filming yourself, look how it fits into what is being cultivated in the minds of people today, including viewers and tv viewers and the general population of the earth if you remember, last year there was a scandal on the grin when uh black actors african americans expressed their dissatisfaction that for some reason they only give an oscar to, so to speak, representatives of the white race this year, they decided to correct this and we see a picture of the rights of an american. and more about the boy. and more progia. yes, and the drugs are all chipped, as they say, this is just an illustration of that the very tolerance of molecular culturalism, which is, as it were, the image of democracy for today's world. well, in general, let's go back for a second and decipher what

tolerance is. i'll read a little bit of this lesson to you. it's called a lesson in tolerance for children at school. eh, well, that's it, it's wonderful exactly tolerance is forgiveness compassion respect for the rights of others this cooperation is respect for human dignity. friendship, harmony in diversity , peace and harmony mercy well, how can you argue with what i just read, but doesn't mind at all. it seems at first glance. it is wonderful that children will understand tolerance in this way. and is it understood in the world in today's life, and in this essence, it seems to me very interesting the point of view of the bishop and the renarch, when he wrote this letter he was then the bishop of perm and solikamsk, and the letter was drawn to fellow citizens

by the head of the institution of education and culture . here is what he writes in recent years. more and more actively imposed. we have some kind of tolerance, as a type of modern behavior a person who allegedly contributes to the formation and development of civil society in russia and the prevention of extremism. the concept of tolerance comes from the latin word tolerante, which in translation means the ability to endure. however, today we are faced with new versions of the understanding of this overseas word that are not traditional for eastern christian thinking. here it is obvious, the crafty substitution of one term tolerance for another concept of readiness, which is perfect. it is clear to everyone. understand means full the doom of people to perceive without resistance in all spheres of public life. without exception, all the phenomena of this world

that arose lie, including all sorts of filth that does not correspond to their moral and cultural ideas and traditions. and today, under the plausible pretext of fighting extremism and allegedly promoting the development of civil society in russia, they are trying to impose on us some kind of tolerance, true, the goal of which is not at all to fight extremism, but to make money on human vices and their weakness. i understand that this opinion, perhaps, is debatable and one can disagree with it, but this is the point of view of a church priest. and if we look at this issue more broadly and look at the examples, is it really wrong, bishop and renard look whether we are talking, but, probably, it

should be. comprehensive, that is, common tolerance, everyone feels each other, everyone understands each other. everyone tolerates each other, forgives each other, stands in solidarity with each other, and so on and so forth. and is it really so. here let's look at one example lived on in the light of such a person, vitaly ivanovich churkin, a wonderful person, a diplomat ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary at various times was ambassador to chile belgium and canada in the permanent representative of russia to nato of the sudden european union deputy minister of foreign affairs of russia permanent representative of the russian federation to the united nations and in the council security he from april 8, 2006 to february 20 , 2017 until his death. you know, once a philosopher, ivan ilyin said a wonderful phrase. he said to live

for the sake of being able to die. here are the vitals, the churkins in order to be seen and died for their truth, for defending the interests of their country. fearlessly. he fought, cursed, defended his point of view at any level. he was not afraid to argue, he did not think what they would say about him. he was a fighter who defended the interests of his country as a professional fighter and warrior in his place. and so he passed away . for all un employees, i’m not talking about our, so to speak, citizens who knew or killed and churkin i won’t know him simply by his actions, because how he behaved, how he defended his point of view. it was a shock that people wrote about him, with whom he entered into reconciliation at every meeting

of the security council and cursed, and not always, so to speak, using diplomatic terms. here , for example, is what probably his most ardent opponent wrote about him - this is the representative of the united states, he is samantha power , devastated by the death of russia's permanent representative to the un vitaly, the churkin maestro of diplomacy and an extremely caring person who did everything possible to to overcome the controversy between the state and russia, she wrote this on the twentieth of february in her twitter this year. and how did the sad events react to this? and our liberal community, in fact, which defends, foaming at the mouth, the world rules of tolerance, multiculturalism, globalization, and so on and so forth. here is what ksenia larina writes, here churkin died at

the workplace, it is not clear that his life was a continuous nightmarish stress, all the time , bosses from moscow and partners in the un yelled at him his life had been a nightmare for a long time. and just like that, he died, like a knocked-down man, stupefied from the endless calls for insults from the round-the -clock horror of being unsuitable, not justifying high trust, and such an ending is worth such humiliating costs. think of putin's servants, the lackey, because you will also fall on your face from the table from the efforts and no one will remember you. after a much-voiced discussion of this post, larina deleted it, but 1,300 people put their likes. raise 1,300 people, and the good ones, this infamy in relation to

