cheburashka and now what concerns the supply of weapons. they write unprecedented help there, it turns out to america to ukraine well, why did this happen? just why is that? but there are several moments that are quite serious that have happened over the past. months, especially when i came to manage the whole process. the first is the effectiveness of strikes against critical ones, everyone admits this, and so that our ukrainians, these

and others, make noise that we will fix everything, okay? and there is no such antidote for it, if we look help unit, there are anti-aircraft missiles that are adapted to buk. that is, it's just a rocket, and the station itself is as it was, bukovskaya, our russian one. so it remained bukovskaya, that is, american missiles. they did not put it according to their own system, but put it under our system. why yes, because it is more effective than the same american one, it's true, no matter how it happens. the second point, uh, which is probably clearly visible and is, in principle, what we talked about today. this army has learned to fight. here i am in a different situation. happened to admit one's mistakes to draw conclusions from our

president's strength in this matter is effectively the third point. today they understand that the mobilized who were they are no longer just many have run in the hostilities, but they have already created a completely new part of the formation, which are able to change, probably, at least the hostilities. maybe today it is not cardinal, but nevertheless, serious significant damage will be inflicted on the kiev regime, including on the battlefield. and the way intelligence works for them. we are now separate to you questions will be restored, so it works, apparently, not bad, then they are purely countermeasures. they understand that now running, what to do here to essentially front? i would have taken the fourth moment in terms of intelligence with us, she

moved to another level. and this is true, including with the feeling by means of intelligence, including with the help of our civil society, when everyone paid and they put all this in there, and the system that is coming out. here's what's the problem? here in these pawnbrokers who sit here when we say, well probably, there he says, probably, some kind of intelligence does not work well, but not just there are not enough forces. and today the issue of creation, more than ever, is relevant precisely for identifying all the traitors of these sleeping scouts and so on and so forth on our territory, which, among other things, were handed over by our guys in makeevka. i am also more than sure that it is

simple, there is no information leak there not phones by and large, and eh? well, i know what's going on at the front. there, for using the phone, they can knock on the head. and it is to knock or specifically and especially, without understanding the convocation of positions to the rest, because this threatens with trouble and quite serious. here with this question. we need to take it seriously. and probably the creation allowed will not be death. let it be its analogue, then we need an effect in order to line our territories from all those who, unfortunately, still remained there or are trying to work there. in this context. not bad. learned to work on the elimination of identifying the elimination of the sabotage group. uh, i can say for sure that every week. two or three or even more groups they are discovered are eliminated. although the ukrainian does not make any attempts to drop these groups in any way today, in the opinion of my colleagues, those who are, it has become much calmer in the

rear. and what are taxes calmly became in the rear, this is a normal subs. this is a normal rear. this is normal provision. and so on and so forth also applies today. the fifth point that follows from here, but of course, now, uh, they will supply a decent amount of armored vehicles of the marders will go. moreover, no matter how much the device was praised. stankov even t-72 b3 she has no chance of surviving for one simple reason, that we have tanks there? five pieces, they work at a distance of up to 5 km, they work extremely accurately. and even if they hit like that, that's why there are just banks not only with grenade launchers and preferably

with charges so that they can pierce armor at the same time. the sixth point, which is serious, should not be underestimated at all. but today we are talking about the fact that the mobilized there are set on fire, and so on and so forth. after all, even within the framework of the program that was announced at a colleague there are only 17 ministries of defense to create there, in general, military divisions. i think everything else is okay, it’s very clear that it’s necessary to have personnel today during hostilities, because even those people who are wounded, some of them decrease for two or three months, but it's objectively nothing you can do. no one goes anywhere that a person put on his feet. that's about mass heroism, as if showing that a person is without a leg. here he is the commander. saperlo regiment. now

he says, i say they will put it to the end. him one leg somehow collected, and the second. well, unfortunately not, they are trying to send a war to the school. i don’t want to tell me, it’s necessary that 100% of the heroes of the russian federation will go there, deservedly, today you just need to put it, see, in addition, what it means to create a division there. yes, rude, it's not easy to collect, there are 15,000 people, for example. it is necessary to put the equipment of weapons, all types of weapons, all types of ammunition stocks, but the most important thing is to put cards, starting from the sergeant from the sergeant. after that, all the officers. and so on through all of these moments now how to cook, of course, probably today that base. the military educational institution that exists, however, is not enough to deliver all this. yes, probably, early graduations

