether some other factors somehow influence it is difficult to say, it is very important there, the principle, of course, the evidence

of evidence is not from a professional point of view from the point of view. even here is such an emotional perception itself. you are now working on it and developing for yourself, appropriate training program. hope she brings it. uh, relevant results. after the high-profile trial ended, the acquitted andrey kulakov is almost constantly in the family circle , spends a lot of time outdoors, enjoying freedom. now. i think that the main thing, well, the main task is to understand what happened in general. and who, in fact, committed this crime. this is the most important thing, that's it, everything else everything else is already such a side that i have a very strong desire to find out who did it and why it all happened at all, what

served to commit such a wild crime, frankly, the reasons, what served me is important, because he does not understand this. well. calmly somehow that's to live and difficult actually difficult for me, most likely, i think that this is a cross-section of circumstances. it just happened. by the way, i have questions in this regard. why, in fact, i considered so many versions of what i did in 2 years, not a single additional evidence was obtained that i could have committed a crime. i have not a single as for the family of the murdered yevgeny saenkova, it is not the ex-husband, alexander, not the daughter. veronica is not a mother, tatyana does not want to comment on the jury's decision; relatives avoid talking to journalists. it's been 2.5 years since the

high-profile crime was committed. however, their killers are still unknown. on december 23, 2021, the moscow regional court

granted the complaint of the prosecutor's office and overturned the acquittal of andrei kulakov. gross violations were found during the consideration of the case. for example, one of the jurors earlier there was a conviction for a fight with a policeman , this fact was carefully hidden, and a relative of another judge from the people was convicted more than once. at the very beginning, it continued, meaning the decision of the court, so, on the basis of the arguments that

we saw as such, the trial of the former head of the ramensky district, andrei kulakov. it was our investigation from the moscow region that only you drew conclusions. see you on the rossiya 24 tv channel. the case of the former head of the

ramensky district of the moscow region, andrei kulakov, was reviewed. that's just the second the jury no longer believed the words of the ex-official, the judges from the people unanimously issued a guilty verdict against kulakov. true, they considered that he deserved indulgence. as a result, on march 18, 2022, the podolsk city court sent kulakov to a colony for 9 years and six months. a discount

from the jury to his deserving indulgence in this way urgently make

gennady petrovich or just gena the gardener

russia introduces a christmas truce vladimir putin instructed the minister of defense to declare a ceasefire along the entire line contact in the zone of svo for 36 hours from noon on january 6 to midnight on january 7, a message on the website of the kremlin states that a large number of orthodox live in the war zone, they should be able to attend church services. on christmas eve, as well as on the day of the nativity of christ, i will celebrate. the decision was made in connection with the appeal of patriarch kirill to the primate. the russian orthodox church called on both sides of the conflict to establish a temporary truce.