a person who can't even answer. let's go further. here are some more quotes from journalist vitaly portnikov in an online publication to an amateur, established by mr. venediktov, and when the new minister sergey lavrov sent him to his own place in the un, it was already a completely different churking. it was already almost vyshinsky. okay, let 's be clear. it was a monster. no diplomat. he was not what he said during the war in georgia, the annexation of the crimea, the war in the donbass, the destruction of aleppo, it is better not to remember it, it was beyond diplomacy. it was beyond good. and evil it was saving hell. career turned him into a jester and executioner. in a few years , even former colleagues will speak of him with contempt. he, too, will be an accomplice in putin's crimes against

humanity. listen. what is tolerance anyway? tolerance is this way you can evaluate a person's life without being familiar with him. don't know what he 's doing? where is he under what pressure is he under terrible pressure when the country within the country is declared to the whole world sanctions are announced when they lie about us, they humiliate us, they want our death. these are the people who live here and like this they can write out loud to say their point of view about the deceased man guys. it actually fits in

my head. moving on, what does internationality look like? well? look, this is a picture taken by turkish photographer burkhan azbiliji. this photo was taken during the assassination of the russian ambassador to turkey, andrei this photo received the main principle in a very prestigious competition called press photo, that is, photos won the main prize. photograph taken by a man during the murder of the russian ambassador shot in the back to turkish terrorists this photograph is a document. but she gets the top prize, for what? for the fact that the photographers sang to take it off. for beauty for a

look for professionalism for an image for what? everything for sale lies killed shot in the back of a man. it's just that everyone is terrified , a distraught terrorist. raising his hand up with a pistol and shouting, terrible slogans of his threatening hatred of the one he only that he killed and this becomes an occasion to become the main one to receive the main prize. and how does the artist, the author of the photo, feel when he is presented with a prize, he presents a prize, he bows, says some words , he is rewarded for what he managed to take off. how a man was killed. now i'm not talking about not calling for humanity and not at all. i just want to understand whether it fits into the concept of tolerance or not? there is a threshold here that cannot be crossed, but it cannot

be crossed. yes, it could be a document. yes, it's on tv. yes it maybe uh in a magazine in a newspaper. yes, of course, this is a fact. this is a terrible fact that is recorded while on camera, but giving a prize like the best photographs for it is as normal, and we see, for example, that tolerance turns out to be very selective. i demand that they be tolerant of me, that they don’t touch me, that they don’t offend me, that i can demonstrate my point of view, that i can say what i want, that they be tolerant of me. and i myself tolerate others. am i not indifferent to someone else's problem to someone else's the sea? here is a rather indicative example. i received a letter from the veterans of the chernobyl disaster, that is, such a situation has developed at the troekurovsky cemetery in moscow that violates

the legislation of the russian federation in the field of burial and funeral business, namely , a gross violation of the territory of the burial place was found in the form of a new burial site and an extraneous construction structure, which does not allow access to other agents, while new burials of the erection of the structure are built closely without gaps and enters the territory of other burials. including the burial places of the full cavalier of the order for personal courage of the hero of the liquidator of the accident at the chernobyl nuclear power plant valery stepanovich sorokin, people's artist of the russian federation alexander sergeevich yankov and others, in addition, a person who appears to be the guards of the said structure to prevent visitors from going to the places of preservation of their relatives and friends. people what kind of building is the granddaughter of the defendant, make yukos, platon lebedev car accident switzerland tragedy. yes , of course. and of course, the relatives wanted

their attitude towards her to be expressed for the last time. at least in this last sign of love for her and memory in how she will be buried in this burial. we can understand the desire of these people. maybe we can understand that their love for this girl is poor. it requires some splash of some last. goodbye last. forgive the last love of the last sign of this love, of course. well, can this be combined with the fact that people buried nearby cannot to be remembered by their relatives who came to plant flowers. just remember to clean up the grave. well, how can you not understand that in so your ambitious desire to show your capabilities turns into a curse in the direction of the person who loved in the direction of the person

you lost, because everyone who comes here seeing this name and surname. you understand that they will think about this girl and about her parents about him about her grandfather about all the relatives who honored the memory of this and unfortunate girl who died in the car. but there are things that cannot be crossed. well, isn't it worth it? absolutely indifference incredible selfishness when i use my opportunities has money connections, i could absolutely forget that other people exist, but will try to touch me. just try to touch me. here is this indifference, which in fact for me in many respects is a synonym for this