can be done there, more people can be recruited, but now, if we take artillery schools, for example, that is, if it is recreated in kolomna, then what is the main essence of everyone who served in this school, and not in the colony. maybe 60, maybe 65, but they are professionals. and most likely, they will not even need to be mobilized. most of them will come back today the current moment is to teach those decrees that will be lieutenants, taking into account the experience that they have, they will go and look at the head of the bright ones, they will immediately catch up with the deputy politicians, we prepared sverdlovsky in novosibirsk higher than political there, like a law school. let me remind you that in donetsk there was a mass, a serious political school, which also trained specialists in signalmen for politov, but they were all political officers and the base was good. why am i talking about these cities, because there are those who remember this system, they can be pulled up today

not to do it somewhere out of the blue, but exactly where it was, because there are people there, something can be done there, because with the front we can’t get people to teach now. it's unreal, because people are every person. in seventh place and today, the sergeants played in a completely different way, though. yes, this is really a junior commander, who is very important on the battlefield, and who is being trained by our training centers. well , of course, in soviet times, we had them there in samara, there chebarkul, and so on and so forth today, maybe there is no such volume, well, the so-called, which remained, probably to them. in addition, a conscript service. nobody canceled lies. she still goes. we also need to prepare those who will go, that is, the sergeant's program under the accelerated program for at least four months. menu for four months even if the great patriotic war, we prepared the junior lieutenant for six months, the sergeants prepared for 4 months there were schools. and so, or

expanding the staffing of the surrounded training center, you may be recreating those that were in the same example. 469 kurozhny training center, he probably solved this problem. but this should probably be done quickly, because it takes time and you can't get away from it. these moments, which are so basic, they are now according to the floods. i would like to establish separately on this issue, if we speak. what should be taken better than the soviet army, it should be taken better, the soviet army, then the barrel for politov, unlike everyone else in the army. it was a separate table with its own frames. why were only members of the cpsu there? for any lie instantly party. the ministry of defense of the soviet union first of all, i lost and then at the same time i

was subordinate to the minister of defense, that is, the central committee of the party clearly knew, well, in modern times , this is probably the presidential administration. yes? let's say what happens to the army clearly with its trunk. and so, when we come to this system, we will understand that we have an exact iron source. not only is the information and education system that is carried out with oneself topped up to the soldier. maybe, proceeding from this logic, restore the institution of representatives of the rate of 100%, 100%. well , we should probably come to this. here, you know, i am already the state defense committee. yes , yes, yes, after that there will be a bet after that there will be a bet. now that concerns, that's just sorted out today. so for those moments that are. uh, the current situation, because they are fighting us very well.

let's admit the second will. we are preparing a doctrine that it is being prepared in such a way that the first thing to be written down is a preemptive one, that a blow in case exacerbation of the situation, the threat to the russian federation is not in advance on that preemptive strike. not an answer to an oncoming one, as in a normal answer to an oncoming one. we sit and wait. here macron supplies tanks, and i was a damaging fucked up, yes, that's all, a preemptive strike on france as a side of the conflict, a side of the conflict. we give a tankin. now we will give, of course, a leopardo, but we are not a party to the conflict. well, you understand, the hotel with you is a serious, extremely serious territory regarding nuclear testing of nuclear weapons, everyone is trying, like to get around,

well, somehow nuclear weapons are accepted. it 's impossible. perhaps in the case of direct integrity cargoes. now on the issue of nuclear testing. well, i’m probably not a great specialist, but the fact that we can resume them in a short time is more than certain, because rosatom works perfectly for us in this matter. we have everything for this. by the way, and further, why? why in order to improve, because to improve the product of specialists, of course you will say, i know i often argue with you cis but they tell me academicians from arzamas, they are not here, they are

talking to you. they say our experts have left, who tested our products have long been outdated even to extend the shelf life. uh, nuclear weapons now need to be tested, you know? well, well, you need to show, we will not move. why is it happening here? why not, because full-scale testing is needed only when a new type of ammunition is being developed, old ammunition is computer simulation with tasks. the term is manifested by the service life. yes, and the americans do it, and we, by the way, we we meet americans in our production. we produce recycle produce recycle americans do not produce. they have closed now in pantex. someone opened a good argument. why is it necessary to test it again to develop new finishes, here is the buryat approach. here, when, damn it, he lived there, yes, they will definitely kill how much he talks there? don't we have new weapons?

how many aviation carriers do we have? how many medium-range missiles are now, which are ground-based and based? but why not develop new types? why should you stand still? see? frankly speaking, if we take the potential of nato and the russian federation, which is today alone? or the second moment, where we have explicit well, let's say parity, for starters, this is a nuclear weapon and today imperfection is

imperfection. this is a segment. we must be making a huge mistake. it needs to be improved, we need to develop something new, we need to show it. and there is no need to be afraid of this, that we will still pull apart the dogs, get clubs on the nuclear head, moreover. when he starts talking on the red line, but these there were already red lines like a fool's shag, to be honest, i'm already tired of talking about them. and at one time, return it in france. yes, it will all end. everyone will set their tail on fire. i assure you. nobody wants to go. moreover, there is no need to use the strategic potential of our triad. without this, we have enough charges to leave dust in this france . and no one else was disrespectful. well , or from britain. it would be better for me to determine, otherwise we have it there, which still does not know where they will twitch. they now fled to france britain you once they are on the road. they are back, let them scratch morocco or the highest colony , the point is just to move on to what is and when we talk today about what is there on the battlefield, we will win yes, we will win

doubts. well, we must globally win once and for all, so that we shut up and no longer blather, i agree, dmitry, i will dilute it a little . i'm definitely a lieutenant general. you will answer, well, right now, a separate block, but dmitry yes, but the problem is that ukraine and the battlefield e are not limited and will not be limited. she is no longer ukraine limited. i'm bigger than him. i think lately it is about the fact that our wonderful partners. they are ripening to the idea of ​​opening a second front against us, because yes, of course, we are improving the army and really consolidating at the front, and it is, of course, putting things in order there. it is obviously going faster than they expected, if they expected at all that we could concentrate the situation at the front. mm.

this puts them in the polo. i'm in some time trouble, but that doesn't mean they don't draw no conclusions. they draw conclusions, if you look at the package that they jointly approved, then this package means that they are moving to ukraine. they move on to the formation of large strike formations. they are preparing to attack. they prepare offensively, not on principle - thousands of little cuts. how they did it in the fall and which ones they applied. we are in serious harm. they are preparing for a major offensive large forces. not in vain. they begin to form for real without fools. no phantom structure for getting paid by dead souls, of which they had a lot of them in the army. and as a strike structure,

army corps. yes, they are a little late, but nevertheless and they must be considered fools. by the middle of spring, they will be ready for a large-scale attack on our positions from the ground forces, and they will be fully transferred to their armed forces. not just for nato standards, but also for nato calibers. see how much was transferred. a what volume is absolutely atypical for eastern europe caliber 105 mm, and is included in the packages and the second. we all understand that due to the complex equipment that is officially announced in these packages, we are, i think, we are not so hired to believe that only what was officially announced was delivered. i think there is still a lot of quietly staged like this on a complex technique. this will be the so-called wet fox. yes, that is, leasing with crews with maintenance, that is, a significant part of

these strike units. it was it’s just that nato citizens who can be effectively fired from the ranks of the armed forces corresponding to their own, or may no longer be fired, which is now hiding. by the way, they say to see how everything is less and less shamefaced. they behave. they have come to a very high degree of frankness in dealing with us. by the way, this is due to the fact that they rate us extremely low and their growing frankness of confrontation with us is a direct reflection of the fact that they believe that we are not on any really serious political actions in relation to them, not in relation to ukraine, in relation to them, well, they are not capable, and in this sense, of course, m-m. we must be very clear that they, too, take into account the changing situation. by the way, pay attention to the last. ah, so to speak, with such materials, and representatives of the administration. here are these bushes, younger and