tolerance, about which they speak in this way. here is this unbridled feeling of permissiveness for oneself and the impossibility for others it is intolerance to someone else's grief to someone else's will to someone else's someone else's point of view. will you forgive me? it begs me, so to speak, a rather harsh phrase. this is called tolerant fascism. and the basis and basis of this by and large is the global, indifference of the so-called lukewarmness in relation to others, values ​​​​are eroded. the foundation

of everything that humanity believed in is being washed away. what was the basis for humanity, what was the concept of good and evil, change places plus and minus everything that was previously imagined impossible becomes discussed later, perhaps, then necessarily we talked about it. and this is a window. and this applies to almost every area of ​​life. it spreads with the speed of a tsunami, washing away the soil from under the person. there is a wonderful short film. uh, i'm absolutely convinced that a is not greatly exaggerated. it's not about the future. this is not fantasy. it's about today. look please.

modern education welcome never mind. it will stop. so

the first question is one plus one yes two wrong, yes, multiculturalism next question. what is three times three? nine is wrong yes, you are not a shovel gender equality, this is a joke. penelope good 6 out of 10 simon you

too 6 out of 10 be careful you've been staring at her for more than 10 seconds which is a form of harassment staring at a woman for more than 15 seconds. and when i say woman, i don't mean to offend those who choose non-traditional relationships when i say non-traditional. i don't mean to sound offensive, which opposes historical well. well i understood from ten. i used math fits. this is a new method.

the assessment process is not yet complete, as we live in a society based on equality, all grades will be divided equally among all of our students. excellent students, we are all equal, we are all average, but we will also go for ourselves. i we haven't received a score yet for our advantage of not knowing anything at all. it's right. so you are not. you're a girl so plus one point advantage but true you're white so minus one but i'm bisexual plus one and it turns out that you're a six out of 10 simon you're

unfortunately a straight white male so minus four points a privilege so you only have one point out of 10 now you're a man and i don't like you so minus two advantage points but you're black and sexually undecided, so that's a plus two. this means that your final score is five. wait, honey, shemale, asian. i am overweight. i am from the poor class. i'm stupid not attractive nipples. i can't run and tie my shoes properly on your own and once i saw great, sunshine is 13 privilege points which means

you have 18 points. yes , right there. only the inscription of equality and drawings with hearts on a piece of paper. he expressed himself and that's beauty. yes, he even wrote the word equality, the wrong tomorrow has nothing to do with mathematics at all. you think you're so cool with all your math science and facts. but how are feelings more important than facts? yes, we are all crazy. i have the right to express my thoughts. and we have the right not to be offended. and if you don't stop attacking us, verbally we'll have to apply the rules of self-defense. you can't do

it like that. do not pay attention. it will stop. temporary education isn't it, it looks like this is the technology of dehumanization. once

human flesh why is this why we should make obligatory what was impossible for us to even imagine. why do we release the most terrible human qualities outwardly, passing them off as good, but the most important thing, it seems to me. why exactly this? that is what permissiveness is. precisely this absolute emancipation is moral. we cover with one defensive word of democracy, as soon as something happens in order to simply pay attention, but is it right to call it a violation of democracy and is only worth a few people

with a point of view. and power from a point of view that is at odds with the generally recognized, which expresses the interests of their country of their people their interests, as the leaders of this or that country, that it is only for them. express their point of view to declare it to fight for them. what do we see? that's what. this is a photo from the carnival. it took place on february 27 this year. here we see, here putin's erdogan kaczynski list called. you know?

i'll be honest. i understand that i will incur anger. i'm already used to it. for me oh, if it's called democracy. let them go, rather tired. all the best until next time. if you take the jews out of here, we will introduce you to the

rank, this is the front line. this is where to withdraw from the director of the liquidation. save what remember this, we never lost it, even in the worst of times, what they do. they pray meet. we are going out now and enough to meet, saturday. as a mood they have been praying for this for 2,000 years. and how will the groom be in hebrew? you don't know, want two who shoot together. you just show how you want?

vladimir putin came to worship on christmas day the annunciation cathedral of the moscow kremlin the temple is located on cathedral square it began to be built in the 14th century it was consecrated in honor of the annunciation of the blessed virgin mary was the iconostasis of the cathedral was the first home temple of the moscow grand dukes and tsars. one of the oldest in russia, the authorship of several icons is attributed to andrei rublevka