older. there is also the same classic wright article by gates famous. this is a very interesting story. they are building a good cop-bad cop scheme for us, classic for americans. and the evil these are biden blinks on companies that have joined macron. they are good policemen who are ready to leave something for us. and as you remember, some of them are still behind us, and karelia is not going to leave koenigsberg. or maybe they will leave korea, but that’s not certain, yes, and the kuriles yes, and the kurils are also not exactly in this sense, you know, mikhailovich himself remarked to me very seriously. uh, about our wonderful central bank feat. there's a wonderful phrase here diversion of resources. and i would like ask, what will these resources be

diverted from? that's what these resources were doing, which should be diverted to import substitution by a duet. do we really have people in the central bank who believe in the revival of the creative economy? yes, it all moved out, some through the upper lars yes, some through the lower one who in estonia who where not everything ended stereoativnaya economy? here she is now creatively making some kind of speech in this sense in various cheerleaders in the baltics. the whole problem is. what is required of us one thing, or rather, two things, it was required, the political will, but we have it. actually, that's why such a byek began to run from awareness. this is what the creative economy ran from the realization that this political will is manifesting, and secondly, that it is necessary to let go of the old

world. that's just for the sake of saying once, here it will not be, there will be no negotiations, there will be no geneva . i cannot but have a conference to review the operation of the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, we will launch a nuclear strike, but there are no questions. no, tomorrow elected generals well, there will be no paradise, but there will be a struggle. for our country to remain alive, because the goal of our partners, yevgeny petrovich, is to destroy both our country and our state, our people - a preventive nuclear strike, this is good, but i am against the cognitive society. yes, this is just

primitivization. let's. you can hardly , let's have the opportunity to say, and the elector b generala himself will formulate everything he wants to say, in fact the last thing, as they say, i am against preventive nuclear strikes. in general, i do not like nuclear weapons, but the current situation. i consider it acceptable to repeat my wonderful, as it seems to me, proposal to temporarily withdraw from the treaty for the entire complete ban on nuclear tests to conduct all series of tests at one of our test sites and then you can go back there, but a primitive nuclear strike. well, yes, this is a thing theoretically acceptable, but practically in the current political situation. no need you just need to understand that there will be no return to the former world.

that's all. and that we need not think how return what is gone, and we need to think about how the new world will look like, where we will have both karelia and the kuril islands and the zaporozhye region and the kherson region and sorry, not koenigsberg. oh, kaliningrad, and this is a much more difficult task than fighting for world peace, but you said, many colleagues say that this topic is against us, but nato is objectively fighting, well, plus they sang along who want nato but don’t take it . i don't understand why we're proud to be alone i really don't understand why we have yes why we don't have weapons officially and early china north korea why don't we have units from there ? well, yeah, i just don't understand why we're trying. i don't understand. i just

really don't understand it. i understand the position of belarus impeccable no questions. but when we talk about others, then why is there not one like this, we can handle it ourselves. yes, here the question is not that we can or cannot handle you, but even if our colleagues in the dkb would forward, well, i don’t know a couple of medical units there, but if they don’t want to be directly involved in the fighting, but also a big thank you that we must counteract. help us by volunteers from those countries that are ready to help us, they vehemently banned us from working with us why because they went on about, and he is the united nations sanctions, by the way, and the sanctions of the system of sanctions against the democratic people's republic of korea should not be slowly released too and in iran and we continue to comply with them. and

why can't we issue war bonds for what is called ordinary people? but this is not at all clear to me. by the way, this is also an attempt to cling to the old world, and he is such a cunning sermer. now the lieutenant's advertisements can easily spread out fucking advertisements without interruption.

this woman is our entire arboretum. can close like this i change your eared puppy for your

quiet life. limited nuclear war is an illusion there can be no limited nuclear war. this is a global catastrophe with the mutual destruction of the united states of the russian federation, along with all regions, and so on. france can only be destroyed there is no other way to destroy a state with nuclear weapons.